How much of a tool does one have to be to declare that a study proving "Global Warming" to be a fraud is "false" because the 97.4% of failed predictions weren't really predictions, but rather, "statements"?
Fascinating. You literally think that if you just repeat a statement often enough, it becomes true. You won't show anyone this mystery study that you keep citing, but you read something on a cult blog that you agree with, so you instantly turned off your brain and BELIEVED.
Snowflake, just like you don't get to redefine life, you don't get to redefine predictions.
Then, you sweet little butthurt fraud, maybe you should stop devoting your life to doing exactly that.
You won't, of course. Fraud, fudging and faking are all you have. You've got your list of fudgy nonsense that says nothing in particular, so you're going to pretend it's a list of predictions by climate scientists, no matter how cowardly and dishonest it makes you look.
By the way, you're going to burn in Hell for eternity for serving Satan, the Lord of Lies. I imagine you think you've cut a special deal with him and will get the VIP treatment, but Satan tells that to everyone. In the end, you'll be headfirst in boiling excrement, just like all the others. You might want to consider that.