The Left made a tragedy about race

[LeftofLeft]

What hatred are whites receiving in America? As long as, they have white ass kissers they don't get anything but love.

The whites that get their businesses looted, for starters. Speaking of white ass kissers, the race hustler from Houston does more than that with whites.

 

[X.Onasis]

No. "Whites Only" implies the camp does not accept minority children. Is that the case? If you think it is then it's going to take a lot more than a few ******* pictures on their website. Besides, you just said you saw a few pictures of blacks. That would mean the camp is NOT whites only, wouldn't it? That would make her wrong, yes?

If she meant that the camp is mostly attended by whites then she should have selected her words more carefully than using a term that was prevalent during Segregation. But even so, it would still be irrelevant to the issue of media attention.


If she knows the camp is not whites only then why did she say that?

I'm guessing you subscribe to the silly notion that blacks can't be racist. This is simply not true because it goes against the established definition of the word but more importantly, it goes against everything we understand about human nature.

Some of the conservative responses here may or may not be racist but if they are, they are no more so than what this woman said. Personally, I think it was a racist thing for her to say and she chose the worst ******* time to say it.

Wait. First you make an accusation of what you think she meant when she said "whites only" when it obviously means something very specific to you. (In some historical context)

And THEN you insist since she has a different historical opinion of a well-known White, Christian, conservative, summer camp attended by many thousands of girls in Central Texas, she should know how relating this tragedy to the way the media is treating the deliberate tragedy of abducting random Hispanic people would hurt your precious sensibilities? Nah, I don't buy that myopic, twisted logic.

Nor will I assume responsibility for what she was thinking. I listened to the end of the audio after reading her words, and I believe I understand that her perspective was addressed at the media attention, driving the news away from trump's terrorizing of Hispanics. She didn't wish more White girls dead! She didn't say they deserved it!

She did impune that those White, Christian conservative parents would have likely felt that way about Latinos or even wanted them deported. That's offensive, but posters here have proven that to be true. Racism exists, but does that qualify? Was she disparaging an entire race of people? Nope.

People here are trying to argue what they think she meant beyond her plain words.
Don't worry, you're not alone. I suspect the jackass who wrote the lede on that race-bating article the stupid piece of shit shared earlier, felt the same way.

I take issue with these statements:
I'm guessing you subscribe to the silly notion that blacks can't be racist. This is simply not true because it goes against the established definition of the word but more importantly, it goes against everything we understand about human nature.

I'd like to see your "established definition" that Blacks can be racist.
And ESPECIALLY that it's human nature. MY guess is, I won't.

Look. We may or may not agree on the very specific, traditional meaning of racism, where in my definition, the assumption of racial superiority is its essence. But we must agree that racism exists and I think it shits the American bed. I thought we were better than that. Perhaps I was wrong.

I don't think there's ever a proper, public time to be a bigot of any sort. I find it funny to be here defending the idea that the strawman others create needs a supporter. This idea of blaming people for not accepting your beliefs as facts is a tell, IFAIC. Especially when the belief is so ingrained that it's routinely defended, no matter how silly and illogical.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

The whites that get their businesses looted, for starters. Speaking of white ass kissers, the race hustler from Houston does more than that with whites.

View attachment 1134041

I will never justify looting, but how many black folks do you think own the businesses in their communities?

 

[LeftofLeft]

I will never justify looting, but how many black folks do you think own the businesses in their communities?

The answer is that very few Blacks own their own businesses in their communities compared to 50 years ago and beyond. That means during the era of Jim Crowe and limited civil rights, there were more Black owned Businesses.

Have you ever asked yourself why the decline in Black owned businesses? Why and how didn’t the elimination of Jim Crowe and the addition of Civil Rights result in MORE Black owned businesses in the communities?

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Wait. First you make an accusation of what you think she meant when she said "whites only" when it obviously means something very specific to you. (In some historical context)

Okay, let's talk about accusations. I believe there was more than one video but here's an unsubstantiated accusation she leveled at the camp in her first video:

"I know I'm going to get cancelled for this, but Camp Mystic is a whites-only, girls Christian camp. They don't even have a token Asian. They don't have a token black person. It's an all-white, white-only conservative Christian camp. If you ain't white, you ain't right. You ain't gettin' in. You ain't goin'"

Now tell me she didn't mean by "Whites-only" that the camp doesn't take minorities. That is precisely what she meant.

I can't find the original video but here's a link to a Fox News page that has the video:

Former Democrat-appointed Houston official claims devastated Texas summer camp was 'Whites-only' as search continues for missing children | Fox News Video

And THEN you insist since she has a different historical opinion of a well-known White, Christian, conservative, summer camp attended by many thousands of girls in Central Texas, she should know how relating this tragedy to the way the media is treating the deliberate tragedy of abducting random Hispanic people would hurt your precious sensibilities? Nah, I don't buy that myopic, twisted logic.

See above. And how many white children have to die before it merits media attention in her eyes?

Nor will I assume responsibility for what she was thinking. I listened to the end of the audio after reading her words, and I believe I understand that her perspective was addressed at the media attention, driving the news away from trump's terrorizing of Hispanics. She didn't wish more White girls dead! She didn't say they deserved it!

I didn't say she did. You're arguing against a point that was never made.

She did impune that those White, Christian conservative parents would have likely felt that way about Latinos or even wanted them deported.

And how would she know what those "White, Christian conservative parents" would have likely felt? She has no ******* clue what those parents would have thought and you know this.

That's offensive, but posters here have proven that to be true. Racism exists, but does that qualify? Was she disparaging an entire race of people? Nope.

She disparaged the camp by accusing them of not taking minorities. An accusation on which she had no basis to make.

People here are trying to argue what they think she meant beyond her plain words.
Don't worry, you're not alone. I suspect the jackass who wrote the lede on that race-bating article the stupid piece of shit shared earlier, felt the same way.

Again, see above. Her plain words are pretty clear that she thinks the camp doesn't take minorities.

I take issue with these statements:
I'm guessing you subscribe to the silly notion that blacks can't be racist. This is simply not true because it goes against the established definition of the word but more importantly, it goes against everything we understand about human nature.

I'd like to see your "established definition" that Blacks can be racist.

I said "...established definition of the WORD...", meaning, the definition of the word "racist". The definition does not, and will not, say that blacks can be racist. It also does not say that whites can be racist. No definition does.

And ESPECIALLY that it's human nature. MY guess is, I won't.

Of course it's human nature. Look at history for Christ's sake. There has been racism and slavery in most cultures and races throughout human history.

Look. We may or may not agree on the very specific, traditional meaning of racism, where in my definition, the assumption of racial superiority is its essence. But we must agree that racism exists and I think it shits the American bed. I thought we were better than that. Perhaps I was wrong.

By definition, the idea that only whites can be racist is itself, a racist idea. I've seen black racism in person and on this forum and have experienced it myself.

I don't think there's ever a proper, public time to be a bigot of any sort. I find it funny to be here defending the idea that the strawman others create needs a supporter.

Like the strawman that the camp only accepts whites?

This idea of blaming people for not accepting your beliefs as facts is a tell, IFAIC. Especially when the belief is so ingrained that it's routinely defended, no matter how silly and illogical.

Like saying the camp only accepts white girls because all the camp victims were white?

 

[X.Onasis]

Okay, let's talk about accusations. I believe there was more than one video but here's an unsubstantiated accusation she leveled at the camp in her first video:

"I know I'm going to get cancelled for this, but Camp Mystic is a whites-only, girls Christian camp. They don't even have a token Asian. They don't have a token black person. It's an all-white, white-only conservative Christian camp. If you ain't white, you ain't right. You ain't gettin' in. You ain't goin'"

Now tell me she didn't mean by "Whites-only" that the camp doesn't take minorities. That is precisely what she meant.

I can't find the original video but here's a link to a Fox News page that has the video:

Former Democrat-appointed Houston official claims devastated Texas summer camp was 'Whites-only' as search continues for missing children | Fox News Video


See above. And how many white children have to die before it merits media attention in her eyes?


I didn't say she did. You're arguing against a point that was never made.


And how would she know what those "White, Christian conservative parents" would have likely felt? She has no ******* clue what those parents would have thought and you know this.


She disparaged the camp by accusing them of not taking minorities. An accusation on which she had no basis to make.


Again, see above. Her plain words are pretty clear that she thinks the camp doesn't take minorities.


I said "...established definition of the WORD...", meaning, the definition of the word "racist". The definition does not, and will not, say that blacks can be racist. It also does not say that whites can be racist. No definition does.


Of course it's human nature. Look at history for Christ's sake. There has been racism and slavery in most cultures and races throughout human history.


By definition, the idea that only whites can be racist is itself, a racist idea. I've seen black racism in person and on this forum and have experienced it myself.


Like the strawman that the camp only accepts whites?

Like saying the camp only accepts white girls because all the camp victims were white?

Oh, for crissakes, WHO, besides you, says the camp "doesn't take" minorities?
She did? AND it's a strawman that only White girls are accepted because only two Black girls are seen in the pictures of hundreds of participants? Issat it pal?

Again, it's you attempting to define and attack what she meant and what she was thinking. Expecting me to defend it is your problem. I'm only taking issue with what YOU say. Like this:

I said "...established definition of the WORD...", meaning, the definition of the word "racist". The definition does not, and will not, say that blacks can be racist. It also does not say that whites can be racist. No definition does.

That's a rather convoluted and equivocal dance around your claim. Like Michael Jackson's moonwalking. You're the one claiming Blacks can be racist according to the "established definition," until you're asked to provide that definition.

Not surprising, is it?

It's clear why you didn't show me your "established definition" of racism because while White racists assume superiority over other entire races, as is the essence of their racism, you don't find that same bigoted stance aimed at the White race. It's not about you not finding a definition, nor will you present any proof that human nature is inherently racist because slavery existed. It may prove that racism exists, but not that it's an attribute of human nature. Otherwise, slavery would likely still be a universally accepted practice today. (The present program of terrorizing and deporting Hispanics excepted)

Nice dance tho. Give your balls a tug.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Oh, for crissakes, WHO, besides you, says the camp "doesn't take" minorities?

She did. Did you not see the quote?

She did? AND it's a strawman that only White girls are accepted because only two Black girls are seen in the pictures of hundreds of participants? Issat it pal?

Yes. Read her quote again: "If you ain't white, you ain't right. You ain't gettin' in. You ain't goin'"

If she saw the two black girls in the pictures on the site, why did she say that? For that matter, if she didn't see the two black girls, why did she say that? The former would indicate she's a racist moron who saw the black girls but nevertheless lamented no token black. The latter would indicate she's a racist moron who made an assumptive leap about the camp's policies based on a few pictures.

Either way, she's a racist moron.

Again, it's you attempting to define and attack what she meant and what she was thinking. Expecting me to defend it is your problem.

She said what she meant: that "If you ain't white, you ain't right. You ain't gettin' in. You ain't goin'"

There is no margin for interpretation here. She is stating that if you're not white, your child is not getting into this camp. And I never asked you to do a damn thing.

I'm only taking issue with what YOU say. Like this:

I said "...established definition of the WORD...", meaning, the definition of the word "racist". The definition does not, and will not, say that blacks can be racist. It also does not say that whites can be racist. No definition does.

That's a rather convoluted and equivocal dance around your claim. Like Michael Jackson's moonwalking. You're the one claiming Blacks can be racist according to the "established definition," until you're asked to provide that definition.

Not surprising, is it?

Wrong. You asked for the "'established definition'" that Blacks can be racist." There is no definition that says blacks can be racist. Neither is there a definition that says whites can be.

If you had asked for the definition of "racist" or "racism" I would have provided it. Which I will do here since either you cannot or will not look it up for yourself.

From Merriam Webster: A belief that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race

It's clear why you didn't show me your "established definition" of racism because while White racists assume superiority over other entire races, as is the essence of their racism, you don't find that same bigoted stance aimed at the White race.

You didn't ask for the established definition of racism. You asked for a definition that does not exist.

It's not about you not finding a definition, nor will you present any proof that human nature is inherently racist because slavery existed.

Not what I said. I did not say that human nature is inherently racist because slavery existed. I said racism and slavery has existed in most cultures and races throughout human history.

Slavery is simply a symptom or outgrowth of racism. So, while slavery is gone, you would obviously agree that racism still exists. Where we disagree, apparently, is that I understand racism to be fundamentally a human trait whereas you seem to think it is a distinctly white trait. Correct me if I'm wrong.

It may prove that racism exists, but not that it's an attribute of human nature. Otherwise, it would likely still be universally accepted practice today. (The present program of terrorizing and deporting Hispanics excepted)

Racism, in and of itself, is not an attribute of human nature. But we have instincts that tell us to be wary of those different from ourselves. Most of us can see past this today but obviously some don't.

Nice dance tho. Give your balls a tug.

I had the balls to look up the definition. You asked me to give you the definition that blacks can be racist but you didn't bother with definitions yourself because you knew it also does not say whites can be racist.

You can't have it both ways.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

The answer is that very few Blacks own their own businesses in their communities compared to 50 years ago and beyond. That means during the era of Jim Crowe and limited civil rights, there were more Black owned Businesses.

Have you ever asked yourself why the decline in Black owned businesses? Why and how didn’t the elimination of Jim Crowe and the addition of Civil Rights result in MORE Black owned businesses in the communities?

That's easy, Intergration.

 

[JusticeHammer]

I will never justify looting, but how many black folks do you think own the businesses in their communities?

More than you think.

 

[LeftofLeft]

That's easy, Intergration.

Integration caused a decline in Black-owned businesses??? Is that what you are saying?

 

[X.Onasis]

If she doesn't understand that all the girls being white doesn't mean the camp is whites only then she's a ******* idiot. If she does then she's a ******* racist.

If you don't understand that "all the girls being white" means exactly that, "the camp is whites only", it's not her who's an idiot. (Read that until you figure it out.)

Still, I don't see a way you can bend that to suggest there's implied racism.
To claim "she specifically used this particular term because it's the exact words that were on signs, back in the days of segregation" is entirely your frame of reference.
To suggest it must also be hers is naive at least, and arrogantly privileged at worst.

And yet you're so twisted up at her being a "******* racist" you're willing to contradict each statement you make. You claim I didn't ask for the established definition of racism when I actually did. Because YOU claimed it's wrong to think that Blacks can't be racist, and now are claiming that the definition cannot implicate that or that Whites can be racist either. WTF is wrong with you? Further, you claim you did not say that human nature is inherently racist IMMEDIATELY after claiming racism is "of course", human nature.

Also, I'd like to see how claiming that she's a racist fits your now claimed definition :
From Merriam Webster: A belief that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race.

Where do you read her implication of the "inherent superiority of a particular race?"
Somewhere? Anywhere? I mean, besides pointing to the implication that racism exists in the statement that those White, Christian conservatives can be racist like some people posting here, that if the victims were Hispanics, there would be little sympathy from them. But only to White folks needing to feel victimized by her words?

Show me what's racist about what she said, according to not just the definition I've repeatedly posted that you obviously didn't bother to comprehend, but also your own copied definition. This "whites only" snivel is getting boring.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

If you don't understand that "all the girls being white" means exactly that, "the camp is whites only", it's not her who's an idiot. (Read that until you figure it out.)

First of all, why are you responding to my first post to you? You already responded to this one. Why are you not responding to the latest one?

But anyway, to respond to your comment, this is where grammar and reading comprehension does its thing. "All the girls being white" simply means all the girls were white. Grammatically speaking, "whites only" suggests the camp is exclusively white, i.e., non-whites not accepted. Which is exactly what she said a few seconds later.

For the fourth time, her words:

"If you ain't white, you ain't right. You ain't gettin' in. You ain't goin'"

That's four times now I've quoted her words to you of her saying no non-whites are getting into that camp. How are you not interpreting it that way? Or are you simply ignoring it? Is that why you responded to the first post again?

Still, I don't see a way you can bend that to suggest there's implied racism.
To claim "she specifically used this particular term because it's the exact words that were on signs, back in the days of segregation" is entirely your frame of reference.
To suggest it must also be hers is naive at least, and arrogantly privileged at worst.

For the fifth time, her words:

"If you ain't white, you ain't right. You ain't gettin' in. You ain't goin'"

And yet you're so twisted up at her being a "******* racist" you're willing to contradict each statement you make. You claim I didn't ask for the established definition of racism when I actually did.

No, you did not. Your exact words were: "I'd like to see your "established definition" that Blacks can be racist."
Again, there is no definition that says blacks can be racist. Neither is there a definition that says whites can be racist. It merely gives a definition of the word. It mentions no particular race so by default, any and all races can be racist, including whites and blacks.

Because YOU claimed it's wrong to think that Blacks can't be racist, and now are claiming that the definition cannot implicate that or that Whites can be racist either.

Jesus please us. I didn't say it was "wrong" to think blacks can't be racist, I said it was not true given what we know from the definition of the word and what we know about human nature.

With that said, the first words out of your mouth (so to speak) when I said this was to demand a definition that says blacks can be racist. This suggests to me that my guess was correct; that you don't think blacks can be racist. Correct me if I'm wrong.

So, you accept the standard definition when it comes to white racism but you demanded proof of a definition that says blacks can be racist, knowing full well there is no such definition regarding whites either. That, sir, is hypocrisy.

WTF is wrong with you?

There's nothing wrong with me that a little critical reading comprehension on your part can't fix.

Further, you claim you did not say that human nature is inherently racist IMMEDIATELY after claiming racism is "of course", human nature.

Wrong. In Post #229 you said: "...nor will you present any proof that human nature is inherently racist because slavery existed.
My response was to that comment from you: "I did not say that human nature is inherently racist because slavery existed."

Also, I'd like to see how claiming that she's a racist fits your now claimed definition :
From Merriam Webster: A belief that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race.

First of all, it is not my "claimed" definition, it is the Merriam-Webster dictionary definition. But her own words place her under the part that says; "...race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities..."
Her words: "I know I'm going to get cancelled for this, but Camp Mystic is a whites-only, girls Christian camp. They don't even have a token Asian. They don't have a token black person. It's an all-white, white-only conservative Christian camp. If you ain't white, you ain't right. You ain't gettin' in. You ain't goin'"
She saw that all the girls were white that died in the flood. She looked at the website and saw mostly white girls. From that she assumed that the policy of the camp was "If you ain't white, you ain't right. You ain't gettin' in. You ain't goin'".
Why else would she assume the camp implemented such a racist policy if not because they were white? At the very least we can say she harbors a prejudice against white conservative Christians.

Where do you read her implication of the "inherent superiority of a particular race?"

I read an implication that blacks are morally superior. Specifically, that whites can be racist but blacks cannot. I get this impression from her words in conjunction with things I've seen other blacks say on here and other places.

Somewhere? Anywhere? I mean, besides pointing to the implication that racism exists in the statement that those White, Christian conservatives can be racist like some people posting here, that if the victims were Hispanics, there would be little sympathy from them. But only to White folks needing to feel victimized by her words?

Are you black? If so, it might explain a lot.

I don't know, did she feel victimized by all the girls being white and the media attention? Apparently so, she's the one who made an issue of it and she's the one who assumed without evidence that the camp only takes white kids.

Show me what's racist about what she said, according to not just the definition I've repeatedly posted that you obviously didn't bother to comprehend, but also your own copied definition. This "whites only" snivel is getting boring.

"If you ain't white, you ain't right. You ain't gettin' in. You ain't goin'"

 

[X.Onasis]

First of all, why are you responding to my first post to you? You already responded to this one. Why are you not responding to the latest one?

But anyway, to respond to your comment, this is where grammar and reading comprehension does its thing. "All the girls being white" simply means all the girls were white. Grammatically speaking, "whites only" suggests the camp is exclusively white, i.e., non-whites not accepted. Which is exactly what she said a few seconds later.

For the fourth time, her words:

"If you ain't white, you ain't right. You ain't gettin' in. You ain't goin'"

That's four times now I've quoted her words to you of her saying no non-whites are getting into that camp. How are you not interpreting it that way? Or are you simply ignoring it? Is that why you responded to the first post again?


For the fifth time, her words:

"If you ain't white, you ain't right. You ain't gettin' in. You ain't goin'"


No, you did not. Your exact words were: "I'd like to see your "established definition" that Blacks can be racist."
Again, there is no definition that says blacks can be racist. Neither is there a definition that says whites can be racist. It merely gives a definition of the word. It mentions no particular race so by default, any and all races can be racist, including whites and blacks.

Jesus please us. I didn't say it was "wrong" to think blacks can't be racist, I said it was not true given what we know from the definition of the word and what we know about human nature.

With that said, the first words out of your mouth (so to speak) when I said this was to demand a definition that says blacks can be racist. This suggests to me that my guess was correct; that you don't think blacks can be racist. Correct me if I'm wrong.

So, you accept the standard definition when it comes to white racism but you demanded proof of a definition that says blacks can be racist, knowing full well there is no such definition regarding whites either. That, sir, is hypocrisy.


There's nothing wrong with me that a little critical reading comprehension on your part can't fix.



Wrong. In Post #229 you said: "...nor will you present any proof that human nature is inherently racist because slavery existed.
My response was to that comment from you: "I did not say that human nature is inherently racist because slavery existed."


First of all, it is not my "claimed" definition, it is the Merriam-Webster dictionary definition. But her own words place her under the part that says; "...race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities..."
Her words: "I know I'm going to get cancelled for this, but Camp Mystic is a whites-only, girls Christian camp. They don't even have a token Asian. They don't have a token black person. It's an all-white, white-only conservative Christian camp. If you ain't white, you ain't right. You ain't gettin' in. You ain't goin'"
She saw that all the girls were white that died in the flood. She looked at the website and saw mostly white girls. From that she assumed that the policy of the camp was "If you ain't white, you ain't right. You ain't gettin' in. You ain't goin'".
Why else would she assume the camp implemented such a racist policy if not because they were white? At the very least we can say she harbors a prejudice against white conservative Christians.


I read an implication that blacks are morally superior. Specifically, that whites can be racist but blacks cannot. I get this impression from her words in conjunction with things I've seen other blacks say on here and other places.


Are you black? If so, it might explain a lot.

I don't know, did she feel victimized by all the girls being white and the media attention? Apparently so, she's the one who made an issue of it and she's the one who assumed without evidence that the camp only takes white kids.

"If you ain't white, you ain't right. You ain't gettin' in. You ain't goin'"

My exact words were in fact: "I'd like to see your "established definition" that Blacks can be racist." Quoting you as well, because you posted,
"I'm guessing you subscribe to the silly notion that blacks can't be racist. This is simply not true because it goes against the established definition of the word but more importantly, it goes against everything we understand about human nature.

Which tells me you believe that stupidity because of the established definition. But when pressed for your "established definition," you provide proof that a suggestion of superiority inherent in a race of people is its essence.
So naturally you ran away from that bone-headed statement by claiming it was wrong for me to ask that because it couldn't be done...

All that because you "read an implication that blacks are morally superior." ?? IN HER WORDS?
"Specifically, that whites can be racist but blacks cannot" in her description of the camp and its historical clientele?

WTF? Because she just read about it, like you just did? Are you sure you're making enough assumptions?
You should consider that the world doesn't revolve around you and your bigotry.
This "whites only" snivel isn't just boring, it belies the fake privilege denied you as a fake victim.

I'd ask you to do better, but ... Just kidding, I don't give a ****.

 

[X.Onasis]

"If you ain't white, you ain't right. You ain't gettin' in. You ain't goin'"

Who do you think she's talking to with this little rhyme? Little White girls?
Izzat it? Do you think she's implying that White girls are inferior?

I wonder if Blacks reading "Whites Only" feel racist?

It's good you've got a stick up your ass over this. Keep it there, you deserve it.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

Houston mayoral appointee fired over Camp Mystic flood comments

Sade Perkins vented her frustrations against the Christian camp hours after a heavy deluge ripped through Camp Mystic in Hunt on the Fourth of July.

www.dailymail.co.uk

By BRITTANY CHAIN FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
A Houston mayoral appointee went ballistic by criticizing a Texas camp site where seven little girls perished in floodwaters - then blaming Donald Trump for the tragedy.

In a series of cruel videos, Sade Perkins vented her frustrations, calling Camp Mystic 'whites only Christian camp' hours after a heavy deluge ripped through in Hunt on the Fourth of July.

'I know I'm going to get cancelled for this, but Camp Mystic is a white-only girls' Christian camp,' she raged on TikTok as girls were still missing

'They don't even have a token Asian. They don't have a token black person. It's an all-white, white-only conservative Christian camp.'

Perkins was admonished by Houston Mayor John Whitmire, who said he would take steps to remove her from the board.

However, she doubled down by blaming Trump, Texas Governor Greg Abbott and Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick for the tragedy, describing it as 'totally preventable.'

She complained she had become 'the scapegoat to cover up for the f***up of a flood', instead arguing the 'reason' for the natural disaster was 'of course your friendly MAGA Trump up there in the White House.'

Comment:
Perkins made a major racist cretin if herself.
She doesn't know what race of all the flood victims are.
There are many private camp resorts in the Texas Hill Country.
They can have whatever demographics that they want.
The Left loves their race based organizations.
They have race based student, employee, political and entertainment organizations.

This does not seem to be out of the ordinary today, especially for black people and black females to go into fits of rage whenever a group or person is white and meets tragedy. They have now become conditioned by the Democrat leadership to hate white people, and that it's OK to be racist because they are, of course, white, and we all know about white privilege, and if only they were white too, they would have it easier. In this case, forgetting that the racist black person spewing vile hatred against whites was elevated to where she is because of DEI.

 

[X.Onasis]

This does not seem to be out of the ordinary today, especially for black people and black females to go into fits of rage whenever a group or person is white and meets tragedy. They have now become conditioned by the Democrat leadership to hate white people, and that it's OK to be racist because they are, of course, white, and we all know about white privilege, and if only they were white too, they would have it easier. In this case, forgetting that the racist black person spewing vile hatred against whites was elevated to where she is because of DEI.

You must be Black to be so familiar with what they think, eh?
Or maybe just smart enough to make up a lie, and dumb enough to believe it?

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

My exact words were in fact: "I'd like to see your "established definition" that Blacks can be racist." Quoting you as well, because you posted,
"I'm guessing you subscribe to the silly notion that blacks can't be racist. This is simply not true because it goes against the established definition of the word but more importantly, it goes against everything we understand about human nature.

Why did you ask for it in the first place? Do you, in fact, believe blacks can't be racist? Is that why you demanded proof from me?

Which tells me you believe that stupidity because of the established definition. But when pressed for your "established definition," you provide proof that a suggestion of superiority inherent in a race of people is its essence.

Are you telling me to ignore one part of the definition in favor of the other part? If you're not then the part that says "a belief that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities" also applies.

What this means is that those who think blacks can't be racist are ascribing a particular trait to whites but not to blacks. That trait being racism. In other words, a moral superiority.

So naturally you ran away from that bone-headed statement by claiming it was wrong for me to ask that because it couldn't be done...

I took the remark to be rhetorical because we both know there is no such definition. Are you saying it was not rhetorical?

All that because you "read an implication that blacks are morally superior." ?? IN HER WORDS?

You're trying to muddle the issue. She assumed the camp had a whites-only racist policy only because she didn't see pictures of black kids. Make of that what you will but I will say it was racist of her to assume racism on the part of the camp.

"Specifically, that whites can be racist but blacks cannot" in her description of the camp and its historical clientele?

Still muddling the issue. I never said any of that in regards to her. I said that in regards to things you said.

I have no ******* clue whether or not she thinks blacks can't be racist. But her words clearly accuse the camp of practicing racial discrimination by not allowing blacks ("You ain't white, you ain't right. You ain't gettin' in. You ain't goin'.") That's all I've been saying where Ms. Perkins is concerned.

WTF? Because she just read about it, like you just did? Are you sure you're making enough assumptions?

Is she making enough assumptions?

You should consider that the world doesn't revolve around you and your bigotry.

I was waiting for that one and there it is. I knew it was just a matter of time before you whipped out your whiny racism card.

This "whites only" snivel isn't just boring, it belies the fake privilege denied you as a fake victim.

If you're bored with that I can quote the "You ain't white, you ain't right. You ain't gettin' in. You ain't goin'" six more times. You'll just keep avoiding it like you've been doing, but hey, why change now?

I'd ask you to do better, but ... Just kidding, I don't give a ****.

I would ask you to do better at reading comprehension but, you don't give a ****.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

You must be Black to be so familiar with what they think, eh?
Or maybe just smart enough to make up a lie, and dumb enough to believe it?

I don't need to be black to comment on racist black females, do I?

 

[X.Onasis]

I don't need to be black to comment on racist black females, do I?

No, but you'd have to be one to accurately say what they think.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Who do you think she's talking to with this little rhyme? Little White girls?

Strawman. If you watched the video, you would know who she's talking to. But you didn't watch it, did you?

Izzat it? Do you think she's implying that White girls are inferior?

Strawman. Nope. I don't think she's implying anything. I think she's saying the camp doesn't allow non-whites because that's exactly what she said.

I wonder if Blacks reading "Whites Only" feel racist?

Strawman. We're not discussing other blacks, we're discussing what this woman said.

It's good you've got a stick up your ass over this. Keep it there, you deserve it.

It sounds like you're the one with the stick up his ass. You've been avoiding the fact that she assumed a racist non-white policy on the part of the camp just because she didn't see any black kids in the pictures.

I've been laying out the facts as to what she said and you've twisted yourself into a pretzel trying to defend her and turn it around on me. So that now, in spite of the fact she assumed racist admission policies by the camp based on circumstantial evidence, somehow, I'm the bigot. Go figure.

This shit would make for an interesting college thesis on deflection, projection and creating strawmen in argumentation.