The Fulton County, Georgia Case Against Trump

[john doe 101]

Pay close attention.

To those of us who have lived through a dozen or more election cycles, I don't have to remind you that past elections have often been characterized by "found" votes, almost always in Democrat-controlled big cities. It may not even be a matter of subversive activities...a bag of ballots found in the basement of the polling place or in a delivery truck, sometimes they are later found at the local post office. It happens. In the Bush-Gore election of 2000 they were finding votes in many different places as the appeals and challenges played out. It definitely happens.

In the aftermath of the 2020 Presidential Election, ,the sitting President of the United States asked the Governor of Georgia to FIND some number of ballots, sufficient to shift the balance in Georgia from Biden to Trump. There is NOTHING wrong with this request. Indeed, it is entirely appropriate. In effect, he is asking the Governor to "leave no stone unturned," in an all-out attempt to find every single vote, presuming that if and when that happens, Trump will be on top.

Trump did not ask the Governor to "manufacture" or "change" votes, or to commit any sort of fraud - merely to FIND as many votes as possible, hopefully Trump votes.

This whole case is bullshit. Every competent, objective attorney looking at the case knows it. Ultimately, probably years after the 2024 election, some appellate court will say, in effect, "This whole case is bullshit." Please excuse my use of esoteric legal language.

More gaslighting. Every attorney "doesnt know it". Fortunately people like you who know nothing about law arent in any type of position to do anything about it, either. Stay in your lane.

 

[Burgermeister]

This is an extreme example of the left accusing their opponents of what they themselves actually do.

 

[Independentthinker]

You should actually try some independent thinking sometime.

LOL. I love it when you guys say I can't possibly be an independent thinker unless I think the same as you.

 

[eagle7-31]

Trump is doomed with those like IndependentThinker supporting him.

ZIEG HEIL BIDEN!

 

[eagle7-31]

This is the one against Trump that I actually feared the most. But, I have some questions and statements that really need to be answered. Here's a link to the case followed by my questions and statements in the order they appear in the article.

Exclusive: Georgia prosecutors have messages showing Trump’s team is behind voting system breach

Atlanta-area prosecutors investigating efforts to overturn the 2020 election results in Georgia are in possession of text messages and emails directly connecting members of Donald Trump’s legal team to the early January 2021 voting system breach in Coffee County, sources tell CNN.

www.yahoo.com

1. Why is a Fulton county prosecutor investigating or involved with something from Coffee county?

2. Trump won Coffee county by about 70% of the vote. In addition, they allege that Trump's team tried to access sensitive voting software well AFTER the vote, not in an attempt to change election results but an attempt to prove voter fraud. It's actually quite surprising that Democrats call this part of an attempt to overturn an election, by simply wanting to check if there was voter fraud. I guess if they were to uncover voter fraud, Democrats say that it is an attempt to overturn the election.

3. Several Republicans and Republican media personalities warned about how Dominion voting machines could “very easily” be manipulated to flip votes from one candidate to another. It’s a claim that has been repeatedly debunked. And yet, Trump and his team have been sued and even lost and may now even be indicted for attempting, not to change votes, but to access Dominion voting machines in order to check for that vote fraud, and apparently they were successful in breaching at least some of those Dominion voting machines, of which the left claim is impossible to do anyway. So, how could Trump and his team, checking for vote fraud, access the impenetrable Dominion voting machines?

4. Also, not in this particular article, there was an investigation into Georgia voting fraud where the unanimous decision proved there was no widespread voter fraud, and yet here they may indict Trump for what amounts to voter fraud for trying to overturn an election where their very own unanimous decision proved there was no voter fraud, not even by Trump. But, let's indict him now anyway for election fraud when they had already unanimously decided there was no election fraud.

Six days before pro-Trump operatives gained unauthorized access to voting systems, the local elections official who allegedly helped facilitate the breach sent a “written invitation” to attorneys working for Trump, according to text messages obtained by CNN.
Investigators have scrutinized the actions of various individuals who were involved, including Misty Hampton, a former Coffee County elections official who authored the letter of invitation referenced in text messages and other documents that have been turned over to prosecutors, multiple sources told CNN.

In other words, if there was a hack, according to CNN’s own reporting on the known facts, there’s no evidence that Trump people either did it or authorized it. Instead, an election official, aware of their concerns, invited them to examine the system.

 

[john doe 101]

This is an extreme example of the left accusing their opponents of what they themselves actually do.

No, actually it's people on the right and left accusing anti-Americans of attempting to steal an election. That is what is actually happening here.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Of course not. Anyone who defends Trump in any way from the left's abuse of power is automatically labeled a MAGAhead. But, beware, there are many moderates and Independents who see Democrats's abuse of power and many of those independents now favor Trump over Biden.

You're a magaturd because you believe any/all investigations re: Trump are democrat 'abuses of power'.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

LOL. I love it when you guys say I can't possibly be an independent thinker unless I think the same as you.

But that is not what I said. The fact is that you don't think at all

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

LOL. I love it when you guys say I can't possibly be an independent thinker unless I think the same as you.

You're a magaturd because you're always using magaturd talking points and never using any critical thinking.

 

[Burgermeister]

You're a magaturd because you're always using magaturd talking points and never using any critical thinking.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Burgermeister is from MAGAturdia, indeed.

 

[Independentthinker]

But that is not what I said. The fact is that you don't think at all

LOL. I love it when you guys say that if I don't think just like you, then you claim I don't think at all.

 

[Independentthinker]

You're a magaturd because you're always using magaturd talking points and never using any critical thinking.

As I said, the only critical thinking you guys think is if I just buy all of your BS without thinking independently on my own.

 

[candycorn]

Of course not. Anyone who defends Trump in any way from the left's abuse of power is automatically labeled a MAGAhead. But, beware, there are many moderates and Independents who see Democrats's abuse of power and many of those independents now favor Trump over Biden.

Are you going to use the line about exposing the nipple on our soul like Elaine Benes did?

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

As I said, the only critical thinking you guys think is if I just buy all of your BS without thinking independently on my own.

Which BS? Be specific.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

LOL. I love it when you guys say that if I don't think just like you, then you claim I don't think at all.

Please explain how you have INDEPENDENTLY came to the conclusion that the election was stolen and the Trump did not engage in illegal acts to overturn the results without resorting to MADAt talking points

 

[g5000]

1. Why is a Fulton county prosecutor investigating or involved with something from Coffee county?

Fani Willis is working on a RICO angle. She isn't just looking into Coffee County, she is also looking into Trump's illegal fake electors in seven states to establish a racketeering charge.

 

[g5000]

Pay close attention.

To those of us who have lived through a dozen or more election cycles, I don't have to remind you that past elections have often been characterized by "found" votes, almost always in Democrat-controlled big cities. It may not even be a matter of subversive activities...a bag of ballots found in the basement of the polling place or in a delivery truck, sometimes they are later found at the local post office. It happens. In the Bush-Gore election of 2000 they were finding votes in many different places as the appeals and challenges played out. It definitely happens.

In the aftermath of the 2020 Presidential Election, ,the sitting President of the United States asked the Governor of Georgia to FIND some number of ballots, sufficient to shift the balance in Georgia from Biden to Trump. There is NOTHING wrong with this request. Indeed, it is entirely appropriate. In effect, he is asking the Governor to "leave no stone unturned," in an all-out attempt to find every single vote, presuming that if and when that happens, Trump will be on top.

Trump did not ask the Governor to "manufacture" or "change" votes, or to commit any sort of fraud - merely to FIND as many votes as possible, hopefully Trump votes.

This whole case is bullshit. Every competent, objective attorney looking at the case knows it. Ultimately, probably years after the 2024 election, some appellate court will say, in effect, "This whole case is bullshit." Please excuse my use of esoteric legal language.

Pay close attention.

Trump's accusation of fraud in Georgia had already been debunked when he called the Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. You need to read the transcript of that call.

Trump brought up the already debunked bullshit about the "suitcases" of ballots. His hoax was based on a deliberately edited video created to hoax you rubes. During the call, Raffensperger offered to provide Trump the FULL video of the entire evening which exploded the hoax Trump was pushing.

Trump's response?

Raffensperger: Mr. President, we’ll send you the link from WSB.

Trump: I don’t care about the link. I don’t need it.


Trump then threatened to weaponize the federal government and prosecute Raffensperger and his attorney if they did not go along with his hoax.

And THAT is when he crossed the line into illegality.

"That’s a criminal, that’s a criminal offense. And you can’t let that happen. That’s a big risk to you and to Ryan, your lawyer. And that’s a big risk. But they are shredding ballots, in my opinion, based on what I’ve heard. And they are removing machinery and they’re moving it as fast as they can, both of which are criminal finds. And you can’t let it happen and you are letting it happen. You know, I mean, I’m notifying you that you’re letting it happen. So look. All I want to do is this. I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have because we won the state."


Trump brought up criminality a dozen times when threatening Raffensperger.

 

[g5000]

Raffensperger: You’re talking about the State Farm video. And I think it’s extremely unfortunate that Rudy Giuliani or his people, they sliced and diced that video and took it out of context. The next day we brought in WSB-TV and we let them show, see the full run of tape and what you’ll see, the events that transpired are nowhere near what was projected by, you know —

 

[g5000]

Raffensperger: Mr. President, we’ll send you the link from WSB.

Trump: I don’t care about the link. I don’t need it.



Trump hired not one, but TWO, research firms to prove his Big Lie.

The TWO firms Trump hired found no fraud.

TWO!

Trump buried those reports and continued to lie.



The Michigan Republican House Speaker and Republican Senate Majority Leader said there was no fraud and would certify the election. Trump ignored them and continued to lie.


The US Attorney General and the Deputy Attorney General told Trump there was no fraud. Trump ignored them and continued to lie.


A recount in Wisconsin demanded by Trump found there was no fraud and actually increased Trump's loss by a wider margin. Trump continued to lie.


State and federal courts, including many helmed by Trump appointees, found no proof of fraud. Trump ignored them and continued to lie.

The Director of National Intelligence informed Trump the election was secure and there was no fraud. Trump ignored him and continued to lie.

The Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency told Trump there was no fraud. Trump ignored them and continued to lie.

The senior White House attorneys told Trump there was no fraud. Trump ignored them and continued to lie.

Senior staffers of Trump's own campaign team told him he had lost! Trump ignored them and continued to lie.

State legislators and secretaries of state all around the country, many of whom were Republicans who had backed Trump's re-election, told Trump there was no fraud and he had lost. Trump ignored them and continued to lie.



Trump knew he lost.

With his Big Lie defeated at every turn, Trump drafted illegal fake electors in seven states.