CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 153,815
- 79,250
- 2,645
Do people who use the phrase “fossil fuels” realize that hydrocarbons do not require dead dinosaurs????
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You need to separate what was actually put out by scientists and what was not. Here is sea level rise from 1993 to the present:
View attachment 891952
No one was going to look at these data and forecast NYC being washed away by this point. Note the vertical scale. There is, however, a non-trivial chance of a catastrophic collapse (as opposed to the gradual collapse unstoppably taking place now) of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) that could cause global sea level to rise by 5 meters (16.4 feet) in a matter of days. The mainstream science position is that it will take over a century for the WAIS to collapse. I'm a cynic.
Yes, Frank, they generally do.. and much more. Given the benefit of hindsight, use of the term "fossil" was probably not the wisest, least ambiguous term one could have chosen. Probably sounded really good at the time though.. as is true of many, many things. Not perfect. Big whoop.Do people who use the phrase “fossil fuels” realize that hydrocarbons do not require dead dinosaurs????
A fossil fuel[a] is a hydrocarbon-containing material such as coal, oil, and natural gas,[2] formed naturally in the Earth's crust from the remains of dead plants and animals that is extracted and burned as a fuel.
The Oxford English Dictionary notes that in the phrase "fossil fuel" the adjective "fossil" means "[o]btained by digging; found buried in the earth", which dates to at least 1652,[23] before the English noun "fossil" came to refer primarily to long-dead organisms in the early 18th century.[24]
What kind of bugs have you eaten today .....god help you if you dared drive anywhereThe deniers here constantly accuse the world's climate scientists of ALL being involved in a massive and decades-long hoat to push global warming in order to 1) Get rich 2) Remain employed 3) Gain control over the population 4) Destroy western civilization. Unfortunately for them, they have ZERO evidence to support those claims.
Deniers here have also constantly IGNORED the possibility that the fossil fuel industry, seeing global warming mitigation measures as an existential threat, might make efforts to slow the acceptance of the science and the measures required to combat this problem. Unfortunately for them, there is a wealth of evidence to prove that this is precisely what they have done and that all deniers have served admirably as the industry's "useful idiots".
![]()
Oil companies discourage climate action, study says
Harvard researchers have turned a spotlight on the sometimes subtle, yet effective, strategies employed by oil companies to foster doubt and delay action on climate change.news.harvard.edu
![]()
Exxon’s Climate Denial History: A Timeline
A review of Exxon's knowledge and subsequent denial of climate change.www.greenpeace.org
![]()
The forgotten oil ads that told us climate change was nothing
Since the 1980s, fossil fuel firms have run ads touting climate denial messages – many of which they’d now like us to forget. Here’s our visual guidewww.theguardian.com
![]()
Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago
A new investigation shows the oil company understood the science before it became a public issue and spent millions to promote misinformationwww.scientificamerican.com
So Saturns Moon Titan has abundant plant and animal life? Really?Yes, Frank, they generally do.. and much more. Given the benefit of hindsight, use of the term "fossil" was probably not the wisest, least ambiguous term one could have chosen. Probably sounded really good at the time though.. as is true of many, many things. Not perfect. Big whoop.
Fossil Fuels for Dummies:
![]()
![]()
1D: Fossil Fuels, Hydrocarbons, and CO2
Part D: Fossil Fuels, Hydrocarbons and CO2 On April 20, 2010, the Deepwater Horizon oil rig operating in the Gulf of Mexico exploded and sank. Oil and gas moved up the drilling well-bore onto the deck causing a ...serc.carleton.eduWhat Are Fossil Fuels? | Smithsonian Ocean
ocean.si.edu
![]()
Fossil fuel | Meaning, Types, & Uses | Britannica
Fossil fuel is a hydrocarbon-containing material of biological origin that can be burned for energy. Fossil fuels, which include coal, petroleum, and natural gas, supply the majority of all energy consumed in industrially developed countries. Learn about the types of fossil fuels, their...www.britannica.com
![]()
Fossil fuel - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
![]()
Fossil fuel - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Actually I have been arguing they have mistaken a natural warming trend for AGW.The deniers here constantly accuse the world's climate scientists of ALL being involved in a massive and decades-long hoat to push global warming in order to 1) Get rich 2) Remain employed 3) Gain control over the population 4) Destroy western civilization. Unfortunately for them, they have ZERO evidence to support those claims.
What's your opinion of the oil companies lying to us? What did you think of the tobacco companies lying to us? Do you know anyone harmed by tobacco?What kind of bugs have you eaten today .....god help you if you dared drive anywhere
So Saturn's moon Titan is not on Earth. Really. Baby steps for you.So Saturns Moon Titan has abundant plant and animal life? Really?
Is that really the topic of this thread?The topic of this thread is the fossil fuel industry's misinformation campaign concerning manmade global warming, not EVs.
Is that really the topic of this thread?
The deniers here constantly accuse the world's climate scientists of ALL being involved in a massive and decades-long hoat to push global warming in order to 1) Get rich 2) Remain employed 3) Gain control over the population 4) Destroy western civilization. Unfortunately for them, they have ZERO evidence to support those claims.
Deniers here have also constantly IGNORED the possibility that the fossil fuel industry, seeing global warming mitigation measures as an existential threat, might make efforts to slow the acceptance of the science and the measures required to combat this problem. Unfortunately for them, there is a wealth of evidence to prove that this is precisely what they have done and that all deniers have served admirably as the industry's "useful idiots".
![]()
Oil companies discourage climate action, study says
Harvard researchers have turned a spotlight on the sometimes subtle, yet effective, strategies employed by oil companies to foster doubt and delay action on climate change.news.harvard.edu
![]()
Exxon’s Climate Denial History: A Timeline
A review of Exxon's knowledge and subsequent denial of climate change.www.greenpeace.org
![]()
The forgotten oil ads that told us climate change was nothing
Since the 1980s, fossil fuel firms have run ads touting climate denial messages – many of which they’d now like us to forget. Here’s our visual guidewww.theguardian.com
![]()
Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago
A new investigation shows the oil company understood the science before it became a public issue and spent millions to promote misinformationwww.scientificamerican.com
Tobacco is not a part of the OPWhat's your opinion of the oil companies lying to us? What did you think of the tobacco companies lying to us? Do you know anyone harmed by tobacco?
I thought this was about the fossil fuel industry? Now you are talking about the sea level?You need to separate what was actually put out by scientists and what was not. Here is sea level rise from 1993 to the present:
View attachment 891952
No one was going to look at these data and forecast NYC being washed away by this point. Note the vertical scale. There is, however, a non-trivial chance of a catastrophic collapse (as opposed to the gradual collapse unstoppably taking place now) of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) that could cause global sea level to rise by 5 meters (16.4 feet) in a matter of days. The mainstream science position is that it will take over a century for the WAIS to collapse. I'm a cynic.
The tobacco industry provided the model on which the fossil fuel industry based their campaign of lies.Tobacco is not a part of the OP
You've got me there. Mea culpa.I thought this was about the fossil fuel industry? Now you are talking about the sea level?
Crick, berates those who are off topic while leading us all, off topic
What's your opinion of the oil companies lying to us? What did you think of the tobacco companies lying to us? Do you know anyone harmed by tobacco?
The deniers here constantly accuse the world's climate scientists of ALL being involved in a massive and decades-long hoat to push global warming in order to 1) Get rich 2) Remain employed 3) Gain control over the population 4) Destroy western civilization. Unfortunately for them, they have ZERO evidence to support those claims.
Deniers here have also constantly IGNORED the possibility that the fossil fuel industry, seeing global warming mitigation measures as an existential threat, might make efforts to slow the acceptance of the science and the measures required to combat this problem. Unfortunately for them, there is a wealth of evidence to prove that this is precisely what they have done and that all deniers have served admirably as the industry's "useful idiots".
![]()
Oil companies discourage climate action, study says
Harvard researchers have turned a spotlight on the sometimes subtle, yet effective, strategies employed by oil companies to foster doubt and delay action on climate change.news.harvard.edu
![]()
Exxon’s Climate Denial History: A Timeline
A review of Exxon's knowledge and subsequent denial of climate change.www.greenpeace.org
![]()
The forgotten oil ads that told us climate change was nothing
Since the 1980s, fossil fuel firms have run ads touting climate denial messages – many of which they’d now like us to forget. Here’s our visual guidewww.theguardian.com
![]()
Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago
A new investigation shows the oil company understood the science before it became a public issue and spent millions to promote misinformationwww.scientificamerican.com
You need to separate what was actually put out by scientists and what was not. Here is sea level rise from 1993 to the present:
View attachment 891952
No one was going to look at these data and forecast NYC being washed away by this point. Note the vertical scale. There is, however, a non-trivial chance of a catastrophic collapse (as opposed to the gradual collapse unstoppably taking place now) of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) that could cause global sea level to rise by 5 meters (16.4 feet) in a matter of days. The mainstream science position is that it will take over a century for the WAIS to collapse. I'm a cynic.
Really?!! How did you get so smart?So Saturn's moon Titan is not on Earth. Really. Baby steps for you.
Fuck you, you ignorant, lying bigot.This is the fallback boogey man...
It is all big oil's fault.
Problem - while many Zionist Fascists in the oil industry have bowed to the laughable Co2 FRAUD, planet Earth is not warming at all
Indeed. Your crazy theory, son. So do tell, "How"?How does Titan have gigantic lakes of “fossil fuels”?