Oil is not in puddles.. it's in rocks like sandstone and limestone. It seeps.
The Fossil Fuel Industry Misinformation Campaign
- Thread starter Crick
- Start date
Oil is not in puddles.. it's in rocks like sandstone and limestone. It seeps.
- Thread starter
- #122
Zillions of dollars? How much is that? Government and journalistic investigations have uncovered hundreds of millions of dollars being spent ANNUALLY on their anti-mitigation PR campaigns.
CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 153,859
- 79,293
- 2,645
Because of dead dinosaurs or because of an abiotic process?
Grumblenuts
Gold Member
- Oct 16, 2017
- 15,442
- 5,233
- 210
Wrong again.
Rewriting the textbook on fossil fuels: New technologies help unravel nature's methane recipes
Experts say scientific understanding of deep hydrocarbons has been transformed, with new insights gained into the sources of energy that could have catalyzed and nurtured Earth's earliest forms of life.
CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 153,859
- 79,293
- 2,645
The deniers here constantly accuse the world's climate scientists of ALL being involved in a massive and decades-long hoat to push global warming in order to 1) Get rich 2) Remain employed 3) Gain control over the population 4) Destroy western civilization. Unfortunately for them, they have ZERO evidence to support those claims.
Deniers here have also constantly IGNORED the possibility that the fossil fuel industry, seeing global warming mitigation measures as an existential threat, might make efforts to slow the acceptance of the science and the measures required to combat this problem. Unfortunately for them, there is a wealth of evidence to prove that this is precisely what they have done and that all deniers have served admirably as the industry's "useful idiots".
Oil companies discourage climate action, study says
Harvard researchers have turned a spotlight on the sometimes subtle, yet effective, strategies employed by oil companies to foster doubt and delay action on climate change.news.harvard.edu
Exxon’s Climate Denial History: A Timeline
A review of Exxon's knowledge and subsequent denial of climate change.www.greenpeace.org
The forgotten oil ads that told us climate change was nothing
Since the 1980s, fossil fuel firms have run ads touting climate denial messages – many of which they’d now like us to forget. Here’s our visual guidewww.theguardian.com
Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago
A new investigation shows the oil company understood the science before it became a public issue and spent millions to promote misinformationwww.scientificamerican.com
- "Denier" is a cult word, not a scientific term
- The OP correctly stated the goals of the AGWCult
- If "fossil Fuels" are an "existential threat" why is China, the world leading user of "Fossil fuels" always exempt from the AGWCult hysterical nonsense?
Blues Man
Diamond Member
- Aug 28, 2016
- 35,513
- 14,915
- 1,530
Fusion power has been "on the horizon" for how many decades now?
CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 153,859
- 79,293
- 2,645
Wrong again.
But you knew that already. So why do you just keep trolling with one non sequitur after another? How much do you get paid for each stupid question?Rewriting the textbook on fossil fuels: New technologies help unravel nature's methane recipes
Experts say scientific understanding of deep hydrocarbons has been transformed, with new insights gained into the sources of energy that could have catalyzed and nurtured Earth's earliest forms of life.phys.org
I'm trying to educate you and I don't give up easily
"Methane (CH4) is abundant on the giant planets—Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune—where it was the product of chemical processing of primordial solar nebula material. On Earth, though, methane is special. Of the 1,750 parts per billion by volume (ppbv) of methane in Earth’s atmosphere, 90 to 95 percent is biological in origin."
The Mystery of Methane on Mars and Titan
Hydrocarbons from biology is less than a rounding error, hydrocarbons from chemical processes are abundant
- Thread starter
- #128
Have you not seen the recent new stories?
US nuclear-fusion lab enters new era: achieving ‘ignition’ over and over
Researchers at the National Ignition Facility are consistently creating reactions that make more energy than they consume.
www.nature.com
Blues Man
Diamond Member
- Aug 28, 2016
- 35,513
- 14,915
- 1,530
Yeah I won't hold my breath it will take a hundred years to get the regulations in placedHave you not seen the recent new stories?
US nuclear-fusion lab enters new era: achieving ‘ignition’ over and over
Researchers at the National Ignition Facility are consistently creating reactions that make more energy than they consume.
- Thread starter
- #130
No it won't. This is WAY safer than fission plants.
Grumblenuts
Gold Member
- Oct 16, 2017
- 15,442
- 5,233
- 210
In other words, you lie for Koch Industries and pretend to be stupid. So how much are you being paid for doing that here? Still waiting..
Grumblenuts
Gold Member
- Oct 16, 2017
- 15,442
- 5,233
- 210
Have you not seen the recent new stories?
US nuclear-fusion lab enters new era: achieving ‘ignition’ over and over
Researchers at the National Ignition Facility are consistently creating reactions that make more energy than they consume.
And more will cost you only $365/yr.. CHEAP!
CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 153,859
- 79,293
- 2,645
"Methane (CH4) is abundant on the giant planets—Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune—where it was the product of chemical processing of primordial solar nebula material. On Earth, though, methane is special. Of the 1,750 parts per billion by volume (ppbv) of methane in Earth’s atmosphere, 90 to 95 percent is biological in origin."
The Mystery of Methane on Mars and Titan
Hydrocarbons from biology is less than a rounding error, hydrocarbons from chemical processes are abundant
Blues Man
Diamond Member
- Aug 28, 2016
- 35,513
- 14,915
- 1,530
Not necessarily.
Besides it's extremely limited based on tritium supplies. And at $30000 for a gram of tritium, how viable will fusion power be? The irony here is the best way to produce tritium in in fission reactors
Molten salt reactors run on some of the most abundant elements in the ground
Last edited:
- Banned
- #135
Crick with her Environmental Wacko bullshit again. LOL!The deniers here constantly accuse the world's climate scientists of ALL being involved in a massive and decades-long hoat to push global warming in order to 1) Get rich 2) Remain employed 3) Gain control over the population 4) Destroy western civilization. Unfortunately for them, they have ZERO evidence to support those claims.
Deniers here have also constantly IGNORED the possibility that the fossil fuel industry, seeing global warming mitigation measures as an existential threat, might make efforts to slow the acceptance of the science and the measures required to combat this problem. Unfortunately for them, there is a wealth of evidence to prove that this is precisely what they have done and that all deniers have served admirably as the industry's "useful idiots".
Oil companies discourage climate action, study says
Harvard researchers have turned a spotlight on the sometimes subtle, yet effective, strategies employed by oil companies to foster doubt and delay action on climate change.
Exxon’s Climate Denial History: A Timeline
A review of Exxon's knowledge and subsequent denial of climate change.
The forgotten oil ads that told us climate change was nothing
Since the 1980s, fossil fuel firms have run ads touting climate denial messages – many of which they’d now like us to forget. Here’s our visual guide
Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago
A new investigation shows the oil company understood the science before it became a public issue and spent millions to promote misinformation
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 151,346
- 35,004
- 2,180
she's unsure of what it is she's solving to fix! Kind of odd in fact.
- Banned
- #137
Ms. Crick is confused about a lot of things. This thread is just another example.
- Thread starter
- #138
I personally have no problem with well made fission reactors, but...
ask and you shall receive
Tritium: Changing lead into gold
In order to produce energy from the fusion of light atoms, nature offers a dozen of possible combinations. Only one is accessible in the current state of techn[...]
www.iter.org
Blues Man
Diamond Member
- Aug 28, 2016
- 35,513
- 14,915
- 1,530
Like I said made in fission reactors
- Thread starter
- #140
Did you not look at the article to which I linked? Tritium can be made in fusion reactors simply by adding lithium to the chamber walls.
Tritium: Changing lead into gold
In order to produce energy from the fusion of light atoms, nature offers a dozen of possible combinations. Only one is accessible in the current state of techn[...]
www.iter.org
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Musk Used Heavy Drugs Including Ketamine And Ecstasy While He Became Close To Trump- Started by MarcATL
- Replies: 9
-
-
-
