The History of The GOP Since 1980....In One Paragraph.....

[The5thHorseman]

Nice site, notice the sharp uptick after 2020 here?

That uptick is double the angle.

Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items Less Food and Energy in U.S. City Average

Graph and download economic data for Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items Less Food and Energy in U.S. City Average (CPILFESL) from Jan 1957 to Sep 2024 about core, headline figure, all items, urban, consumer, CPI, inflation, price index, indexes, price, and USA.

fred.stlouisfed.org

This looks to be about right, too.

The sticky price consumer price index | FRED Blog

fredblog.stlouisfed.org

Duke,

Shut up and do the math.

 

[The Duke]

Duke,

Shut up and do the math.

Don't tell me what to do, boy. You do not have that right.

You can go jump off a table headfirst again, though.

 

[Couchpotato]

Couchpotato

Toddsterpatriot

The Duke

?

Which specific POLICY caused this to happen?

 

[The5thHorseman]

Don't tell me what to do, boy. You do not have that right.

You can go jump off a table headfirst again, though.

Then take your beating and run along.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Which specific POLICY caused this to happen?

First do the math.

Then we'll have something to discuss.

 

[Couchpotato]

First do the math.

Then we'll have something to discuss.

Nope if you want to discuss policy the math doesnt matter. Is this the deficit reduction? Or the unemployment numbers? Deficit went down and unemployment went down pandemic to post pandemic. I havent disputed that. Which policy that was enacted caused it. This should be a layup.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Nope if you want to discuss policy the math doesnt matter. Is this the deficit reduction? Or the unemployment numbers? Deficit went down and unemployment went down pandemic to post pandemic. I havent disputed that. Which policy that was enacted caused it. This should be a layup.

Not this again.

The effectiveness of policy is measured in outcomes.

You've never bothered to establish what they are.

So we are going to look at RESULTS.

Then you can go ahead and explain why, in theory, the facts are just being contrary.

 

[Couchpotato]

Not this again.

The effectiveness of policy is measured in outcomes.

You've never bothered to establish what they are.

So we are going to look at RESULTS.

Then you can go ahead and explain why, in theory, the facts are just being contrary.

WHICH POLICY? WHICH ONE? You're posting outcomes without posting the policy you think made them happen. 8 pages and you havent listed a single policy. Not one.

 

[The5thHorseman]

WHICH POLICY? WHICH ONE? You're posting outcomes without posting the policy you think made them happen. 8 pages and you havent listed a single policy. Not one.

First let's agree on what is objectively true.

Then we can discuss what may have made it happen.

 

[Couchpotato]

First let's agree on what is objectively true.

Then we can discuss what may have made it happen.

The only thing that’s objectively true so far is you have little interest in discussing policy and want to play stupid games.

Post a policy and the results you think it brought about or fuck off.

 

[The5thHorseman]

The only thing that’s objectively true so far is you have little interest in discussing policy and want to play stupid games.

Post a policy and the results you think it brought about or fuck off.

No...

What is clear to this point is that you are ignorant of the facts, and want to have a theoretical discussion of "policies".

One I very much doubt you are capable of engaging in.

But you SHOULD be capable of some arithmetic.

 

[Couchpotato]

No...

What is clear to this point is that you are ignorant of the facts, and want to engage in a theoretical discussion of "policies".

One I very much doubt you are capable of engaging in.

But you SHOULD be capable of some arithmetic.

Thank you for proving my point. You’re dismissed.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Thank you for proving my point. You’re dismissed.

Thank you...

Be sure to hang around for the numbers you've never seen.

 

[Couchpotato]

Thank you...

Be sure to hang around for the numbers you've never seen.

You’re the guy who bitched that noone would discuss policy and are now refusing to discuss policy………

 

[The5thHorseman]

Couchpotato

Toddsterpatriot

The Duke

?

Growing weary of the wait.....

All Employees, Total Private

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Release: Employment Situation



Units: Thousands of Persons, Seasonally Adjusted


Frequency: Monthly


The series comes from the 'Current Employment Statistics (Establishment Survey).'



2/89 - 89,615


2/93 - 91,142

2/01 - 111,879

2/09 - 110,735

2/17 - 123,519

2/21 - 121, 751

6/23 - 133,494



Bush I - 1,527

Clinton - 20,737

Bush II - (1,144)

Obama - 22,784


Trump - (1,768)

Biden - 11,743


Since 1989, Private Industries have added a total of 43,879,000 jobs.

Of that total, 3 GOP administrations have contributed (1,385) million.

Couchpotato

Over to you.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Don't, for even a second, think that the misery ends with employment....

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Because one number is unambiguously smaller than the other.

It sure is.

How did he do it?

You must know, so why are you afraid to share? LOL!

 

[The5thHorseman]

It sure is.

How did he do it?

You must know, so why are you afraid to share? LOL!

By requesting less money.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

By requesting less money.

Sounds so simple.

For which areas did he request less money?

 

[The5thHorseman]

Sounds so simple.

For which areas did he request less money?

Doesn't matter.