The Joe Rogan interview of Trump is nearing 40 MILLION VIEWS.

And it sounds like you don't listen to Rogan very much.

View attachment 1034386


"On an episode of the Joe Rogan Experience this week, Rogan told New York Times columnist Bari Weiss that he was going to vote for Bernie Sanders. Rogan has always had nice things to say about Sanders, and in the summer he had him on his show to talk about his campaign, the evils of the health insurance industry and the need for a political revolution against the power of big money. That interview has over 11 million views on YouTube. . . . "

Bernie Sanders Responds to Criticism of his Socialist Policies | Joe Rogan​


Trump Lashes Out At Joe Rogan For Backing RFK Jr.​


View attachment 1034394

I just listened to the entire interview. There is not one thing in the interview that Rogan states that show Rogan is a liberal that supports Sanders or Kamala.

You have zero idea who Joe Rogan is and have never spent anytime to learn.

You are either ignorant or have low IQ, which is it. Answer my question.
 
CNN is the modern equivalent of, Godwin's Law.

You lose all credibility and your argument when you cite CNN as your source.
CNN has no credibility

They tried to claim xiden never put harris in charge of the border it’s pathetic
 
Just shy of 42 million.

I think her Shannon Sharpe pod hit 1 million.

Interesting, she flew to all the other pods she has done and did it in their studio, but she would not with Joe Rogan.

SHE CANNOT SIT FOR 3 HOURS AND WORD SALAD AND FILIBUSTER.
 
Most of Joe Rogan's views are from men which Kamala's campaign knows full well. But Kamala was not capable of sitting down with Joe like a normal person in his studio so they demanded he COME TO HER, and limit the interview to one hour. What a disaster as a Presidential candidate clearly the WORST in modern history.

I'd like to see it but I don't even watch three hour movies.
 
You do not listen to Joe Rogan. Name one podcast of his, with the time of his comment that supports your opinion.

I listen to Rogan, pure conservative.
Support of gay marriage and lots of recreational drug use don't seem like very conservative positions to me.
 
I read what you posted which showed you did not listen to the Trump Rogan interview, or any Trump interview.

You have a right to, not listen and educate yourself and thus be wrong. It is your right.
Okay I'll bite. What in my post makes you think I didn't listen to the Trump Rogan interview? Just curious.

Meanwhile it might be useful to you and others to know what Joe Rogan thinks of himself and how his political perspective has changed over time.

 
Last edited:
Obama dropped the ball not going on Rogan. That would've been an easy layup for him. Joe's repeatedly called him the best President of his lifetime, would've been his favorite guest ever.
 
Support of gay marriage and lots of recreational drug use don't seem like very conservative positions to me.
Like I said, you don't listen to Rogan. Trying to state two issues are only democrat issues is pure bigotry and a very low IQ response.

How about violence, fighting, Rogan not only supports violence but fights. That is not a Democrat position. Rogan is not liberal.

Hunting and gun ownership, another conservative position Rogan supports. Again Rogan is not a liberal.

Rogan fled California for Texas. Rogan is not a Democrat.

There, by your rule dumbmahummed, my 3 issues TRUMP your measly 2 issues.

How about illegal immigration, Rogan is against. 4 issues to 2. Rogan is not a liberal.
 
Like I said, you don't listen to Rogan. Trying to state two issues are only democrat issues is pure bigotry and a very low IQ response.

How about violence, fighting, Rogan not only supports violence but fights. That is not a Democrat position. Rogan is not liberal.

Hunting and gun ownership, another conservative position Rogan supports. Again Rogan is not a liberal.

Rogan fled California for Texas. Rogan is not a Democrat.

There, by your rule dumbmahummed, my 3 issues TRUMP your measly 2 issues.

How about illegal immigration, Rogan is against. 4 issues to 2. Rogan is not a liberal.
You are full of shit, moron. You are stupidly confusing Democrats with liberals.

The Democratic party is extremely authoritarian, it is not liberal.

Banning guns is not a liberal position. It is a fascist authoritarian position. Liberals respect basic civil rights such as the right to keep and bear arms and self defense.

BTW, IQ=158. Your IQ is about average. Your IQ isn't within 50 points of mine. You are like a subhuman monkey to me.
 
Support of gay marriage and lots of recreational drug use don't seem like very conservative positions to me.
You go
I would imagine it would have a very large audience if he did. But successful podcasters (as do successful radio talk show hosts) need to be crystal clear and uncomplicated in their narratives and express complete thoughts. I don't know that Trump possesses that particular skill.

Trump tends to take more for granted that those listening know something about the subject he is talking about and his very active mind is often racing ahead of his words so he often speaks in half sentences and incomplete phrases as he is pushing forward to the next point. That works for him in most interviews and exchanges of thoughts/ideas, but not sure how effective it would be in a podcast.
What you wrote here shows you either did not listen or did not actively listen to see how Trump weaves an intricate detailed explanation of the events he describes.

You don't know, according to your words, if Trump possess a particular skill that you described? If you had listened, meaning listened without being distracted you would not be indecisive on if Trump possesses that particular skill.

This why I say you did not listen, and now I say if you did listen, at the least you were distracted.

There is so much that Trump wants to say on one particular topic. So many different aspects to that one issue. Trump expertly weaves the story, bringing together the many elements.

At the beginning of the interview it frustrated Rogan. Rogan was looking for a specific answer. Trump felt before giving the answer that he had to explain the people and problems he faced so that we could understand Trump's state on mind.

Everything Trump replied with, explained, may not of seemed like a direct answer but it was all related and something Trump was never allowed to tell people in an interview.

It was intriguing to here these nuanced details explained.
 
You go

What you wrote here shows you either did not listen or did not actively listen to see how Trump weaves an intricate detailed explanation of the events he describes.

You don't know, according to your words, if Trump possess a particular skill that you described? If you had listened, meaning listened without being distracted you would not be indecisive on if Trump possesses that particular skill.

This why I say you did not listen, and now I say if you did listen, at the least you were distracted.

There is so much that Trump wants to say on one particular topic. So many different aspects to that one issue. Trump expertly weaves the story, bringing together the many elements.

At the beginning of the interview it frustrated Rogan. Rogan was looking for a specific answer. Trump felt before giving the answer that he had to explain the people and problems he faced so that we could understand Trump's state on mind.

Everything Trump replied with, explained, may not of seemed like a direct answer but it was all related and something Trump was never allowed to tell people in an interview.

It was intriguing to here these nuanced details explained.
He does know what he is talking about the vast majority of the time and yes, he usually gets all the information necessary into the narrative when given time and opportunity to do so. That does not change the fact that he has a particular speaking style and, when speaking extemporaneously, that style generally includes a lot of unfinished sentences, and incompletely fleshed out thoughts in those sentences.

Compare the way he expresses himself with the way say J.D. Vance expresses himself. Different as night and day. Trump is more entertaining and gets more variety into his comments. But JD is a master at fully fleshing out and supporting the comments he makes and he does so eloquently.

Trump is compelling and for the most part spot on accurate in what he says but I wouldn't rate his speaking style as eloquent. He sometimes repeats things he hears as fact without any qualification and that occasionally gets him into trouble--Haitians eating cats in Springfield for one example--but those occasions are pretty rare considering how much time he is speaking or writing to the public. His content is more often spot on.

I have not criticized Trump's content. But I stand by my observations of his speaking style. His speaking style works great at rallies. But while he does and did get it done in a lengthy interview with Rogan, I still don't think his extemporaneous speaking style would work well as a radio talk show host or in a regular podcast. That in no way disqualifies him from being a great leader, a great President.

Perhaps we can agree to disagree on that?
 
Last edited:
He didn't.

Republicans call Harris a failed border czar. The facts tell a different story.​

I know you all want to try and rewrite history....but

Biden taps VP Harris to lead response to border challenges​







 
You are welcome to refute any factual claim CNN made. Please proceed.
It’s not on my to do list. Both Harris and Trump are politicians and they’ll tell wrong numbers and talking points that aren’t true. The difference is, CNN doesn’t check Biden, Harris, etc.. and they often use their opinion in a “fact check” on Trump.

They aren’t honest, so I don’t really care what they have to say
 

Forum List

Back
Top