The First Lie President Obama Told

[Flanders]

The freaks, the do-gooders, and the priests —— totalitarians all —— always despised the First Amendment. Freaks believe tyranny works for them. Do-gooders would find fault in the Garden of Eden. Priests will never rest until their personal moral opinion governs the world.

NOTE: Judges, priests, and Imams wear black. Think about it!

The government, the press, and organized religions are working full-time to eliminate freedom of speech, but, to date, nothing erased the First Amendment more effectively than this:

Who could have guessed that after the largest terror attack on American soil, the United States would take in record numbers of Muslims?​

These 16 words:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; . . .​

were never meant to include immigrants coming here specifically to deny freedom of religion to every non-Muslim. Clerics of every non-Muslim organized religion in America have no love for freedom of religion, but the laity of every other religion live by the spirit of the First Amendment. Conversely, not one Muslim will ever defend freedom of religion. I know I am right about Muslims for one reason above all others:

Taqiyya and Kitman: The role of Deception in Islamic Terrorism

Taqiyya and Kitman: The role of Deception in Islamic Terrorism :: Reader comments at Daniel Pipes​

Question: The Chicago sewer rat lies about everything; so why cannot Americans see that he is practicing Taqiyya and Kitman?

It is fair to say that the “constitutional scholar” makes no pretense of defending the Constitution. Indeed, swearing his oath of office was the first lie he told as president. That is why I do not believe any of the of spin talking heads spout about his so-called legacy. Taqiyya the Liar is aiming at bigger things than the ACA or the Iran Deal. He wants to be remembered as the Father of Global Government. On top of his father fantasy he is positive his conduct as president will eventually elevate him to ‘Saint of Islam’ in the eyes of Muslims for all time. If you doubt my take, imagine looking back at him AFTER Islam destroys America as Muslims are promising. Taqiyya’s contribution to America’s defeat will make him a major Saint of Islam on par with Saint Peter in Roman Catholicism.

Challenge Muslims on their respect for the First Amendment, and they will come out of the woodwork swearing they will defend the U.S. Constitution to the death —— not for everyone but for themselves so long as Islam is considered a religion instead of a political movement. I am not talking about Muslim Imams only. Every Muslim will retreat behind Taqiyya and Kitman when asked. You will not see that in other religion because no other religion’s ideology approves of lying; whereas, Islam demands it in order to defeat enemies from within.

Back up one step and you will see that Islam the religion was never separated from Islam the political movement. There is not a snowball’s chance in hell of turning Muslims away from theocracy after they’ve practiced it since the 7th century. America’s brilliant Constitution protecting Americans from theocracy does not protect them from touchy-feely non-Muslim fools who willingly follow Taqiyya the Liar to the slaughterhouse.

NOTE: Ever since 9-11-2001 I’ve been saying that Islam should be legally defined as a political movement which it is, while Socialism/Communism should be defined as a religion which it is. In that way both are denied First Amendment protection. In short: Socialism violates the First Amendment because it is a religion implementing the tax collector’s morality, while Islam is NOT entitled to First Amendment protection because it is a political movement.

If my above observations are too esoteric for you try this:

There is such a cascade of horrors that accompany this demographic of immigrants that it’s difficult to know where to begin. So let’s start here: it has become abundantly clear that Muslims who come to America as refugees have fueled a rapid rise of insular communities that become breeding grounds for terrorists.

Meanwhile, half a million Muslim girls in the United States are now at risk for female genital mutilation. Per Breitbart, “there are more girls in the United States at risk of lifelong sexual disfigurement than there are in Uganda and Cameroon.”

XXXXX​

Despite mounting evidence that Muslims are not good for America, we just keep on bringing them in.

September 15, 2015
U.S. has admitted 3,000,000 Muslims since 9/11
By Carol Brown

Blog: U.S. has admitted 3,000,000 Muslims since 9/11​

Here’s another Question: How come Republicans supposedly declared war on women?

And a followup: Aside from funding Planned Parenthood, how can Hillary Clinton claim she is fighting for women when her president, and her political party, welcome Muslim immigrants who practice female castration?

​

 

[Campbell]

The freaks, the do-gooders, and the priests —— totalitarians all —— always despised the First Amendment. Freaks believe tyranny works for them. Do-gooders would find fault in the Garden of Eden. Priests will never rest until their personal moral opinion governs the world.

NOTE: Judges, priests, and Imams wear black. Think about it!

The government, the press, and organized religions are working full-time to eliminate freedom of speech, but, to date, nothing erased the First Amendment more effectively than this:

Who could have guessed that after the largest terror attack on American soil, the United States would take in record numbers of Muslims?​

These 16 words:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; . . .​

were never meant to include immigrants coming here specifically to deny freedom of religion to every non-Muslim. Clerics of every non-Muslim organized religion in America have no love for freedom of religion, but the laity of every other religion live by the spirit of the First Amendment. Conversely, not one Muslim will ever defend freedom of religion. I know I am right about Muslims for one reason above all others:

Taqiyya and Kitman: The role of Deception in Islamic Terrorism

Taqiyya and Kitman: The role of Deception in Islamic Terrorism :: Reader comments at Daniel Pipes​

Question: The Chicago sewer rat lies about everything; so why cannot Americans see that he is practicing Taqiyya and Kitman?

It is fair to say that the “constitutional scholar” makes no pretense of defending the Constitution. Indeed, swearing his oath of office was the first lie he told as president. That is why I do not believe any of the of spin talking heads spout about his so-called legacy. Taqiyya the Liar is aiming at bigger things than the ACA or the Iran Deal. He wants to be remembered as the Father of Global Government. On top of his father fantasy he is positive his conduct as president will eventually elevate him to ‘Saint of Islam’ in the eyes of Muslims for all time. If you doubt my take, imagine looking back at him AFTER Islam destroys America as Muslims are promising. Taqiyya’s contribution to America’s defeat will make him a major Saint of Islam on par with Saint Peter in Roman Catholicism.

Challenge Muslims on their respect for the First Amendment, and they will come out of the woodwork swearing they will defend the U.S. Constitution to the death —— not for everyone but for themselves so long as Islam is considered a religion instead of a political movement. I am not talking about Muslim Imams only. Every Muslim will retreat behind Taqiyya and Kitman when asked. You will not see that in other religion because no other religion’s ideology approves of lying; whereas, Islam demands it in order to defeat enemies from within.

Back up one step and you will see that Islam the religion was never separated from Islam the political movement. There is not a snowball’s chance in hell of turning Muslims away from theocracy after they’ve practiced it since the 7th century. America’s brilliant Constitution protecting Americans from theocracy does not protect them from touchy-feely non-Muslim fools who willingly follow Taqiyya the Liar to the slaughterhouse.

NOTE: Ever since 9-11-2001 I’ve been saying that Islam should be legally defined as a political movement which it is, while Socialism/Communism should be defined as a religion which it is. In that way both are denied First Amendment protection. In short: Socialism violates the First Amendment because it is a religion implementing the tax collector’s morality, while Islam is NOT entitled to First Amendment protection because it is a political movement.

If my above observations are too esoteric for you try this:

There is such a cascade of horrors that accompany this demographic of immigrants that it’s difficult to know where to begin. So let’s start here: it has become abundantly clear that Muslims who come to America as refugees have fueled a rapid rise of insular communities that become breeding grounds for terrorists.

Meanwhile, half a million Muslim girls in the United States are now at risk for female genital mutilation. Per Breitbart, “there are more girls in the United States at risk of lifelong sexual disfigurement than there are in Uganda and Cameroon.”

XXXXX​

Despite mounting evidence that Muslims are not good for America, we just keep on bringing them in.

September 15, 2015
U.S. has admitted 3,000,000 Muslims since 9/11
By Carol Brown

Blog: U.S. has admitted 3,000,000 Muslims since 9/11​

Here’s another Question: How come Republicans supposedly declared war on women?

And a followup: Aside from funding Planned Parenthood, how can Hillary Clinton claim she is fighting for women when her president, and her political party, welcome Muslim immigrants who practice female castration?

​

The only thing I gathered from that garish collection of unadulterated bullshit is that you're a good Republican.....if there is any such thing.

 

[Sallow]

The Muslim hate mongering continues. It's so Germany, 1933.

 

[Sonny Clark]

The first lie he told was that he was going to bring hope and change ( meaning hope that "good" changes would occur ). And, now, we've lost all hope, and change is all we have left in our pockets.

 

[Campbell]

The first lie he told was that he was going to bring hope and change ( meaning hope that "good" changes would occur ). And, now, we've lost all hope, and change is all we have left in our pockets.

My wife and I have cleared about $150,000 in our IRA accounts since Obama started. 'Course who's counting? Certainly not someone who supports an ignoramus who handed the most powerful financial institutions in the world 3/4 of a trillion dollars on his way out of the office and left our economy bleeding 750,000 jobs a month:

 

[Moonglow]

The good ol' white folks banned the Native American Indian religious ceremonies until 1978 when a law was passed allowing them to worship freely..

 

[easyt65]

COMMON MYTHS:

1. TEA PARTY BEGAN THE 'BIRTHER MOVEMENT'
-- Actually, the 1st person to EVER bring up Obama's birth certificate and question his nationality / eligibility to run for office was HILLARY CLINTON. Obama came out of 'nowhere' to overtake her in the polls, threatening to ruin her walk into the White House, which she believed - and still does - she was/is OWED! To try to 'take him down', she and her campaign started the 'birther' conspiracy. (Sorry, Libs - the 'birther movement' started as in inner-party 'food fight' (more Clinton dirty tactics of going after someone personally).)

2. The GOP BEGAN THE 'WAR ON WOMEN'
- The term 'War on Women' was a term and tactic begun by the Obama administration in reaction to the GOP's accurate pointing out that the ACA's mandate that medical facilities run by religious institutions MUST hand out contraceptives and perform abortions, that this was / is UN-Constitutional.

Imagine the panic felt by the self-professed Constitutional scholar when it was pointed out that his mandate / attempt to impose such a thing on a religious-run institution was Un-Constitutional...that it threatened the entire ACA (because as Kennedy pointed out, if the law was to be found Un-Constitutional - ANY OF IT - the whole thing would have to be repealed, not picked apart piece by piece.)

So, in true Liberal deceitful fashion, instead of addressing the extremely accurate charge of this part of the mandate being Un-Constitutional, the Liberals instead shifted the topic/issue to something else....which not by coincidence was false: "The GOP just don't want women to have access to free contraceptives. Despite the issue being about Obama's government trying to impose it's will on religious institutions and the medical centers they ran (a violation of the Constitution), Liberals declared the whole issue was about ACCESS TO CONTRACEPTIVES....and many of the small minded. low information 'sheeple' - being fed tons of cr@p by the liberally complicit media - bought into it...and thus the faux 'War on Women' was coined.

The true 'War on Women' began long ago, not only by Liberals but also by so-called 'women's rights' groups...who profess to stand up for women but who sit by quietly while Liberals demonize and rake Conservative women over the proverbial coals.

 

[Flanders]

The only thing I gathered from that garish collection of unadulterated bullshit is that you're a good Republican.....if there is any such thing.

To Campbell: Now you know not to read my threads since I do not write them for your kind.

And just to set you straight, I am not a Republican. Read what it says beneath my screen name.

The Muslim hate mongering continues. It's so Germany, 1933.

To Sallow: I have not heard from you since April. I was hoping you were bypassing my threads. No such luck.

COMMON MYTHS:

To easyt65: Well said.

With your permission, I will add this to your list. The reason he had Kerry sign the ATT twice: First in September 2013, and on August 26, 2015:

Obama's next backdoor assault on 2nd Amendment
Posted By Greg Corombos On 08/27/2015 @ 9:44 pm

Obama’s next backdoor assault on 2nd Amendment​

I guess he is worried that the ATT has zero chance of being ratified no matter how many times Kerry signs it:

​

65.4 Million Gun Purchases Since Obama Took Office, 91% More Than Bush's First-Term Total
By Gregory Gwyn-Williams, Jr. | February 11, 2013 | 10:59 PM EST

65.4 Million Gun Purchases Since Obama Took Office, 91% More Than Bush's First-Term Total

XXXXX​

January 11, 2013
U.S. gun sales hit a record high since Obama's re-election
Tony Rizzo - The Kansas City Star

U.S. gun sales hit a record high since Obama's re-election​

 

[Campbell]

The only thing I gathered from that garish collection of unadulterated bullshit is that you're a good Republican.....if there is any such thing.

To Campbell: Now you know not to read my threads since I do not write them for your kind.

And just to set you straight, I am not a Republican. Read what it says beneath my screen name.

The Muslim hate mongering continues. It's so Germany, 1933.

To Sallow: I have not heard from you since April. I was hoping you were bypassing my threads. No such luck.

COMMON MYTHS:

To easyt65: Well said.

With your permission, I will add this to your list. The reason he had Kerry sign the ATT twice: First in September 2013, and on August 26, 2015:

Obama's next backdoor assault on 2nd Amendment
Posted By Greg Corombos On 08/27/2015 @ 9:44 pm

Obama’s next backdoor assault on 2nd Amendment​

I guess he is worried that the ATT has zero chance of being ratified no matter how many times Kerry signs it:

​

65.4 Million Gun Purchases Since Obama Took Office, 91% More Than Bush's First-Term Total
By Gregory Gwyn-Williams, Jr. | February 11, 2013 | 10:59 PM EST

65.4 Million Gun Purchases Since Obama Took Office, 91% More Than Bush's First-Term Total

XXXXX​

January 11, 2013
U.S. gun sales hit a record high since Obama's re-election
Tony Rizzo - The Kansas City Star

U.S. gun sales hit a record high since Obama's re-election​

LMAO!!!! That's not a real brainteaser. The NRA was afraid Obama might be able to get some kind of realistic gun ownership policy enacted. They know when to spend a few millions on negative ads. Go ahead and admit that you believe any American citizen should be issued a fighting man's weapon. That way the NRA will quadruple it's already bludgeoning bottom line. Doesn't really make much difference to you folks how many insane folks manage to carry their weapons to a school or a McDonalds to wipe out innocent people. That doesn't bother you a bit.

 

[easyt65]

LMAO!!!! That's not a real brainteaser. The NRA was afraid Obama might be able to get some kind of realistic gun ownership policy enacted. They know when to spend a few millions on negative ads. Go ahead and admit that you believe any American citizen should be issued a fighting man's weapon. That way the NRA will quadruple it's already bludgeoning bottom line. Doesn't really make much difference to you folks how many insane folks manage to carry their weapons to a school or a McDonalds to wipe out innocent people. That doesn't bother you a bit.

Liberals are a god-send to the NRA...nothing has helped sell guns faster than the Socialist currently in office and his fellow anti-American who continue to demonstrate there is no distance they will go to try to strip law abiding citizens of their guns. He has no problem GIVING them to Mexican Drug Cartels, Al Qaeida in Libya, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and ISIS in Syria...but God forbid law abiding American citizens have them.

To Obama's credit, the death toll for his own 'personal' gift of weapons to the Drug Cartels is over 350, to include a US BPA and a military member killed at a shooting at a recruiting station by a gun linked to Fast and Furious - well over the number, I believe, of shooting incidents by 'maniacs' going on a shooting rampage here in the US.

Tallying up his death toll that can be credited to him as a result of his running guns to ISIS is more difficult; however, since we know there have been THOUSANDS of men, women, and children killed by them probably with HIS weapons, let's just give Obama the benefit of the doubt regarding the number and call it a 'couple thousand'.

Gun control? HAIL YEAH - I am all for it! Obama's administration should be controlled, prohibited from handling, buying, or selling any weapons with out proper adult supervision...and only then is small calibers and small numbers!

 

[Flanders]

Doesn't really make much difference to you folks how many insane folks manage to carry their weapons to a school or a McDonalds to wipe out innocent people. That doesn't bother you a bit.

To Campbell: What bothers me is halfwits like you who do not know the reason for the 2nd Amendment. See this thread:

2nd Amendment: Nothing Changed In Over Two Centuries | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum​

If that is not enough for you this should at least tell you that Americans do not want to die an unarmed victim because of Taqiyya the Liar’s immigration policies:

Poll: For First Time, Most Americans Don’t Believe Guns ‘Too Easy’ to Get
Most see current gun laws as 'about right'
BY: Stephen Gutowski
September 15, 2015 4:41 pm

Poll: For First Time, Most Americans Don’t Believe Guns ‘Too Easy’ to Get​

 

[Campbell]

Doesn't really make much difference to you folks how many insane folks manage to carry their weapons to a school or a McDonalds to wipe out innocent people. That doesn't bother you a bit.

To Campbell: What bothers me is halfwits like you who do not know the reason for the 2nd Amendment. See this thread:

2nd Amendment: Nothing Changed In Over Two Centuries | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum​

If that is not enough for you this should at least tell you that Americans do not want to die an unarmed victim because of Taqiyya the Liar’s immigration policies:

Poll: For First Time, Most Americans Don’t Believe Guns ‘Too Easy’ to Get
Most see current gun laws as 'about right'
BY: Stephen Gutowski
September 15, 2015 4:41 pm

Poll: For First Time, Most Americans Don’t Believe Guns ‘Too Easy’ to Get​

I hope what happened to those 5 and 6 year olds in Sandy Hook never happens to one of yours:

TOUGH GUYS

 

[Flanders]

I hope what happened to those 5 and 6 year olds in Sandy Hook never happens to one of yours:

To Campbell: Phoney compassion for the “children” displayed by assholes trying to impress fellow liberals does not work on me. You let me worry about my mine. I’d rater have a gun than rely on people like you.

Since you brought it up, can you guarantee that it will not happen to yours after the federal government overturns the 2nd Amendment without bothering to repeal it?

Incidentally, Japan’s Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto is credited with saying this, but he NEVER said it:

You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.​

Spend a little thought on the reason for a well-armed population in relation to the tens of millions of illegal aliens who have already invaded —— with Muslim refugees on the way.

Incidentally, the scum bag in the White House cannot stop terrorists he calls criminals, but he would have us believe that by disarming law-abiding Americans he can stop gun violence committed by a few criminal wack jobs.

 

[Campbell]

I hope what happened to those 5 and 6 year olds in Sandy Hook never happens to one of yours:

To Campbell: Phoney compassion for the “children” displayed by assholes trying to impress fellow liberals does not work on me. You let me worry about my mine. I’d rater have a gun than rely on people like you.

Since you brought it up, can you guarantee that it will not happen to yours after the federal government overturns the 2nd Amendment without bothering to repeal it?

Incidentally, Japan’s Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto is credited with saying this, but he NEVER said it:

You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.​

Spend a little thought on the reason for a well-armed population in relation to the tens of millions of illegal aliens who have already invaded —— with Muslim refugees on the way.

Incidentally, the scum bag in the White House cannot stop terrorists he calls criminals, but he would have us believe that by disarming law-abiding Americans he can stop gun violence committed by a few criminal wack jobs.

I believe the saying was, "Remember Pearl Harbor"

have you ever visited the Arizona Memorial? It was the most somber place I've ever been:

 

[Syriusly]

The freaks, the do-gooders, and the priests —— totalitarians all —— always despised the First Amendment. Freaks believe tyranny works for them. Do-gooders would find fault in the Garden of Eden. Priests will never rest until their personal moral opinion governs the world.

NOTE: Judges, priests, and Imams wear black. Think about it!

The government, the press, and organized religions are working full-time to eliminate freedom of speech, but, to date, nothing erased the First Amendment more effectively than this:

Who could have guessed that after the largest terror attack on American soil, the United States would take in record numbers of Muslims?​

These 16 words:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; . . .​

were never meant to include immigrants coming here specifically to deny freedom of religion to every non-Muslim. Clerics of every non-Muslim organized religion in America have no love for freedom of religion, but the laity of every other religion live by the spirit of the First Amendment. Conversely, not one Muslim will ever defend freedom of religion. I know I am right about Muslims for one reason above all others:

Taqiyya and Kitman: The role of Deception in Islamic Terrorism

Taqiyya and Kitman: The role of Deception in Islamic Terrorism :: Reader comments at Daniel Pipes​

Question: The Chicago sewer rat lies about everything; so why cannot Americans see that he is practicing Taqiyya and Kitman?

It is fair to say that the “constitutional scholar” makes no pretense of defending the Constitution. Indeed, swearing his oath of office was the first lie he told as president. That is why I do not believe any of the of spin talking heads spout about his so-called legacy. Taqiyya the Liar is aiming at bigger things than the ACA or the Iran Deal. He wants to be remembered as the Father of Global Government. On top of his father fantasy he is positive his conduct as president will eventually elevate him to ‘Saint of Islam’ in the eyes of Muslims for all time. If you doubt my take, imagine looking back at him AFTER Islam destroys America as Muslims are promising. Taqiyya’s contribution to America’s defeat will make him a major Saint of Islam on par with Saint Peter in Roman Catholicism.

Challenge Muslims on their respect for the First Amendment, and they will come out of the woodwork swearing they will defend the U.S. Constitution to the death —— not for everyone but for themselves so long as Islam is considered a religion instead of a political movement. I am not talking about Muslim Imams only. Every Muslim will retreat behind Taqiyya and Kitman when asked. You will not see that in other religion because no other religion’s ideology approves of lying; whereas, Islam demands it in order to defeat enemies from within.

Back up one step and you will see that Islam the religion was never separated from Islam the political movement. There is not a snowball’s chance in hell of turning Muslims away from theocracy after they’ve practiced it since the 7th century. America’s brilliant Constitution protecting Americans from theocracy does not protect them from touchy-feely non-Muslim fools who willingly follow Taqiyya the Liar to the slaughterhouse.

NOTE: Ever since 9-11-2001 I’ve been saying that Islam should be legally defined as a political movement which it is, while Socialism/Communism should be defined as a religion which it is. In that way both are denied First Amendment protection. In short: Socialism violates the First Amendment because it is a religion implementing the tax collector’s morality, while Islam is NOT entitled to First Amendment protection because it is a political movement.

If my above observations are too esoteric for you try this:

There is such a cascade of horrors that accompany this demographic of immigrants that it’s difficult to know where to begin. So let’s start here: it has become abundantly clear that Muslims who come to America as refugees have fueled a rapid rise of insular communities that become breeding grounds for terrorists.

Meanwhile, half a million Muslim girls in the United States are now at risk for female genital mutilation. Per Breitbart, “there are more girls in the United States at risk of lifelong sexual disfigurement than there are in Uganda and Cameroon.”

XXXXX​

Despite mounting evidence that Muslims are not good for America, we just keep on bringing them in.

September 15, 2015
U.S. has admitted 3,000,000 Muslims since 9/11
By Carol Brown

Blog: U.S. has admitted 3,000,000 Muslims since 9/11​

Here’s another Question: How come Republicans supposedly declared war on women?

And a followup: Aside from funding Planned Parenthood, how can Hillary Clinton claim she is fighting for women when her president, and her political party, welcome Muslim immigrants who practice female castration?

​

Was there an actual statement in that vast collection of words in your OP?

 

[Syriusly]

The OP appears to still believe that Obama is out to disarm every American.

Despite President Obama doing absolutely nothing to do any such thing in 7 years.

Gullible idiots like him are a god send to the gun industry.

 

[Flanders]

The OP appears to still believe that Obama is out to disarm every American.

To Syriusly: Registration is the final step before confiscation. Registering every gun has been his objective.

• Perhaps the most immediate threat to the rights of gun owners in the Arms Trade Treaty is found in Article 5. Under the title of “General Implementation,” Article 5 mandates that all countries participating in the treaty “shall establish and maintain a national control system, including a national control list.” This list should “apply the provisions of this Treaty to the broadest range of conventional arms.”

• Article 12 adds to the record-keeping requirement, mandating that the list include “the quantity, value, model/type, authorized international transfers of conventional arms,” as well as the identity of the “end users” of these items.

Saturday, 08 November 2014
Merry Christmas: UN Declares Arms Trade Treaty to Go Into Effect Dec. 24
Written by Joe Wolverton, II, J.D.

Merry Christmas: UN Declares Arms Trade Treaty to Go Into Effect Dec. 24​

Despite President Obama doing absolutely nothing to do any such thing in 7 years.

To Syriusly: He tried. Thank God he failed:

Obama's next backdoor assault on 2nd Amendment
Posted By Greg Corombos On 08/27/2015 @ 9:44 pm

Obama’s next backdoor assault on 2nd Amendment

Gullible idiots like him are a god send to the gun industry.

To Syriusly: Assholes like you believe that a well-armed free people are coming after you when, in fact, it is the government that is coming after you. I could be wrong. Disarming private Americans is justified if you work for the government.

Returning to my original premise for a moment:

Indeed, swearing his oath of office was the first lie he told as president. That is why I do not believe any of the of spin talking heads spout about his so-called legacy. Taqiyya the Liar is aiming at bigger things than the ACA or the Iran Deal.

Media turd-maggots should never tie his legacy to the Iran Deal:

 

[Campbell]

The OP appears to still believe that Obama is out to disarm every American.

Despite President Obama doing absolutely nothing to do any such thing in 7 years.

Gullible idiots like him are a god send to the gun industry.

Gun Nuts and the NRA are the gun industry. Anybody who reads the second amendment and who doesn't understand that the reference was to the state providing a militia really should do a little self examination:

Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

And to those who believe those pea shooters would win a revolution they must not be familiar with cruise missiles and big guns:

 

[Flanders]

Gun Nuts and the NRA are the gun industry. Anybody who reads the second amendment and who doesn't understand that the reference was to the state providing a militia really should do a little self examination:

To Campbell: The state the Founders cited never included an oppressive federal government.

Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

To Campbell: The 2nd Amendment is meaningless if the federal government, or state government, define a well regulated militia. If the government’s definition applies, then government agents constitute the well regulated militia. The Supreme Court says just that in principle ever time it rules on the right to bear arms.

And to those who believe those pea shooters would win a revolution they must not be familiar with cruise missiles and big guns:

To Campbell: You are engaging in wishful thinking. One hundred million pea shooters is a lot of fire power in the hands of a whole bunch of Americans; many with some military training. That is the very reason the government wants every gun registered. In any event research Communist Revolutions. Russia and China to name two. In both cases the government had far superior weaponry.

You are deluding yourself if you believe Communist governments will never suffer the same fate that brought them to power.

And let’s not overlook motivation.

The federal government has no burning moral issue like defending the welfare state to rely on. This time, the people who oppose the government hold the moral high ground because they will be fighting to save and RESTORE their own individual liberties. In short: All revolutions come from the middle class, and then only when something has been taken away from them. The poor do not have the organizational skills necessary to foment successful revolution. The rich have no reason to revolt. In short: People never start a revolution to get something. They always revolt to get something back.

 

[Campbell]

Gun Nuts and the NRA are the gun industry. Anybody who reads the second amendment and who doesn't understand that the reference was to the state providing a militia really should do a little self examination:

To Campbell: The state the Founders cited never included an oppressive federal government.

Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

To Campbell: The 2nd Amendment is meaningless if the federal government, or state government, define a well regulated militia. If the government’s definition applies, then government agents constitute the well regulated militia. The Supreme Court says just that in principle ever time it rules on the right to bear arms.

And to those who believe those pea shooters would win a revolution they must not be familiar with cruise missiles and big guns:

To Campbell: You are engaging in wishful thinking. One hundred million pea shooters is a lot of fire power in the hands of a whole bunch of Americans; many with some military training. That is the very reason the government wants every gun registered. In any event research Communist Revolutions. Russia and China to name two. In both cases the government had far superior weaponry.

You are deluding yourself if you believe Communist governments will never suffer the same fate that brought them to power.

And let’s not overlook motivation.

The federal government has no burning moral issue like defending the welfare state to rely on. This time, the people who oppose the government hold the moral high ground because they will be fighting to save and RESTORE their own individual liberties. In short: All revolutions come from the middle class, and then only when something has been taken away from them. The poor do not have the organizational skills necessary to foment successful revolution. The rich have no reason to revolt. In short: People never start a revolution to get something. They always revolt to get something back.

No My Friend...it's the people who try to substitute firearms for their inadequate penis size who raise the most hell over any mention of writing new regulations to attempt to keep high powered weapons out of the hands of the mentally impaired. Most of the gun law hell raisers are at least paranoid and in some cases schizophrenic.

Now if you would like to discuss penis size mine is plenty long enough but it's no bigger around than a beer can.