The forbidden subject

Deplorable Yankee

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2019
16,357
15,212
2,415
DIXIE
The stolen election :p


War Room calls the New York Times’ 10,000-word bluff: they’re not confident.

If there was really nothing to the election fraud, the political establishment and the media would welcome the argument. But they won’t. The last thing they want is for President Trump to show all of the damning evidence in the well of the senate.

“If they thought Trump had nothing, they would want Trump to roll in,” said Stephen K. Bannon.
Raheem Kassam says the NYT story is 10,000 words long “and 9,000 words are opinion.” And their opinion is clear: they want a fixed fight for the impeachment trial where voter fraud cannot be mentioned.

John Fredericks says the Deplorables want to hear from President Trump directly and to have all the evidence be heard.

They want their day in court, they’ve never had it,” Fredericks said. “They simply want a hearing. And they want President Trump to lead it.”






The dangerous insurrectionists!



ekekrkkrkrkrkkrr.jpeg
 
Sounds like a Soprano thriller!!!
Itd be nice to see people get whacked

View attachment 452338
That looks like the same model of gallows that is featured in the J.C. Whitney auto parts catalog for $647.99. It comes with instructions for ease of assembly. The three nooses & rope hand rail are included! It's portable but the caster wheels are NOT included(Harbor Freight casters are inexpensive?) The drawback to it is J.C. Whitney only ships it to Washington DC!
 
Sounds like a Soprano thriller!!!
Itd be nice to see people get whacked

View attachment 452338
That looks like the same model of gallows that is featured in the J.C. Whitney auto parts catalog for $647.99. It comes with instructions for ease of assembly. The three nooses & rope hand rail are included! It's portable but the caster wheels are NOT included(Harbor Freight casters are inexpensive?) The drawback to it is J.C. Whitney only ships it to Washington DC!

They should expand to Albany and Sacramento
 
Sounds like a Soprano thriller!!!
Itd be nice to see people get whacked

View attachment 452338

Yes, it is strange that the left (and even some of the right) has had a meltdown over a simple question: Were there some irregularities in the November 3 election?

Why the extreme indignation?

It certainly seems to indicate that the accusation itself has touched a raw nerve in a lot of people.

Let's be frank: We will never know (unless someday a diary is discovered that spills the beans).

The left says: Well, not a single court believed you Deplorables.
The right says: We never had a chance to present our case.

One thing for sure: There will be much bitterness for a long time. And that man from Delaware governing by executive orders has only intensified the anger.
 
The stolen election :p


War Room calls the New York Times’ 10,000-word bluff: they’re not confident.

If there was really nothing to the election fraud, the political establishment and the media would welcome the argument. But they won’t. The last thing they want is for President Trump to show all of the damning evidence in the well of the senate.

“If they thought Trump had nothing, they would want Trump to roll in,” said Stephen K. Bannon.
Raheem Kassam says the NYT story is 10,000 words long “and 9,000 words are opinion.” And their opinion is clear: they want a fixed fight for the impeachment trial where voter fraud cannot be mentioned.

John Fredericks says the Deplorables want to hear from President Trump directly and to have all the evidence be heard.

They want their day in court, they’ve never had it,” Fredericks said. “They simply want a hearing. And they want President Trump to lead it.”






The dangerous insurrectionists!




Does anyone know how many were in attendance ?
 
The stolen election :p


War Room calls the New York Times’ 10,000-word bluff: they’re not confident.

If there was really nothing to the election fraud, the political establishment and the media would welcome the argument. But they won’t. The last thing they want is for President Trump to show all of the damning evidence in the well of the senate.

“If they thought Trump had nothing, they would want Trump to roll in,” said Stephen K. Bannon.
Raheem Kassam says the NYT story is 10,000 words long “and 9,000 words are opinion.” And their opinion is clear: they want a fixed fight for the impeachment trial where voter fraud cannot be mentioned.

John Fredericks says the Deplorables want to hear from President Trump directly and to have all the evidence be heard.

They want their day in court, they’ve never had it,” Fredericks said. “They simply want a hearing. And they want President Trump to lead it.”






The dangerous insurrectionists!



View attachment 452332

Primary them ALL!
 
Don't forget that the orange whore and the morons who follow him had months and plenty of opportunities to present their "evidence" of massive voter fraud to the public and to the courts, and failed to do so. Sometimes they even told the courts that they weren't alleging fraud! Sometimes the courts had to shame them into retracting their crazy accusations; most memorably when one of the orange whore's lawyers had to admit that there was a "non-zero" number of republican observers in a place where votes were being counted.

They could have set up a website that would include copies of their submissions to the various courts, including their complaint documents, attached evidence, the courts' decisions on the matters in front of them, and all of the affidavits they collected. They could have bought airtime to present all their "evidence." But they did nothing but whine and waste an appalling amount of everybody's time.
 
olitical establishment and the media would welcome the argument. But they won’t. The last thing they want is for President Trump to show all of the damning evidence in the well of the senate
Nothing has stopped former President TRUMP from showing any evidence.

Trump just does not have any evidence to present. It's all made up bull crud, that you CHOSE to believe....on his word alone.

For goodness sake, he was president, he could have used any platform he wanted to present and show his legitimate evidence.... the DOJ, the federal election committee, the FBI, Homeland Security....

Trump has NO EVIDENSE OF FRAUD, he has spin and speculations.

The states have recounts and audits and canvassing of the election that verified each state's election results, which lead to their certification.
 
Last edited:
The Democrats and Media are exploiting the capital protest to smear the GOP voters as dangerous white supremacist and domestic terrorist
KARMA! What goes around, comes around.

You labeled all liberals dangerous because of blm and antifa protests that transferred to rioting at night.
 
Don't forget that the orange whore and the morons who follow him had months and plenty of opportunities to present their "evidence" of massive voter fraud to the public and to the courts, and failed to do so. Sometimes they even told the courts that they weren't alleging fraud! Sometimes the courts had to shame them into retracting their crazy accusations; most memorably when one of the orange whore's lawyers had to admit that there was a "non-zero" number of republican observers in a place where votes were being counted.

They could have set up a website that would include copies of their submissions to the various courts, including their complaint documents, attached evidence, the courts' decisions on the matters in front of them, and all of the affidavits they collected. They could have bought airtime to present all their "evidence." But they did nothing but whine and waste an appalling amount of everybody's time.

Greg
 
olitical establishment and the media would welcome the argument. But they won’t. The last thing they want is for President Trump to show all of the damning evidence in the well of the senate
Nothing has stopped former President TRUMP from showing any evidence.

Trump just does not have any evidence to present. It's all made up bull crud, that you CHOSE to believe....on his word alone.

For goodness sake, he was president, he could have used any platform he wanted to present and show his legitimate evidence.... the DOJ, the federal election committee, the FBI, Homeland Security....

Trump has NO EVIDENSE OF FRAUD, he has spin and speculations.

The states have recounts and audits and canvassing of the election that verified each state's election results, which lead to their certification.
Not really

But keep telling yourself that if ya want
 
The Democrats and Media are exploiting the capital protest to smear the GOP voters as dangerous white supremacist and domestic terrorist

It was no "protest." The people who attacked the Capitol actually were dangerous white supremacists and domestic terrorists. If the shoe fits, wear it.

People do not come to protests wearing combat gear, helmets, and have 2-way radios, batons, and all sorts of other weapons. They do not send messages days before a protest stating that they intend to storm and take over the Capitol and riot, or that a "civil war" is being started. They do not assault LEOs. In a protest, people usually dress in street clothes, carry signs, and chant. There is a mountain of evidence that the criminals who mounted the terrorist attack on the Capitol and Congress itself planned it well in advance. You cannot legitimize what they did by calling it a "protest."

I was in one of the Women's Marches, the one held in DC in January, 2017, while sister marches took place in many cities across the U.S. and some in other countries. The streets were so crowded that it was difficult to walk, and the estimated size of the crowd was three times as many folks as the crowd that attended trump's inauguration, approximately a little less than 500,000:

Crowd Scientists Say Women’s March in Washington Had 3 Times as Many People as Trump’s Inauguration (Published 2017)

Yet the crowd did not threaten or attack anyone or any building, including the Capitol, and did no damage. Nobody came in combat gear with weapons.
 
Don't forget that the orange whore and the morons who follow him had months and plenty of opportunities to present their "evidence" of massive voter fraud to the public and to the courts, and failed to do so. Sometimes they even told the courts that they weren't alleging fraud! Sometimes the courts had to shame them into retracting their crazy accusations; most memorably when one of the orange whore's lawyers had to admit that there was a "non-zero" number of republican observers in a place where votes were being counted.

They could have set up a website that would include copies of their submissions to the various courts, including their complaint documents, attached evidence, the courts' decisions on the matters in front of them, and all of the affidavits they collected. They could have bought airtime to present all their "evidence." But they did nothing but whine and waste an appalling amount of everybody's time.

Greg
The case presented was an absolute joke! It was bull crud from the get go...laughable.
 

Forum List

Back
Top