Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,438
- 2,290
I've been thinking about this for some time now. The left have called themselves progressives in the past, but now this is evident more than ever. They keep progressing towards removing deterrents to crime. Let's look at it:
*The left consistently tries to remove (or restrict) firearms in the hands of law abiding citizens.
*They have taken the stance that ICE should be dissolved.
*They have created sanctuary cities, and after Trump's election, sanctuary states.
*These riots could have been stopped, or even prevented by liberal Mayors asking the state for National Guard aid, but didn't. Nor did any of them accept the Presidents generous offer to help. Some of these disorders have been going on for months.
*They've long stood against the death penalty. They are fine with killing babies, but not killing murderers or mass murderers.
*They are now trying to defund, or even eliminate their police departments.
*They (Soros) have started organizations to provide bail to rioters who were arrested so they can get out to continue their crime spree.
*They shutdown the government for the longest time in history to prevent the President from building a wall.
So what do all these leftist policies have in common? They are all designed to weaken or remove deterrents to crime. While I understand the left is pretty much void of logic, the question is, what would weakening or removing these deterrents accomplish? The answer is, to promote more illegal activity.
Now that an election is coming up, do you vote for a candidate who's party is for getting rid of deterrents, or do you vote for a candidate that's for deterrents, and even stronger deterrents to help slow down or stop illegal activity?
*The left consistently tries to remove (or restrict) firearms in the hands of law abiding citizens.
*They have taken the stance that ICE should be dissolved.
*They have created sanctuary cities, and after Trump's election, sanctuary states.
*These riots could have been stopped, or even prevented by liberal Mayors asking the state for National Guard aid, but didn't. Nor did any of them accept the Presidents generous offer to help. Some of these disorders have been going on for months.
*They've long stood against the death penalty. They are fine with killing babies, but not killing murderers or mass murderers.
*They are now trying to defund, or even eliminate their police departments.
*They (Soros) have started organizations to provide bail to rioters who were arrested so they can get out to continue their crime spree.
*They shutdown the government for the longest time in history to prevent the President from building a wall.
So what do all these leftist policies have in common? They are all designed to weaken or remove deterrents to crime. While I understand the left is pretty much void of logic, the question is, what would weakening or removing these deterrents accomplish? The answer is, to promote more illegal activity.
Now that an election is coming up, do you vote for a candidate who's party is for getting rid of deterrents, or do you vote for a candidate that's for deterrents, and even stronger deterrents to help slow down or stop illegal activity?