The Judiciary Is Attempting To Seize Executive Power

[jc456]

Due process means correct identification. That was done Before taking into custody. Judges stalling over double and triple checks

Correct, they had a warrant signed by a judge.

 

[dudmuck]

The Biden Junta allowed 15,000,000 unvetted illegals to INVADE our Country willy nilly - no one tried to stop the motherfuckers - we want them out of here NOW but President Trump must dot the i's and cross the T's - BULLSHIT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Contumacious]

View attachment 1092071

View attachment 1092072


WW
.
.
.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69741724/jgg-v-trump/

If the facts in the declaration are confirmed , and If the asylum officer finds that the person has shown a credible fear of return to Venezuela then a US immigration offical assigned to ESS will transfer him to the hearing

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Donnie's overreached hands are being slapped.

The Good Ship Lollipop

^^^"Why all this change? Before Orange Man Bad started rocking the boat, we had the best government money could buy."

 

[jc456]

looks like the demofks looking for the judge?

 

[Contumacious]

Interesting - I haven't seen President Trump. Tom Homan or Ms Bondi cry

 

[jc456]

Interesting - I haven't seen President Trump. Tom Homan or Ms Bondi cry

why are the demofks making such an effort to find the judges? looks like that meme is them.

 

[Contumacious]

the fact is, if xiden had authority to let em in, Trump has that same authority to remove em.

The Biden Junta had NO Constitutional or Statutory authority to open the Borders.

 

[WorldWatcher]

If the facts in the declaration are confirmed , and If the asylum officer finds that the person has shown a credible fear of return to Venezuela then a US immigration offical assigned to ESS will transfer him to the hearing

There isn't an asylum officer, there isn't going to be a determination.

That's why the individuals were moved to an El Salvador prison - so they were out of reach of US Immigration Courts.

The individual had an asylum hearing scheduled for next month.

WW

 

[jc456]

The Biden Junta had NO Constitutional or Statutory authority to open the Borders.

still doesn't matter, they had warrants to remove em

 

[dudmuck]

Interesting - I haven't seen President Trump. Tom Homan or Ms Bondi cry

Loading…

truthsocial.com

this is certainly crying

 

[jc456]

Loading…

truthsocial.com

this is certainly crying

the fact there's a judge is you all crying.

 

[MarcATL]

Judges stopped Biden from paying off student debt.

Also gummed up Obama's plans.

This is the system we have.

Where was this thread then OP?

 

[WEATHER53]

There isn't an asylum officer, there isn't going to be a determination.

That's why the individuals were moved to an El Salvador prison - so they were out of reach of US Immigration Courts.

The individual had an asylum hearing scheduled for next month.

WW

Asylum has very limited criteria. Limited to death or imprisonment over political or religious beliefs
Not better health care
Not work
Not housing
Not income
Not food
Not
Not not

 

[WEATHER53]

still doesn't matter, they had warrants to remove em

The due process was processed
This is solely interfering judges getting jollies

 

[Nobody911]

WE THE PEOPLE, MAGADONIANS object to the Politicians in Black Robes attempt to use LAWFARE to seize Executive Power. In order to do so they are IGNORING SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT .

The Judiciary Is Attempting To Seize Executive Power​

Biden judge Tanya Chutkan orders EPA not to obey a presidential order to terminate waste, fraud, and abuse. Chutkan was admonished by the US Supreme Court last June for ignoring presidential immunity and rushing a politically motivated case against Trump just prior to election season.

Biden judge Ana Reyes ordered the Defense Department not to enforce a presidential directive to ban transgender people from serving in the military. No Democrat judge blocked the Biden Defense Department’s order to put promotions of white heterosexuals on hold while transgendered, homosexual, and blacks were promoted in their place.

Obama judge James Boasberg ordered planes in flight deporting dangerous immigrant-invader gang members to return the illegal aliens to the US. President Trump called for the lunatic judge’s impeachment, and Republican Supreme Court justice Roberts (no relation) upbraided Trump.

Boasberg’s order is especially egregious as is Justice Roberts upbraiding of Trump. It seems neither Boasberg nor Roberts are sufficiently competent to know that the US Supreme Court has previously ruled that deportations under the Alien Enemy Act are not subject to judicial review.

I predicted that the judiciary would be the main obstacle to American renewal. So many incompetent and unqualified people have been put on the bench that the judiciary is an obstacle to governance. So many judges have been put on the bench because of where they stand on liberal causes such as abortion and who use judicial rulings to legislate their personal preferences that the institution of the judiciary is a dangerous threat to the United States. The only solution is to ignore the corrupt judiciary, or perhaps they should all be removed and we start over.

The US judicial system is so cumbersome that an appeal of a ruling against a president can take longer than a presidential term. This makes it so easy for ideological judges to prevent governance.

The Judiciary Is Attempting To Seize Executive Power - LewRockwell

Biden judge Tanya Chutkan orders EPA not to obey a presidential order to terminate waste, fraud, and abuse. Chutkan was admonished by the US Supreme Court last June for ignoring presidential immunity and rushing a politically motivated case against Trump just prior to election season. Biden...

www.lewrockwell.com

MAGA is now history, dude. Only idiots believe those Trump’s pets. lol.

The statement that the U.S. Supreme Court has previously ruled that deportations under the Alien Enemies Act are not subject to judicial review and that the Court cannot change its rulings is INCORRECT for several reasons:

Judicial Review: While the political question doctrine may limit judicial review in certain cases involving national security or political questions, it does not categorically bar review of executive actions under the Alien Enemies Act. The doctrine, as established in Baker v. Carr, allows for judicial intervention when there is an "obvious mistake" or a "manifestly unauthorized exercise of power" by the executive branch1.

Ability to Change Rulings: The Supreme Court can and has changed its previous rulings. This is evident from the numerous landmark cases where the Court has overturned its own precedents, such as Brown v. Board of Education (overturning Plessy v. Ferguson), Lawrence v. Texas (overturning Bowers v. Hardwick), and Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (overturning Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey)2. The principle of stare decisis encourages consistency but does not prevent the Court from revising its decisions when deemed necessary2.

Therefore, the Supreme Court retains the authority to review and potentially alter its stance on matters related to the Alien Enemies Act if it deems such actions are not in line with constitutional or legal standards.

Sources:
1. The Courts Can Stop Abuse of the Alien Enemies Act – the Political Question Doctrine is No Bar
2. A short list of overturned Supreme Court landmark decisions | Constitution Center
3. Trump administration touts deportations under Alien Enemies Act after a judge temporarily blocked its use
4. Ludecke v. Watkins, 335 U.S. 160 (1948)
5. Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)
6. https://www.npr.org/2025/03/18/nx-s1-5331857/alien-enemies-act-trump-deportations
7. https://www.justsecurity.org/109168/alien-enemies-act-litigation/
8. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/programs/constitution_day/landmark-cases/
9. https://www.forbes.com/sites/alison...ump-and-musk-are-winning-and-losing-in-court/

 

[jc456]

MAGA is now history, dude. Only idiots believe those Trump’s pets. lol.

The statement that the U.S. Supreme Court has previously ruled that deportations under the Alien Enemies Act are not subject to judicial review and that the Court cannot change its rulings is INCORRECT for several reasons:

Judicial Review: While the political question doctrine may limit judicial review in certain cases involving national security or political questions, it does not categorically bar review of executive actions under the Alien Enemies Act. The doctrine, as established in Baker v. Carr, allows for judicial intervention when there is an "obvious mistake" or a "manifestly unauthorized exercise of power" by the executive branch1.

Ability to Change Rulings: The Supreme Court can and has changed its previous rulings. This is evident from the numerous landmark cases where the Court has overturned its own precedents, such as Brown v. Board of Education (overturning Plessy v. Ferguson), Lawrence v. Texas (overturning Bowers v. Hardwick), and Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (overturning Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey)2. The principle of stare decisis encourages consistency but does not prevent the Court from revising its decisions when deemed necessary2.

Therefore, the Supreme Court retains the authority to review and potentially alter its stance on matters related to the Alien Enemies Act if it deems such actions are not in line with constitutional or legal standards.

Sources:
1. The Courts Can Stop Abuse of the Alien Enemies Act – the Political Question Doctrine is No Bar
2. A short list of overturned Supreme Court landmark decisions | Constitution Center
3. Trump administration touts deportations under Alien Enemies Act after a judge temporarily blocked its use
4. Ludecke v. Watkins, 335 U.S. 160 (1948)
5. Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)
6. https://www.npr.org/2025/03/18/nx-s1-5331857/alien-enemies-act-trump-deportations
7. https://www.justsecurity.org/109168/alien-enemies-act-litigation/
8. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/programs/constitution_day/landmark-cases/
9. https://www.forbes.com/sites/alison...ump-and-musk-are-winning-and-losing-in-court/

Keep trying, MAGA

 

[jc456]

Judges stopped Biden from paying off student debt.

Also gummed up Obama's plans.

This is the system we have.

Where was this thread then OP?

And he ignored it

 

[jc456]

MAGA is now history, dude. Only idiots believe those Trump’s pets. lol.

The statement that the U.S. Supreme Court has previously ruled that deportations under the Alien Enemies Act are not subject to judicial review and that the Court cannot change its rulings is INCORRECT for several reasons:

Judicial Review: While the political question doctrine may limit judicial review in certain cases involving national security or political questions, it does not categorically bar review of executive actions under the Alien Enemies Act. The doctrine, as established in Baker v. Carr, allows for judicial intervention when there is an "obvious mistake" or a "manifestly unauthorized exercise of power" by the executive branch1.

Ability to Change Rulings: The Supreme Court can and has changed its previous rulings. This is evident from the numerous landmark cases where the Court has overturned its own precedents, such as Brown v. Board of Education (overturning Plessy v. Ferguson), Lawrence v. Texas (overturning Bowers v. Hardwick), and Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (overturning Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey)2. The principle of stare decisis encourages consistency but does not prevent the Court from revising its decisions when deemed necessary2.

Therefore, the Supreme Court retains the authority to review and potentially alter its stance on matters related to the Alien Enemies Act if it deems such actions are not in line with constitutional or legal standards.

Sources:
1. The Courts Can Stop Abuse of the Alien Enemies Act – the Political Question Doctrine is No Bar
2. A short list of overturned Supreme Court landmark decisions | Constitution Center
3. Trump administration touts deportations under Alien Enemies Act after a judge temporarily blocked its use
4. Ludecke v. Watkins, 335 U.S. 160 (1948)
5. Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)
6. https://www.npr.org/2025/03/18/nx-s1-5331857/alien-enemies-act-trump-deportations
7. https://www.justsecurity.org/109168/alien-enemies-act-litigation/
8. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/programs/constitution_day/landmark-cases/
9. https://www.forbes.com/sites/alison...ump-and-musk-are-winning-and-losing-in-court/

This is what people losing say

 

[j-mac]

"or any invasion or predatory incursion is perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States by any foreign nation or government, "

So there are two conditions that can trigger AEA: Declared war and invasion by another government. Read the above portion very carefully and the description clearly applies to actions of foreign government.

A criminal organization is not a government.

[DISCLAIMER: The scum sucking turds can be thrown in an American jail and if a danger to society held without bond while they receive due process. If they (a) a criminal - have a trial, put them in prison, then deport them with their term is done. If they are (b) here illegally, then deport them immediately upon receiving a removal order from the court.)

WW

The key in what you posted is "or predatory incursion"....
Now, let's see the proclamation from the WH...

"TdA is closely aligned with, and indeed has infiltrated, the Maduro regime, including its military and law enforcement apparatus. TdA grew significantly while Tareck El Aissami served as governor of Aragua between 2012 and 2017. In 2017, El Aissami was appointed as Vice President of Venezuela. Soon thereafter, the United States Department of the Treasury designated El Aissami as a Specially Designated Narcotics Trafficker under the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act, 21 U.S.C. 1901 et seq. El Aissami is currently a United States fugitive facing charges arising from his violations of United States sanctions triggered by his Department of the Treasury designation.

Like El Aissami, Nicolas Maduro, who claims to act as Venezuela’s President and asserts control over the security forces and other authorities in Venezuela, also maintains close ties to regime-sponsored narco-terrorists. Maduro leads the regime-sponsored enterprise Cártel de los Soles, which coordinates with and relies on TdA and other organizations to carry out its objective of using illegal narcotics as a weapon to “flood” the United States. In 2020, Maduro and other regime members were charged with narcoterrorism and other crimes in connection with this plot against America."

Invocation of the Alien Enemies Act Regarding the Invasion of The United States by Tren De Aragua

BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A PROCLAMATION Tren de Aragua (TdA) is a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization with thousands of

www.whitehouse.gov

Deporting these criminals is totally legal. And Dems will be from here on out as the party that wanted Narco Terrorists from Venezuela here to extort, terrorize, rape, and kill Americans...

Period.