The Free World needs a new leader

There are no free world leaders in Europe. These fools need to stop lecturing us about the free world when they are working on returning Germany to its dark days.
 
They all are. :rolleyes:
Not really. The Dems were so afraid to offend antisemitic Muslims that Kamala skipped over picking the Jewish guy from PA and went with the imbecile Waltz.
 
I voted for the president of the United States, not leader of get everything for free across the world. When the rest of the world starts pulling its own weight we can resume such conversations.
 
Not really. The Dems were so afraid to offend antisemitic Muslims that Kamala skipped over picking the Jewish guy from PA and went with the imbecile Waltz.
Look at the funding. Follow the money. Yeah, really.
 
No. You think that based on a distortion of reality where defending oneself from Russian aggression is a provocation.
In 1962, we came very close to nuclear WWIII because the Soviet Union was placing nuclear missiles mere miles from the Florida coast. Russia views Ukraine making overtures to NATO in the same light and will not tolerate NATO expanding that close to the Russian border. Him being correct or not is irrelevant, that is one reason why he acted when he did. Another reason is likely that he saw a weak, indecisive American president who wouldn't do anything if he invaded.
 
If Russia wasn't interested in western expansion, then eastward expansion of NATO wouldn't have been threatening to them.
NATO would never invade Russia
It would lead to a nuclear war

NATO is looking to prevent Russian expansion
 
If Trump came out with a new law against drunk driving, the Dems would side with the drunks.
45 of them in the Senate voted yesterday in favor of boys playing on girls teams. That should be fun tonight when they get up and walk out when he says he's banned boys in girls sports
 
NATO would never invade Russia
It would lead to a nuclear war

NATO is looking to prevent Russian expansion
That's the western expectation, and as always is colored by the inevitable, "we are virtuous, so we would never try to blah, blah, blah". How does the Russian mindset view that, given that they have been expanding and were once stood down by an American president when they tried to put nukes in Cuba? You expect your enemies to act like you do, hence of course he saw Ukraine's overtures to NATO as a threat. Heck, that's one BIG reason why we've resisted taking Ukraine into NATO in the first place.
 
That's the western expectation, and as always is colored by the inevitable, "we are virtuous, so we would never try to blah, blah, blah". How does the Russian mindset view that, given that they have been expanding and were once stood down by an American president when they tried to put nukes in Cuba? You expect your enemies to act like you do, hence of course he saw Ukraine's overtures to NATO as a threat. Heck, that's one BIG reason why we've resisted taking Ukraine into NATO in the first place.
Ukraine overtures to NATO were warranted

After the collapse of the USSR, Ukraine had the third most nuclear weapons. They voluntarily surrendered their nukes based on an assurance of protection from the west.
Russia has repeatedly violated their sovereignty
 
Ukraine overtures to NATO were warranted

After the collapse of the USSR, Ukraine had the third most nuclear weapons. They voluntarily surrendered their nukes based on an assurance of protection from the west.
Russia has repeatedly violated their sovereignty
That's a dangerous game Russia has been playing, daring the US to get involved. I'm just glad we haven't put troops in harm's way over there, yet.
 
That's a dangerous game Russia has been playing, daring the US to get involved. I'm just glad we haven't put troops in harm's way over there, yet.
President Biden wisely avoided sending US Troops like was done in Vietnam, Kuwait, Iraq and Afghanistan

He built an alliance to provide Ukraine the weapons it needs to fight Russia

Trump screwed it all up and is supporting Russia
 
Look at the funding. Follow the money. Yeah, really.
Yeah, really. She wouldn’t pick the Jewish guy. The Dems are more afraid of offending the Muslims than the Jews.

You can see that at all the Jew-hate lib colleges.
 
45 of them in the Senate voted yesterday in favor of boys playing on girls teams. That should be fun tonight when they get up and walk out when he says he's banned boys in girls sports
I am so looking forward to this speech!
 
Yeah, really. She wouldn’t pick the Jewish guy. The Dems are more afraid of offending the Muslims than the Jews.

You can see that at all the Jew-hate lib colleges.
And yet, the money is the same. :rolleyes:
 
It's the same amount. No one cut israel's annual aid.
You are on another topic. I am talking about the ARAB money flowing into America and turning people into Jew-haters.
 
I am so looking forward to this speech!
I think he needs to repeat at least 3 times. "No boys in girls sports. No boys in girls sports. I can't believe we're even having this conversation. No boys in girls sports.'
 
Back
Top Bottom