The Least Qualified Nominee Ever

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
128,394
Reaction score
64,426
Points
2,615
Location
Brooklyn, NY
1. We're all prepared for the warfare that is going to take place over Trump's nominees for cabinet and other offices, and I assumed the 'defense' would be the line the Dems always used: "The President is entitled to have the advisers that he chooses!"

2. But one of my fav opinion outlets pointed out the candidate who was the least qualified nominee for higher office EVER!
And Democrat voters slobbered over him, worshipped him, and proclaimed him to have all sorts of characterists he never deserved.
Guess.

3. The Dems ran the candidate as..........wait for it..........GOD!!!!!!!!!!
And as the hightest IQ ever to be President.



4. "When Donald Trump shocked the world by winning office in 2016, .... the newly elected president did was the Worst Thing Ever. Then as now, lefties loved to disparage Trump's cabinet picks and other nominees as unqualified and inferior. .... fumed that under the Trump administration, "experience was clearly not required to hold a high office."

. "You all carry on about Trump's picks not having enough experience for their jobs,"...."and yet every one of you voted for Barack Obama in 2008."

It was true: my left-leaning colleagues were all massive Obama supporters. During the first-term junior senator's 2008 campaign, I would point out that the man had zero executive experience and hadn't run so much as a hot dog stand. They shrugged it off.




5. ...his oh-so-impressive CV at the time he first applied for the job of Leader of the Free World:

  • Two years doing corporate research and at the New York Public Interest Research Group
  • Several years as a community organizer with a church-based group, the Developing Communities Project
  • "Summer associate" (whatever that is) at the Chicago law firm Sidley Austin
  • Twelve years as "senior lecturer" at the University of Chicago Law School (a part-time position)
  • Eight years as Illinois State Senator (classified as a “full-time lite” position by the National Conference of State Legislatures)
  • Four years as the junior U.S. senator from Illinois, two of which were spent running for president
  • Has Ivy League degrees
  • Wrote a book about himself
  • Gave a really good speech once
  • Identifies as black."
  • The Least-Qualified Nominee for High Office Ever


Deep down you know what his real "qualification" was.
 
1. We're all prepared for the warfare that is going to take place over Trump's nominees for cabinet and other offices, and I assumed the 'defense' would be the line the Dems always used: "The President is entitled to have the advisers that he chooses!"

2. But one of my fav opinion outlets pointed out the candidate who was the least qualified nominee for higher office EVER!
And Democrat voters slobbered over him, worshipped him, and proclaimed him to have all sorts of characterists he never deserved.
Guess.

3. The Dems ran the candidate as..........wait for it..........GOD!!!!!!!!!!
And as the hightest IQ ever to be President.



4. "When Donald Trump shocked the world by winning office in 2016, .... the newly elected president did was the Worst Thing Ever. Then as now, lefties loved to disparage Trump's cabinet picks and other nominees as unqualified and inferior. .... fumed that under the Trump administration, "experience was clearly not required to hold a high office."

. "You all carry on about Trump's picks not having enough experience for their jobs,"...."and yet every one of you voted for Barack Obama in 2008."

It was true: my left-leaning colleagues were all massive Obama supporters. During the first-term junior senator's 2008 campaign, I would point out that the man had zero executive experience and hadn't run so much as a hot dog stand. They shrugged it off.




5. ...his oh-so-impressive CV at the time he first applied for the job of Leader of the Free World:

  • Two years doing corporate research and at the New York Public Interest Research Group
  • Several years as a community organizer with a church-based group, the Developing Communities Project
  • "Summer associate" (whatever that is) at the Chicago law firm Sidley Austin
  • Twelve years as "senior lecturer" at the University of Chicago Law School (a part-time position)
  • Eight years as Illinois State Senator (classified as a “full-time lite” position by the National Conference of State Legislatures)
  • Four years as the junior U.S. senator from Illinois, two of which were spent running for president
  • Has Ivy League degrees
  • Wrote a book about himself
  • Gave a really good speech once
  • Identifies as black."
  • The Least-Qualified Nominee for High Office Ever


Deep down you know what his real "qualification" was.
Obama's qualification was that he was willing to say anything.

I'm not sure if he's a puppet or something else, but clearly he has no leadership qualities.

He was the foot in the door for the Globalists.

He made it happen.

He took what the Clintons did and put in on steroids.

Even Bush was for sale. Obama wanted beach front properties. Bush was taught by his Dad just to go along with the establishment. He didn't need the money. Obama is rich as shit now, and his legacy is right up there with MLK and Muhammad Ali. Everyone kisses his backside. Nobody can touch him.

Biden will never be that safe.
 
1. We're all prepared for the warfare that is going to take place over Trump's nominees for cabinet and other offices, and I assumed the 'defense' would be the line the Dems always used: "The President is entitled to have the advisers that he chooses!"

2. But one of my fav opinion outlets pointed out the candidate who was the least qualified nominee for higher office EVER!
And Democrat voters slobbered over him, worshipped him, and proclaimed him to have all sorts of characterists he never deserved.
Guess.

3. The Dems ran the candidate as..........wait for it..........GOD!!!!!!!!!!
And as the hightest IQ ever to be President.



4. "When Donald Trump shocked the world by winning office in 2016, .... the newly elected president did was the Worst Thing Ever. Then as now, lefties loved to disparage Trump's cabinet picks and other nominees as unqualified and inferior. .... fumed that under the Trump administration, "experience was clearly not required to hold a high office."

. "You all carry on about Trump's picks not having enough experience for their jobs,"...."and yet every one of you voted for Barack Obama in 2008."

It was true: my left-leaning colleagues were all massive Obama supporters. During the first-term junior senator's 2008 campaign, I would point out that the man had zero executive experience and hadn't run so much as a hot dog stand. They shrugged it off.




5. ...his oh-so-impressive CV at the time he first applied for the job of Leader of the Free World:

  • Two years doing corporate research and at the New York Public Interest Research Group
  • Several years as a community organizer with a church-based group, the Developing Communities Project
  • "Summer associate" (whatever that is) at the Chicago law firm Sidley Austin
  • Twelve years as "senior lecturer" at the University of Chicago Law School (a part-time position)
  • Eight years as Illinois State Senator (classified as a “full-time lite” position by the National Conference of State Legislatures)
  • Four years as the junior U.S. senator from Illinois, two of which were spent running for president
  • Has Ivy League degrees
  • Wrote a book about himself
  • Gave a really good speech once
  • Identifies as black."
  • The Least-Qualified Nominee for High Office Ever


Deep down you know what his real "qualification" was.
Obama was infinitely more qualified than Reality TV Host Trump
 
Obama's qualification was that he was willing to say anything.

I'm not sure if he's a puppet or something else, but clearly he has no leadership qualities.

He was the foot in the door for the Globalists.

He made it happen.

He took what the Clintons did and put in on steroids.

Even Bush was for sale. Obama wanted beach front properties. Bush was taught by his Dad just to go along with the establishment. He didn't need the money. Obama is rich as shit now, and his legacy is right up there with MLK and Muhammad Ali. Everyone kisses his backside. Nobody can touch him.

Biden will never be that safe.
wait.......are you saying that Obama is not God??????????


Blasphemy!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Interesting that none of the Dems have denied that they were taught that Obama is God.


The collorary of course, is that Democrat ideology is a religion itself.


The real problem is that to them, it is their religion.



There are two religions in conflict.

That of the Founders, the Judeo-Christian faith.
The Bible is its foundation.


And that of Democrats, Liberals, Communists, Nazis, Fascists.....Militant Secularism. Lacking self-awareness, the Democrats, Liberals, Progressives ridicule religion as superstition......but kneel to their false religion, Militant Secularism.
From the Amazon review of Godless, by Coulter…


Though liberalism rejects the idea of God and reviles people of faith, it bears all the attributes of a religion. In Godless, Coulter throws open the doors of the Church of Liberalism, showing us its sacraments (abortion), its holy writ (Roe v. Wade), its martyrs (from Soviet spy Alger Hiss to cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jamal), its clergy (public school teachers), its churches (government schools, where prayer is prohibited but condoms are free), its doctrine of infallibility (as manifest in the "absolute moral authority" of spokesmen from Cindy Sheehan to Max Cleland), and its cosmology (in which mankind is an inconsequential accident).

Then, of course, there's the liberal creation myth: Charles Darwin's theory of evolution.



Here we can watch their religious service:

1726793373695.png






Bowing to Saint George Floyd.





Can I get an "Amen!"
 
1. We're all prepared for the warfare that is going to take place over Trump's nominees for cabinet and other offices, and I assumed the 'defense' would be the line the Dems always used: "The President is entitled to have the advisers that he chooses!"

2. But one of my fav opinion outlets pointed out the candidate who was the least qualified nominee for higher office EVER!
And Democrat voters slobbered over him, worshipped him, and proclaimed him to have all sorts of characterists he never deserved.
Guess.

3. The Dems ran the candidate as..........wait for it..........GOD!!!!!!!!!!
And as the hightest IQ ever to be President.



4. "When Donald Trump shocked the world by winning office in 2016, .... the newly elected president did was the Worst Thing Ever. Then as now, lefties loved to disparage Trump's cabinet picks and other nominees as unqualified and inferior. .... fumed that under the Trump administration, "experience was clearly not required to hold a high office."

. "You all carry on about Trump's picks not having enough experience for their jobs,"...."and yet every one of you voted for Barack Obama in 2008."

It was true: my left-leaning colleagues were all massive Obama supporters. During the first-term junior senator's 2008 campaign, I would point out that the man had zero executive experience and hadn't run so much as a hot dog stand. They shrugged it off.




5. ...his oh-so-impressive CV at the time he first applied for the job of Leader of the Free World:

  • Two years doing corporate research and at the New York Public Interest Research Group
  • Several years as a community organizer with a church-based group, the Developing Communities Project
  • "Summer associate" (whatever that is) at the Chicago law firm Sidley Austin
  • Twelve years as "senior lecturer" at the University of Chicago Law School (a part-time position)
  • Eight years as Illinois State Senator (classified as a “full-time lite” position by the National Conference of State Legislatures)
  • Four years as the junior U.S. senator from Illinois, two of which were spent running for president
  • Has Ivy League degrees
  • Wrote a book about himself
  • Gave a really good speech once
  • Identifies as black."
  • The Least-Qualified Nominee for High Office Ever


Deep down you know what his real "qualification" was.
He sucked dick for crack cocaine.

That made him a real winner in the Democrats' eyes!!!
 
Dude, nobody ever reads your crap, lol!!
Not again!

They read a post, realize that it eviscerates their beliefs, and that they have no way to respond, and write "nobody ever reads" what they just responded to!


These Democrat voters are identical to those insects that can survive even with their head cut off.
 
Not again!

They read a post, realize that it eviscerates their beliefs, and that they have no way to respond, and write "nobody ever reads" what they just responded to!


These Democrat voters are identical to those insects that can survive even with their head cut off.
LMAO!

Nobody reads your page long screeds.
 
Pete Buttgig is the worst ever.

PATERNITY LEAVE FOR 6 months during the East Palestine disaster?

Everything that morn did turned to shit.

How many EV charging stations did he get online for $8 billion? 8?
 
When the Dems went after Palin as unqualified and she was more qualified than Obama, their own standard disqualified him, yet they still voted for him in DEI style. The Dem own standard validates this OP.
 
Garland is bad because he is a Nazi.

Totally corrupt.
 
As is the claim with every Democrat nominee, they are simply brilliant.


Here is "Presidential Historian" Michael Beschloss, trying to fluff up Obama, and getting his rear end handed to him by Don Imus.



November 11, 2008
Historian Michael Beschloss was interviewed Monday on Don Imus’ radio show and he made the claim that President-elect Obama’s IQ is off the charts and that he is the smartest president we have ever had. Here is the meat of the conversation:

Quote:

Historian Michael Beschloss: Yeah. Even aside from the fact of electing the first African American President and whatever one’s partisan views this is a guy whose IQ is off the charts — I mean you cannot say that he is anything but a very serious and capable leader and — you know — You and I have talked about this for years …

Imus: Well. What is his IQ?

Historian Michael Beschloss: … our system doesn’t allow those people to become President, those people meaning people THAT smart and THAT capable

Imus: What is his IQ?

Historian Michael Beschloss: Pardon?

Imus: What is his IQ?

Historian Michael Beschloss: Uh. I would say it’s probably - he’s probably the smartest guy ever to become President.



You can find the full audio on the show here. WTKK - Imus In The Morning, 96.9 WTKK, Boston*-*Imus in the Morning guest: Michael Beschloss 11/10/08
You have to fast forward to about 13 minutes in to get the good stuff. So I’m thinking that I would like to know the historian’s IQ. I’m thinking that it’s somewhere around catatonic or idiot. Too much Kool-Aid. How can someone claim that an IQ is off the charts when they don’t even know what that person’s IQ is and for that matter, where the hell are Obama’s school records period?

Did he even have good grades? Did he have good grades when he was snorting cocaine? He’s hiding all his transcripts in his bid to be transparent, so we’ll never know. And what is even more laughable - does this Beschloss guy even know the IQs of any of the presidents. You know that Reagan sure was an idiot. And how about that Jefferson guy, all he could do was write a Declaration of Independence. Washington sure was stupid, he was just a military genius. And Madison, don’t even get me started.

Obama hasn’t done a damn thing yet and he is already a genius and I heard some poll today that has a 60%+ approval rating for him. Never mind that he only got 52% of the vote.
freedomswings.wordpress.com

Obama Is Our Smartest President?

Historian Michael Beschloss was interviewed Monday on Don Imus’ radio show and he made the claim that President-elect Obama’s IQ is off the charts and that he is the smartest president …
freedomswings.wordpress.com
freedomswings.wordpress.com
 
Those who follow such things know that leadership is a qualification in and unto itself. Corporate CEO offices are peppered with bright, dynamic individuals who were not "qualified" to be hired as CEO's for reasons that seem quite logical. A guy who ran a maker of detergents is hired to run a car rental company; a conglomeration of fast food enterprises hires some who ran a steel mill; a retired General is hired to run a consulting firm. It happens all the time. If you are a good leader, know business in general, can identify and exploit good people, you can run a large department effectively.

Trump has chosen people who are dynamic, share his views on governance, and don't give a shit about the criticism they will certainly endure.

Give him his people, then if they fail you can use that against him in the mid-terms.
 
Back
Top Bottom