The Four Main Fails of AGW

[CrusaderFrank]

So, does the heat retained by CO2 raise temperature?

If your stupid question has a point to it, then make it directly. Nobody is going to play your stupid cult games.

Pooh flinging monkey says what?

 

[westwall]

Here are the 4 main reasons why AGW fails:

1. There are no experiments.

A flat out lie. The absorption characteristics of CO2 are characterized by hundreds of papers. We've shown them to Frank before.

2. This additional planet killing atmospheric heat in 1 above is somehow also heating the oceans down 700m deep?

Well, yes. Again, we've explained that to Frank in one-syllable words. The fact that he's an imbecile doesn't make reality invalid.

3. So many failed predictions!

Again, a big lie. The climate scientist predictions have been excellent, while Frank and his cult pals have faceplanted consistently for over 40 years running now.

4. The AGW Cult;

Flat earthers and scientologists also claim that those outside of their cults are the real cultists. That's standard behavior for authoritarian-follower cult losers. They can cry and whine all they like, but all the data _still_ say's they're kook cult losers. Frank thinks he can overturn reality if he just throws enough trantrums, but that is not the case.

AGW science crosses all political boundaries all around the world, because it's actual science. If left-wing politics vanished, the science wouldn't change at all.

Frank's butthurt denialism is restricted mostly to American conservatives, because it's entirely political. If right-wing politics vanished, denialism would instantly cease to exist.

Here are the 4 main reasons why AGW fails:

1. There are no experiments.

A flat out lie. The absorption characteristics of CO2 are characterized by hundreds of papers. We've shown them to Frank before.

2. This additional planet killing atmospheric heat in 1 above is somehow also heating the oceans down 700m deep?

Well, yes. Again, we've explained that to Frank in one-syllable words. The fact that he's an imbecile doesn't make reality invalid.

3. So many failed predictions!

Again, a big lie. The climate scientist predictions have been excellent, while Frank and his cult pals have faceplanted consistently for over 40 years running now.

4. The AGW Cult;

Flat earthers and scientologists also claim that those outside of their cults are the real cultists. That's standard behavior for authoritarian-follower cult losers. They can cry and whine all they like, but all the data _still_ say's they're kook cult losers. Frank thinks he can overturn reality if he just throws enough trantrums, but that is not the case.

AGW science crosses all political boundaries all around the world, because it's actual science. If left-wing politics vanished, the science wouldn't change at all.

Frank's butthurt denialism is restricted mostly to American conservatives, because it's entirely political. If right-wing politics vanished, denialism would instantly cease to exist.

Notice the Cat Lady did NOT respond with anything ON POINT but deflected and insulted

Of course. That's all they have. They toss out irrelevant points trying to deflect from the failures they have accumulated over the past 35 years. Tipping point after tipping point has come and gone, and the world is pretty much the same. These assholes are anti science religious nutjobs.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Have you ever been 700m down in the watery depths of an ocean?

Was there any point to such a stupid question? If so, you should make it directly and honestly. You know, act like a liberal.

Down 700m in the depths of the ocean, it is very cold down there. Or is that global warming that has that chilling effect?

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Here are the 4 main reasons why AGW fails:

1. There are no experiments.

A flat out lie. The absorption characteristics of CO2 are characterized by hundreds of papers. We've shown them to Frank before.

2. This additional planet killing atmospheric heat in 1 above is somehow also heating the oceans down 700m deep?

Well, yes. Again, we've explained that to Frank in one-syllable words. The fact that he's an imbecile doesn't make reality invalid.

3. So many failed predictions!

Again, a big lie. The climate scientist predictions have been excellent, while Frank and his cult pals have faceplanted consistently for over 40 years running now.

4. The AGW Cult;

Flat earthers and scientologists also claim that those outside of their cults are the real cultists. That's standard behavior for authoritarian-follower cult losers. They can cry and whine all they like, but all the data _still_ say's they're kook cult losers. Frank thinks he can overturn reality if he just throws enough trantrums, but that is not the case.

AGW science crosses all political boundaries all around the world, because it's actual science. If left-wing politics vanished, the science wouldn't change at all.

Frank's butthurt denialism is restricted mostly to American conservatives, because it's entirely political. If right-wing politics vanished, denialism would instantly cease to exist.

Here are the 4 main reasons why AGW fails:

1. There are no experiments.

A flat out lie. The absorption characteristics of CO2 are characterized by hundreds of papers. We've shown them to Frank before.

2. This additional planet killing atmospheric heat in 1 above is somehow also heating the oceans down 700m deep?

Well, yes. Again, we've explained that to Frank in one-syllable words. The fact that he's an imbecile doesn't make reality invalid.

3. So many failed predictions!

Again, a big lie. The climate scientist predictions have been excellent, while Frank and his cult pals have faceplanted consistently for over 40 years running now.

4. The AGW Cult;

Flat earthers and scientologists also claim that those outside of their cults are the real cultists. That's standard behavior for authoritarian-follower cult losers. They can cry and whine all they like, but all the data _still_ say's they're kook cult losers. Frank thinks he can overturn reality if he just throws enough trantrums, but that is not the case.

AGW science crosses all political boundaries all around the world, because it's actual science. If left-wing politics vanished, the science wouldn't change at all.

Frank's butthurt denialism is restricted mostly to American conservatives, because it's entirely political. If right-wing politics vanished, denialism would instantly cease to exist.

Notice the Cat Lady did NOT respond with anything ON POINT but deflected and insulted

Of course. That's all they have. They toss out irrelevant points trying to deflect from the failures they have accumulated over the past 35 years. Tipping point after tipping point has come and gone, and the world is pretty much the same. These assholes are anti science religious nutjobs.

No the world isnt the same, because if there actually was global warming and the sea levels were rising would Obama be buying up land right on the ocean? Of course that brown turd would be stupid enough to buy a house that would be under water in 12 years if AOC is right, because Obammy was that stupid with our money.

12 Years Left Due To Climate Change? Obama Says 'Screw It' And Buys Oceanfront Mega-Mansion.

townhall.com

 

[jc456]

well that one doesn't show the characteristics of CO2 and temperature at all.

And there go those goalposts, sailing down the field! You asked for an experiment that showed CO2 caused warming. I gave you one. Now you're making up bogus reasons why it doesn't count. Like this:

It's a failed experiment because there is no control of CO2.

Of course there is. One side has more CO2 than the other. It's precisely measured on each side.

it's been explained many times in here.

Don't tell such stupid lies. Even you should have standards.

I could go get more experiments. You'd just move the goalposts again. I hope you don't embarrass yourself by denying that. So why should we bother, when it's a given that you'll just lie more, as you did here?

Naw, it’s been explained. Your link doesn’t explain Frank’s number 1. You failed. No goal posts

 

[Dadoalex]

Here are the 4 main reasons why AGW fails:

1. There are no experiments. The central pillar is that an increase in a negligible atmospheric gas is generating heat that will soon end all life on Earth. Well, how much additional heat does the 120 ppm of CO2 generate? Why is there never a non-imaginary number provided by the lab work?

2. This additional planet killing atmospheric heat in 1 above is somehow also heating the oceans down 700m deep? Yet, it takes far more energy to heat water than air. Where is that missing energy?

3. So many failed predictions! Any real scientist would have had to discard the flawed theory and moved on, AGW is impervious to its graphic, public misses

4. The AGW Cult; yes, it's a Cult, because it's religion, not science, is oblivious to the fact that China generates more of this imaginary planet killing gas than all industrial nations combined and double the output of the USA. If this really was science and an existential threat, all the efforts would be on dialing back Chinese output. Instead, the AGW Cult excuses the ChiComs for being allowed to continue spewing this imaginary planet killing gas for 20 years beyond the latest alleged tipping point.

Here's the problem kids.
People who pretend to understand science.

CO2 doesn't produce heat.
CO2 retains heat not allowing it to escape to space.

And when you don't understand the science you are, of course, prone to making stupid suggestions.

So, does the heat retained by CO2 raise temperature?

Asked and answered.

If you've a point, make it.

 

[westwall]

Here are the 4 main reasons why AGW fails:

1. There are no experiments. The central pillar is that an increase in a negligible atmospheric gas is generating heat that will soon end all life on Earth. Well, how much additional heat does the 120 ppm of CO2 generate? Why is there never a non-imaginary number provided by the lab work?

2. This additional planet killing atmospheric heat in 1 above is somehow also heating the oceans down 700m deep? Yet, it takes far more energy to heat water than air. Where is that missing energy?

3. So many failed predictions! Any real scientist would have had to discard the flawed theory and moved on, AGW is impervious to its graphic, public misses

4. The AGW Cult; yes, it's a Cult, because it's religion, not science, is oblivious to the fact that China generates more of this imaginary planet killing gas than all industrial nations combined and double the output of the USA. If this really was science and an existential threat, all the efforts would be on dialing back Chinese output. Instead, the AGW Cult excuses the ChiComs for being allowed to continue spewing this imaginary planet killing gas for 20 years beyond the latest alleged tipping point.

Here's the problem kids.
People who pretend to understand science.

CO2 doesn't produce heat.
CO2 retains heat not allowing it to escape to space.

And when you don't understand the science you are, of course, prone to making stupid suggestions.

So, does the heat retained by CO2 raise temperature?

Asked and answered.

If you've a point, make it.

He did. The AGW crowd is an anti science religious cult.

Sylvia Brown, a KNOWN charlatan, has a far better predictive rate than ANY climatologists. ANYWHERE.

 

[jc456]

Asked and answered.

If you've a point, make it.

Read the OP

 

[CrusaderFrank]

mamooth

How much additional heat, measured by a temperature increase, does the additional 120 ppm of CO2 (from 280 to 400PPM), generate?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

great, which one shows the affect of CO2 on temperature?

Sure. Here's an easy one.

Needless to say, most deniers say it doesn't count, because .... reasons. They can't give one, other than "BUT IT DOESN'T AGREE WITH ME, SO IT'S WRONG!".

I did a search and not one article or experiment popped up. So, if you don't mind, which one of the experiments in that link shows the impact of CO2 on temperature.

Got it. Goalpost-moving. And now you're going to move the goalposts again, and again, and again.

1:36 of the video CO2 is 7.3% 7.3% >.04%

also the ice man dissolves to water vapor, a far more powerful GHG that CO2 ever was. You know that right?

You saw that CO2 was increased several orders of magnitude AND they had to add water vapor to make the fake work, right?

You Fail

and Fail.

 

[jc456]

A flat out lie. The absorption characteristics of CO2 are characterized by hundreds of papers. We've shown them to Frank before.

then why not link to one?

Because I've done so many times before, and Frank just lies about it. But since you asked, I count 77 papers listed here that define the spectral absorption characteristics of CO2.

https://lweb.cfa.harvard.edu/hitran/Updated/ref-table.pdf

A lot of this stuff originates with the Air Force, who were trying to make missiles with IR seeker heads. You can't make those work without knowing what kinds of IR will travel through the atmosphere.

Needless to say, the Air Force is clearly part of the socialist conspiracy.

why don't you just answer Frank?

How much additional heat, measured by a temperature increase, does the additional 120 ppm of CO2 (from 280 to 400PPM), generate?

 

[jc456]

great, which one shows the affect of CO2 on temperature?

Sure. Here's an easy one.

Needless to say, most deniers say it doesn't count, because .... reasons. They can't give one, other than "BUT IT DOESN'T AGREE WITH ME, SO IT'S WRONG!".

I did a search and not one article or experiment popped up. So, if you don't mind, which one of the experiments in that link shows the impact of CO2 on temperature.

Got it. Goalpost-moving. And now you're going to move the goalposts again, and again, and again.

1:36 of the video CO2 is 7.3% 7.3% >.04%

also the ice man dissolves to water vapor, a far more powerful GHG that CO2 ever was. You know that right?

You saw that CO2 was increased several orders of magnitude AND they had to add water vapor to make the fake work, right?

You Fail

and Fail.

Frank,
Hilarious.

 

[Flash]

Here are the 4 main reasons why AGW fails:

1. There are no experiments. The central pillar is that an increase in a negligible atmospheric gas is generating heat that will soon end all life on Earth. Well, how much additional heat does the 120 ppm of CO2 generate? Why is there never a non-imaginary number provided by the lab work?

2. This additional planet killing atmospheric heat in 1 above is somehow also heating the oceans down 700m deep? Yet, it takes far more energy to heat water than air. Where is that missing energy?

3. So many failed predictions! Any real scientist would have had to discard the flawed theory and moved on, AGW is impervious to its graphic, public misses

4. The AGW Cult; yes, it's a Cult, because it's religion, not science, is oblivious to the fact that China generates more of this imaginary planet killing gas than all industrial nations combined and double the output of the USA. If this really was science and an existential threat, all the efforts would be on dialing back Chinese output. Instead, the AGW Cult excuses the ChiComs for being allowed to continue spewing this imaginary planet killing gas for 20 years beyond the latest alleged tipping point.

Five other fails:

5. The principal scientists have been caught red handed fabricating and cherry picking data. That also includes government agencies like NASA, NOAA and the UN Commission on Climate. They have lost their credibility a long time ago. They are in fact lying sonofabitches and they have been caught at it many times.

6. We really don't know what the climate has been like prior to most post WWII. Prior to that time frame the data from places like Africa and South America and many parts of Asia were vastly underrepresented, especially in the Southern hemisphere. Most temperature data came from universities located in large cities in the US and Europe. Even ice core and tree ring data is not representative and besides, we have caught the AGW weenies cherry picking.

7. The turkeys use correlation as a fact when in reality there make not be a correlation. Like the length of women's skits rising and falling with the stock market. The earth is in a post glacial warming period and none of the idiots can tell you what is natural and what is man made.

8. The historical data we have says that atmospheric CO2 levels lags temperature increases. The fact of the matter is the historical record shows a time when the CO2 was much higher but the earth much cooler. Also the CO2 levels being lower and the earth warmer. That pretty well screw up all these stupid computer models that the turkeys use, don't it?

9. The AGW turkeys refer to NASA satellite data extensively. However, they fail to tell us that the data sensors are not calibrated close enough to determine the low levels of temperature increases they claim. The sensors are good to about +/- 4 F but yet the weenies are claiming a half degree.

 

[Dadoalex]

Here are the 4 main reasons why AGW fails:

1. There are no experiments. The central pillar is that an increase in a negligible atmospheric gas is generating heat that will soon end all life on Earth. Well, how much additional heat does the 120 ppm of CO2 generate? Why is there never a non-imaginary number provided by the lab work?

2. This additional planet killing atmospheric heat in 1 above is somehow also heating the oceans down 700m deep? Yet, it takes far more energy to heat water than air. Where is that missing energy?

3. So many failed predictions! Any real scientist would have had to discard the flawed theory and moved on, AGW is impervious to its graphic, public misses

4. The AGW Cult; yes, it's a Cult, because it's religion, not science, is oblivious to the fact that China generates more of this imaginary planet killing gas than all industrial nations combined and double the output of the USA. If this really was science and an existential threat, all the efforts would be on dialing back Chinese output. Instead, the AGW Cult excuses the ChiComs for being allowed to continue spewing this imaginary planet killing gas for 20 years beyond the latest alleged tipping point.

Here's the problem kids.
People who pretend to understand science.

CO2 doesn't produce heat.
CO2 retains heat not allowing it to escape to space.

And when you don't understand the science you are, of course, prone to making stupid suggestions.

So, does the heat retained by CO2 raise temperature?

Asked and answered.

If you've a point, make it.

He did. The AGW crowd is an anti science religious cult.

Sylvia Brown, a KNOWN charlatan, has a far better predictive rate than ANY climatologists. ANYWHERE.

No, HE didn't.
If HE wants a class in thermodynamics, hydrodynamics. chemistry and general physics I suggest HE go back to school.

As brilliant as I am this is no place to be teaching high school science.

 

[Dadoalex]

Asked and answered.

If you've a point, make it.

Read the OP

And the OP's point was that some moron should go to school here on this thread?
Dumber that I thought.

 

[jc456]

Asked and answered.

If you've a point, make it.

Read the OP

And the OP's point was that some moron should go to school here on this thread?
Dumber that I thought.

I don’t think so, details though

 

[westwall]

Here are the 4 main reasons why AGW fails:

1. There are no experiments. The central pillar is that an increase in a negligible atmospheric gas is generating heat that will soon end all life on Earth. Well, how much additional heat does the 120 ppm of CO2 generate? Why is there never a non-imaginary number provided by the lab work?

2. This additional planet killing atmospheric heat in 1 above is somehow also heating the oceans down 700m deep? Yet, it takes far more energy to heat water than air. Where is that missing energy?

3. So many failed predictions! Any real scientist would have had to discard the flawed theory and moved on, AGW is impervious to its graphic, public misses

4. The AGW Cult; yes, it's a Cult, because it's religion, not science, is oblivious to the fact that China generates more of this imaginary planet killing gas than all industrial nations combined and double the output of the USA. If this really was science and an existential threat, all the efforts would be on dialing back Chinese output. Instead, the AGW Cult excuses the ChiComs for being allowed to continue spewing this imaginary planet killing gas for 20 years beyond the latest alleged tipping point.

Here's the problem kids.
People who pretend to understand science.

CO2 doesn't produce heat.
CO2 retains heat not allowing it to escape to space.

And when you don't understand the science you are, of course, prone to making stupid suggestions.

So, does the heat retained by CO2 raise temperature?

Asked and answered.

If you've a point, make it.

He did. The AGW crowd is an anti science religious cult.

Sylvia Brown, a KNOWN charlatan, has a far better predictive rate than ANY climatologists. ANYWHERE.

No, HE didn't.
If HE wants a class in thermodynamics, hydrodynamics. chemistry and general physics I suggest HE go back to school.

As brilliant as I am this is no place to be teaching high school science.

Yes, he did. The fact that you don't understand the scientific method shows me you are nothing but a liar.

 

[mamooth]

Do you have a non-imaginary whole number answer to: how much additional heat does the 120 ppm of CO2 generate? What's the temperature increase?

1.5C, as we've told you before. 120 ppm is half a doubling, logarithmically. ECS is 3.0C/doubling, so half of that.

Now, you now have to answer my question. Them's the rules.

Why are you always such a dishonest troll? This discussion goes no further until you answer.

 

[mamooth]

1:36 of the video CO2 is 7.3% 7.3% >.04%

So why are you claiming that's the level in the chambers? Why did you make such a stupid claim? Was it stupidity or dishonesty?

also the ice man dissolves to water vapor, a far more powerful GHG that CO2 ever was. You know that right?

Dumbass, there's lots of free water sitting in both chambers, so they'll have the same humidity levels. Sweeet Jeebus, you're dumb.

You saw that CO2 was increased several orders of magnitude AND they had to add water vapor to make the fake work, right?

No, you're just stupid and dishonest. That tends to be the answer to every stupid and dishonest question you ask.

 

[Flash]

Here are the 4 main reasons why AGW fails:

1. There are no experiments.

A flat out lie. The absorption characteristics of CO2 are characterized by hundreds of papers. We've shown them to Frank before.

2. This additional planet killing atmospheric heat in 1 above is somehow also heating the oceans down 700m deep?

Well, yes. Again, we've explained that to Frank in one-syllable words. The fact that he's an imbecile doesn't make reality invalid.

3. So many failed predictions!

Again, a big lie. The climate scientist predictions have been excellent, while Frank and his cult pals have faceplanted consistently for over 40 years running now.

4. The AGW Cult;

Flat earthers and scientologists also claim that those outside of their cults are the real cultists. That's standard behavior for authoritarian-follower cult losers. They can cry and whine all they like, but all the data _still_ say's they're kook cult losers. Frank thinks he can overturn reality if he just throws enough trantrums, but that is not the case.

AGW science crosses all political boundaries all around the world, because it's actual science. If left-wing politics vanished, the science wouldn't change at all.

Frank's butthurt denialism is restricted mostly to American conservatives, because it's entirely political. If right-wing politics vanished, denialism would instantly cease to exist.

Here are the 4 main reasons why AGW fails:

1. There are no experiments.

A flat out lie. The absorption characteristics of CO2 are characterized by hundreds of papers. We've shown them to Frank before.

2. This additional planet killing atmospheric heat in 1 above is somehow also heating the oceans down 700m deep?

Well, yes. Again, we've explained that to Frank in one-syllable words. The fact that he's an imbecile doesn't make reality invalid.

3. So many failed predictions!

Again, a big lie. The climate scientist predictions have been excellent, while Frank and his cult pals have faceplanted consistently for over 40 years running now.

4. The AGW Cult;

Flat earthers and scientologists also claim that those outside of their cults are the real cultists. That's standard behavior for authoritarian-follower cult losers. They can cry and whine all they like, but all the data _still_ say's they're kook cult losers. Frank thinks he can overturn reality if he just throws enough trantrums, but that is not the case.

AGW science crosses all political boundaries all around the world, because it's actual science. If left-wing politics vanished, the science wouldn't change at all.

Frank's butthurt denialism is restricted mostly to American conservatives, because it's entirely political. If right-wing politics vanished, denialism would instantly cease to exist.

Notice the Cat Lady did NOT respond with anything ON POINT but deflected and insulted

Of course. That's all they have. They toss out irrelevant points trying to deflect from the failures they have accumulated over the past 35 years. Tipping point after tipping point has come and gone, and the world is pretty much the same. These assholes are anti science religious nutjobs.

No the world isnt the same, because if there actually was global warming and the sea levels were rising would Obama be buying up land right on the ocean? Of course that brown turd would be stupid enough to buy a house that would be under water in 12 years if AOC is right, because Obammy was that stupid with our money.

12 Years Left Due To Climate Change? Obama Says 'Screw It' And Buys Oceanfront Mega-Mansion.

townhall.com

Al Gore even built a mega mansion right on the ocean so that shows you that even the Moon Bat Environmental Wacko leaders don't believe the horseshit they are selling to their fellow Moon Bats.