Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’ve written you off as being an idiot shortly after joining this board. Just saying.I don't know the exact law of the FBI attempting to interfere in the national election of the President. What was that treason statute number again?Little room for doubt. Prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law and make them an example for all to see.
Was Lynch coordinating with Comey in the Clinton investigation?
Prosecute them for what law?
Title and Chapter, please.
Unless you're full of shit, of course.
There is no "treason" statute. Treason is defined in the Constitution, not in the Code.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
[Emphasis mine]
Once again you are posting like an idiot, so there is no law against this , so I can do it and get away with it.
I'm having a hard time following your argument.
Yes, when something is not against the law, you can do it and "get away with it".
I don't know the exact law of the FBI attempting to interfere in the national election of the President. What was that treason statute number again?Little room for doubt. Prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law and make them an example for all to see.
Was Lynch coordinating with Comey in the Clinton investigation?
Prosecute them for what law?
Title and Chapter, please.
Unless you're full of shit, of course.
There is no "treason" statute. Treason is defined in the Constitution, not in the Code.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
[Emphasis mine]
Once again you are posting like an idiot, so there is no law against this , so I can do it and get away with it.
I'm having a hard time following your argument.
Yes, when something is not against the law, you can do it and "get away with it".
Attempting to subvert our election for a Russian pawn certainly qualifies.18 U.S. Code § 2381 - TreasonI don't know the exact law of the FBI attempting to interfere in the national election of the President. What was that treason statute number again?Little room for doubt. Prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law and make them an example for all to see.
Was Lynch coordinating with Comey in the Clinton investigation?
Prosecute them for what law?
Title and Chapter, please.
Unless you're full of shit, of course.
There is no "treason" statute. Treason is defined in the Constitution, not in the Code.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
[Emphasis mine]
Attempting a coup against our Constitutional process in selecting our next POTUS. With Russia owning Hillary, this is looking really bad for all Democrats involved. Death penalty case.
Did you actually read you link? It says the exact same thing the Constitution says.
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
Are you trying to seriously argue that Hillary Clinton has "levied war" against the United States?
What I know is that our laws - particularly our criminal laws - are very specifically written in statute to enumerate the exact elements of a crime that need to be proven.
I asked for the Title and Chapter of the law you guys believe was broken. This is what I was given.
Can you make an argument that any actions of Lynch, Comey, either Clinton, or anyone else involved meets those elements?
You seem to have misunderstood.
I didn't ask you to repost youtube videos that make you feel warm and fuzzy inside.
I asked for someone to tell me what law was broken, and demonstrate how.
She had classified US material on her personal server which a high school geek could have broke into. She didn't return government mails back to the state department. She destroyed evidence (tampering with evidence) that was subpoenaed by the US Congress. She forwarded some of those classified emails to her buddy who was not cleared to see such information who shared that laptop with her husband who was sending dick pictures to strangers on the internet.
Can you tell me that anybody outside of their cabal would have gotten away with anything like this?
1. Spillage happens everyday, and no one gets prosecuted for it.
2. By all means, Congress is well within their power to try her for contempt of Congress, if they thought they had a case.
3. Huma Abedin, as Clinton's chief of staff, certainly had clearance to see those documents.
You are losing on this one, all you are telling us if there is no law addressed it's fair game
Attempting to subvert our election for a Russian pawn certainly qualifies.18 U.S. Code § 2381 - TreasonI don't know the exact law of the FBI attempting to interfere in the national election of the President. What was that treason statute number again?Prosecute them for what law?
Title and Chapter, please.
Unless you're full of shit, of course.
There is no "treason" statute. Treason is defined in the Constitution, not in the Code.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
[Emphasis mine]
Attempting a coup against our Constitutional process in selecting our next POTUS. With Russia owning Hillary, this is looking really bad for all Democrats involved. Death penalty case.
Did you actually read you link? It says the exact same thing the Constitution says.
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
Are you trying to seriously argue that Hillary Clinton has "levied war" against the United States?
Which law do you think attempting to manipulate the election of our President is?
I don't know the exact law of the FBI attempting to interfere in the national election of the President. What was that treason statute number again?
There is no "treason" statute. Treason is defined in the Constitution, not in the Code.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
[Emphasis mine]
Once again you are posting like an idiot, so there is no law against this , so I can do it and get away with it.
I'm having a hard time following your argument.
Yes, when something is not against the law, you can do it and "get away with it".
Because you are trying to find loop holes, what's so complicated?
This is not a matter of "loop holes". This is about the rule of law, rather than the rule of feelings.
There is no "treason" statute. Treason is defined in the Constitution, not in the Code.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
[Emphasis mine]
Once again you are posting like an idiot, so there is no law against this , so I can do it and get away with it.
I'm having a hard time following your argument.
Yes, when something is not against the law, you can do it and "get away with it".
Because you are trying to find loop holes, what's so complicated?
This is not a matter of "loop holes". This is about the rule of law, rather than the rule of feelings.
No you want laws and a nanny state, if there is no laws against it you think it's ok.
I’ve written you off as being an idiot shortly after joining this board. Just saying.I don't know the exact law of the FBI attempting to interfere in the national election of the President. What was that treason statute number again?Prosecute them for what law?
Title and Chapter, please.
Unless you're full of shit, of course.
There is no "treason" statute. Treason is defined in the Constitution, not in the Code.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
[Emphasis mine]
Once again you are posting like an idiot, so there is no law against this , so I can do it and get away with it.
I'm having a hard time following your argument.
Yes, when something is not against the law, you can do it and "get away with it".
There is no "treason" statute. Treason is defined in the Constitution, not in the Code.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
[Emphasis mine]
Once again you are posting like an idiot, so there is no law against this , so I can do it and get away with it.
I'm having a hard time following your argument.
Yes, when something is not against the law, you can do it and "get away with it".
Because you are trying to find loop holes, what's so complicated?
This is not a matter of "loop holes". This is about the rule of law, rather than the rule of feelings.
No you want laws and a nanny state, if there is no laws against it you think it's ok.
I’ve written you off as being an idiot shortly after joining this board. Just saying.I don't know the exact law of the FBI attempting to interfere in the national election of the President. What was that treason statute number again?
There is no "treason" statute. Treason is defined in the Constitution, not in the Code.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
[Emphasis mine]
Once again you are posting like an idiot, so there is no law against this , so I can do it and get away with it.
I'm having a hard time following your argument.
Yes, when something is not against the law, you can do it and "get away with it".
Do you think I give a shit about what you think, fuckwit?
I’ve written you off as being an idiot shortly after joining this board. Just saying.I don't know the exact law of the FBI attempting to interfere in the national election of the President. What was that treason statute number again?
There is no "treason" statute. Treason is defined in the Constitution, not in the Code.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
[Emphasis mine]
Once again you are posting like an idiot, so there is no law against this , so I can do it and get away with it.
I'm having a hard time following your argument.
Yes, when something is not against the law, you can do it and "get away with it".
Do you think I give a shit about what you think, fuckwit?
I’ve written you off as being an idiot shortly after joining this board. Just saying.There is no "treason" statute. Treason is defined in the Constitution, not in the Code.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
[Emphasis mine]
Once again you are posting like an idiot, so there is no law against this , so I can do it and get away with it.
I'm having a hard time following your argument.
Yes, when something is not against the law, you can do it and "get away with it".
Do you think I give a shit about what you think, fuckwit?
Why you getting upset? We are having a friendly conversation here....
It’s clear you only have the equivalent of a 5th grade education.
But we welcome your kind here because you make everyone else look like a genius.
I’ve written you off as being an idiot shortly after joining this board. Just saying.There is no "treason" statute. Treason is defined in the Constitution, not in the Code.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
[Emphasis mine]
Once again you are posting like an idiot, so there is no law against this , so I can do it and get away with it.
I'm having a hard time following your argument.
Yes, when something is not against the law, you can do it and "get away with it".
Do you think I give a shit about what you think, fuckwit?
I’ve written you off as being an idiot shortly after joining this board. Just saying.There is no "treason" statute. Treason is defined in the Constitution, not in the Code.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
[Emphasis mine]
Once again you are posting like an idiot, so there is no law against this , so I can do it and get away with it.
I'm having a hard time following your argument.
Yes, when something is not against the law, you can do it and "get away with it".
Do you think I give a shit about what you think, fuckwit?
Why you getting upset? We are having a friendly conversation here....
I’ve written you off as being an idiot shortly after joining this board. Just saying.Once again you are posting like an idiot, so there is no law against this , so I can do it and get away with it.
I'm having a hard time following your argument.
Yes, when something is not against the law, you can do it and "get away with it".
Do you think I give a shit about what you think, fuckwit?
Why you getting upset? We are having a friendly conversation here....
I have being so much liberal posters here getting so upset latley ..why?
I love how Clinton, recorded on tape state " If Trump wins we all hang. You fix this god damn thing now" They new exactly what they were doing..18 U.S. Code § 2381 - TreasonI don't know the exact law of the FBI attempting to interfere in the national election of the President. What was that treason statute number again?Little room for doubt. Prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law and make them an example for all to see.
Was Lynch coordinating with Comey in the Clinton investigation?
Prosecute them for what law?
Title and Chapter, please.
Unless you're full of shit, of course.
There is no "treason" statute. Treason is defined in the Constitution, not in the Code.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
[Emphasis mine]
Attempting a coup against our Constitutional process in selecting our next POTUS. With Russia owning Hillary, this is looking really bad for all Democrats involved. Death penalty case.
I’ve written you off as being an idiot shortly after joining this board. Just saying.Once again you are posting like an idiot, so there is no law against this , so I can do it and get away with it.
I'm having a hard time following your argument.
Yes, when something is not against the law, you can do it and "get away with it".
Do you think I give a shit about what you think, fuckwit?
Why you getting upset? We are having a friendly conversation here....
I wasn't taking to you, nor am I "upset".
Why would I think you’d ever consider an opinion that differs from yours? lolI’ve written you off as being an idiot shortly after joining this board. Just saying.I don't know the exact law of the FBI attempting to interfere in the national election of the President. What was that treason statute number again?
There is no "treason" statute. Treason is defined in the Constitution, not in the Code.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
[Emphasis mine]
Once again you are posting like an idiot, so there is no law against this , so I can do it and get away with it.
I'm having a hard time following your argument.
Yes, when something is not against the law, you can do it and "get away with it".
Do you think I give a shit about what you think, fuckwit?
I’ve written you off as being an idiot shortly after joining this board. Just saying.Once again you are posting like an idiot, so there is no law against this , so I can do it and get away with it.
I'm having a hard time following your argument.
Yes, when something is not against the law, you can do it and "get away with it".
Do you think I give a shit about what you think, fuckwit?
Why you getting upset? We are having a friendly conversation here....
I wasn't taking to you, nor am I "upset".
