The truth is that we all should be upset by a "couple of white guys" when one of them is shooting police from ambush. What we should be upset about is a bunch of brown skinned, and white, beheading journalists.
The truth is that in America, and most places, you have a better chance of dying from lighting strikes then by terrorism. But, lighting strikes are hardly preventable. It seems as if we can do something about acts of terror.
So look at motive. Can anyone say that any of the crimes committed by a "couple of white guys" was actually based on Christianity or even done for Christianity? Eric Rudolf may be the one case where something was done because of his interpretation of Christian beliefs.
Now, can anyone disagree that the terrorism, such as we saw on 9/11, is not basically done because of religious belief? The suicide bombers wishing for to be martyrs is not based on religious beliefs? If nothing else their religious beliefs is what holds them together, no so for the "couple of white guys" who commit terrorism. NO Christian church teaches such action, NONE. Can the same be said for other religions?
McVeigh was pissed because of Waco not because it was a "Christian" organization but because of the over reach of the US government. What was the motivation of the Boston bombers?
The left defends the Muslims because why? I can see them defending the Muslims most are actually peaceful, when outnumbered for sure. But why the smear of Christians? Why does the left think that smearing one group with distortion makes another look better? That because of the excesses of a very few we should over look the excesses of many? I just don't understand the liberal mindset. It is like if they can prove someone is being hypocritical that makes the argument invalid. It is lunacy.