The Great Hurricane Drought of 2025

[EMH]

Are we calling the season over yet ...

Atlantic storms 2025 = 12 ... average 14 ...
East Pacific storms 2025 = 18 ... average 17 ...
Central Pacific storms 2025 = 4 ... average 4 ...

That's "normal" and "average" ... THERE, I ruined it for everyone ...

CO2 FRAUD is claiming a "Breakout" in Cane Activity due to "warming."

Clearly, that is not happening even if Kash and DOJ are cool with NWS fudging the cane that hit Jamaica into a cat 5 when it really was a cat 1.

 

[ReinyDays]

CO2 FRAUD is claiming a "Breakout" in Cane Activity due to "warming."

Clearly, that is not happening even if Kash and DOJ are cool with NWS fudging the cane that hit Jamaica into a cat 5 when it really was a cat 1.

Isn't that special ...

 

[ding]

It doesn't cause any "warming" either

Sincerely


highly correlated satellite and ballon data
surface air pressure

1C per doubling of CO2 at the most. So not much.

 

[EMH]

1C per doubling of CO2 at the most. So not much.

There is no evidence of that. There is evidence that increasing CO2 from 270ppm to 400ppm did nothing, did not warm atmosphere at all.

CO2 FRAUD "faux skeptics" simply won't accept that truth, since it is their "job" to lie to the American people and keep the "warming myth" ongoing, since that is what funds them...

 

[ding]

There is no evidence of that. There is evidence that increasing CO2 from 270ppm to 400ppm did nothing, did not warm atmosphere at all.

CO2 FRAUD "faux skeptics" simply won't accept that truth, since it is their "job" to lie to the American people and keep the "warming myth" ongoing, since that is what funds them...

It's based on the physics of radiative forcing. Learn some science.
Molecules like carbon dioxide are transparent to most incoming solar (shortwave) radiation but absorb and re-emit outgoing terrestrial (longwave, or infrared) radiation. An increase in their concentration acts like thickening the planet's "thermal blanket," trapping more heat in the lower atmosphere and at the surface.

 

[ReinyDays]

It's based on the physics of radiative forcing. Learn some science.
Molecules like carbon dioxide are transparent to most incoming solar (shortwave) radiation but absorb and re-emit outgoing terrestrial (longwave, or infrared) radiation. An increase in their concentration acts like thickening the planet's "thermal blanket," trapping more heat in the lower atmosphere and at the surface.

He doesn't believe in the Greenhouse Effect ... this is a sock-puppet for SSDD ...

 

[Hafar1014]

It's based on the physics of radiative forcing. Learn some science.
Molecules like carbon dioxide are transparent to most incoming solar (shortwave) radiation but absorb and re-emit outgoing terrestrial (longwave, or infrared) radiation. An increase in their concentration acts like thickening the planet's "thermal blanket," trapping more heat in the lower atmosphere and at the surface.

CO2 has no effect on temperature

 

[ding]

He doesn't believe in the Greenhouse Effect ... this is a sock-puppet for SSDD ...

That's ok you don't believe replacing fossil fuels with solar will have a net negative feedback.

Or that changes in ocean currents and how they distribute heat are responsible for abrupt climate changes.

Or that the planet is better off with more atmospheric CO2 rather than less.

Or that the planet is naturally warming like it does every time the northern hemisphere deglaciates.

 

[ding]

CO2 has no effect on temperature

Sure it does. It's a logarithmic relationship. Learn some science.

 

[EMH]

It's based on the physics of radiative forcing

There is theory and there is data. All forms of gas absorb one form of EM or another. O3 absorbs UV, which is 10k more powerful than weak IR. CO2 absorbs weak IR and that didn't do jack according to the ACTUAL DATA

satellites, balloons, and surface air pressure

Theory that increasing atmospheric CO2 causes warming = REJECTED

 

[EMH]

An increase in their concentration acts like thickening the planet's "thermal blanket," trapping more heat in the lower atmosphere and at the surface.

outed as completely false by all actual data on the issue. Only supported by FUDGED FRAUD.

 

[ding]

There is theory and there is data. All forms of gas absorb one form of EM or another. O3 absorbs UV, which is 10k more powerful than weak IR. CO2 absorbs weak IR and that didn't do jack according to the ACTUAL DATA

satellites, balloons, and surface air pressure

Theory that increasing atmospheric CO2 causes warming = REJECTED

It's physics. A doubling of CO2 will produce 1C of warming. A halving of CO2 will 1C of cooling.

 

[EMH]

It's physics. A doubling of CO2 will produce 1C of warming. A halving of CO2 will 1C of cooling.

Refuted by satellites, balloons, and surface air pressure.

A doubling of atmospheric CO2 would do nothing because a 50% increase did nothing.

 

[ding]

Refuted by satellites, balloons, and surface air pressure.

A doubling of atmospheric CO2 would do nothing because a 50% increase did nothing.

Fake news.

 

[EMH]

Fake news.

any evidence Earth surface air pressure is increasing?

Nope

 

[Hafar1014]

Fake news.

CO2 cannot make the earth warm. Green plants will convert it to O2 and increase that ability exponentially. We cant produce enough and we are at a minimal level and need to produce more

 

[ding]

any evidence Earth surface air pressure is increasing?

Nope

Red herring And even that you don't get right.

 

[ding]

CO2 cannot make the earth warm. Green plants will convert it to O2 and increase that ability exponentially. We cant produce enough and we are at a minimal level and need to produce more

Your arguing against the greenhouse gas effect isn't helping your cause. It's hurting it.

 

[Hafar1014]

Your arguing against the greenhouse gas effect isn't helping your cause. It's hurting it.

Temperature has not increased and its been warmer before humans even existed. Human activity does not make the earth warmer. The sun creates climate. There is zero valid research that shows CO2 makes the earth warmer. Climate change is a lie and its dead as doornail today.

 

[ding]

Temperature has not increased and its been warmer before humans even existed. Human activity does not make the earth warmer. The sun creates climate. There is zero valid research that shows CO2 makes the earth warmer. Climate change is a lie and its dead as doornail today.

The theoretical associated surface temperature - FROM PHYSICS CALCULATIONS - is 1C per doubling of CO2. The same calculations exist for the other greenhouse gases.

Do you deny the GHG effect of all greenhouse gases or just CO2?