Scientifically, it is true.
However, when talking about our current continental placements it is still just a fraction of what has been seen in the past. And even during the Little Ice Age, we saw some absolutely massive storms. But the differences in even the last decades or centuries are simply as much science as sticking your finger outside, and if it gets wet saying it is raining.
I absolutely shake my head when people try to make claims based on years or decades, when we have records going back hundreds of years and longer. I keep hearing that states like California are seeing less rainfall because of "Global Warming", yet we know for a fact that rainfall is actually up fractions of an inch over what they were over three hundred years ago.
The "drought" there has not a damned thing to do with "climate change", it's simple over population and the changing of the definition by the IPCC to include man caused over consumption into the definition of "drought". That is why that area has the same rainfall as it did a century ago, but there was no drought then. The population was ¼ of what the population is today. Rain actually increased fractionally (about 0.05%), but there are now 4 people trying to use that water for every 1 person trying to use it a century ago.
But it has not a damned thing to do with "climate change". This is why my tongue in cheek response whenever anybody starts screaming about "droughts", my answer is to kill off around 60% of the global population. Suddenly, all of those "droughts" will vanish overnight.