RE
The Latest: Israeli official: Tlaib, Omar barred from entry
⁜→ ForeverYoung436, Shusha, Coyote, et al,
I have to admit, I did not see all this before. But I would like to mention an entirely different perspective for your consideration.
It is the behavior of our president I find more disturbing.
Agreed. He's an embarrassment.
Edited to add: I don't think his silly comments influenced the Israeli government, though. They made the decision they made for their own reasons.
I respectfully disagree. The Israelis were going to let them in before Trump put his two cents in.
(REFERENCES)
◈ International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) •
Article 20
1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.
2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.
◈ International Convention on Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) •
Article 4
States Parties condemn all propaganda and all organizations which are based on ideas or theories of superiority of one race or group of persons of one colour or ethnic origin, or which attempt to justify or promote racial hatred and discrimination in any form, and undertake to adopt immediate and positive measures designed to eradicate all incitement to, or acts of, such discrimination and, to this end, with due regard to the principles embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the rights expressly set forth in article 5 of this Convention, inter alia:
(a) Shall declare an offence punishable by law all dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority or hatred, incitement to racial discrimination, as well as all acts of violence or incitement to such acts against any race or group of persons of another colour or ethnic origin, and also the provision of any assistance to racist activities, including the financing thereof;
(b) Shall declare illegal and prohibit organizations, and also organized and all other propaganda activities, which promote and incite racial discrimination, and shall recognize participation in such organizations or activities as an offence punishable by law;
(c) Shall not permit public authorities or public institutions, national or local, to promote or incite racial discrimination.
(COMMENT)
You all look at the visa denial issue as strictly political end fighting. I see it from a counterintelligence standpoint wherein if either
(or both) of these Members of Congress go to Israel or the territories in dispute, and they speak or give interviews that result in any kind of disturbance at all, they will be in violation of one
(or both) of these International Conventions pertaining to Human Rights Law
[as opposed to International Humanitarian Law (IHL)].
Of course, if such an event occurred, attributable to either Member of Congress, the US Embassy (Department of State) would invoke "Diplomatic Immunity." But in fact, that would not even become necessary as criminal law would not
(in the modern political arena) be the default response to instances of incitement if less diplomatic effort would achieve the same effect. But the impact
(casualties or death) as a result of any violence (confrontations in which police and security forces 'clash with Arab Palestinians) would be laid at the feet of these Members, and the US would be liable
(diyah payments).
Now you may think this is an exaggerated concern. However, clashes and confrontations over less have occurred many times. And if there is an organized crowd or spontaneous gathering, there may be agitators
(Fedayeen Activists, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers) in the mix specifically to create chaos and ignite exploitable incidents for the media.
It would be wise if both the US and Israel think twice about travel. They need to do a good risk assessment and examine the agenda. You know that the US Congressional leadership would not think twice about the potential for trouble. They are political animals and not prone to common sense.
Just My Thought,
Most Respectfully,
R