HenryBHough
Diamond Member
If Lady Bird had been just a little more like Moochelle I could accept that she financed a little promotion for her man.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
someone farted in here.^
btw agent troll NAZI "the biggest dumbfuck agent troll i have ever come across since you not only talk to yourself all the time at PF as well as here with me,but the fact your such a stupid **** you dont even try and hide your an evil agent being so transparent with your user name."
something i have noticed about you troll agents,is like all paid shills at PF,you go and whine to the mods all the time when you are exposed for the paid shill you are there.
thats something i have noticed that ALL paid shills such as yourself at PF do all the time,you childish crybabies always whine to the mods there all the time,whether its the JFK or 9/11 section.
Thats why i dont go there and feed you so you can troll like your handlers want you to since the mods there play favorites and side with the people that defend the governments version of events since that site is government controlled.
this site fortunately the mods dont play favorites and is not government controlled so i can tell the TRUTH about you here and watch you sling shit in defeat like the monkey troll you are.
as we BOTH know,your handlers pay you very well.no way would you constantly go back to the JFK section for your constant ass beatings you get there everyday like you have from so many people over the years there.you would NEVER do it for free.
this site is about the only one i know of that is not government controlled where the mods dont play favorites.
translation of paid shill soupnazis reply to my post," the dumbfuck paid shill who talks to himself and actually thinks i read his replies. which is proof he belongs in a nuthouse."
yeah you are right 9/11. I am a crybaby whining paid shill who whines to the mods all the time at that site cause like you said so very well, I am a crybaby shill and you are also correct that my handlers pay me very well for the constant ass beatings there at that site and are also correct that i would never come back for those ass beatings i get there everyday and have by over a hundred people over the years since i been there if I wasnt paid very well by my bosses to troll there.
you for sure hit the nail on the head,i need help the fact i talk to myself actually addressing your posts as though i believe you read my lies and bullshit.![]()



bullshit it's just your delusion that frame is so enlarged and slo moded that it is un readable tot any sane person . it's like a Rorschach test!I just identified the rear exit in frame 318 and matched it to Oliver Stone's copy of Zapruder. The entire hole can be seen in 313, in addition to disruption in frames 318-320.
http://i1312.photobucket.com/albums/t528/friscokid71/Screenshot 396_zpsi7o2pb5m.png~original
oh wait! I can see the virgin Mary in the bottom right of the frame!
The back of the head suffered a wound of exit. There's no doubt about that. How would a jackass like you interpret frame 313?
![]()
It shows a skull bursting open when hit by a bullet which is common.
Your silly interpretation is based on ignorance and is not fact or evidence which supports any of your claims.
The autopsy proves you wrong and you have yet to offer any evidence refuting it
hey hand job if we are all on ignore, why the **** do you answer?someone farted in here.^
btw agent troll NAZI "the biggest dumbfuck agent troll i have ever come across since you not only talk to yourself all the time at PF as well as here with me,but the fact your such a stupid **** you dont even try and hide your an evil agent being so transparent with your user name."
something i have noticed about you troll agents,is like all paid shills at PF,you go and whine to the mods all the time when you are exposed for the paid shill you are there.
thats something i have noticed that ALL paid shills such as yourself at PF do all the time,you childish crybabies always whine to the mods there all the time,whether its the JFK or 9/11 section.
Thats why i dont go there and feed you so you can troll like your handlers want you to since the mods there play favorites and side with the people that defend the governments version of events since that site is government controlled.
this site fortunately the mods dont play favorites and is not government controlled so i can tell the TRUTH about you here and watch you sling shit in defeat like the monkey troll you are.
as we BOTH know,your handlers pay you very well.no way would you constantly go back to the JFK section for your constant ass beatings you get there everyday like you have from so many people over the years there.you would NEVER do it for free.
this site is about the only one i know of that is not government controlled where the mods dont play favorites.
translation of paid shill soupnazis reply to my post," the dumbfuck paid shill who talks to himself and actually thinks i read his replies. which is proof he belongs in a nuthouse."
yeah you are right 9/11. I am a crybaby whining paid shill who whines to the mods all the time at that site cause like you said so very well, I am a crybaby shill and you are also correct that my handlers pay me very well for the constant ass beatings there at that site and are also correct that i would never come back for those ass beatings i get there everyday and have by over a hundred people over the years since i been there if I wasnt paid very well by my bosses to troll there.
you for sure hit the nail on the head,i need help the fact i talk to myself actually addressing your posts as though i believe you read my lies and bullshit.![]()
bahahahahahaha that's your imaginary case!bullshit it's just your delusion that frame is so enlarged and slo moded that it is un readable tot any sane person . it's like a Rorschach test!I just identified the rear exit in frame 318 and matched it to Oliver Stone's copy of Zapruder. The entire hole can be seen in 313, in addition to disruption in frames 318-320.
http://i1312.photobucket.com/albums/t528/friscokid71/Screenshot 396_zpsi7o2pb5m.png~original
oh wait! I can see the virgin Mary in the bottom right of the frame!
The back of the head suffered a wound of exit. There's no doubt about that. How would a jackass like you interpret frame 313?
![]()
It shows a skull bursting open when hit by a bullet which is common.
Your silly interpretation is based on ignorance and is not fact or evidence which supports any of your claims.
The autopsy proves you wrong and you have yet to offer any evidence refuting it
It's not common, but if your fake case had an exit in the right front it could work. Did jfk also have an exit wound on the right forehead?


bullshit it's just your delusion that frame is so enlarged and slo moded that it is un readable tot any sane person . it's like a Rorschach test!I just identified the rear exit in frame 318 and matched it to Oliver Stone's copy of Zapruder. The entire hole can be seen in 313, in addition to disruption in frames 318-320.
http://i1312.photobucket.com/albums/t528/friscokid71/Screenshot 396_zpsi7o2pb5m.png~original
oh wait! I can see the virgin Mary in the bottom right of the frame!
The back of the head suffered a wound of exit. There's no doubt about that. How would a jackass like you interpret frame 313?
![]()
It shows a skull bursting open when hit by a bullet which is common.
Your silly interpretation is based on ignorance and is not fact or evidence which supports any of your claims.
The autopsy proves you wrong and you have yet to offer any evidence refuting it
It's not common, but if your fake case had an exit in the right front it could work. Did jfk also have an exit wound on the right forehead?

bahahahahahaha that's your imaginary case!bullshit it's just your delusion that frame is so enlarged and slo moded that it is un readable tot any sane person . it's like a Rorschach test!I just identified the rear exit in frame 318 and matched it to Oliver Stone's copy of Zapruder. The entire hole can be seen in 313, in addition to disruption in frames 318-320.
http://i1312.photobucket.com/albums/t528/friscokid71/Screenshot 396_zpsi7o2pb5m.png~original
oh wait! I can see the virgin Mary in the bottom right of the frame!
The back of the head suffered a wound of exit. There's no doubt about that. How would a jackass like you interpret frame 313?
![]()
It shows a skull bursting open when hit by a bullet which is common.
Your silly interpretation is based on ignorance and is not fact or evidence which supports any of your claims.
The autopsy proves you wrong and you have yet to offer any evidence refuting it
It's not common, but if your fake case had an exit in the right front it could work. Did jfk also have an exit wound on the right forehead?
there is no exist wound in the back of jfk's skull .
all your make believe analysis and mental illness will not make it so.
a typo is the best you've got?.bahahahahahaha that's your imaginary case!bullshit it's just your delusion that frame is so enlarged and slo moded that it is un readable tot any sane person . it's like a Rorschach test!
oh wait! I can see the virgin Mary in the bottom right of the frame!
The back of the head suffered a wound of exit. There's no doubt about that. How would a jackass like you interpret frame 313?
![]()
It shows a skull bursting open when hit by a bullet which is common.
Your silly interpretation is based on ignorance and is not fact or evidence which supports any of your claims.
The autopsy proves you wrong and you have yet to offer any evidence refuting it
It's not common, but if your fake case had an exit in the right front it could work. Did jfk also have an exit wound on the right forehead?
there is no exist wound in the back of jfk's skull .
all your make believe analysis and mental illness will not make it so.
bahahahahahaha that's your imaginary case!
there is no exit wound in the front of jfk's skull .
all your make believe analysis and mental illness will not make it so. YOU CAN'T EVEN SPELL EXIT CORRECTLY. Keep suckin' on shit.
bullshit it's just your delusion that frame is so enlarged and slo moded that it is un readable tot any sane person . it's like a Rorschach test!I just identified the rear exit in frame 318 and matched it to Oliver Stone's copy of Zapruder. The entire hole can be seen in 313, in addition to disruption in frames 318-320.
http://i1312.photobucket.com/albums/t528/friscokid71/Screenshot 396_zpsi7o2pb5m.png~original
oh wait! I can see the virgin Mary in the bottom right of the frame!
The back of the head suffered a wound of exit. There's no doubt about that. How would a jackass like you interpret frame 313?
![]()
It shows a skull bursting open when hit by a bullet which is common.
Your silly interpretation is based on ignorance and is not fact or evidence which supports any of your claims.
The autopsy proves you wrong and you have yet to offer any evidence refuting it
It's not common, but if your fake case had an exit in the right front it could work. Did jfk also have an exit wound on the right forehead?
bullshit it's just your delusion that frame is so enlarged and slo moded that it is un readable tot any sane person . it's like a Rorschach test!I just identified the rear exit in frame 318 and matched it to Oliver Stone's copy of Zapruder. The entire hole can be seen in 313, in addition to disruption in frames 318-320.
http://i1312.photobucket.com/albums/t528/friscokid71/Screenshot 396_zpsi7o2pb5m.png~original
oh wait! I can see the virgin Mary in the bottom right of the frame!
The back of the head suffered a wound of exit. There's no doubt about that. How would a jackass like you interpret frame 313?
![]()
It shows a skull bursting open when hit by a bullet which is common.
Your silly interpretation is based on ignorance and is not fact or evidence which supports any of your claims.
The autopsy proves you wrong and you have yet to offer any evidence refuting it
It's not common, but if your fake case had an exit in the right front it could work. Did jfk also have an exit wound on the right forehead?
Wrong.
It is not my case it is what the evidence proves.
No exit wound is the front is needed.
It entered at an odd angle but from behind and above.
You have spent years failing to refute that fact

a typo is the best you've got?.bahahahahahaha that's your imaginary case!
It shows a skull bursting open when hit by a bullet which is common.
Your silly interpretation is based on ignorance and is not fact or evidence which supports any of your claims.
The autopsy proves you wrong and you have yet to offer any evidence refuting it
It's not common, but if your fake case had an exit in the right front it could work. Did jfk also have an exit wound on the right forehead?
there is no exist wound in the back of jfk's skull .
all your make believe analysis and mental illness will not make it so.
bahahahahahaha that's your imaginary case!
there is no exit wound in the front of jfk's skull .
all your make believe analysis and mental illness will not make it so. YOU CAN'T EVEN SPELL EXIT CORRECTLY. Keep suckin' on shit.
you don't even mock well
bullshit it's just your delusion that frame is so enlarged and slo moded that it is un readable tot any sane person . it's like a Rorschach test!I just identified the rear exit in frame 318 and matched it to Oliver Stone's copy of Zapruder. The entire hole can be seen in 313, in addition to disruption in frames 318-320.
http://i1312.photobucket.com/albums/t528/friscokid71/Screenshot 396_zpsi7o2pb5m.png~original
oh wait! I can see the virgin Mary in the bottom right of the frame!
The back of the head suffered a wound of exit. There's no doubt about that. How would a jackass like you interpret frame 313?
![]()
It shows a skull bursting open when hit by a bullet which is common.
Your silly interpretation is based on ignorance and is not fact or evidence which supports any of your claims.
The autopsy proves you wrong and you have yet to offer any evidence refuting it
It's not common, but if your fake case had an exit in the right front it could work. Did jfk also have an exit wound on the right forehead?
dude-![]()
bullshit it's just your delusion that frame is so enlarged and slo moded that it is un readable tot any sane person . it's like a Rorschach test!
oh wait! I can see the virgin Mary in the bottom right of the frame!
The back of the head suffered a wound of exit. There's no doubt about that. How would a jackass like you interpret frame 313?
![]()
It shows a skull bursting open when hit by a bullet which is common.
Your silly interpretation is based on ignorance and is not fact or evidence which supports any of your claims.
The autopsy proves you wrong and you have yet to offer any evidence refuting it
It's not common, but if your fake case had an exit in the right front it could work. Did jfk also have an exit wound on the right forehead?
Wrong.
It is not my case it is what the evidence proves.
No exit wound is the front is needed.
It entered at an odd angle but from behind and above.
You have spent years failing to refute that fact
It did not enter at an odd angle you deluded kook. It is your fake case to prove. You are the dumbest joke going. There was a fake exit wound in the right front according to some Zframes and the skull x-rays.
![]()
dude-bullshit it's just your delusion that frame is so enlarged and slo moded that it is un readable tot any sane person . it's like a Rorschach test!
oh wait! I can see the virgin Mary in the bottom right of the frame!
The back of the head suffered a wound of exit. There's no doubt about that. How would a jackass like you interpret frame 313?
![]()
It shows a skull bursting open when hit by a bullet which is common.
Your silly interpretation is based on ignorance and is not fact or evidence which supports any of your claims.
The autopsy proves you wrong and you have yet to offer any evidence refuting it
It's not common, but if your fake case had an exit in the right front it could work. Did jfk also have an exit wound on the right forehead?![]()
It shows a skull bursting open when hit by a bullet which is common.
Your silly interpretation is based on ignorance and is not fact or evidence which supports any of your claims.
The autopsy proves you wrong and you have yet to offer any evidence refuting it
It's not common, but if your fake case had an exit in the right front it could work. Did jfk also have an exit wound on the right forehead?
Wrong.
It is not my case it is what the evidence proves.
No exit wound is the front is needed.
It entered at an odd angle but from behind and above.
You have spent years failing to refute that fact
It did not enter at an odd angle you deluded kook. It is your fake case to prove. You are the dumbest joke going. There was a fake exit wound in the right front according to some Zframes and the skull x-rays.
![]()
There is no exit wound fake or otherwise in the front seen in any of these photographs and yes it did enter and exit at an odd angle from above and slightly from the left,
It is you who is proven to be deluded.
Not one image or piece of evidence proves a rear entrance wound which you keep claiming

Overwhelming evidence proves the entrance wound was in the back.dude-
It shows a skull bursting open when hit by a bullet which is common.
Your silly interpretation is based on ignorance and is not fact or evidence which supports any of your claims.
The autopsy proves you wrong and you have yet to offer any evidence refuting it
It's not common, but if your fake case had an exit in the right front it could work. Did jfk also have an exit wound on the right forehead?
It shows a skull bursting open when hit by a bullet which is common.
Your silly interpretation is based on ignorance and is not fact or evidence which supports any of your claims.
The autopsy proves you wrong and you have yet to offer any evidence refuting it
It's not common, but if your fake case had an exit in the right front it could work. Did jfk also have an exit wound on the right forehead?
Wrong.
It is not my case it is what the evidence proves.
No exit wound is the front is needed.
It entered at an odd angle but from behind and above.
You have spent years failing to refute that fact
It did not enter at an odd angle you deluded kook. It is your fake case to prove. You are the dumbest joke going. There was a fake exit wound in the right front according to some Zframes and the skull x-rays.
![]()
There is no exit wound fake or otherwise in the front seen in any of these photographs and yes it did enter and exit at an odd angle from above and slightly from the left,
It is you who is proven to be deluded.
Not one image or piece of evidence proves a rear entrance wound which you keep claiming
Not one image or piece of evidence proves a rear entrance wound which you and those fake doctors keep claiming. We agree on this simple fact, you epic schmuck.
![]()
Overwhelming evidence proves the entrance wound was in the back.dude-It shows a skull bursting open when hit by a bullet which is common.
Your silly interpretation is based on ignorance and is not fact or evidence which supports any of your claims.
The autopsy proves you wrong and you have yet to offer any evidence refuting it
It's not common, but if your fake case had an exit in the right front it could work. Did jfk also have an exit wound on the right forehead?
It's not common, but if your fake case had an exit in the right front it could work. Did jfk also have an exit wound on the right forehead?
Wrong.
It is not my case it is what the evidence proves.
No exit wound is the front is needed.
It entered at an odd angle but from behind and above.
You have spent years failing to refute that fact
It did not enter at an odd angle you deluded kook. It is your fake case to prove. You are the dumbest joke going. There was a fake exit wound in the right front according to some Zframes and the skull x-rays.
![]()
There is no exit wound fake or otherwise in the front seen in any of these photographs and yes it did enter and exit at an odd angle from above and slightly from the left,
It is you who is proven to be deluded.
Not one image or piece of evidence proves a rear entrance wound which you keep claiming
Not one image or piece of evidence proves a rear entrance wound which you and those fake doctors keep claiming. We agree on this simple fact, you epic schmuck.
![]()

Overwhelming evidence proves the entrance wound was in the back.dude-It's not common, but if your fake case had an exit in the right front it could work. Did jfk also have an exit wound on the right forehead?
Wrong.
It is not my case it is what the evidence proves.
No exit wound is the front is needed.
It entered at an odd angle but from behind and above.
You have spent years failing to refute that fact
It did not enter at an odd angle you deluded kook. It is your fake case to prove. You are the dumbest joke going. There was a fake exit wound in the right front according to some Zframes and the skull x-rays.
![]()
There is no exit wound fake or otherwise in the front seen in any of these photographs and yes it did enter and exit at an odd angle from above and slightly from the left,
It is you who is proven to be deluded.
Not one image or piece of evidence proves a rear entrance wound which you keep claiming
Not one image or piece of evidence proves a rear entrance wound which you and those fake doctors keep claiming. We agree on this simple fact, you epic schmuck.
![]()
You just agreed that no evidence of such a wound existed and I totally agree with you, nutzie.
![]()
dude-bullshit it's just your delusion that frame is so enlarged and slo moded that it is un readable tot any sane person . it's like a Rorschach test!
oh wait! I can see the virgin Mary in the bottom right of the frame!
The back of the head suffered a wound of exit. There's no doubt about that. How would a jackass like you interpret frame 313?
![]()
It shows a skull bursting open when hit by a bullet which is common.
Your silly interpretation is based on ignorance and is not fact or evidence which supports any of your claims.
The autopsy proves you wrong and you have yet to offer any evidence refuting it
It's not common, but if your fake case had an exit in the right front it could work. Did jfk also have an exit wound on the right forehead?![]()
It shows a skull bursting open when hit by a bullet which is common.
Your silly interpretation is based on ignorance and is not fact or evidence which supports any of your claims.
The autopsy proves you wrong and you have yet to offer any evidence refuting it
It's not common, but if your fake case had an exit in the right front it could work. Did jfk also have an exit wound on the right forehead?
Wrong.
It is not my case it is what the evidence proves.
No exit wound is the front is needed.
It entered at an odd angle but from behind and above.
You have spent years failing to refute that fact
It did not enter at an odd angle you deluded kook. It is your fake case to prove. You are the dumbest joke going. There was a fake exit wound in the right front according to some Zframes and the skull x-rays.
![]()
There is no exit wound fake or otherwise in the front seen in any of these photographs and yes it did enter and exit at an odd angle from above and slightly from the left,
It is you who is proven to be deluded.
Not one image or piece of evidence proves a rear entrance wound which you keep claiming
GPC['ajax']))">He gets shit on his face EVERYDAY at PF and like the coward crybaby he is,he whines to the mods there all the time like the chickenshit coward he is.I never go to the mods there at that site but he always loses the debate there and whines to the mods there all the time as a result.lol.a typo is the best you've got?.bahahahahahaha that's your imaginary case!It shows a skull bursting open when hit by a bullet which is common.
Your silly interpretation is based on ignorance and is not fact or evidence which supports any of your claims.
The autopsy proves you wrong and you have yet to offer any evidence refuting it
It's not common, but if your fake case had an exit in the right front it could work. Did jfk also have an exit wound on the right forehead?
there is no exist wound in the back of jfk's skull .
all your make believe analysis and mental illness will not make it so.
bahahahahahaha that's your imaginary case!
there is no exit wound in the front of jfk's skull .
all your make believe analysis and mental illness will not make it so. YOU CAN'T EVEN SPELL EXIT CORRECTLY. Keep suckin' on shit.
you don't even mock well
I got the facts, *****. You got shit on your face. Was Clint Hill wrong about seeing the hole on the right rear?
Testimony Of Clinton J. Hill, Special Agent, Secret Service
The closest witnesses saw the right rear exit as does every person viewing in it frame 313.
Clint Hill saw the rear exit, skull detach and heard Greer's revolver.
Mr. HILL. This is the first sound that I heard; yes, sir. I jumped from the car, realizing that something was wrong, ran to the Presidential limousine. Just about as I reached it, there was another sound, which was different than the first sound. I think I described it in my statement as though someone was shooting a revolver into a hard object--it seemed to have some type of an echo. I put my right foot, I believe it was, on the left rear step of the automobile, and I had a hold of the handgrip with my hand, when the car lurched forward. I lost my footing and I had to run about three or four more steps before I could get back up in the car.
Between the time I originally grabbed the handhold and until I was up on the car, Mrs. Kennedy--the second noise that I heard had removed a portion of the President's head, and he had slumped noticeably to his left. Mrs. Kennedy had jumped up from the seat and was, it appeared to me, reaching for something coming off the right rear bumper of the car, the right rear tail, when she noticed that I was trying to climb on the car. She turned toward me and I grabbed her and put her back in the back seat, crawled up on top of the back seat and lay there.
Mr. SPECTER. You say that it appeared that she was reaching as if something was coming over to the rear portion of the car, back in the area where you were coming to?
Mr. HILL. Yes, sir.
Mr. SPECTER. Was there anything back there that you observed, that she might have been reaching for?
Mr. HILL. I thought I saw something come off the back, too, but I cannot say that there was. I do know that the next day we found the portion of the President's head.
Mr. SPECTER. Where did you find that portion of the President's head?
Mr. HILL. It was found in the street. It was turned in, I believe, by a medical student or somebody in Dallas.
Mr. SPECTER. What did you observe as to President Kennedy's condition on arrival at the hospital?
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.
Mr. SPECTER. I believe you testified as to the impression you had as to the source of the first shot. To be sure that the record is complete, what was your reaction as to where the first shot came from, Mr. Hill?
Mr. HILL. Right rear.
Mr. SPECTER. And did you have a reaction or impression as to the source of point of origin of the second shot that you described?
Mr. HILL. It was right, but I cannot say for sure that it was rear, because when I mounted the car it was--it had a different sound, first of all, than the first sound that I heard. The second one had almost a double sound--as though you were standing against something metal and firing into it, and you hear both the sound of a gun going off and the sound of the cartridge hitting the metal place, which could have been caused probably by the hard surface of the head. But I am not sure that that is what caused it.
Mr. SPECTER. Are you describing this double sound with respect to what you heard on the occasion of the second shot?
Mr. HILL. The second shot that I heard; yes, sir.
Mr. SPECTER. Now, do you now or have you ever had the impression or reaction that there was a shot which originated from the front of the Presidential car?
Mr. HILL. No.
