The future of the GOP isn't about Ron DeSantis or Glenn Youngkin

[maybelooking]

Give me one example, even if it's hypothetical, on how we are stopping ANYONE from voting.

They can't.

Its a liberal talking point. Nothing more. Feelings over facts.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The Republican Party is now a full-blown Fascist Party.

In what way?

Let's test your lie, shall we?

• democrats have a scapegoat based on race. Whites are the new "Juden."
  • Republicans judge people by the content of their Character
• democrats are collectivist, seeking control of the means of production by their Reich.
  • Republicans support free people trading freely with each other
• democrats are totalitarian. Well duh.
  • Republicans promote individual liberty
• democrats supplant civil rights with group privilege
  • Republicans support rights for all
• democrats eradicate the rule of law and create dictatorship based on the party
  • Capricious and arbitrary rule by dictators runs against the concepts of lberty
• democrats forcibly suppress religion
  • The state is the god of the democrats
• democrats crush freedom of speech
  • Hate speech laws, political correctness, cancel culture
• democrats create a police state and "Roger Stone" enemies for even minor process crimes in order to create terror
  • One of your own opposed Biden's border treason and had the Gestapo kick his door in.

So we know who the fascists are.


As founding father of the democrat party said;

"Accuse your enemy of what you are doing." - Vladimir Lenin

 

[martybegan]

“DeSantis and Youngkin both have worked to adapt to Trumpism, to find ways to tap into the excitement Trump arouses in their own way, something nearly every Republican candidate will do in the next few election cycles. But the real question we should be using to assess these candidates is not the moderation of their tone or their relationship to Trump -- it's their dedication to democracy.

In Republican politics these days, that dedication is increasingly rare. Calls for election audits, attempts to strip power from voters, threats of future insurrections -- all have been defining features of Republican politics in the past year since Trump left office. Which is why, when it comes to discussions of the future of the Republican Party and who might lead it after Trump, the main question we should all be asking is about the candidate's relationship to democracy. Are they actively working to undermine it? Are they playing along with the baroque schemes and conspiracies of the antidemocratic right? Are they speaking out forcefully against the insurrection and efforts to undermine future elections?

Where Republicans land on those questions will determine not only the future of the Republican Party, but the future of the republic itself.”

The future of the GOP isn't about Ron DeSantis or Glenn Youngkin | CNN

As debates continue about the Republican Party's post-Trump future, it will be critical to see past conventional political labels -- lest they conceal the true threats imperiling American democracy, writes Nicole Hemmer. The tendency to see the Republican Party as a body organized by a split...

www.cnn.com

The antidemocratic right, indeed.

Concern Troll is concerned.

 

[PoliticalChic]

What category do you put the fake russian dossier in?
I put it in shenanigans, but you probably would put it in gospel

I bet he bought every one of the 30+ lies and hoaxes.

 

[lennypartiv]

The future of the GOP isn't about Ron DeSantis or Glenn Youngkin​

Hopefully it's Boebert and Greene because they know how to get under the skin of liberal Democrats.

 

[Hellokitty]

Why do you think it wouldn't?...the two we got sure are corrupt...we need to give people a third way...a way where in my opinion the majority in this nation really are....

For starters because 1 of the 2 corrupt parties controls the majority of main/social media.
I agree there are many issue of agreement within the majority of the nation, but the majority of people get pulled to one side or the other based on a few issues of disagreement.

 

[daveman]

The Republican Party is now a full-blown Fascist Party.

Hurting leftists' feelings is not fascism.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Hurting leftists' feelings is not fascism.

I think it is safe to go beyond that, and say that if you are not hurting leftists' feelings, then you are not accomplishing anything at all worthwhile to make the world a better place.

 

[Dragonlady]

Give me one example, even if it's hypothetical, on how we are stopping ANYONE from voting.

You’re changing the hours so that hourly rated working people can’t get to the polls. You’re using specified forms of ID, instead of any form of government ID for voting.

Putting polling stations for poor neighbourhoods outside of areas that are serviced by public transit.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

You’re changing the hours so that hourly rated working people can’t get to the polls. You’re using specified forms of ID, instead of any form of government ID for voting.

Putting polling stations for poor neighbourhoods outside of areas that are serviced by public transit.

Correct.

And this goes to the future of the GOP and whether the party will continue on its anti-democratic path hostile to the political process and the right to vote.

 

[Confederate Soldier]

You’re changing the hours so that hourly rated working people can’t get to the polls. You’re using specified forms of ID, instead of any form of government ID for voting.

Putting polling stations for poor neighbourhoods outside of areas that are serviced by public transit.

So all of this would impact me, a lower class white person, who has to drive over 25 miles to visit a grocery store, let alone vote. I don't have whatever ID they are requiring either, and when I work, I don't get off from dusk to dawn. So all of this sounds like it would hurt lower class rural white people, than it would affect lower class people of color who live in or right next to, a city.

 

[Juicin]

“DeSantis and Youngkin both have worked to adapt to Trumpism, to find ways to tap into the excitement Trump arouses in their own way, something nearly every Republican candidate will do in the next few election cycles. But the real question we should be using to assess these candidates is not the moderation of their tone or their relationship to Trump -- it's their dedication to democracy.

In Republican politics these days, that dedication is increasingly rare. Calls for election audits, attempts to strip power from voters, threats of future insurrections -- all have been defining features of Republican politics in the past year since Trump left office. Which is why, when it comes to discussions of the future of the Republican Party and who might lead it after Trump, the main question we should all be asking is about the candidate's relationship to democracy. Are they actively working to undermine it? Are they playing along with the baroque schemes and conspiracies of the antidemocratic right? Are they speaking out forcefully against the insurrection and efforts to undermine future elections?

Where Republicans land on those questions will determine not only the future of the Republican Party, but the future of the republic itself.”

The future of the GOP isn't about Ron DeSantis or Glenn Youngkin | CNN

As debates continue about the Republican Party's post-Trump future, it will be critical to see past conventional political labels -- lest they conceal the true threats imperiling American democracy, writes Nicole Hemmer. The tendency to see the Republican Party as a body organized by a split...

www.cnn.com

The antidemocratic right, indeed.

You understand in an actual democracy what we would get is basically the "trumpist" party platform...Right/

Socially conservative

Economically liberal to the poors with some mercantilism mixed in.

Sexual rights for queers? Gone in a democracy

Climate change? Try clean air and water, no AMerican wants to pay higher energy prices for anything but those two issues

Student debt relief/ lol

Defund the police/

List goes on and on

 

[Lesh]

Give me one example, even if it's hypothetical, on how we are stopping ANYONE from voting.

Lowering the number of voting booths or not increasing them with population increases creates long lines.

Long lines mean that at least some people will give up and not vote.
'
There

 

[Confederate Soldier]

Lowering the number of voting booths or not increasing them with population increases creates long lines.

Long lines mean that at least some people will give up and not vote.
'
There

IF this were true, it wouldn't single out minority voters or democrat voters, because everyone would be equally annoyed, and equally impatient. Republicans and Democrats.

 

[Lesh]

IF this were true, it wouldn't single out minority voters or democrat voters, because everyone would be equally annoyed, and equally impatient. Republicans and Democrats.

As long as it happens in Dem heavy districts...and it does. The fact that some Republicans are disenfranchised means nothing to the GOP as long as it gives them an ADVANTAGE

You asked for one,... I gave you one, There are many

 

[Uncensored2008]

You’re changing the hours so that hourly rated working people can’t get to the polls.

8 Am to 8 PM?

Nah, you're just lying

You’re using specified forms of ID,

Like on Airlines?

Like vaccine passports to go to a restaurant?

instead of any form of government ID for voting.

Putting polling stations for poor neighbourhoods outside of areas that are serviced by public transit.

You know this will disenfranchise the key demographic for democrats.

 

[Confederate Soldier]

As long as it happens in Dem heavy districts...and it does. The fact that some Republicans are disenfranchised means nothing to the GOP as long as it gives them an ADVANTAGE

You asked for one,... I gave you one, There are many

What do you mean, some? Republican voters for the most part, are rural or small town. They have to drive very long distances to polling places. Some towns will be overwhelmed by republicans trying to vote. It will hurt white republicans far more than it will hurt minority democrats.

 

[Lesh]

What do you mean, some? Republican voters for the most part, are rural or small town. They have to drive very long distances to polling places. Some towns will be overwhelmed by republicans trying to vote. It will hurt white republicans far more than it will hurt minority democrats.

Dance all you want...long lines are one way to disenfranchise voters.

You asked. I told you

 

[Uncensored2008]

Dance all you want...long lines are one way to disenfranchise voters.

You asked. I told you

Frau Braun, how will they make long lines for Nazis but not for Republicans?

Wouldn't long line affect everyone?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

OP mad that flash bang is tanking and the country can't stand him. Yeah, 81million huh, lol.