The great global warming fraud

[Old Rocks]

Who gives a flying s**t about scientists.

Check with the engineers. They are the practical ones. They know how things work in the real world.

Look at that scientist....lab coat, bottles and a scope. They try to scale up lab tests to a global system.

Hysterical.

Most engineers are conservative.

Most engineers are not on board with the great global warming retard show.

Now that is about the most idiotic post I have seen today. LOL Most of the scientists that study the Arctic have been there months at a time. Engineers use what the scientists discover, most are not that conversant in science. Data from satellites, measurements of ocean temperatures, these are not theoretical things, but real data, and it all says we are warming rapidly.

 

[Old Rocks]

Not this professor.

Climate Catastrophe: What Experts Really Say

Explore the Climate Catastrophe debate with Dr. Richard Lindzen's insights on warming and the costs of Net Zero policies.

clintel.org

That professor has very little respect in the scientific community at present. He testified before Congress that tobacco is harmless. He testified for the fossil fuel corporations for $2500 a day when that was big money. MIT got rid of him for a reason.

 

[Old Rocks]

Well then, that eliminates wind power, solar, and EV cars as NONE of them meet your definition of "clean energy" unless one lies to oneself and does not take into account the full scope of such energy from inception to dissolution, and rather just look at one narrow aspect of its use, calling any of them "clean" while not considering what goes into mining their raw materials, the manufacture of them, the maintenance and the waste disposal of them once they are broke and worn out.

All these new "clean" energies really do is shift industry away from oil and gas towards a new market with new companies and such, as well as merely shift where in the chain of creation the most pollution occurs.

I wonder what the Left's reaction would be to the proposal that we switch to clean energy, solar, wind, EV cars and the like, but the same companies already in the energy sector currently producing most of the oil and gas handle it?

I bet the Left would HATE that suggestion! Because their real goal is to put oil and gas out of business rather than create clean energy! The Left would rather go without clean energy, without solar and gas and EV electric rather than let the Oil/gas companies reap and control the technologies.

The Left simply want to cut Big Oil out of the energy profits by creating a new technology they control to steal away the money for themselves. It is about money and power, not saving the planet, which is just their Shtick.

LOL Yes, everything we build requires energy and materials. But the amount of damage done in mining for materials for wind turbines, solar panels, and batteries is far, far less than that for obtaining oil and coal. But you liars will simply not admit that. One has to wonder what your reason for denying obvious reality is.

 

[Old Rocks]

fudged FRAUD outed as such by the reality of the situation, that the ice grew and keeps growing... has for 40 million years.







fudged fraud and we paid for it








is 100% refuted by the actual unFudged satellite and balloon data and surface air pressure







Let me ask you this. You "believe" Antarctica lost ice despite growing a new ice layer over the entire continent. How? If the entire continent got thicker, the only possible explanation would be icebergs, since AA has no liquid water.... do you realize how ridiculous that claim is?

Do you realize how ridiculous your silly illogic is? LOL