Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Little room for doubt. Prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law and make them an example for all to see.
Was Lynch coordinating with Comey in the Clinton investigation?
Little room for doubt. Prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law and make them an example for all to see.
Was Lynch coordinating with Comey in the Clinton investigation?
Prosecute them for what law?
Title and Chapter, please.
Unless you're full of shit, of course.
Little room for doubt. Prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law and make them an example for all to see.
Was Lynch coordinating with Comey in the Clinton investigation?
Prosecute them for what law?
Title and Chapter, please.
Unless you're full of shit, of course.
Obstruction of Justice for starters. But that seems sort of obvious. Don't you think?
Little room for doubt. Prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law and make them an example for all to see.
Was Lynch coordinating with Comey in the Clinton investigation?
Prosecute them for what law?
Title and Chapter, please.
Unless you're full of shit, of course.
Obstruction of Justice for starters. But that seems sort of obvious. Don't you think?
There are at least 6 different sections of the US Code that address what could be called "Obstruction of Justice". Which are you referring to?
Little room for doubt. Prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law and make them an example for all to see.
Was Lynch coordinating with Comey in the Clinton investigation?
Prosecute them for what law?
Title and Chapter, please.
Unless you're full of shit, of course.
Obstruction of Justice for starters. But that seems sort of obvious. Don't you think?
There are at least 6 different sections of the US Code that address what could be called "Obstruction of Justice". Which are you referring to?
18 USC 1503 springs immediately to mind. Though a case can be made for 18 USC 1505 as well based on the 33,000 deleted emails while under subpoena.
Little room for doubt. Prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law and make them an example for all to see.
Was Lynch coordinating with Comey in the Clinton investigation?
Little room for doubt. Prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law and make them an example for all to see.
Was Lynch coordinating with Comey in the Clinton investigation?
Prosecute them for what law?
Title and Chapter, please.
Unless you're full of shit, of course.
Obstruction of Justice for starters. But that seems sort of obvious. Don't you think?
There are at least 6 different sections of the US Code that address what could be called "Obstruction of Justice". Which are you referring to?
18 USC 1503 springs immediately to mind. Though a case can be made for 18 USC 1505 as well based on the 33,000 deleted emails while under subpoena.
Ok, we'll start with 1503.
(a) Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United States, or officer who may be serving at any examination or other proceeding before any United States magistrate judge or other committing magistrate, in the discharge of his duty, or injures any such grand or petit juror in his person or property on account of any verdict or indictment assented to by him, or on account of his being or having been such juror, or injures any such officer, magistrate judge, or other committing magistrate in his person or property on account of the performance of his official duties, or corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b). If the offense under this section occurs in connection with a trial of a criminal case, and the act in violation of this section involves the threat of physical force or physical force, the maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for the offense shall be the higher of that otherwise provided by law or the maximum term that could have been imposed for any offense charged in such case.
Do you have evidence of these "threats" or "force"? Who do you believe threatened who? What juror or officer of the court are you referring to?
1505 is essentially the same thing, except for administrative or congressional investigations. Same questions as above.
Prosecute them for what law?
Title and Chapter, please.
Unless you're full of shit, of course.
Obstruction of Justice for starters. But that seems sort of obvious. Don't you think?
There are at least 6 different sections of the US Code that address what could be called "Obstruction of Justice". Which are you referring to?
18 USC 1503 springs immediately to mind. Though a case can be made for 18 USC 1505 as well based on the 33,000 deleted emails while under subpoena.
Ok, we'll start with 1503.
(a) Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United States, or officer who may be serving at any examination or other proceeding before any United States magistrate judge or other committing magistrate, in the discharge of his duty, or injures any such grand or petit juror in his person or property on account of any verdict or indictment assented to by him, or on account of his being or having been such juror, or injures any such officer, magistrate judge, or other committing magistrate in his person or property on account of the performance of his official duties, or corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b). If the offense under this section occurs in connection with a trial of a criminal case, and the act in violation of this section involves the threat of physical force or physical force, the maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for the offense shall be the higher of that otherwise provided by law or the maximum term that could have been imposed for any offense charged in such case.
Do you have evidence of these "threats" or "force"? Who do you believe threatened who? What juror or officer of the court are you referring to?
1505 is essentially the same thing, except for administrative or congressional investigations. Same questions as above.
Threats or force aren't the only ways that one obstructs. Surely you have to know that.
Was the chance meeting on the tarmac between Slick Willie Clinton and Loretta Lynch:
a. Orders on how to proceed
b. Exchanging pleasantries
c. Booty call
Obstruction of Justice for starters. But that seems sort of obvious. Don't you think?
There are at least 6 different sections of the US Code that address what could be called "Obstruction of Justice". Which are you referring to?
18 USC 1503 springs immediately to mind. Though a case can be made for 18 USC 1505 as well based on the 33,000 deleted emails while under subpoena.
Ok, we'll start with 1503.
(a) Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United States, or officer who may be serving at any examination or other proceeding before any United States magistrate judge or other committing magistrate, in the discharge of his duty, or injures any such grand or petit juror in his person or property on account of any verdict or indictment assented to by him, or on account of his being or having been such juror, or injures any such officer, magistrate judge, or other committing magistrate in his person or property on account of the performance of his official duties, or corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b). If the offense under this section occurs in connection with a trial of a criminal case, and the act in violation of this section involves the threat of physical force or physical force, the maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for the offense shall be the higher of that otherwise provided by law or the maximum term that could have been imposed for any offense charged in such case.
Do you have evidence of these "threats" or "force"? Who do you believe threatened who? What juror or officer of the court are you referring to?
1505 is essentially the same thing, except for administrative or congressional investigations. Same questions as above.
Threats or force aren't the only ways that one obstructs. Surely you have to know that.
What I know is that our laws - particularly our criminal laws - are very specifically written in statute to enumerate the exact elements of a crime that need to be proven.
I asked for the Title and Chapter of the law you guys believe was broken. This is what I was given.
Can you make an argument that any actions of Lynch, Comey, either Clinton, or anyone else involved meets those elements?
There are at least 6 different sections of the US Code that address what could be called "Obstruction of Justice". Which are you referring to?
18 USC 1503 springs immediately to mind. Though a case can be made for 18 USC 1505 as well based on the 33,000 deleted emails while under subpoena.
Ok, we'll start with 1503.
(a) Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United States, or officer who may be serving at any examination or other proceeding before any United States magistrate judge or other committing magistrate, in the discharge of his duty, or injures any such grand or petit juror in his person or property on account of any verdict or indictment assented to by him, or on account of his being or having been such juror, or injures any such officer, magistrate judge, or other committing magistrate in his person or property on account of the performance of his official duties, or corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b). If the offense under this section occurs in connection with a trial of a criminal case, and the act in violation of this section involves the threat of physical force or physical force, the maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for the offense shall be the higher of that otherwise provided by law or the maximum term that could have been imposed for any offense charged in such case.
Do you have evidence of these "threats" or "force"? Who do you believe threatened who? What juror or officer of the court are you referring to?
1505 is essentially the same thing, except for administrative or congressional investigations. Same questions as above.
Threats or force aren't the only ways that one obstructs. Surely you have to know that.
What I know is that our laws - particularly our criminal laws - are very specifically written in statute to enumerate the exact elements of a crime that need to be proven.
I asked for the Title and Chapter of the law you guys believe was broken. This is what I was given.
Can you make an argument that any actions of Lynch, Comey, either Clinton, or anyone else involved meets those elements?
Obstruction of Justice for starters. But that seems sort of obvious. Don't you think?
There are at least 6 different sections of the US Code that address what could be called "Obstruction of Justice". Which are you referring to?
18 USC 1503 springs immediately to mind. Though a case can be made for 18 USC 1505 as well based on the 33,000 deleted emails while under subpoena.
Ok, we'll start with 1503.
(a) Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United States, or officer who may be serving at any examination or other proceeding before any United States magistrate judge or other committing magistrate, in the discharge of his duty, or injures any such grand or petit juror in his person or property on account of any verdict or indictment assented to by him, or on account of his being or having been such juror, or injures any such officer, magistrate judge, or other committing magistrate in his person or property on account of the performance of his official duties, or corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b). If the offense under this section occurs in connection with a trial of a criminal case, and the act in violation of this section involves the threat of physical force or physical force, the maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for the offense shall be the higher of that otherwise provided by law or the maximum term that could have been imposed for any offense charged in such case.
Do you have evidence of these "threats" or "force"? Who do you believe threatened who? What juror or officer of the court are you referring to?
1505 is essentially the same thing, except for administrative or congressional investigations. Same questions as above.
Threats or force aren't the only ways that one obstructs. Surely you have to know that.
What I know is that our laws - particularly our criminal laws - are very specifically written in statute to enumerate the exact elements of a crime that need to be proven.
I asked for the Title and Chapter of the law you guys believe was broken. This is what I was given.
Can you make an argument that any actions of Lynch, Comey, either Clinton, or anyone else involved meets those elements?
