Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Trump admitted he had those documents. That is, he admitted to a felony. And you're running cover for it.
Why?
We know there were documents that had been declassified - that is what Trump and his lawyers have said.Okay dude. That’s nice. There were classified documents at Trump’s house. We know it. Trump admitted it. It justifies the search.
There were instigators, for sure. You denying that?Lemme guess. You’re one of those “FBI agents started the riot” guys?
Nope. Trump’s lawyers have never said they were declassified.We know there were documents that had been declassified - that is what Trump and his lawyers have said.
Can you list some reasons?Actually there is every reason to not tell the sitting POTUS about it
They do the same with drug raids. They pile the drugs found and put the weapons on top of them, all on one table, and publish those dramatic pictures.Ummm, NO.
The photo was obviously STAGED.
1. SOP for any criminal investigators - to include the FBI - is to take photos of the surroundings AS-IS. For sensationalism / optics for you dupes to get excited over the FBI piled up a bunch of coversheets and folders before they took the picture.
2. There is no classified info showing - it would be illegal to do so.
3. There is a ruler at the bottom to give people an idea of size of objects in the photo, one that was PLACED THERE as part of the STAGED photo.
The photo is meaningless and shows NOTHING.
Okay dude. That’s nice. There were classified documents at Trump’s house. We know it. Trump admitted it. It justifies the search.
No. Garland said nothing of the sort. Neither do the documents revealed say it about the justification for the raid.Actually Garland declared the whole reason he approved the historic, unprecedented, unwarranted, heavily-armed raid on Trump's home ... after waiting weeks to think about it ... was because Trump had in his possession 'National Security-threatening nuclear secrets'.
Can you list some reasons?
If they really did not tell him, that is much more problematic than if they did, IMO. Keep in mind that the raid itself was a politically motivated travesty. Whether they told or did not tell the president beforehand cannot change that. It was horrible for democracy, either way.
At the final planning meeting, if they discussed telling Biden or not, the discussion should have gone like this: "Fellas, we're about to execute a raid on the President's main political rival who is the most likely person to unseat him in the next election. It will be extremely controversial and divisive for the American voter, and will be seen by almost half the nation as another example of the perceived double standard we in federal law enforcement allegedly hold for political figures. Should we tell the president?"
If the answer is "no," it could only be for three reasons that I could think of:
1) The president might say, "No! I don't want an extremely controversial and divisive event that add to the perception that my Justice Department has a double standard," and we are a rogue agency, remember?
2) The president would almost certainly say yes, but by not even telling him, we give him plausible deniability.
or
3) The doddering president might blurt something out about how the raid found boxes of evidence before we even make the raid and Trump's legal team will be tipped off.
If you know another reason, I'd be interested to read it.
They do the same with drug raids. They pile the drugs found and put the weapons on top of them, all on one table, and publish those dramatic pictures.
President Trump did.Nope. Trump’s lawyers have never said they were declassified.
www.nbcnews.com
Yes, that is absolutely correct.Except in those photos you can actually SEE the drugs and weapons.
They aren't covered by blankets, cover sheets, folders, etc...like in the FBI's photo.
Trump has claimed it was declassified on social media which is meaningless. He’s done this before and his Chief of Staff told the judge that his statements on social media aren’t literal.President Trump did.
Trump allies say he declassified Mar-a-Lago documents seized by FBI. Experts are skeptical.
Legal experts say presidents have absolute authority to declassify documents, but it's not clear whether Trump ever took action to do so.
The FBI that lied about Trump having nuclear secrets and that they never took his passports say he didn't.
Nothing has been definitively proven ... except previous / current liars on both sides have made conflicting claims.
www.documentcloud.org
No. Garland said nothing of the sort. Neither do the documents revealed say it about the justification for the raid.
www.rawstory.com
www.businessinsider.com
ussanews.com
www.theblaze.com
Playing dumb is a think errorThere is no way in HELL Biden's Director of the FBI plans and carries out the very 1st heavily armed raid of a (former) Presidrnt's home, the 1st ever such event in US history, without notifying the current President 1st.
This has got to he Biden's biggest lie of his life...
Yes, that is absolutely correct.
I will say that I am not surprised if Trump had declassified documents that still had classification markings on them. Nothing illegal about that.
But, as I have said earlier, Trump should be acting as if the entire weight of the federal justice system and the intelligence community is colluding against him to stop his 2024 run. It would have wise to stamp those documents "De-classified by order of the President." It would not have prevented this raid, but it would have at least caused the FBI to have to bleach off those de-classification stamps before presenting the fake evidence.
The only conviction against rogue FBI personnel in attacking Trump has been for altering documents. Maybe that would have made an agent in their pseudo-document lab hesitate to to the job.
So you’ve already dropped your claim that Garland was using nuclear secrets as a basis for the raid.Merrick Garland spent weeks deliberating over whether to issue a search warrant for Trump: report
One week ago the Department of Justice and FBI executed a search warrant at former President Donald Trump's Palm Beach golf club, Mar-a-Lago. Attorney General Merrick Garland gave a statement the day after and made it clear that the search warrant issued was signed off by him personally...
Merrick Garland mulled over decision to approve Trump search warrant at Mar-a-Lago for weeks, highlighting his 'extremely careful' nature, report says
Justice Department officials and the FBI met for weeks discussing the warrant application before deciding to sign off on it, sources told The Wall Street Journal.
Alberta premier slams Trudeau gov’t for ‘ridiculous’ attempt to regulate cattle emissions | USSA News | The Tea Party's Front Page.
by Anthony Murdoch Danielle Smith said she is in disbelief that limiting cattle farts and burps is an important issue and warned that restrictions could lead to food shortages. (LifeSiteNews) — The Premier of Canada’s largest beef-producing province blasted what she said is a “ridiculous” new...
AG Garland reportedly waited weeks to approve Mar-a-Lago raid â but that detail raises critical question | Blaze Media
Attorney General Merrick Garland reportedly deliberated for weeks whether FBI agents should conduct a raid on Mar-a-Lago to retrieve highly classified documents.What are the details?At at press conference last week, Garland confirmed that he personally approved the raid on former President...
The DOJ & FBI had 18 months - suppoaedly knowing Trump had highly classified do uments and nuclear secrets - but made bo attempt to retrieve them.
Trump handed over 15 boxes of material in June, & neither the DOJ or FBI even ASKED about the supposed nuclear secrets let alone demanded their return.
Garland, the DOJ, the FBI, and snowflakes now want us to believe, AS GARLAND CLAIMED, that he waited WEEKS, deliberated for WEEKS, while supposedly knowing Trump allegedly had personal possession of 'National Security-threatening nuclear secrets', trying to decide if he shod approve a raid to get them back....from a man the left insists is a national security risk, a traitor who colluded with the Russians, etc...
View attachment 691205
Bwuhahahahahaha!
What f*ing incompetent moron wod WAIT WEEKS to approve a raid to get nuclear secrets back from such a threat?
Good grief, do you mindless, Trump-hating, TDS-suffering freaks think these things through before you post them?
Gee, as it turns out, the FBI-leaked 'nuclear secrets' reports and FBI claim Trump had nuclear secrets was / is all a LIE.
It was a lie to get the very broad search warrant and justify the raid, just like how they defrauded the FISA Court.
And not only did the criminal Semocrat dupes buy it,right in front of their faces, they are still trying to pathetically defend it.
Keep in mind that the raid itself was a politically motivated travesty. Whether they told or did not tell the president beforehand cannot change that. It was horrible for democracy, either way.
*SNIP*I understand this is your opinion, but I do not share it.
But you having this view removes every reason for the POTUS to not be involved in a DOJ investigation.
