I doubt that.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The Lancet Gets Down On Trump
- Thread starter okfine
- Start date
I doubt that.
You're right. I wasn't advising anybody that COVID-19 was an issue on Jan 22. I have a personal email that I sent to my parents on Jan 10th warning of a new virus coming out of China. Said it could be bad. Thought it was giong to be worse than SARs, but turned out I was wrong on that count.
Anyone who thinks “test, trace, and isolate” is going to do anything to end this pandemic is a fucking moron.The Lancet is getting political and telling all how they feel about how the pandemic is being handled.
"Trump and his allies, The Lancet laments in its editorial, are expecting a quick and easy solution to a difficult health crisis. His administration, according to The Lancet, “is obsessed with magic bullets: vaccines, new medicines or a hope that the virus will simply disappear. But only a steadfast reliance on basic public health principles — like test, trace and isolate — will see the emergency brought to an end, and this requires an effective national public health agency. The CDC needs a director who can provide leadership without the threat of being silenced and who has the technical capacity to lead today’s complicated effort.”
Americans must put a president in the White House, come January 2021, who will understand that public health should not be guided by partisan politics.
âPublic health should not be guided by partisan politicsâ: Trump scorched in editorial on his coronavirus response
The coronavirus pandemic reached a grim milestone this week: worldwide, more than 300,000 people have died from COVID-19 — and over 86,200 of them died in the United States, according to Johns Hopkins University researchers. With the United States’ death count continuing to soar, The Lancet, one...www.rawstory.com
The last thing we need is the government breaking into people’s homes in order to “separate and isolate” people.
Thanks for playing.
Then why didn’t you warn trump? Why didn’t you warn the democrats and the media who called trump racist and xenophobic for putting travel restrictions from China? You allowed the media to trick the public. You have blood on your hands!I doubt that.
You're right. I wasn't advising anybody that COVID-19 was an issue on Jan 22. I have a personal email that I sent to my parents on Jan 10th warning of a new virus coming out of China. Said it could be bad. Thought it was giong to be worse than SARs, but turned out I was wrong on that count.
Then why didn’t you warn trump? Why didn’t you warn the democrats and the media who called trump racist and xenophobic for putting travel restrictions from China? You allowed the media to trick the public. You have blood on your hands!
You got it all wrong. It was xenophobic. And it was racist. Trump is a racist. Why only put travel restrictions on China. That was the point. Those calling him out on it weren't annoyed he had put travel restrictions on, they were wondering why he didn't put them on everybody. Just as an FYI, you do know that virus don't know about travel restrictions and borders, right? You do know that when a virus hops on board a person's body it doesn't go to itself, "Well, my host is not from China, therefore I can't be spread around". You do know that, right?
BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 94,264
- 30,549
- 2,250
Based on the info provided by ‘experts‘. What were you advising on Jan 22?Yes. The OP and its source are a Trump bash. Facts ? They could have congratulated the Trump administration on their Jan 22 briefing to Congress on the virus (at which only a few showed up, while everyone was consumed by the impeachement fiasco)No. The facts are all that count. They would have been presented no matter which party was screwing up so bad.
You mean his Jan 22 remarks where he said the virus was completely under control, and he laughed at the possibility that it would ever become a pandemic or the Jan 24 statement where he praised China for being so in control of the situation and praising them for their transparency in the situation? Is that what you think he should be congratulated for?
I'm not he president who determines what actions the county takes, and I don't have access to up to date accurate information 24/7 like that fool does. He should at least read the damn reports, instead of acting like a spoiled dictator.
It emanated from China, you phony!Then why didn’t you warn trump? Why didn’t you warn the democrats and the media who called trump racist and xenophobic for putting travel restrictions from China? You allowed the media to trick the public. You have blood on your hands!
You got it all wrong. It was xenophobic. And it was racist. Trump is a racist. Why only put travel restrictions on China. That was the point. Those calling him out on it weren't annoyed he had put travel restrictions on, they were wondering why he didn't put them on everybody. Just as an FYI, you do know that virus don't know about travel restrictions and borders, right? You do know that when a virus hops on board a person's body it doesn't go to itself, "Well, my host is not from China, therefore I can't be spread around". You do know that, right?
He followed advice from experts. What did you do since you knew so much? Take it up with fauci and birks, etc.Based on the info provided by ‘experts‘. What were you advising on Jan 22?Yes. The OP and its source are a Trump bash. Facts ? They could have congratulated the Trump administration on their Jan 22 briefing to Congress on the virus (at which only a few showed up, while everyone was consumed by the impeachement fiasco)No. The facts are all that count. They would have been presented no matter which party was screwing up so bad.
You mean his Jan 22 remarks where he said the virus was completely under control, and he laughed at the possibility that it would ever become a pandemic or the Jan 24 statement where he praised China for being so in control of the situation and praising them for their transparency in the situation? Is that what you think he should be congratulated for?
I'm not he president who determines what actions the county takes, and I don't have access to up to date accurate information 24/7 like that fool does. He should at least read the damn reports, instead of acting like a spoiled dictator.
BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 94,264
- 30,549
- 2,250
I doubt that.Based on the info provided by ‘experts‘. What were you advising on Jan 22?Yes. The OP and its source are a Trump bash. Facts ? They could have congratulated the Trump administration on their Jan 22 briefing to Congress on the virus (at which only a few showed up, while everyone was consumed by the impeachement fiasco)No. The facts are all that count. They would have been presented no matter which party was screwing up so bad.
You mean his Jan 22 remarks where he said the virus was completely under control, and he laughed at the possibility that it would ever become a pandemic or the Jan 24 statement where he praised China for being so in control of the situation and praising them for their transparency in the situation? Is that what you think he should be congratulated for?
That it was a very contagious virus and there was cause for concern. Certainly wasn't praising China and saying there was going to be no problem.
Doubt all you want. We know the stupid shit Trump said.
BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 94,264
- 30,549
- 2,250
He followed advice from experts. What did you do since you knew so much? Take it up with fauci and birks, etc.Based on the info provided by ‘experts‘. What were you advising on Jan 22?Yes. The OP and its source are a Trump bash. Facts ? They could have congratulated the Trump administration on their Jan 22 briefing to Congress on the virus (at which only a few showed up, while everyone was consumed by the impeachement fiasco)No. The facts are all that count. They would have been presented no matter which party was screwing up so bad.
You mean his Jan 22 remarks where he said the virus was completely under control, and he laughed at the possibility that it would ever become a pandemic or the Jan 24 statement where he praised China for being so in control of the situation and praising them for their transparency in the situation? Is that what you think he should be congratulated for?
I'm not he president who determines what actions the county takes, and I don't have access to up to date accurate information 24/7 like that fool does. He should at least read the damn reports, instead of acting like a spoiled dictator.
No he didn't. His remarks were the exact opposite of what the experts were telling him dumb ass. The reports he was shown have been made public.
There has been so much disinformation in recent decades that believing anything is questionable.Ha HA. Like Democrats aren't treating it partisanly, right ?The Lancet is getting political and telling all how they feel about how the pandemic is being handled.
"Trump and his allies, The Lancet laments in its editorial, are expecting a quick and easy solution to a difficult health crisis. His administration, according to The Lancet, “is obsessed with magic bullets: vaccines, new medicines or a hope that the virus will simply disappear. But only a steadfast reliance on basic public health principles — like test, trace and isolate — will see the emergency brought to an end, and this requires an effective national public health agency. The CDC needs a director who can provide leadership without the threat of being silenced and who has the technical capacity to lead today’s complicated effort.”
Americans must put a president in the White House, come January 2021, who will understand that public health should not be guided by partisan politics.
âPublic health should not be guided by partisan politicsâ: Trump scorched in editorial on his coronavirus response
The coronavirus pandemic reached a grim milestone this week: worldwide, more than 300,000 people have died from COVID-19 — and over 86,200 of them died in the United States, according to Johns Hopkins University researchers. With the United States’ death count continuing to soar, The Lancet, one...
The Lancet is among the top rated medical journals in the world, if not the top rated medical journals in the world. Hardly a partisan publication. Trump sucks, and they found it necessary to comment on how that is causing unnecessary deaths.
He followed experts advice. It’s only been a couple of months and you’re already suckered by propaganda.He followed advice from experts. What did you do since you knew so much? Take it up with fauci and birks, etc.Based on the info provided by ‘experts‘. What were you advising on Jan 22?Yes. The OP and its source are a Trump bash. Facts ? They could have congratulated the Trump administration on their Jan 22 briefing to Congress on the virus (at which only a few showed up, while everyone was consumed by the impeachement fiasco)No. The facts are all that count. They would have been presented no matter which party was screwing up so bad.
You mean his Jan 22 remarks where he said the virus was completely under control, and he laughed at the possibility that it would ever become a pandemic or the Jan 24 statement where he praised China for being so in control of the situation and praising them for their transparency in the situation? Is that what you think he should be congratulated for?
I'm not he president who determines what actions the county takes, and I don't have access to up to date accurate information 24/7 like that fool does. He should at least read the damn reports, instead of acting like a spoiled dictator.
No he didn't. His remarks were the exact opposite of what the experts were telling him dumb ass. The reports he was shown have been made public.
BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 94,264
- 30,549
- 2,250
No There have been so many conspiracy theories in recent decades till people have lost their minds. People like Trump who claim the media is the enemy, and enemies like Russia should be proud. They have disrupted the sane running of out country just like they had always hoped.There has been so much disinformation in recent decades that believing anything is questionable.Ha HA. Like Democrats aren't treating it partisanly, right ?The Lancet is getting political and telling all how they feel about how the pandemic is being handled.
"Trump and his allies, The Lancet laments in its editorial, are expecting a quick and easy solution to a difficult health crisis. His administration, according to The Lancet, “is obsessed with magic bullets: vaccines, new medicines or a hope that the virus will simply disappear. But only a steadfast reliance on basic public health principles — like test, trace and isolate — will see the emergency brought to an end, and this requires an effective national public health agency. The CDC needs a director who can provide leadership without the threat of being silenced and who has the technical capacity to lead today’s complicated effort.”
Americans must put a president in the White House, come January 2021, who will understand that public health should not be guided by partisan politics.
âPublic health should not be guided by partisan politicsâ: Trump scorched in editorial on his coronavirus response
The coronavirus pandemic reached a grim milestone this week: worldwide, more than 300,000 people have died from COVID-19 — and over 86,200 of them died in the United States, according to Johns Hopkins University researchers. With the United States’ death count continuing to soar, The Lancet, one...
The Lancet is among the top rated medical journals in the world, if not the top rated medical journals in the world. Hardly a partisan publication. Trump sucks, and they found it necessary to comment on how that is causing unnecessary deaths.
BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 94,264
- 30,549
- 2,250
He followed experts advice. It’s only been a couple of months and you’re already suckered by propaganda.He followed advice from experts. What did you do since you knew so much? Take it up with fauci and birks, etc.Based on the info provided by ‘experts‘. What were you advising on Jan 22?Yes. The OP and its source are a Trump bash. Facts ? They could have congratulated the Trump administration on their Jan 22 briefing to Congress on the virus (at which only a few showed up, while everyone was consumed by the impeachement fiasco)No. The facts are all that count. They would have been presented no matter which party was screwing up so bad.
You mean his Jan 22 remarks where he said the virus was completely under control, and he laughed at the possibility that it would ever become a pandemic or the Jan 24 statement where he praised China for being so in control of the situation and praising them for their transparency in the situation? Is that what you think he should be congratulated for?
I'm not he president who determines what actions the county takes, and I don't have access to up to date accurate information 24/7 like that fool does. He should at least read the damn reports, instead of acting like a spoiled dictator.
No he didn't. His remarks were the exact opposite of what the experts were telling him dumb ass. The reports he was shown have been made public.
No he didn't. He didn't even read the reports.
like the other side never props up their people....Yeah, it’s peer reviewed by other lefties.The Lancet is among the top rated medical journals in the world, if not the top rated medical journals in the world. Hardly a partisan publication. Trump sucks, and they found it necessary to comment on how that is causing unnecessary deaths.
Everything published there is peer reviewed. Politics doesn't enter the picture.
The stupidity I see on this board in an effort to prop up a grifting con man in the White House is stunning.
- Oct 20, 2013
- 55,734
- 17,714
- 2,250
YOU KNOW what I mean, because I clearly stated it on Post # 37 . And you know what he/they should be congratulated for. I see no need to repeat myself.You mean his Jan 22 remarks where he said the virus was completely under control, and he laughed at the possibility that it would ever become a pandemic or the Jan 24 statement where he praised China for being so in control of the situation and praising them for their transparency in the situation? Is that what you think he should be congratulated for?
- Oct 20, 2013
- 55,734
- 17,714
- 2,250
At the time only China was suspect for containing the virus. other places were not known (including the US) to have it . Duh!You got it all wrong. It was xenophobic. And it was racist. Trump is a racist. Why only put travel restrictions on China. That was the point. Those calling him out on it weren't annoyed he had put travel restrictions on, they were wondering why he didn't put them on everybody. Just as an FYI, you do know that virus don't know about travel restrictions and borders, right? You do know that when a virus hops on board a person's body it doesn't go to itself, "Well, my host is not from China, therefore I can't be spread around". You do know that, right?
And since you still call Trump racist for the China travel ban, we'll recommend you to the pharmacy for stupid pills. Even MSNBC has backed off from that.
- Oct 20, 2013
- 55,734
- 17,714
- 2,250
If he had not read any report (like the one from Tom Cotton (Jan 20), he would not have authorized the Jan 22 briefing to the Senate, and Schumer would have never known. Do you think you can get somewhere here, by just jumbling up facts and dates ?No he didn't. He didn't even read the reports.
Your leftist fake media reports have all been refuted.
- Oct 20, 2013
- 55,734
- 17,714
- 2,250
You are lost.]
No There have been so many conspiracy theories in recent decades till people have lost their minds. People like Trump who claim the media is the enemy, and enemies like Russia should be proud. They have disrupted the sane running of out country just like they had always hoped.
- Oct 20, 2013
- 55,734
- 17,714
- 2,250
Nothing was ever more evident. But Democrats concoct things and then run with them. It's what they do.He followed experts advice. It’s only been a couple of months and you’re already suckered by propaganda.
And they don't have much for a campaign, so distorting the coronavirus scenario, may be all they've got.
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 138
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 209
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 197
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 69
- Views
- 699
- Replies
- 33
- Views
- 166
- Replies
- 37
- Views
- 121
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8111
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-