The liberal march towards EXTREME fascism

The first shots of the second Civil War were officially fired yesterday by Apple (of all organizations) and were followed up by Amazon, Google, and Twitter.

Charge all of them with collusion, racketeering, conspiracy, price-fixing, and more. Charge them now, and take over their organizations for criminal activity. Then break them up, handing over control to conservatives who respect the free market.
Uh, Guy a free market means that you can ban whoever you feel like banning.
Wait...what?!? What happened to your beloved “accommodation laws”?!? Oops!!! I’m going to expose your ignorance in the next post. Stay tuned.
 
Uh, Guy a free market means that you can ban whoever you feel like banning.

Here's an example you can think of.

Think of Twitter as a Christian Bakery
And Trump as a gay couple wanting a Wedding Cake.
As usual, you create a strawman because you’re on the wrong side of the argument and you know it.

Here is an actual example you can think of: Twitter is a bakery. Trump is a gay couple wanting a cake. Twitter says “nope”. Ok. Fine. Trump will take his business to Parler. That’s the beauty of the free market!!!

But Twitter picks up the phone and tells the power company - shut off all electricity to the bakery Parler. Then Twitter calls the water company and tells them - shut off all water to Parler. Then Twitter calls the city and tells them - start construction in front of the Parler bakery and make sure nobody can get in.

That’s what just occurred. Companies illegally conspired and colluded to stop a competitor from operating in the free market. That was never legal. Ever. You can refuse a customer (I support that) but you cannot work to stop competition. That’s not the free market. That’s the fascism you desire.

I always enjoy exposing your lies and your ignorance, Joseph (Stalin)!
 
fascism
noun
  1. an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.
Since the AMERICAN right believes in a nearly INVISIBLE federal government, the EUROPEAN definitions of left and right dont apply in AMERICA. Oppressive GODVERNMENT is ALWAYS left wing
 
Wonder what happened to the left’s favorite “public accommodation” laws?!? Ohhh the lawsuits here are going to be epic. Cannot wait until John Matze owns Amazon

Here's what happened.

They have terms of use.

USMB has terms of use.

you violate terms of use, you get banned.

This isn't complicated.

Uhhh....”guy”....there is no “disease prevention” in the US Constitution. I know that upsets you because A. you’re a fascist and B. you’re fragile, but it is what it is. It’s the highest law in the land and it doesn’t change with the wind because you want to cry about it.

Guy, the Constitution is not a suicide pact.

What upsets me is that Covid was 100% worse than it needed to be because of idiots like you.
 
That’s what just occurred. Companies illegally conspired and colluded to stop a competitor from operating in the free market. That was never legal. Ever. You can refuse a customer (I support that) but you cannot work to stop competition. That’s not the free market. That’s the fascism you desire.

They did nothing of the sort.

Parler didn't comply with terms of use for aps...
 
That’s what just occurred. Companies illegally conspired and colluded to stop a competitor from operating in the free market. That was never legal.

No "competition" was stopped. And Trump was not silenced - he's just not allowed on their website. He's not allowed on mine either. In neither case are anyone's rights being violated. Parler was not silenced. Amazon just refused to host their website.
 
That’s what just occurred. Companies illegally conspired and colluded to stop a competitor from operating in the free market. That was never legal. Ever. You can refuse a customer (I support that) but you cannot work to stop competition. That’s not the free market. That’s the fascism you desire.
They did nothing of the sort.
That’s exactly what they did. Thanks for playing.
 
Parler didn't comply with terms of use for aps...
1. Like everything else you post, that’s a blatant lie

2.
They couldn’t even if they wanted to. Parler (just like Twitter) falls under Section 230, dumb ass. It protects them from being held accountable as “media” but it also prevents them from interfering in the posts/comments/etc. of their users.

You literally just make shit up every day here on USMB.
 
That’s what just occurred. Companies illegally conspired and colluded to stop a competitor from operating in the free market. That was never legal.
No "competition" was stopped. And Trump was not silenced - he's just not allowed on their website.
We’re talking about Parler, you high school dropout :eusa_doh:

And yes, competition was “stopped”. They conspired to shut down competition. The lawsuits are going to be medieval. They’ve already been filed. Looking forward to John Matze owning Amazon!
 
Here's what happened.

They have terms of use.

USMB has terms of use.

you violate terms of use, you get banned.

This isn't complicated.
It isn’t complicated. Unfortunately you’re ignorant and too lazy to turn on the news. That isn’t what happened at all. No “terms of service” were ever violated.

And you can’t lie your way out of this one. The documentation is all there for Parler. And they fall under Section 230, dumb ass.
 
That’s exactly what they did. Thanks for playing.

Nope. They refused to carry an application that violated their terms of service.

You guys didn't whine when a bunch of companies refused to work with PornHub until they cleaned up their act.

Same deal here. the Big phone companies said, "Either start moderating your app, or we won't carry it.".


Seems reasonable to most people.

It isn’t complicated. Unfortunately you’re ignorant and too lazy to turn on the news. That isn’t what happened at all. No “terms of service” were ever violated.

And you can’t lie your way out of this one. The documentation is all there for Parler. And they fall under Section 230, dumb ass.

Section 230 is not a get out of jail free card, buddy. Parler is allowing people to advocate all manners of violence that would get you kicked off Twitter, Facebook or even USMB.

So they can either clean up their act, or no one will carry them. I'm good with either.
 
You guys didn't whine when a bunch of companies refused to work with PornHub until they cleaned up their act.
Literally no idea what you're talking about, snowflake. I'm not aware of anything with "PornHub" so it's hard for me to whine one way or another.

Furthermore, I'm pretty sure whatever their situation was, multiple big tech companies did not conspire and collude to eliminate them as a competitor.
 
You cannot commit "violence" in the digital world

You continue to just make shit up

No, but you can advocate it.

And when some unstable person acts on what you say, you can be held liable. That's the point you don't seem to get.

This isn't even anything new. Back in the 1950's, comic books were blamed for juvenile deliquency. The result was the Comics industry instituted the Comic Book Code before the government could start censoring them.

Same thing happened with the Music industry back in the 1980's. Tipper Gore made a stink, and before they let the government start doing something, the industry imposed warning labels on albums.

So what we are seeing here is an industry self-regulating. Not only in limiting what apps are available, but what users can post. My opinion, about damned time, too.

I've been warning people for over a decade now. This is how the left thinks. They are disturbed fucking fascists who want to eliminate anyone who will not be subservient to their fucked-up ideology.

Wow, sounds like he was trolling wingnuts, not that he was saying anything serious.
 
Same thing happened with the Music industry back in the 1980's. Tipper Gore made a stink, and before they let the government start doing something, the industry imposed warning labels on albums.
Bwahahaha!! Well Parler put “warning labels” on their terms of service. It said, “warning, we provide free speech which is triggering to fascists”.

Thanks for playing

You’re so desperate at this point, you’re trying to equate “warning labels” which on no way oppressed the free speech of music artists to literally shutting down a competitor.
 
I've been warning people for over a decade now. This is how the left thinks. They are disturbed fucking fascists who want to eliminate anyone who will not be subservient to their fucked-up ideology.
Wow, sounds like he was trolling wingnuts, not that he was saying anything serious.
Wow...history has proven me 100% correct. But what else is new?
 
Bwahahaha!! Well Parler put “warning labels” on their terms of service. It said, “warning, we provide free speech which is triggering to fascists”.

Thanks for playing

You’re so desperate at this point, you’re trying to equate “warning labels” which on no way oppressed the free speech of music artists to literally shutting down a competitor.

Actually, it definitely did... in that something that rated a warning label was a lot less likely to be marketable.

The internet is cleaning up it's act before the government does. This is actually a good thing.

Wow...history has proven me 100% correct. But what else is new?

I thought you were talking about the PBS Guy.

Nobody takes you seriously, Poodle.
 

Forum List

Back
Top