The forbidden subject

[Deplorable Yankee]

Don't forget that the orange whore and the morons who follow him had months and plenty of opportunities to present their "evidence" of massive voter fraud to the public and to the courts, and failed to do so. Sometimes they even told the courts that they weren't alleging fraud! Sometimes the courts had to shame them into retracting their crazy accusations; most memorably when one of the orange whore's lawyers had to admit that there was a "non-zero" number of republican observers in a place where votes were being counted.

They could have set up a website that would include copies of their submissions to the various courts, including their complaint documents, attached evidence, the courts' decisions on the matters in front of them, and all of the affidavits they collected. They could have bought airtime to present all their "evidence." But they did nothing but whine and waste an appalling amount of everybody's time.

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf

Greg

The case presented was an absolute joke! It was bull crud from the get go...laughable.

Which one ?the one the Supreme Court wouldn't hear because....well one of the reasons they claimed was "they feared violence from the left "?

 

[wamose]

Lindsey Graham is at it again. Like McConnell, he's flipping to his natural, neocon side now that Trump has helped him get reelected, ingrates that they are. They both kissed Trump's ass when they knew Trump could help them. Now, they don't know him. It's not hard to imagine how easy it will be for them to turn on their constituents. It's a wonder they both don't have two assholes from sitting on that fence so long, phony bastards that they are. I can still hear Graham singing praises for Sotomayor and Kagan during their confirmation hearings.

 

[Lysistrata]

Don't forget that the orange whore and the morons who follow him had months and plenty of opportunities to present their "evidence" of massive voter fraud to the public and to the courts, and failed to do so. Sometimes they even told the courts that they weren't alleging fraud! Sometimes the courts had to shame them into retracting their crazy accusations; most memorably when one of the orange whore's lawyers had to admit that there was a "non-zero" number of republican observers in a place where votes were being counted.

They could have set up a website that would include copies of their submissions to the various courts, including their complaint documents, attached evidence, the courts' decisions on the matters in front of them, and all of the affidavits they collected. They could have bought airtime to present all their "evidence." But they did nothing but whine and waste an appalling amount of everybody's time.

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf

Greg

This is the complaint written entirely by trump's attorneys.

See the 11th Circuit's decision: Pearson v. Kemp, No. 20-14480 | Casetext Search + Citator

Apparently Sidney Powell flubbed it in this case.

 

[Flash]

This was something that even a political fiction writer like Tom Clancy couldn't have dreamed up.

Obama gave away the store to China in American jobs and technology. Even money through scams like the Paris Climate Accord and WHO. China liked it.

China looked forward to Crooked Hillary continuing the gravy train. However, that didn't happen.

Trump was elected and he he stopped the technology transfer, the money and held the Chinese feet to the fire on trade. China didn't like it.

Then this mysterious virus appears out of China that creates a world wide pandemic. The pandemic destroys Trump's great economy.

More importantly it allows the Democrat Dirty Tricks Department a terrific opportunity. They can implement the scam of unverified mail in ballots because of the virus scare.

The Democrats swing into action in their Democrat controlled swing districts where they count the ballots.

China Joe miraculously pulls out a win due to the fraudulent ballots in the Democrat controlled swing districts.

China get what they wanted. Their man in the White House. Things can return to normal now. American jobs, money and technology will be flowing into their country. No more Space Force to challenge them in Space and a weakened American military is just more gravy.

Life will be good for Chinese just like life will be good for the Biden family now that Hunter has enough money to pay his cocaine dealer.

 

[Michigan Swampbuck]

I believe that there was intention to occupy the capitol building, but by whom? I seriously doubt that Donald Trump intended his speech to incite an insurrection that day, and no doubt that the majority of demonstrators were peaceful and had no such intentions, so who were the real perps? Provocateurs? Anarchists? Some group executing a false flag operation?

But I must concede that there is reason to believe that the Trump team didn't have any solid evidence of election fraud. I think they were full of hot air, but likely right about the election. Personally I believe there was massive ballot tampering and fraud that favored the sanctioned results. However, being merely a fly-over, smelly Walmart shopping deplorable with an IQ of a cave dwelling troglodyte, my opinion means squat.

 

[beautress]

I believe that there was intention to occupy the capitol building, but by whom? I seriously doubt that Donald Trump intended his speech to incite an insurrection that day, and no doubt that the majority of demonstrators were peaceful and had no such intentions, so who were the real perps? Provocateurs? Anarchists? Some group executing a false flag operation?

But I must concede that there is reason to believe that the Trump team didn't have any solid evidence of election fraud. I think they were full of hot air, but likely right about the election. Personally I believe there was massive ballot tampering and fraud that favored the sanctioned results. However, being merely a fly-over, smelly Walmart shopping deplorable with an IQ of a cave dwelling troglodyte, my opinion means squat.

Don't worry, sir. The truth is out there somewhere. We can still pray that the accounts can be balanced in the near future with faith that the judicial people come to grips with those who profit wrongfully from the trust that was given them.

 

[Bobob]

The stolen election


War Room calls the New York Times’ 10,000-word bluff: they’re not confident.

If there was really nothing to the election fraud, the political establishment and the media would welcome the argument. But they won’t. The last thing they want is for President Trump to show all of the damning evidence in the well of the senate.

“If they thought Trump had nothing, they would want Trump to roll in,” said Stephen K. Bannon.
Raheem Kassam says the NYT story is 10,000 words long “and 9,000 words are opinion.” And their opinion is clear: they want a fixed fight for the impeachment trial where voter fraud cannot be mentioned.

John Fredericks says the Deplorables want to hear from President Trump directly and to have all the evidence be heard.

“They want their day in court, they’ve never had it,” Fredericks said. “They simply want a hearing. And they want President Trump to lead it.”

Establishment Fears President Trump Making His Case Before the Senate

War Room calls the New York Times’ 10,000-word bluff: they’re not confident. If there was really nothing to the election

pandemic.warroom.org

The dangerous insurrectionists!



View attachment 452332

You missed the view of the ralliers inside the Capitol! It's a clearer view.

 

[Darkwind]

The Democrats and Media are exploiting the capital protest to smear the GOP voters as dangerous white supremacist and domestic terrorist

It was no "protest." The people who attacked the Capitol actually were dangerous white supremacists and domestic terrorists. If the shoe fits, wear it.

People do not come to protests wearing combat gear, helmets, and have 2-way radios, batons, and all sorts of other weapons. They do not send messages days before a protest stating that they intend to storm and take over the Capitol and riot, or that a "civil war" is being started. They do not assault LEOs. In a protest, people usually dress in street clothes, carry signs, and chant. There is a mountain of evidence that the criminals who mounted the terrorist attack on the Capitol and Congress itself planned it well in advance. You cannot legitimize what they did by calling it a "protest."

I was in one of the Women's Marches, the one held in DC in January, 2017, while sister marches took place in many cities across the U.S. and some in other countries. The streets were so crowded that it was difficult to walk, and the estimated size of the crowd was three times as many folks as the crowd that attended trump's inauguration, approximately a little less than 500,000:

Crowd Scientists Say Women’s March in Washington Had 3 Times as Many People as Trump’s Inauguration (Published 2017)

Yet the crowd did not threaten or attack anyone or any building, including the Capitol, and did no damage. Nobody came in combat gear with weapons.

There is no evidence of any of that at all. Why are you lying? There was no attack on or at the Capitol. A peaceful protest got out of hand by a few people. It was, in many regards, much more peaceful than ALL of the BLM and antifa riots put together. Hell, the burning of D.C. by BLM alone last summer was thousands of times more violent.

 

[Lysistrata]

The Democrats and Media are exploiting the capital protest to smear the GOP voters as dangerous white supremacist and domestic terrorist

It was no "protest." The people who attacked the Capitol actually were dangerous white supremacists and domestic terrorists. If the shoe fits, wear it.

People do not come to protests wearing combat gear, helmets, and have 2-way radios, batons, and all sorts of other weapons. They do not send messages days before a protest stating that they intend to storm and take over the Capitol and riot, or that a "civil war" is being started. They do not assault LEOs. In a protest, people usually dress in street clothes, carry signs, and chant. There is a mountain of evidence that the criminals who mounted the terrorist attack on the Capitol and Congress itself planned it well in advance. You cannot legitimize what they did by calling it a "protest."

I was in one of the Women's Marches, the one held in DC in January, 2017, while sister marches took place in many cities across the U.S. and some in other countries. The streets were so crowded that it was difficult to walk, and the estimated size of the crowd was three times as many folks as the crowd that attended trump's inauguration, approximately a little less than 500,000:

Crowd Scientists Say Women’s March in Washington Had 3 Times as Many People as Trump’s Inauguration (Published 2017)

Yet the crowd did not threaten or attack anyone or any building, including the Capitol, and did no damage. Nobody came in combat gear with weapons.

There is no evidence of any of that at all. Why are you lying? There was no attack on or at the Capitol. A peaceful protest got out of hand by a few people. It was, in many regards, much more peaceful than ALL of the BLM and antifa riots put together. Hell, the burning of D.C. by BLM alone last summer was thousands of times more violent.

Explain how I am lying. Explain how there was no attack on or at the Capitol when we saw it broadcast in real time. The Capitol and our Congress inside, carrying out a Constitutionally mandated function was attacked by armed terrorists who planned this attack in advance. The Jan. 6th attack on the U.S. Government.

Listen up, I live 3-4 highway stops from the Pentagon, then you cross the 14th St. Bridge, which takes you right to the Mall by the Smithsonian and, a few blocks away is the Capitol. Yes, there was a terrorist attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6, and it was planned in advance.

 

[Indeependent]

The stolen election


War Room calls the New York Times’ 10,000-word bluff: they’re not confident.

If there was really nothing to the election fraud, the political establishment and the media would welcome the argument. But they won’t. The last thing they want is for President Trump to show all of the damning evidence in the well of the senate.

“If they thought Trump had nothing, they would want Trump to roll in,” said Stephen K. Bannon.
Raheem Kassam says the NYT story is 10,000 words long “and 9,000 words are opinion.” And their opinion is clear: they want a fixed fight for the impeachment trial where voter fraud cannot be mentioned.

John Fredericks says the Deplorables want to hear from President Trump directly and to have all the evidence be heard.

“They want their day in court, they’ve never had it,” Fredericks said. “They simply want a hearing. And they want President Trump to lead it.”

Establishment Fears President Trump Making His Case Before the Senate

War Room calls the New York Times’ 10,000-word bluff: they’re not confident. If there was really nothing to the election

pandemic.warroom.org

The dangerous insurrectionists!



View attachment 452332

The only way the proof would be allowed is if those who voted Trump showed up as a armed force to protect the investigators of the evidence.

 

[Coyote]

The Democrats and Media are exploiting the capital protest to smear the GOP voters as dangerous white supremacist and domestic terrorist

It was no "protest." The people who attacked the Capitol actually were dangerous white supremacists and domestic terrorists. If the shoe fits, wear it.

People do not come to protests wearing combat gear, helmets, and have 2-way radios, batons, and all sorts of other weapons. They do not send messages days before a protest stating that they intend to storm and take over the Capitol and riot, or that a "civil war" is being started. They do not assault LEOs. In a protest, people usually dress in street clothes, carry signs, and chant. There is a mountain of evidence that the criminals who mounted the terrorist attack on the Capitol and Congress itself planned it well in advance. You cannot legitimize what they did by calling it a "protest."

I was in one of the Women's Marches, the one held in DC in January, 2017, while sister marches took place in many cities across the U.S. and some in other countries. The streets were so crowded that it was difficult to walk, and the estimated size of the crowd was three times as many folks as the crowd that attended trump's inauguration, approximately a little less than 500,000:

Crowd Scientists Say Women’s March in Washington Had 3 Times as Many People as Trump’s Inauguration (Published 2017)

Yet the crowd did not threaten or attack anyone or any building, including the Capitol, and did no damage. Nobody came in combat gear with weapons.

There is no evidence of any of that at all. Why are you lying? There was no attack on or at the Capitol. A peaceful protest got out of hand by a few people. It was, in many regards, much more peaceful than ALL of the BLM and antifa riots put together. Hell, the burning of D.C. by BLM alone last summer was thousands of times more violent.

Trying to figure out how a "peaceful protest" ends up with dead people and stolen/destroyed property.

Never mind...this is Trumplandia.

 

[Darkwind]

The Democrats and Media are exploiting the capital protest to smear the GOP voters as dangerous white supremacist and domestic terrorist

It was no "protest." The people who attacked the Capitol actually were dangerous white supremacists and domestic terrorists. If the shoe fits, wear it.

People do not come to protests wearing combat gear, helmets, and have 2-way radios, batons, and all sorts of other weapons. They do not send messages days before a protest stating that they intend to storm and take over the Capitol and riot, or that a "civil war" is being started. They do not assault LEOs. In a protest, people usually dress in street clothes, carry signs, and chant. There is a mountain of evidence that the criminals who mounted the terrorist attack on the Capitol and Congress itself planned it well in advance. You cannot legitimize what they did by calling it a "protest."

I was in one of the Women's Marches, the one held in DC in January, 2017, while sister marches took place in many cities across the U.S. and some in other countries. The streets were so crowded that it was difficult to walk, and the estimated size of the crowd was three times as many folks as the crowd that attended trump's inauguration, approximately a little less than 500,000:

Crowd Scientists Say Women’s March in Washington Had 3 Times as Many People as Trump’s Inauguration (Published 2017)

Yet the crowd did not threaten or attack anyone or any building, including the Capitol, and did no damage. Nobody came in combat gear with weapons.

There is no evidence of any of that at all. Why are you lying? There was no attack on or at the Capitol. A peaceful protest got out of hand by a few people. It was, in many regards, much more peaceful than ALL of the BLM and antifa riots put together. Hell, the burning of D.C. by BLM alone last summer was thousands of times more violent.

Trying to figure out how a "peaceful protest" ends up with dead people and stolen/destroyed property.

Never mind...this is Trumplandia.

You are kidding, right? We witnessed you, the left, and the Democrats in power, telling us that peaceful protests all through late spring and all summer were the result of a few out of control people. Suddenly, it is different because it is the right?

That is utterly ridiculous. The protesters were at the Capitol to voice their concerns (as is their right) about a pending vote that should have been at least put off until an investigation could be had. IN fact, that protest was 1000's of times more peaceful than any one single BLM or antifa riot.

 

[Darkwind]

The Democrats and Media are exploiting the capital protest to smear the GOP voters as dangerous white supremacist and domestic terrorist

It was no "protest." The people who attacked the Capitol actually were dangerous white supremacists and domestic terrorists. If the shoe fits, wear it.

People do not come to protests wearing combat gear, helmets, and have 2-way radios, batons, and all sorts of other weapons. They do not send messages days before a protest stating that they intend to storm and take over the Capitol and riot, or that a "civil war" is being started. They do not assault LEOs. In a protest, people usually dress in street clothes, carry signs, and chant. There is a mountain of evidence that the criminals who mounted the terrorist attack on the Capitol and Congress itself planned it well in advance. You cannot legitimize what they did by calling it a "protest."

I was in one of the Women's Marches, the one held in DC in January, 2017, while sister marches took place in many cities across the U.S. and some in other countries. The streets were so crowded that it was difficult to walk, and the estimated size of the crowd was three times as many folks as the crowd that attended trump's inauguration, approximately a little less than 500,000:

Crowd Scientists Say Women’s March in Washington Had 3 Times as Many People as Trump’s Inauguration (Published 2017)

Yet the crowd did not threaten or attack anyone or any building, including the Capitol, and did no damage. Nobody came in combat gear with weapons.

There is no evidence of any of that at all. Why are you lying? There was no attack on or at the Capitol. A peaceful protest got out of hand by a few people. It was, in many regards, much more peaceful than ALL of the BLM and antifa riots put together. Hell, the burning of D.C. by BLM alone last summer was thousands of times more violent.

Explain how I am lying. Explain how there was no attack on or at the Capitol when we saw it broadcast in real time. The Capitol and our Congress inside, carrying out a Constitutionally mandated function was attacked by armed terrorists who planned this attack in advance. The Jan. 6th attack on the U.S. Government.

Listen up, I live 3-4 highway stops from the Pentagon, then you cross the 14th St. Bridge, which takes you right to the Mall by the Smithsonian and, a few blocks away is the Capitol. Yes, there was a terrorist attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6, and it was planned in advance.

You saw some demonstrators get out of hand, not a coordinated attack. Are you on some sort of reality changing chemical? God, you people will lie about anything.

 

[the other mike]

The stolen election


War Room calls the New York Times’ 10,000-word bluff: they’re not confident.

If there was really nothing to the election fraud, the political establishment and the media would welcome the argument. But they won’t. The last thing they want is for President Trump to show all of the damning evidence in the well of the senate.

“If they thought Trump had nothing, they would want Trump to roll in,” said Stephen K. Bannon.
Raheem Kassam says the NYT story is 10,000 words long “and 9,000 words are opinion.” And their opinion is clear: they want a fixed fight for the impeachment trial where voter fraud cannot be mentioned.

John Fredericks says the Deplorables want to hear from President Trump directly and to have all the evidence be heard.

“They want their day in court, they’ve never had it,” Fredericks said. “They simply want a hearing. And they want President Trump to lead it.”

Establishment Fears President Trump Making His Case Before the Senate

War Room calls the New York Times’ 10,000-word bluff: they’re not confident. If there was really nothing to the election

pandemic.warroom.org

The dangerous insurrectionists!



View attachment 452332

Once it's been proven Trump will beat both parties in 2024.

 

[the other mike]

The stolen election


War Room calls the New York Times’ 10,000-word bluff: they’re not confident.

If there was really nothing to the election fraud, the political establishment and the media would welcome the argument. But they won’t. The last thing they want is for President Trump to show all of the damning evidence in the well of the senate.

“If they thought Trump had nothing, they would want Trump to roll in,” said Stephen K. Bannon.
Raheem Kassam says the NYT story is 10,000 words long “and 9,000 words are opinion.” And their opinion is clear: they want a fixed fight for the impeachment trial where voter fraud cannot be mentioned.

John Fredericks says the Deplorables want to hear from President Trump directly and to have all the evidence be heard.

“They want their day in court, they’ve never had it,” Fredericks said. “They simply want a hearing. And they want President Trump to lead it.”

Establishment Fears President Trump Making His Case Before the Senate

War Room calls the New York Times’ 10,000-word bluff: they’re not confident. If there was really nothing to the election

pandemic.warroom.org

The dangerous insurrectionists!



View attachment 452332

The truth will prevail.

 

[lg325]

I wish I was at the rally. I was in the Covid wing of the hospital at the time. Yes it got violent but all those people are the working people who have been ignored, brushed off, told to shut up and get out of the way. Called deplorable by those who are supposed to represent them. When a segment of society gets treated like that ,after a time they will rise up. That is what happened on 1/6/21. I say that as a registered democrat and one of those deplorables. And the son and grandson of working class , patriotic Americans. Instead of the Government elite being afraid of them ,they need to try talking to them.

 

[lg325]

If Only Bolder Type Could Get You What You Want!

Think it'll work in the gulag comrade ?
View attachment 452340

You misspelled GITMO. I hear it's been spruced up for the 1/6 traitors.

Yep...I ran out of fingers to count on

You're gonna need more cages

I Love that video! I wish I was there!

 

[beautress]

The Democrats and Media are exploiting the capital protest to smear the GOP voters as dangerous white supremacist and domestic terrorist

It was no "protest." The people who attacked the Capitol actually were dangerous white supremacists and domestic terrorists. If the shoe fits, wear it.

People do not come to protests wearing combat gear, helmets, and have 2-way radios, batons, and all sorts of other weapons. They do not send messages days before a protest stating that they intend to storm and take over the Capitol and riot, or that a "civil war" is being started. They do not assault LEOs. In a protest, people usually dress in street clothes, carry signs, and chant. There is a mountain of evidence that the criminals who mounted the terrorist attack on the Capitol and Congress itself planned it well in advance. You cannot legitimize what they did by calling it a "protest."

I was in one of the Women's Marches, the one held in DC in January, 2017, while sister marches took place in many cities across the U.S. and some in other countries. The streets were so crowded that it was difficult to walk, and the estimated size of the crowd was three times as many folks as the crowd that attended trump's inauguration, approximately a little less than 500,000:

Crowd Scientists Say Women’s March in Washington Had 3 Times as Many People as Trump’s Inauguration (Published 2017)

Yet the crowd did not threaten or attack anyone or any building, including the Capitol, and did no damage. Nobody came in combat gear with weapons.

There is no evidence of any of that at all. Why are you lying? There was no attack on or at the Capitol. A peaceful protest got out of hand by a few people. It was, in many regards, much more peaceful than ALL of the BLM and antifa riots put together. Hell, the burning of D.C. by BLM alone last summer was thousands of times more violent.

Explain how I am lying. Explain how there was no attack on or at the Capitol when we saw it broadcast in real time. The Capitol and our Congress inside, carrying out a Constitutionally mandated function was attacked by armed terrorists who planned this attack in advance. The Jan. 6th attack on the U.S. Government.

Listen up, I live 3-4 highway stops from the Pentagon, then you cross the 14th St. Bridge, which takes you right to the Mall by the Smithsonian and, a few blocks away is the Capitol. Yes, there was a terrorist attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6, and it was planned in advance.

Well, Ms. Lisis, every family has its notmees in the cookie jar , bit most of them are between the preschool ages of 3 and 5 years old. There are few of them who are grownups, and they are generally rationalizing the truth in favor of the .omeurta-insisting antileaders of the Markzosocialist Democrat Party. You know, the ones who imposed throw away the laws set in place by their state legislatures when America was still a Judeo-Christian Nation, and legislatures did all they could to make America prosper, keep the majority off the welfare rolls by small and all businesses to hire union and nonunion workers alike in manufacturing, service, financial, food-production, and instructional capacities. With no identities required by unconstitutional shove-it-down-the-throat laws, it makes it so easy for cheaters to get what they want without worries that someone stops the inanity and insanity of that horrible week before election aimed at getting rid of majority votes for Donald Trump.

I hate what the God-forsaken, atheistic get-rid-of-prayers-in-public-school Democrats did to cheat their loser candidate into the WH based on revenge for beating the unpopular tyrant-by-"I forget"- candidate, Hillary Clinton in 2016.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

The Democrats and Media are exploiting the capital protest to smear the GOP voters as dangerous white supremacist and domestic terrorist

It was no "protest." The people who attacked the Capitol actually were dangerous white supremacists and domestic terrorists. If the shoe fits, wear it.

People do not come to protests wearing combat gear, helmets, and have 2-way radios, batons, and all sorts of other weapons. They do not send messages days before a protest stating that they intend to storm and take over the Capitol and riot, or that a "civil war" is being started. They do not assault LEOs. In a protest, people usually dress in street clothes, carry signs, and chant. There is a mountain of evidence that the criminals who mounted the terrorist attack on the Capitol and Congress itself planned it well in advance. You cannot legitimize what they did by calling it a "protest."

I was in one of the Women's Marches, the one held in DC in January, 2017, while sister marches took place in many cities across the U.S. and some in other countries. The streets were so crowded that it was difficult to walk, and the estimated size of the crowd was three times as many folks as the crowd that attended trump's inauguration, approximately a little less than 500,000:

Crowd Scientists Say Women’s March in Washington Had 3 Times as Many People as Trump’s Inauguration (Published 2017)

Yet the crowd did not threaten or attack anyone or any building, including the Capitol, and did no damage. Nobody came in combat gear with weapons.

There is no evidence of any of that at all. Why are you lying? There was no attack on or at the Capitol. A peaceful protest got out of hand by a few people. It was, in many regards, much more peaceful than ALL of the BLM and antifa riots put together. Hell, the burning of D.C. by BLM alone last summer was thousands of times more violent.

Trying to figure out how a "peaceful protest" ends up with dead people and stolen/destroyed property.

Never mind...this is Trumplandia.

Despite what the media would like you to believe.....only one person was killed during the protest....a lady protestor shot and killed by a supposed Capitol Cop in plain clothes....to this day they will not reveal his identity.

Exposed: The Media Has Been Lying About The Capitol Protests

Don’t count on Nancy Pelosi’s “truth” commission to correct the record.

issuesinsights.com

 

[Lastamender]

The Democrats and Media are exploiting the capital protest to smear the GOP voters as dangerous white supremacist and domestic terrorist

It was no "protest." The people who attacked the Capitol actually were dangerous white supremacists and domestic terrorists. If the shoe fits, wear it.

People do not come to protests wearing combat gear, helmets, and have 2-way radios, batons, and all sorts of other weapons. They do not send messages days before a protest stating that they intend to storm and take over the Capitol and riot, or that a "civil war" is being started. They do not assault LEOs. In a protest, people usually dress in street clothes, carry signs, and chant. There is a mountain of evidence that the criminals who mounted the terrorist attack on the Capitol and Congress itself planned it well in advance. You cannot legitimize what they did by calling it a "protest."

I was in one of the Women's Marches, the one held in DC in January, 2017, while sister marches took place in many cities across the U.S. and some in other countries. The streets were so crowded that it was difficult to walk, and the estimated size of the crowd was three times as many folks as the crowd that attended trump's inauguration, approximately a little less than 500,000:

Crowd Scientists Say Women’s March in Washington Had 3 Times as Many People as Trump’s Inauguration (Published 2017)

Yet the crowd did not threaten or attack anyone or any building, including the Capitol, and did no damage. Nobody came in combat gear with weapons.

There is no evidence of any of that at all. Why are you lying? There was no attack on or at the Capitol. A peaceful protest got out of hand by a few people. It was, in many regards, much more peaceful than ALL of the BLM and antifa riots put together. Hell, the burning of D.C. by BLM alone last summer was thousands of times more violent.

Trying to figure out how a "peaceful protest" ends up with dead people and stolen/destroyed property.

Never mind...this is Trumplandia.

Shouldn't you be asking BLM and Anti-Fa those questions?