The insurrection in New Jersey at the ICE detention center

[WEATHER53]

Yea, it is called the U.S. Constitution

For US citizens

 

[Meathead]

Why doesnt the Trump administration allow an independent inspection of its ICE Detention facilities ?

Independent politicians?

 

[Failzero]

NJ Congress members are being denied access

But many other NJ officials & Dignitaries got to tour

 

[jacksonlamb]

There are qualifications for receiving the benefits of due process

Yeah, be subject to the jurisdiction of the US. Hint: we all are except diplomats.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Yeah, be subject to the jurisdiction of the US. Hint: we all are except diplomats.

Are illegal immigrant entitled to due process?

Yes — unauthorized immigrants are entitled to due process in the United States. This is one of the clearest and most consistently upheld principles in American constitutional law.

Here’s the short, solid answer:

​

The Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment protect “persons” — not just citizens.Courts have repeatedly held that any person on U.S. soil, regardless of immigration status, has due‑process rights.

This includes:

• The right to a hearing before being deported (with specific exceptions)
• The right to challenge detention
• The right to counsel (though not at government expense)
• The right to be free from arbitrary imprisonment
• The right to humane treatment under the Constitution

​

These rulings make the principle unmistakable:

Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886)​

The Court held that constitutional protections apply to “all persons within the territory of the United States.”

Wong Wing v. United States (1896)​

Unauthorized immigrants cannot be punished with imprisonment or hard labor without due process.

Zadvydas v. Davis (2001)​

The government cannot detain immigrants indefinitely; detention must be reasonable and reviewable.

Plyler v. Doe (1982)​

Even undocumented children have equal‑protection rights and cannot be denied public education.

​

Immigration law is civil, not criminal, so the process is different — but still required:

• Notice of charges
• Opportunity to appear before an immigration judge
• Ability to present evidence
• Ability to appeal
• Protection from arbitrary detention
• Access to interpreters
• Protection from torture or persecution (asylum rights)

There are limited exceptions, such as expedited removal near the border, but even those require:

• Screening for credible fear
• Review by an asylum officer
• Judicial review in certain circumstances

Constitutional Provisions​

• U.S. Const. amend. V.
• U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1.

Supreme Court Cases (APA Style)​

• Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886).
• Wong Wing v. United States, 163 U.S. 228 (1896).
• Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982).
• Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001).

Statutes and Regulations (APA Style)​

• 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1)(A)(ii).
• 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a).
• 8 U.S.C. § 1229a.
• 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3).
• 8 U.S.C. § 1252.
• 8 U.S.C. § 1362.
• 8 C.F.R. §§ 208.16–208.18.
• 8 C.F.R. § 208.30.

 

[rightwinger]

It’s not a daily dog and pony show around for lib loons . They have no “inspection” authority

Who does?
Trump officials?

 

[TimFitz]

Have the Furries come out to join the protests yet?

That's a weird intersectionality. I want to meet the people who like to have sex while dressed as giant foxes and rabbits and ask them how that aligns with marching to let anyone walk into the country at will and never ever deporting them.

I bet that's an interesting story.

One that plays in your warped imagination, no doubt!

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

OK
Then who, outside of the Trump administration has authorization?

The Officials from the Countries They Invaded from Should Demand That We Give Them Their Citizens Back

Otherwise, they approve of the invasion and should be punished accordingly.

 

[22lcidw]

One that plays in your warped imagination, no doubt!

We will continue to work with you to destroy the United States. Well done. The greatness about this is, is that we have to many people who still think that we live in a mano mano world when we live in a terrorist world now. The ignorant who screwed with people in the mano mano way, opened up a hornet's nest in the terrorist results. And it will get worse and worse.

 

[Eman623]

One that plays in your warped imagination, no doubt!

Even I'm not warped enough to imagine this:

 

[jacksonlamb]

We will continue to work with you to destroy the United States. Well done. The greatness about this is, is that we have to many people who still think that we live in a mano mano world when we live in a terrorist world now. The ignorant who screwed with people in the mano mano way, opened up a hornet's nest in the terrorist results. And it will get worse and worse.

You got us now!

 

[WEATHER53]

Yeah, be subject to the jurisdiction of the US. Hint: we all are except diplomats.

Illegals do not qualify for due process benefit but do have to be treated humanely .

 

[jacksonlamb]

Illegals do not qualify for due process benefit but do have to be treated humanely .

Actually, they do. You will not be able to quote any law that bars them from due process.

 

[WEATHER53]

Are illegal immigrant entitled to due process?

Yes — unauthorized immigrants are entitled to due process in the United States. This is one of the clearest and most consistently upheld principles in American constitutional law.

Here’s the short, solid answer:

​

The Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment protect “persons” — not just citizens.Courts have repeatedly held that any person on U.S. soil, regardless of immigration status, has due‑process rights.

This includes:

• The right to a hearing before being deported (with specific exceptions)
• The right to challenge detention
• The right to counsel (though not at government expense)
• The right to be free from arbitrary imprisonment
• The right to humane treatment under the Constitution

​

These rulings make the principle unmistakable:

Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886)​

The Court held that constitutional protections apply to “all persons within the territory of the United States.”

Wong Wing v. United States (1896)​

Unauthorized immigrants cannot be punished with imprisonment or hard labor without due process.

Zadvydas v. Davis (2001)​

The government cannot detain immigrants indefinitely; detention must be reasonable and reviewable.

Plyler v. Doe (1982)​

Even undocumented children have equal‑protection rights and cannot be denied public education.

​

Immigration law is civil, not criminal, so the process is different — but still required:

• Notice of charges
• Opportunity to appear before an immigration judge
• Ability to present evidence
• Ability to appeal
• Protection from arbitrary detention
• Access to interpreters
• Protection from torture or persecution (asylum rights)

There are limited exceptions, such as expedited removal near the border, but even those require:

• Screening for credible fear
• Review by an asylum officer
• Judicial review in certain circumstances

Constitutional Provisions​

• U.S. Const. amend. V.
• U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1.

Supreme Court Cases (APA Style)​

• Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886).
• Wong Wing v. United States, 163 U.S. 228 (1896).
• Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982).
• Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001).

Statutes and Regulations (APA Style)​

• 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1)(A)(ii).
• 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a).
• 8 U.S.C. § 1229a.
• 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3).
• 8 U.S.C. § 1252.
• 8 U.S.C. § 1362.
• 8 C.F.R. §§ 208.16–208.18.
• 8 C.F.R. § 208.30.

They do not have to be Mirandaized

 

[WEATHER53]

Actually, they do. You will not be able to quote any law that bars them from due process.

I cant find one that says they lawfully must be due processed identical to a US citizen.

 

[jacksonlamb]

They do not have to be Mirandaized

They get due process.

 

[struth]

The trials were just and fair. The pardons were not.

The American people disagreed with you

Trump openly campaigned on pardoning folks victimized by the Demafasict weaponization and abuse of power

He won, overwhelmingly

 

[struth]

Why doesnt the Trump administration allow an independent inspection of its ICE Detention facilities ?

Independent from what?

Why didn’t the xiden admin?

 

[Lockback]

The Color Revolution will be well funded

"You can say that again. This is costing me millions. But it's worth it if it pays off in America being destroyed."

 

[WEATHER53]

"You can say that again. This is costing me millions. But it's worth it if it pays off in America being destroyed."

Arrestable threat