The left continues to deny basic science

[regent]

There are written histories on the birth of science. The period when modern science was born, was called The Age of Enlightenment or Age of Reason. A most interesting period caused by liberalism in Europe and the new America. Much of that Age can even be read in America's Declaration of Independence and Constitution.

 

[P@triot]

The left continues to deny basic science...

Planned Parenthood affiliate says ‘some men have a uterus’ — Ben Shapiro hits back with the truth

Bennie the Bully is a stupid

Males with a uterus and fallopian tubes, a rare disorder of sexual...

Oh snowflake...therein is the key word. We all know that anomalies of nature exists. But that’s not what Planned Parenthood was referring to. I honestly can’t tell if you are a disingenuous partisan hack or just an ignorant illiterate. I’m leaning towards the former, but the later wouldn’t surprise me.

Thank you for admitting that SOME men have a uterus, the ONLY thing PP said, and therefore the ONLY thing PP was referring to.

If you have a uterus and a penis, you're a hermaphrodite, not a man.

Boom! Bripat delivers a knockout blow to Ed the Ignorant!

 

[P@triot]

You give yourself away the type media you read.

And you “give yourself away the illiterate high school dropout”.

 

[Norman]

There are written histories on the birth of science. The period when modern science was born, was called The Age of Enlightenment or Age of Reason. A most interesting period caused by liberalism in Europe and the new America. Much of that Age can even be read in America's Declaration of Independence and Constitution.

The age of capitalism...

Modern day science denying liberals wouldn't want to have anything to do with it.

 

[P@triot]

You can’t make this stuff up. The left continues to deny science, biology, reality, etc.

But Time was judged guilty of using “a simplistic and outdated understanding of biology to perpetuate some very dangerous ideas about trans women,” and failing to acknowledge that biological sex “isn’t something we’re actually born with, it’s something that doctors or our parents assign us at birth.”

Yeah, um, biological sex is something you are absolutely born with. It is scientifically indisputable.

Transgender Ideology Is Riddled With Contradictions. Here Are the Big Ones.

 

[P@triot]

This is what happens when one rejects logic, reason, and reality in favor of emotions. When that happens, all positions contradict themselves and a person comes across sounding like an absolute lunatic...

On the one hand, they claim that the real self is something other than the physical body, in a new form of Gnostic dualism, yet at the same time they embrace a materialist philosophy in which only the material world exists. They say that gender is purely a social construct, while asserting that a person can be “trapped” in the wrong gender.

How can one be “trapped” in a physical situation if in fact gender is merely a “social construct”? By the very argument, it proves that gender is biological and not a “construct” at all.

Transgender Ideology Is Riddled With Contradictions. Here Are the Big Ones.

 

[P@triot]

This is what happens when one rejects logic, reason, and reality in favor of emotions. When that happens, all positions contradict themselves and a person comes across sounding like an absolute lunatic...

They say there are no meaningful differences between man and woman, yet they rely on rigid sex stereotypes to argue that “gender identity” is real, while human embodiment is not. They claim that truth is whatever a person says it is, yet they believe there’s a real self to be discovered inside that person.

How can “gender identity” be real if in fact gender is merely a “social construct”? By the very argument, one need only to ignore the “social construct” to be completely happy and content. No surgeries required. No transition required. No hormones required. Oops...

Transgender Ideology Is Riddled With Contradictions. Here Are the Big Ones.

 

[P@triot]

The left continues to deny basic science...

Stacie Ray was born a man. It’s right there on the birth certificate. But Stacie Ray, along with Jane Doe, Ashley Breda and Basil Argento, insists the birth certificate is wrong. With the help of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), they have sued the state of Ohio for refusing to change their birth certificates to reflect their updated gender.

They are biologically men. They are demanding that the state lie.

Should politics trump biology? The ACLU seems to think so and they have a lawsuit to prove it.

 

[regent]

The left continues to deny basic science...

Stacie Ray was born a man. It’s right there on the birth certificate. But Stacie Ray, along with Jane Doe, Ashley Breda and Basil Argento, insists the birth certificate is wrong. With the help of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), they have sued the state of Ohio for refusing to change their birth certificates to reflect their updated gender.

They are biologically men. They are demanding that the state lie.

Should politics trump biology? The ACLU seems to think so and they have a lawsuit to prove it.

So was that what this is all about, a lawsuit, and you are using this as evidence that the left denies basic science? It is about the law, and one that can't tell the difference between the law and science.

 

[toobfreak]

The left continues to deny basic science
The left's entire narrative is completely falling apart with each passing day...

"It has not warmed in Alabama in the last century according to NOAA’s own data,” Watts wrote on his website Watts Up With That? “In fact the average temperature has COOLED since 1895…"

Indeed, as I've presented in the past, it HAS cooled, but that does not phase liberals who carry with them their own closed set of "science facts and climate data" that claims otherwise! The Left carries with it its own closed bubble of reality which it lives and believes by.

 

[P@triot]

So was that what this is all about, a lawsuit, and you are using this as evidence that the left denies basic science?

Yeah, sweetie. Science proves they are men. The left rejects that and insists they are “women”.

 

[P@triot]

Even radical left-wing Slate.com is now admitting one major lie from the left regarding the “Global Warming” scam:

According to an article on Slate, the myth of the monstrous garbage patch was made up to call attention to the problem of pollution and "save our Oceans."

But wait! It gets even better:

There Is No Island of Trash in the Pacific. But the cause of clean oceans needed a good story. Our warming planet could use another one.

They are openly calling for more lies to perpetuate the “Global Warming” scam!

Is the ‘Great Pacific Garbage Patch’ just a myth?

The Great Pacific Garbage Patch Was the Myth We Needed to Save Our Oceans

 

[P@triot]

The left continues to deny basic, settled, science...

If you’re wondering about the word “menstruator,” the College Fix noted some activists use it “to avoid connecting the act of menstruation to women.”

Indeed, it declares that “not everyone who is a woman (gender) menstruates (a biological process associated with certain reproductive parts). And not every person who menstruates is a woman, either.”

Ummm....actually....every person who menstruates is a woman.

Harvard dorms now have free tampons — but mostly in gender-neutral restrooms. The reason is a hoot.

 

[Wyatt earp]

They said that when they were under Obama's thumb and their jobs depended on agreeing with every idiocy he uttered.

That's one of the dumbest things you've ever said and you have a large repertoire on that type of lunacy.
Our Joint Chiefs see for themselves that climate change producing droughts are causing a political problem of migrating large amounts of people into areas seeking life sustaining fresh water. Syria is just one example.
Your inane answer just shows how deeply and unrepentantly biased and foolish you are.

You said it was dumb, but you failed to prove it was wrong. You simply asserted that we can trust generals to pontificate on scientific matters. When have generals ever been trustworthy about anything?

I just explained how the generals have seen for themselves how climate change has destabilized whole regions throughout the world.
You don't need a weatherman to tell you which way the wind blows.
Then you denegrate our best and our brightest to sublimateyiurself to yi

The generals haven't seen jack shit other than who signs their paychecks. General should stick to what they are qualified to do, which is to wage war. Critiquing theories about the climate isn't in their area of expertise. You have to be the world's biggest dumbass to consider a general's opinion on climate change.

Wage war? How about PREVENTING WAR. Our brilliant Generals don't make up scientific data. They're smart enough to read about the dangers of climate change and ONCE AGAIN : SEE THOSE DANGERS FOR THEMSELVES UP CLOSE AND PERSONAL.
Ive never met anyone so resistant to learning as you.
You're a lost cause and I'm not going to waste anymore of my time on you.

They also have a battle plan drawn up to fight space aliens, so what's your point that the military is doing it's job and don't want to get stuck with it's pants down?


.

 

[bripat9643]

They said that when they were under Obama's thumb and their jobs depended on agreeing with every idiocy he uttered.

That's one of the dumbest things you've ever said and you have a large repertoire on that type of lunacy.
Our Joint Chiefs see for themselves that climate change producing droughts are causing a political problem of migrating large amounts of people into areas seeking life sustaining fresh water. Syria is just one example.
Your inane answer just shows how deeply and unrepentantly biased and foolish you are.

You said it was dumb, but you failed to prove it was wrong. You simply asserted that we can trust generals to pontificate on scientific matters. When have generals ever been trustworthy about anything?

I just explained how the generals have seen for themselves how climate change has destabilized whole regions throughout the world.
You don't need a weatherman to tell you which way the wind blows.
Then you denegrate our best and our brightest to sublimateyiurself to yi

The generals haven't seen jack shit other than who signs their paychecks. General should stick to what they are qualified to do, which is to wage war. Critiquing theories about the climate isn't in their area of expertise. You have to be the world's biggest dumbass to consider a general's opinion on climate change.

Wage war? How about PREVENTING WAR. Our brilliant Generals don't make up scientific data. They're smart enough to read about the dangers of climate change and ONCE AGAIN : SEE THOSE DANGERS FOR THEMSELVES UP CLOSE AND PERSONAL.
Ive never met anyone so resistant to learning as you.
You're a lost cause and I'm not going to waste anymore of my time on you.

Wrong idiot. The generals prepared propaganda about Globull Warming because Obama ordered them to, and for no other reason. Generals are spineless jellyfish who kiss every ass above them in the military food chain. The minute Trump got into office, they rescinded everything they ever did with regard to AGW.

 

[BILLSANDS]

Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.

 

[bripat9643]

Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.

The Myth of the Climate Change '97%'

 

[theHawk]

The left's entire narrative is completely falling apart with each passing day...

"It has not warmed in Alabama in the last century according to NOAA’s own data,” Watts wrote on his website Watts Up With That? “In fact the average temperature has COOLED since 1895…"

Alarmists say global warming to blame for ‘record’ tick population — but there’s one massive problem

If the idea of global warming is a myth created and pushed by the left, then why do at least 97 percent of climate scientists agree on the reality of human-caused climate change? Do you think all scientists are leftist? That's not likely. Apparently you believe in science or you wouldn't say the left is denying it. Why is your thread title claiming that leftists deny science when you are actually the one denying it? The left agrees with the scientists.

"According to the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication and the George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication, which conduct an annual survey on what Americans think about climate change, only 13 percent of Americans correctly identified that more than 90 percent of all climate scientists have concluded that human-caused global warming is happening. (It’s actually at least 97 percent of climate scientists that agree human-caused global warming is happening.)"
Almost 90% of Americans don’t know there’s scientific consensus on global warming

And then you have the international scientific community. Almost all the scientists in the world agree that AGW is real. Scientists from all cultures and political systems. So how do you arrange that, deniers?

“Global warming” is real, because the planet has been warming for 12,000 years since the last ice age. “AGW” is a lame ass attempt to blame the last hundred years of slight warming (if there has even been any) on mankind.

You Warmers deny the fact that it’s perfectly natural for Earth to go through cycles of ice ages and periods of constant warming in between. What are you morons so afraid of if the planet gets a few degrees warmer anyway? There have been plenty of times in Earth’s history when it was much warmer, so warm there were no polar ice caps even. Yet life thrived and we still had ice ages.

 

[BILLSANDS]

Climate change like evolution has been overwhelming proven , and accepted by experts in the field, people just deny it because they are gluttons their motivation for ignoring the obvious is the same motivation as an alcoholic or a heroin junkie. they live in denial, they know that reality is in conflict with their convenience, if climate change is real americans will have to make sacrifices so you ignore the truth you bury your head in the sand like some sort of retarded ostrich and pretend you can just keep driving you big car and living in your big house, you cant, stop lying to yourself, it makes you look stupid, and by the way none of your sources are credible, you look like a complete fool even mentioning them

 

[Lesh]

As always...we have a Denier cherry picking data

Why only 100 years?

Why ignore the hefty increase in temp over the last 70 years?