The Great Kansas (Libertarianism) Tea Party Disaster

[Dot Com]

surprised that rw'ers didn't bring any links to support their assertions? 'twas ever thus.

as for the OP, I hope its a bloodbath

 

[Mertex]

I've not seen much difference between Libertarians and modern day Tea Party conservatives.

Shut the fuck up. Research before you post. Unless your intention is character assassination.


Let's see how Libertarians view the Koch/Brownback alliance.


Beltway Libertarian Money Men

Thomas DiLorenzo

Charles Koch and Steve Forbes have long been major funders of the Beltway libertarian crowd. So who are they supporting for president? Koch is just wild about Sam Brownback, while Forbes is a Giuliani supporter. A Christo-fascist and an ordinary, run-of-the-mill fascist, in other words. These phony baloney “libertarians” apparently never heard of Ron Paul (who one Cato nerd once stupidly dismissed as being “too white and too middle class”).

Maybe you should do some research yourself. Your link/source doesn't counter what I said.

Our data show that libertarians have generally voted Republican—66 percent for Ronald Reagan in 1980, 74 percent for George H. W. Bush in 1988, and 72 percent for George W. Bush in 2000.
The Libertarian Vote Cato Institute

the broadly defined libertarian vote (folks interested in reducing the size, spending, and scope of government) has tended to vote for Republican candidates, ostensibly because of the GOP's limited-government rhetoric. Depending on the definition,

upwards of seven out of 10 libertarian-leaning voters go Republican in presidential races.
Study Who will Libertarians Vote for President in 2012

 

[Contumacious]

Research before you post.

Ironic given that the date on your link is from August 10, 2007 which was when GW Bush was still in office.

It doesn't fucking matter.

The fact is that the Kansas crowd is motivated by CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN values not Libertarianism.

But it amazes me that the Demopublicans who have brought us the income tax, the nationalization of credit and banking, massive depressions, a behemoth federal government, unnecessary wars, but Kansas is the center of attention.

Go fuck yourself.

.

Your inability to provide a valid substantiation for your failed allegation on top of resorting to spurious vulgarities is a tacit admission that you have nothing of any value to contribute to this thread. Have a nice day.

Your lack of

Research before you post.

Ironic given that the date on your link is from August 10, 2007 which was when GW Bush was still in office.

It doesn't fucking matter.

The fact is that the Kansas crowd is motivated by CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN values not Libertarianism.

But it amazes me that the Demopublicans who have brought us the income tax, the nationalization of credit and banking, massive depressions, a behemoth federal government, unnecessary wars, but Kansas is the center of attention.

Go fuck yourself.

.

Your inability to provide a valid substantiation for your failed allegation on top of resorting to spurious vulgarities is a tacit admission that you have nothing of any value to contribute to this thread. Have a nice day.

Translation.

You are full of shit.

.

No. It means you didn't bring any facts to the table. Insults and ad hominems will get you nowhere.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

Excude me Dingle Berry,

I am a Libertarian , I don't remember reading anywhere about a victory in Topeka, nor have been invited to one. The state is controlled by theocrats so it is very hard for me to believe that they welcome Libertarianism.

So shut the fuck up.


.

 

[Mertex]

Go fuck yourself.

.

Apparently you don't like to be handed your ass on a platter? Epic Fail.....

 

[Contumacious]

I've not seen much difference between Libertarians and modern day Tea Party conservatives.

Shut the fuck up. Research before you post. Unless your intention is character assassination.


Let's see how Libertarians view the Koch/Brownback alliance.


Beltway Libertarian Money Men

Thomas DiLorenzo

Charles Koch and Steve Forbes have long been major funders of the Beltway libertarian crowd. So who are they supporting for president? Koch is just wild about Sam Brownback, while Forbes is a Giuliani supporter. A Christo-fascist and an ordinary, run-of-the-mill fascist, in other words. These phony baloney “libertarians” apparently never heard of Ron Paul (who one Cato nerd once stupidly dismissed as being “too white and too middle class”).

Maybe you should do some research yourself. Your link/source doesn't counter what I said.

Our data show that libertarians have generally voted Republican—66 percent for Ronald Reagan in 1980, 74 percent for George H. W. Bush in 1988, and 72 percent for George W. Bush in 2000.
The Libertarian Vote Cato Institute

the broadly defined libertarian vote (folks interested in reducing the size, spending, and scope of government) has tended to vote for Republican candidates, ostensibly because of the GOP's limited-government rhetoric. Depending on the definition,

upwards of seven out of 10 libertarian-leaning voters go Republican in presidential races.
Study Who will Libertarians Vote for President in 2012

Here is part of my research, from the same article:


"But for those on the trail of the elusive swing voter, the real news is 2004. The libertarian vote for Bush dropped from 72 to 59 percent, while the libertarian vote for the Democratic nominee almost doubled. It’s not hard to imagine why. Libertarians didn’t like Bush’s record on excessive federal spending, expansion of entitlements, the federal marriage amendment, government spying, and the war in Iraq. Kerry didn’t offer libertarians much except that he was not Bush, but he still narrowed the Republican majority among libertarians from 52 points to 21 points.


Unfortunately , Libertarians are forced to vote for THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS - while admitting that BOTH candidates will do severe damage to our nation , we must then concluded which one will do less damage.

And so it fucking goes.

.

 

[Mertex]

Here is part of my research, from the same article:


"But for those on the trail of the elusive swing voter, the real news is 2004. The libertarian vote for Bush dropped from 72 to 59 percent, while the libertarian vote for the Democratic nominee almost doubled. It’s not hard to imagine why. Libertarians didn’t like Bush’s record on excessive federal spending, expansion of entitlements, the federal marriage amendment, government spying, and the war in Iraq. Kerry didn’t offer libertarians much except that he was not Bush, but he still narrowed the Republican majority among libertarians from 52 points to 21 points.


Unfortunately , Libertarians are forced to vote for THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS - while admitting that BOTH candidates will do severe damage to our nation , we must then concluded which one will do less damage.

And so it fucking goes.

.

It doesn't matter, idiot, why you vote for who you vote, you end up voting Republican, which is what I said initially. So, you shut the fuck up.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Rolling Stone magazine lefty propaganda and a bunch of dupes applauding.
Look no further than this obama administration's economically stifling energy policy if you want answers to reasons for economic hardships.
And repubs already on the gov dole wanting a more fiscally involved state government? Oh my, how profound!

 

[Contumacious]

Go fuck yourself.

.

Apparently you don't like to be handed your ass on a platter? Epic Fail.....

The poster is premature at best. Since no one has handed my ass on a platter.

No one has shown me that Kansas Theocratic Conservatives decided to vote Libertarian - a party which favors the decriminalization of drugs, abortions and which does not support warmongering.

So , you are the one who banged his head on the hurdle.

.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

How about all of you left wing shills send me a dollar for every post you make on this forum and then I'll insert your replies. That's exactly what you all are advocating.
Morons!

 

[Contumacious]

Here is part of my research, from the same article:


"But for those on the trail of the elusive swing voter, the real news is 2004. The libertarian vote for Bush dropped from 72 to 59 percent, while the libertarian vote for the Democratic nominee almost doubled. It’s not hard to imagine why. Libertarians didn’t like Bush’s record on excessive federal spending, expansion of entitlements, the federal marriage amendment, government spying, and the war in Iraq. Kerry didn’t offer libertarians much except that he was not Bush, but he still narrowed the Republican majority among libertarians from 52 points to 21 points.


Unfortunately , Libertarians are forced to vote for THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS - while admitting that BOTH candidates will do severe damage to our nation , we must then concluded which one will do less damage.

And so it fucking goes.

.

It doesn't matter, idiot, why you vote for who you vote, you end up voting Republican, which is what I said initially. So, you shut the fuck up.

Again, cum swallower, the Republican candidate did not get 100% of the Libertarian Vote. Decisions must be made by individual Libertarians about damage control. So they did not vote republican because they love their platform.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Ironic given that the date on your link is from August 10, 2007 which was when GW Bush was still in office.

It doesn't fucking matter.

The fact is that the Kansas crowd is motivated by CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN values not Libertarianism.

But it amazes me that the Demopublicans who have brought us the income tax, the nationalization of credit and banking, massive depressions, a behemoth federal government, unnecessary wars, but Kansas is the center of attention.

Go fuck yourself.

.

Your inability to provide a valid substantiation for your failed allegation on top of resorting to spurious vulgarities is a tacit admission that you have nothing of any value to contribute to this thread. Have a nice day.

Your lack of

Ironic given that the date on your link is from August 10, 2007 which was when GW Bush was still in office.

It doesn't fucking matter.

The fact is that the Kansas crowd is motivated by CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN values not Libertarianism.

But it amazes me that the Demopublicans who have brought us the income tax, the nationalization of credit and banking, massive depressions, a behemoth federal government, unnecessary wars, but Kansas is the center of attention.

Go fuck yourself.

.

Your inability to provide a valid substantiation for your failed allegation on top of resorting to spurious vulgarities is a tacit admission that you have nothing of any value to contribute to this thread. Have a nice day.

Translation.

You are full of shit.

.

No. It means you didn't bring any facts to the table. Insults and ad hominems will get you nowhere.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

Excude me Dingle Berry,

I am a Libertarian , I don't remember reading anywhere about a victory in Topeka, nor have been invited to one. The state is controlled by theocrats so it is very hard for me to believe that they welcome Libertarianism.

So shut the fuck up.


.

The answer to that is easy. You have no power to make me or anyone shut up and if you don't like it, well, tough fuck for you. Not only that, nasty attacks on members means that you have no real argument to present. Adults debate. Children scream and holler. Take your pick.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Contumacious]

It doesn't fucking matter.

The fact is that the Kansas crowd is motivated by CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN values not Libertarianism.

But it amazes me that the Demopublicans who have brought us the income tax, the nationalization of credit and banking, massive depressions, a behemoth federal government, unnecessary wars, but Kansas is the center of attention.

Go fuck yourself.

.

Your inability to provide a valid substantiation for your failed allegation on top of resorting to spurious vulgarities is a tacit admission that you have nothing of any value to contribute to this thread. Have a nice day.

Your lack of

It doesn't fucking matter.

The fact is that the Kansas crowd is motivated by CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN values not Libertarianism.

But it amazes me that the Demopublicans who have brought us the income tax, the nationalization of credit and banking, massive depressions, a behemoth federal government, unnecessary wars, but Kansas is the center of attention.

Go fuck yourself.

.

Your inability to provide a valid substantiation for your failed allegation on top of resorting to spurious vulgarities is a tacit admission that you have nothing of any value to contribute to this thread. Have a nice day.

Translation.

You are full of shit.

.

No. It means you didn't bring any facts to the table. Insults and ad hominems will get you nowhere.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

Excude me Dingle Berry,

I am a Libertarian , I don't remember reading anywhere about a victory in Topeka, nor have been invited to one. The state is controlled by theocrats so it is very hard for me to believe that they welcome Libertarianism.

So shut the fuck up.


.

The answer to that is easy. You have no power to make me or anyone shut up and if you don't like it, well, tough fuck for you. Not only that, nasty attacks on members means that you have no real argument to present. Adults debate. Children scream and holler. Take your pick.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

Listen fucktard, nasty attacks are necessary for emphasis.

.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Anyone who believes orman is a libertarian is smoking the good stuff.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Kansas is proof of what I've said before. You can't really appreciate how bad conservatism is until you see it in action, i.e.,

until you see what happens when conservatives actually get enough power to actually implement their lunacy.

Brownback is going to be reelected.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Kansas is proof of what I've said before. You can't really appreciate how bad conservatism is until you see it in action, i.e.,

until you see what happens when conservatives actually get enough power to actually implement their lunacy.

Brownback is going to be reelected.

So?

No one as crackpot conservative as Brownback will ever be president.

 

[Nyvin]

Kansas is proof of what I've said before. You can't really appreciate how bad conservatism is until you see it in action, i.e.,

until you see what happens when conservatives actually get enough power to actually implement their lunacy.

Brownback is going to be reelected.

I'll be saving this post for after Nov 4th...

 

[Dot Com]

Kansas is proof of what I've said before. You can't really appreciate how bad conservatism is until you see it in action, i.e.,

until you see what happens when conservatives actually get enough power to actually implement their lunacy.

Brownback is going to be reelected.

I'll be saving this post for after Nov 4th...

yep,

as to the lolibertarian spazz Contmacious, he might heed his own vulgar & child-like bloviations &

 

[Derideo_Te]

Research before you post.

Ironic given that the date on your link is from August 10, 2007 which was when GW Bush was still in office.

It doesn't fucking matter.

The fact is that the Kansas crowd is motivated by CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN values not Libertarianism.

But it amazes me that the Demopublicans who have brought us the income tax, the nationalization of credit and banking, massive depressions, a behemoth federal government, unnecessary wars, but Kansas is the center of attention.

Go fuck yourself.

.

Your inability to provide a valid substantiation for your failed allegation on top of resorting to spurious vulgarities is a tacit admission that you have nothing of any value to contribute to this thread. Have a nice day.

Your lack of

Research before you post.

Ironic given that the date on your link is from August 10, 2007 which was when GW Bush was still in office.

It doesn't fucking matter.

The fact is that the Kansas crowd is motivated by CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN values not Libertarianism.

But it amazes me that the Demopublicans who have brought us the income tax, the nationalization of credit and banking, massive depressions, a behemoth federal government, unnecessary wars, but Kansas is the center of attention.

Go fuck yourself.

.

Your inability to provide a valid substantiation for your failed allegation on top of resorting to spurious vulgarities is a tacit admission that you have nothing of any value to contribute to this thread. Have a nice day.

Translation.

You are full of shit.

.

Congratulations on disqualifying yourself from this thread. Have a nice day.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Talk about filth. Now we see a popular information source among pop-culture jerks which owes it's pop culture popularity in part for promoting drug abuse, refer to an apparent Christian politician in a derogatory way as "God's senator" and quoted by low information liberal A-holes who really think they aren't complete bigots?

Zero substance means you cannot refute the OP.

 

[Derideo_Te]

I've not seen much difference between Libertarians and modern day Tea Party conservatives.

Shut the fuck up. Research before you post. Unless your intention is character assassination.


Let's see how Libertarians view the Koch/Brownback alliance.


Beltway Libertarian Money Men

Thomas DiLorenzo

Charles Koch and Steve Forbes have long been major funders of the Beltway libertarian crowd. So who are they supporting for president? Koch is just wild about Sam Brownback, while Forbes is a Giuliani supporter. A Christo-fascist and an ordinary, run-of-the-mill fascist, in other words. These phony baloney “libertarians” apparently never heard of Ron Paul (who one Cato nerd once stupidly dismissed as being “too white and too middle class”).

Maybe you should do some research yourself. Your link/source doesn't counter what I said.

Our data show that libertarians have generally voted Republican—66 percent for Ronald Reagan in 1980, 74 percent for George H. W. Bush in 1988, and 72 percent for George W. Bush in 2000.
The Libertarian Vote Cato Institute

the broadly defined libertarian vote (folks interested in reducing the size, spending, and scope of government) has tended to vote for Republican candidates, ostensibly because of the GOP's limited-government rhetoric. Depending on the definition,

upwards of seven out of 10 libertarian-leaning voters go Republican in presidential races.
Study Who will Libertarians Vote for President in 2012

Here is part of my research, from the same article:


"But for those on the trail of the elusive swing voter, the real news is 2004. The libertarian vote for Bush dropped from 72 to 59 percent, while the libertarian vote for the Democratic nominee almost doubled. It’s not hard to imagine why. Libertarians didn’t like Bush’s record on excessive federal spending, expansion of entitlements, the federal marriage amendment, government spying, and the war in Iraq. Kerry didn’t offer libertarians much except that he was not Bush, but he still narrowed the Republican majority among libertarians from 52 points to 21 points.


Unfortunately , Libertarians are forced to vote for THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS - while admitting that BOTH candidates will do severe damage to our nation , we must then concluded which one will do less damage.

And so it fucking goes.

.

Libertarians voted for Governor Brownback. Just do the math.

22% of Americans self identify as Libertarians.

Poll 22 percent of Americans lean libertarian - The Washington Post

The poll also shows libertarians identify much more with the GOP (43 percent) than with the Democratic Party (5 percent), but half identify with neither party.

So if we look at the election results for Brownback compared to the Libertarian candidate this is what we find;

Sam Brownback - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Only 2.7% voted for the Libertarian candidate. That means that remaining 19.3% voted for someone else and since only 5% identify with Dems that means the overwhelming majority of Libertarians voted for Brownback.

Hardly surprising since he was campaigning as a Tea Party Libertarian with the backing of the Koch Brothers.

You own this economic disaster in KS even though you lack the honesty and integrity to admit it.