The forbidden subject

[Lysistrata]

What a bizarre comment, perhaps "rant."

they are generally rationalizing the truth in favor of the .omeurta-insisting antileaders of the Markzosocialist Democrat Party.

who is "they" and what is a "Markzosocialist Democrat Party"? You must come from an Eastern European nation.

the ones who imposed throw away the laws set in place by their state legislatures when America was still a Judeo-Christian Nation,

I don't know what you mean by this. The U.S. has never had an established religion of any sort. I think that the people who wrote the Constitution learned not only from the history of Christianity in Europe, but also from the history of the colonies that were uniting. Each colony had had its own religion, though all of them were Christian, and carried out jailings, beatings, banishings, and even hangings stemming from their religious differences. The "Founders" might have been aware, among other things, of the life and execution in 1660 of Mary Dyer, Quaker:

Top 10 Things You May Not Know About Mary Dyer

Christians have never agreed among themselves since Jesus left the planet. This situation has continued up to the present day, and, sadly, it is based on a desire for superiority, power, dominance, and winning, not any desire for spiritual growth or enlightenment. With no disrespect intended toward any other faith, the U.S. can never be a "Christian nation" due to this fact alone.

Moreover, there was no election cheating, and prayer has never been banned in public schools.

 

[beautress]

What a bizarre comment, perhaps "rant."

they are generally rationalizing the truth in favor of the .omeurta-insisting antileaders of the Markzosocialist Democrat Party.

who is "they" and what is a "Markzosocialist Democrat Party"? You must come from an Eastern European nation.

the ones who imposed throw away the laws set in place by their state legislatures when America was still a Judeo-Christian Nation,

I don't know what you mean by this. The U.S. has never had an established religion of any sort. I think that the people who wrote the Constitution learned not only from the history of Christianity in Europe, but also from the history of the colonies that were uniting. Each colony had had its own religion, though all of them were Christian, and carried out jailings, beatings, banishings, and even hangings stemming from their religious differences. The "Founders" might have been aware, among other things, of the life and execution in 1660 of Mary Dyer, Quaker:

Top 10 Things You May Not Know About Mary Dyer

Christians have never agreed among themselves since Jesus left the planet. This situation has continued up to the present day, and, sadly, it is based on a desire for superiority, power, dominance, and winning, not any desire for spiritual growth or enlightenment. With no disrespect intended toward any other faith, the U.S. can never be a "Christian nation" due to this fact alone.

Moreover, there was no election cheating, and prayer has never been banned in public schools.

Lie sister sez: "You must come from an Eastern European country."

No, my ancestry is Mayflower travellers with Holland-Dutsch roots , a Native American tribe who survived the sick blanket Trail of Tears tour to nowhere Oaklahoma, ministers of 2 American churches, and a grandmother who was a deadringer in looks for Queen Elizabeth II in old age.

Do keep your day job and give up your career in wannabeing clairvoyant. THX.

 

[beautress]

What a bizarre comment, perhaps "rant."

they are generally rationalizing the truth in favor of the .omeurta-insisting antileaders of the Markzosocialist Democrat Party.

who is "they" and what is a "Markzosocialist Democrat Party"? You must come from an Eastern European nation.

the ones who imposed throw away the laws set in place by their state legislatures when America was still a Judeo-Christian Nation,

I don't know what you mean by this. The U.S. has never had an established religion of any sort. I think that the people who wrote the Constitution learned not only from the history of Christianity in Europe, but also from the history of the colonies that were uniting. Each colony had had its own religion, though all of them were Christian, and carried out jailings, beatings, banishings, and even hangings stemming from their religious differences. The "Founders" might have been aware, among other things, of the life and execution in 1660 of Mary Dyer, Quaker:

Top 10 Things You May Not Know About Mary Dyer

Christians have never agreed among themselves since Jesus left the planet. This situation has continued up to the present day, and, sadly, it is based on a desire for superiority, power, dominance, and winning, not any desire for spiritual growth or enlightenment. With no disrespect intended toward any other faith, the U.S. can never be a "Christian nation" due to this fact alone.

Moreover, there was no election cheating, and prayer has never been banned in public schools.

They do not pray over the intercom devices where I grew up, and also at where I spent 35 of my adult years.

 

[Coyote]

The Democrats and Media are exploiting the capital protest to smear the GOP voters as dangerous white supremacist and domestic terrorist

It was no "protest." The people who attacked the Capitol actually were dangerous white supremacists and domestic terrorists. If the shoe fits, wear it.

People do not come to protests wearing combat gear, helmets, and have 2-way radios, batons, and all sorts of other weapons. They do not send messages days before a protest stating that they intend to storm and take over the Capitol and riot, or that a "civil war" is being started. They do not assault LEOs. In a protest, people usually dress in street clothes, carry signs, and chant. There is a mountain of evidence that the criminals who mounted the terrorist attack on the Capitol and Congress itself planned it well in advance. You cannot legitimize what they did by calling it a "protest."

I was in one of the Women's Marches, the one held in DC in January, 2017, while sister marches took place in many cities across the U.S. and some in other countries. The streets were so crowded that it was difficult to walk, and the estimated size of the crowd was three times as many folks as the crowd that attended trump's inauguration, approximately a little less than 500,000:

Crowd Scientists Say Women’s March in Washington Had 3 Times as Many People as Trump’s Inauguration (Published 2017)

Yet the crowd did not threaten or attack anyone or any building, including the Capitol, and did no damage. Nobody came in combat gear with weapons.

There is no evidence of any of that at all. Why are you lying? There was no attack on or at the Capitol. A peaceful protest got out of hand by a few people. It was, in many regards, much more peaceful than ALL of the BLM and antifa riots put together. Hell, the burning of D.C. by BLM alone last summer was thousands of times more violent.

Trying to figure out how a "peaceful protest" ends up with dead people and stolen/destroyed property.

Never mind...this is Trumplandia.

Shouldn't you be asking BLM and Anti-Fa those questions?

Why?

 

[Lastamender]

The Democrats and Media are exploiting the capital protest to smear the GOP voters as dangerous white supremacist and domestic terrorist

It was no "protest." The people who attacked the Capitol actually were dangerous white supremacists and domestic terrorists. If the shoe fits, wear it.

People do not come to protests wearing combat gear, helmets, and have 2-way radios, batons, and all sorts of other weapons. They do not send messages days before a protest stating that they intend to storm and take over the Capitol and riot, or that a "civil war" is being started. They do not assault LEOs. In a protest, people usually dress in street clothes, carry signs, and chant. There is a mountain of evidence that the criminals who mounted the terrorist attack on the Capitol and Congress itself planned it well in advance. You cannot legitimize what they did by calling it a "protest."

I was in one of the Women's Marches, the one held in DC in January, 2017, while sister marches took place in many cities across the U.S. and some in other countries. The streets were so crowded that it was difficult to walk, and the estimated size of the crowd was three times as many folks as the crowd that attended trump's inauguration, approximately a little less than 500,000:

Crowd Scientists Say Women’s March in Washington Had 3 Times as Many People as Trump’s Inauguration (Published 2017)

Yet the crowd did not threaten or attack anyone or any building, including the Capitol, and did no damage. Nobody came in combat gear with weapons.

There is no evidence of any of that at all. Why are you lying? There was no attack on or at the Capitol. A peaceful protest got out of hand by a few people. It was, in many regards, much more peaceful than ALL of the BLM and antifa riots put together. Hell, the burning of D.C. by BLM alone last summer was thousands of times more violent.

Trying to figure out how a "peaceful protest" ends up with dead people and stolen/destroyed property.

Never mind...this is Trumplandia.

Shouldn't you be asking BLM and Anti-Fa those questions?

Why?

Because their peaceful protests killed over 20 and no one ever said a thing besides encouraging them.

 

[Coyote]

The Democrats and Media are exploiting the capital protest to smear the GOP voters as dangerous white supremacist and domestic terrorist

It was no "protest." The people who attacked the Capitol actually were dangerous white supremacists and domestic terrorists. If the shoe fits, wear it.

People do not come to protests wearing combat gear, helmets, and have 2-way radios, batons, and all sorts of other weapons. They do not send messages days before a protest stating that they intend to storm and take over the Capitol and riot, or that a "civil war" is being started. They do not assault LEOs. In a protest, people usually dress in street clothes, carry signs, and chant. There is a mountain of evidence that the criminals who mounted the terrorist attack on the Capitol and Congress itself planned it well in advance. You cannot legitimize what they did by calling it a "protest."

I was in one of the Women's Marches, the one held in DC in January, 2017, while sister marches took place in many cities across the U.S. and some in other countries. The streets were so crowded that it was difficult to walk, and the estimated size of the crowd was three times as many folks as the crowd that attended trump's inauguration, approximately a little less than 500,000:

Crowd Scientists Say Women’s March in Washington Had 3 Times as Many People as Trump’s Inauguration (Published 2017)

Yet the crowd did not threaten or attack anyone or any building, including the Capitol, and did no damage. Nobody came in combat gear with weapons.

There is no evidence of any of that at all. Why are you lying? There was no attack on or at the Capitol. A peaceful protest got out of hand by a few people. It was, in many regards, much more peaceful than ALL of the BLM and antifa riots put together. Hell, the burning of D.C. by BLM alone last summer was thousands of times more violent.

Trying to figure out how a "peaceful protest" ends up with dead people and stolen/destroyed property.

Never mind...this is Trumplandia.

Shouldn't you be asking BLM and Anti-Fa those questions?

Why?

Because their peaceful protests killed over 20 and no one ever said a thing besides encouraging them.

You must be confused. No one is calling the riots a peaceful protest. On the hand there were thousands around the country that were peaceful.

 

[Lastamender]

The Democrats and Media are exploiting the capital protest to smear the GOP voters as dangerous white supremacist and domestic terrorist

It was no "protest." The people who attacked the Capitol actually were dangerous white supremacists and domestic terrorists. If the shoe fits, wear it.

People do not come to protests wearing combat gear, helmets, and have 2-way radios, batons, and all sorts of other weapons. They do not send messages days before a protest stating that they intend to storm and take over the Capitol and riot, or that a "civil war" is being started. They do not assault LEOs. In a protest, people usually dress in street clothes, carry signs, and chant. There is a mountain of evidence that the criminals who mounted the terrorist attack on the Capitol and Congress itself planned it well in advance. You cannot legitimize what they did by calling it a "protest."

I was in one of the Women's Marches, the one held in DC in January, 2017, while sister marches took place in many cities across the U.S. and some in other countries. The streets were so crowded that it was difficult to walk, and the estimated size of the crowd was three times as many folks as the crowd that attended trump's inauguration, approximately a little less than 500,000:

Crowd Scientists Say Women’s March in Washington Had 3 Times as Many People as Trump’s Inauguration (Published 2017)

Yet the crowd did not threaten or attack anyone or any building, including the Capitol, and did no damage. Nobody came in combat gear with weapons.

There is no evidence of any of that at all. Why are you lying? There was no attack on or at the Capitol. A peaceful protest got out of hand by a few people. It was, in many regards, much more peaceful than ALL of the BLM and antifa riots put together. Hell, the burning of D.C. by BLM alone last summer was thousands of times more violent.

Trying to figure out how a "peaceful protest" ends up with dead people and stolen/destroyed property.

Never mind...this is Trumplandia.

Shouldn't you be asking BLM and Anti-Fa those questions?

Why?

Because their peaceful protests killed over 20 and no one ever said a thing besides encouraging them.

You must be confused. No one is calling the riots a peaceful protest. On the hand there were thousands around the country that were peaceful.

Again, I can turn on CNN. Say something once in a while.

 

[Coyote]

The Democrats and Media are exploiting the capital protest to smear the GOP voters as dangerous white supremacist and domestic terrorist

It was no "protest." The people who attacked the Capitol actually were dangerous white supremacists and domestic terrorists. If the shoe fits, wear it.

People do not come to protests wearing combat gear, helmets, and have 2-way radios, batons, and all sorts of other weapons. They do not send messages days before a protest stating that they intend to storm and take over the Capitol and riot, or that a "civil war" is being started. They do not assault LEOs. In a protest, people usually dress in street clothes, carry signs, and chant. There is a mountain of evidence that the criminals who mounted the terrorist attack on the Capitol and Congress itself planned it well in advance. You cannot legitimize what they did by calling it a "protest."

I was in one of the Women's Marches, the one held in DC in January, 2017, while sister marches took place in many cities across the U.S. and some in other countries. The streets were so crowded that it was difficult to walk, and the estimated size of the crowd was three times as many folks as the crowd that attended trump's inauguration, approximately a little less than 500,000:

Crowd Scientists Say Women’s March in Washington Had 3 Times as Many People as Trump’s Inauguration (Published 2017)

Yet the crowd did not threaten or attack anyone or any building, including the Capitol, and did no damage. Nobody came in combat gear with weapons.

There is no evidence of any of that at all. Why are you lying? There was no attack on or at the Capitol. A peaceful protest got out of hand by a few people. It was, in many regards, much more peaceful than ALL of the BLM and antifa riots put together. Hell, the burning of D.C. by BLM alone last summer was thousands of times more violent.

Trying to figure out how a "peaceful protest" ends up with dead people and stolen/destroyed property.

Never mind...this is Trumplandia.

Shouldn't you be asking BLM and Anti-Fa those questions?

Why?

Because their peaceful protests killed over 20 and no one ever said a thing besides encouraging them.

You must be confused. No one is calling the riots a peaceful protest. On the hand there were thousands around the country that were peaceful.

Again, I can turn on CNN. Say something once in a while.

Sorry dude, I’m not interested in contributing to your echo chamber.

 

[Lastamender]

The Democrats and Media are exploiting the capital protest to smear the GOP voters as dangerous white supremacist and domestic terrorist

It was no "protest." The people who attacked the Capitol actually were dangerous white supremacists and domestic terrorists. If the shoe fits, wear it.

People do not come to protests wearing combat gear, helmets, and have 2-way radios, batons, and all sorts of other weapons. They do not send messages days before a protest stating that they intend to storm and take over the Capitol and riot, or that a "civil war" is being started. They do not assault LEOs. In a protest, people usually dress in street clothes, carry signs, and chant. There is a mountain of evidence that the criminals who mounted the terrorist attack on the Capitol and Congress itself planned it well in advance. You cannot legitimize what they did by calling it a "protest."

I was in one of the Women's Marches, the one held in DC in January, 2017, while sister marches took place in many cities across the U.S. and some in other countries. The streets were so crowded that it was difficult to walk, and the estimated size of the crowd was three times as many folks as the crowd that attended trump's inauguration, approximately a little less than 500,000:

Crowd Scientists Say Women’s March in Washington Had 3 Times as Many People as Trump’s Inauguration (Published 2017)

Yet the crowd did not threaten or attack anyone or any building, including the Capitol, and did no damage. Nobody came in combat gear with weapons.

There is no evidence of any of that at all. Why are you lying? There was no attack on or at the Capitol. A peaceful protest got out of hand by a few people. It was, in many regards, much more peaceful than ALL of the BLM and antifa riots put together. Hell, the burning of D.C. by BLM alone last summer was thousands of times more violent.

Trying to figure out how a "peaceful protest" ends up with dead people and stolen/destroyed property.

Never mind...this is Trumplandia.

Shouldn't you be asking BLM and Anti-Fa those questions?

Why?

Because their peaceful protests killed over 20 and no one ever said a thing besides encouraging them.

You must be confused. No one is calling the riots a peaceful protest. On the hand there were thousands around the country that were peaceful.

Again, I can turn on CNN. Say something once in a while.

Sorry dude, I’m not interested in contributing to your echo chamber.

You seem like your just not interested in contributing at all. Rhetoric is rhetoric.

 

[Lysistrata]

What a bizarre comment, perhaps "rant."

they are generally rationalizing the truth in favor of the .omeurta-insisting antileaders of the Markzosocialist Democrat Party.

who is "they" and what is a "Markzosocialist Democrat Party"? You must come from an Eastern European nation.

the ones who imposed throw away the laws set in place by their state legislatures when America was still a Judeo-Christian Nation,

I don't know what you mean by this. The U.S. has never had an established religion of any sort. I think that the people who wrote the Constitution learned not only from the history of Christianity in Europe, but also from the history of the colonies that were uniting. Each colony had had its own religion, though all of them were Christian, and carried out jailings, beatings, banishings, and even hangings stemming from their religious differences. The "Founders" might have been aware, among other things, of the life and execution in 1660 of Mary Dyer, Quaker:

Top 10 Things You May Not Know About Mary Dyer

Christians have never agreed among themselves since Jesus left the planet. This situation has continued up to the present day, and, sadly, it is based on a desire for superiority, power, dominance, and winning, not any desire for spiritual growth or enlightenment. With no disrespect intended toward any other faith, the U.S. can never be a "Christian nation" due to this fact alone.

Moreover, there was no election cheating, and prayer has never been banned in public schools.

They do not pray over the intercom devices where I grew up, and also at where I spent 35 of my adult years.

Huh?
Before the school-prayer decision, the teachers led us in the Our Father (Lord's Prayer), then we said it another way in church on Sunday, which confused the heck out of us little kids. I don't know what the kids and families who were not Christian did. I don't know what the agnostics and atheists did, either.

There will never be a prayer that accommodates everyone's beliefs, accept, perhaps, "To Whom It May Concern (if any): Thanks, Yours truly, Your Human Creations (maybe or perhaps not)."

Prayer in schools has never been banned, just staff involvement in it for a purpose other than keeping discipline during classes.

The Democrats and Media are exploiting the capital protest to smear the GOP voters as dangerous white supremacist and domestic terrorist

It was no "protest." The people who attacked the Capitol actually were dangerous white supremacists and domestic terrorists. If the shoe fits, wear it.

People do not come to protests wearing combat gear, helmets, and have 2-way radios, batons, and all sorts of other weapons. They do not send messages days before a protest stating that they intend to storm and take over the Capitol and riot, or that a "civil war" is being started. They do not assault LEOs. In a protest, people usually dress in street clothes, carry signs, and chant. There is a mountain of evidence that the criminals who mounted the terrorist attack on the Capitol and Congress itself planned it well in advance. You cannot legitimize what they did by calling it a "protest."

I was in one of the Women's Marches, the one held in DC in January, 2017, while sister marches took place in many cities across the U.S. and some in other countries. The streets were so crowded that it was difficult to walk, and the estimated size of the crowd was three times as many folks as the crowd that attended trump's inauguration, approximately a little less than 500,000:

Crowd Scientists Say Women’s March in Washington Had 3 Times as Many People as Trump’s Inauguration (Published 2017)

Yet the crowd did not threaten or attack anyone or any building, including the Capitol, and did no damage. Nobody came in combat gear with weapons.

There is no evidence of any of that at all. Why are you lying? There was no attack on or at the Capitol. A peaceful protest got out of hand by a few people. It was, in many regards, much more peaceful than ALL of the BLM and antifa riots put together. Hell, the burning of D.C. by BLM alone last summer was thousands of times more violent.

Trying to figure out how a "peaceful protest" ends up with dead people and stolen/destroyed property.

Never mind...this is Trumplandia.

Shouldn't you be asking BLM and Anti-Fa those questions?

Why?

Because their peaceful protests killed over 20 and no one ever said a thing besides encouraging them.

Hundreds of thousands of people marched with BLM here and in other countries, and I've never heard of them killing anybody. I don't know who is in "Anti-Fa" or even if it is an organization. Where did this "Anti-Fa" kill anyone, deliberately or otherwise? Who ever encouraged killing or rioting?

 

[beautress]

What a bizarre comment, perhaps "rant."

they are generally rationalizing the truth in favor of the .omeurta-insisting antileaders of the Markzosocialist Democrat Party.

who is "they" and what is a "Markzosocialist Democrat Party"? You must come from an Eastern European nation.

the ones who imposed throw away the laws set in place by their state legislatures when America was still a Judeo-Christian Nation,

I don't know what you mean by this. The U.S. has never had an established religion of any sort. I think that the people who wrote the Constitution learned not only from the history of Christianity in Europe, but also from the history of the colonies that were uniting. Each colony had had its own religion, though all of them were Christian, and carried out jailings, beatings, banishings, and even hangings stemming from their religious differences. The "Founders" might have been aware, among other things, of the life and execution in 1660 of Mary Dyer, Quaker:

Top 10 Things You May Not Know About Mary Dyer

Christians have never agreed among themselves since Jesus left the planet. This situation has continued up to the present day, and, sadly, it is based on a desire for superiority, power, dominance, and winning, not any desire for spiritual growth or enlightenment. With no disrespect intended toward any other faith, the U.S. can never be a "Christian nation" due to this fact alone.

Moreover, there was no election cheating, and prayer has never been banned in public schools.

They do not pray over the intercom devices where I grew up, and also at where I spent 35 of my adult years.

Huh?
Before the school-prayer decision, the teachers led us in the Our Father (Lord's Prayer), then we said it another way in church on Sunday, which confused the heck out of us little kids. I don't know what the kids and families who were not Christian did. I don't know what the agnostics and atheists did, either.

There will never be a prayer that accommodates everyone's beliefs, accept, perhaps, "To Whom It May Concern (if any): Thanks, Yours truly, Your Human Creations (maybe or perhaps not)."

Prayer in schools has never been banned, just staff involvement in it for a purpose other than keeping discipline during classes.

The Democrats and Media are exploiting the capital protest to smear the GOP voters as dangerous white supremacist and domestic terrorist

It was no "protest." The people who attacked the Capitol actually were dangerous white supremacists and domestic terrorists. If the shoe fits, wear it.

People do not come to protests wearing combat gear, helmets, and have 2-way radios, batons, and all sorts of other weapons. They do not send messages days before a protest stating that they intend to storm and take over the Capitol and riot, or that a "civil war" is being started. They do not assault LEOs. In a protest, people usually dress in street clothes, carry signs, and chant. There is a mountain of evidence that the criminals who mounted the terrorist attack on the Capitol and Congress itself planned it well in advance. You cannot legitimize what they did by calling it a "protest."

I was in one of the Women's Marches, the one held in DC in January, 2017, while sister marches took place in many cities across the U.S. and some in other countries. The streets were so crowded that it was difficult to walk, and the estimated size of the crowd was three times as many folks as the crowd that attended trump's inauguration, approximately a little less than 500,000:

Crowd Scientists Say Women’s March in Washington Had 3 Times as Many People as Trump’s Inauguration (Published 2017)

Yet the crowd did not threaten or attack anyone or any building, including the Capitol, and did no damage. Nobody came in combat gear with weapons.

There is no evidence of any of that at all. Why are you lying? There was no attack on or at the Capitol. A peaceful protest got out of hand by a few people. It was, in many regards, much more peaceful than ALL of the BLM and antifa riots put together. Hell, the burning of D.C. by BLM alone last summer was thousands of times more violent.

Trying to figure out how a "peaceful protest" ends up with dead people and stolen/destroyed property.

Never mind...this is Trumplandia.

Shouldn't you be asking BLM and Anti-Fa those questions?

Why?

Because their peaceful protests killed over 20 and no one ever said a thing besides encouraging them.

Hundreds of thousands of people marched with BLM here and in other countries, and I've never heard of them killing anybody. I don't know who is in "Anti-Fa" or even if it is an organization. Where did this "Anti-Fa" kill anyone, deliberately or otherwise? Who ever encouraged killing or rioting?

You must listen to the Lamestream media. A lot of lefties do. Lamestreamers have no access to information Pelosi and Schumer do not want Democrats to know, so you never hear what is actually going on, and you have some moderators here who do the same. It's going to come undone when people like you get wise, and that won't happen until you wise up, which will likely be never since we lost the truth in one person, one vote system. The Dems changed voter laws unconstitutionally last fall, to not get authentication of identity to vote. As a consequence, Biden won on illegally added votes, which occurred in the hundreds of thousand. I'm putting g you on ignore. I will, however check In a few weeks to see if you are still inured in the DNC talking point lies in Lamestream, or if you're into conservative sources who refuse to quote Biden the extortionist's convenient options instead of actual reality. And, frankly I really don't care.