The first liberal court in two generations if HRC wins

[Old Rocks]

LOL Crush? Well, if you are easily crushed by laughter, I suppose that is the correct term.

 

[rightwinger]

We may finally benefit from a 21st century interpretation of that document that was written from an 18th century perspective.

The liberal Supreme Court will move us into the 21st century with a modern view of capital punishment/ineffective prison system, voter rights, gay rights and the rights of women

And help twats like you crush anyone who doesn't agree with you.

Fascist.

You are not crushed, you will just have to accept a more liberal America

 

[Old Rocks]

As things appear now, this is pretty much inevitable. During the Clinton Presidency, the Supreme Court will be liberal. And our 'Conservatives' will sit in their basements, stroking their AK's and AR's, muttering about revolution and 2nd Amendment solutions, until they succumb to heart failure from their obesity and lack of exercise. And their heirs will turn over all the ammo and guns to the police for destruction.

Seems like you have a masturbatory fantasy here.

"Wank wank, dead conservatives, wank wank, dead libertarians, wank wank, AGW is my God, Wank wank."

LOL Only stating what the obvious physical conditions of most of the 'Conseratives' I see, are. And I nor anyone else has anything to do with that condition. Like the nomination of Trump, this is their own doing. LOL

 

[martybegan]

We may finally benefit from a 21st century interpretation of that document that was written from an 18th century perspective.

The liberal Supreme Court will move us into the 21st century with a modern view of capital punishment/ineffective prison system, voter rights, gay rights and the rights of women

And help twats like you crush anyone who doesn't agree with you.

Fascist.

You are not crushed, you will just have to accept a more liberal America

a more PROGRESSIVE STATIST america. you idiots left the classical liberal boat a long time ago.

 

[martybegan]

As things appear now, this is pretty much inevitable. During the Clinton Presidency, the Supreme Court will be liberal. And our 'Conservatives' will sit in their basements, stroking their AK's and AR's, muttering about revolution and 2nd Amendment solutions, until they succumb to heart failure from their obesity and lack of exercise. And their heirs will turn over all the ammo and guns to the police for destruction.

Seems like you have a masturbatory fantasy here.

"Wank wank, dead conservatives, wank wank, dead libertarians, wank wank, AGW is my God, Wank wank."

LOL Only stating what the obvious physical conditions of most of the 'Conseratives' I see, are. And I nor anyone else has anything to do with that condition. Like the nomination of Trump, this is their own doing. LOL

Go suck some more government dick, Old rocks.

 

[rightwinger]

We may finally benefit from a 21st century interpretation of that document that was written from an 18th century perspective.

The liberal Supreme Court will move us into the 21st century with a modern view of capital punishment/ineffective prison system, voter rights, gay rights and the rights of women

And help twats like you crush anyone who doesn't agree with you.

Fascist.

You are not crushed, you will just have to accept a more liberal America

a more PROGRESSIVE STATIST america. you idiots left the classical liberal boat a long time ago.

No such thing as a classical liberal. Liberalism is a function of its time and the issues they face

 

[martybegan]

We may finally benefit from a 21st century interpretation of that document that was written from an 18th century perspective.

The liberal Supreme Court will move us into the 21st century with a modern view of capital punishment/ineffective prison system, voter rights, gay rights and the rights of women

And help twats like you crush anyone who doesn't agree with you.

Fascist.

You are not crushed, you will just have to accept a more liberal America

a more PROGRESSIVE STATIST america. you idiots left the classical liberal boat a long time ago.

No such thing as a classical liberal. Liberalism is a function of its time and the issues they face

Wrong. When one prefers government to enforce morality and thought, one cannot be liberal.

 

[rightwinger]

The liberal Supreme Court will move us into the 21st century with a modern view of capital punishment/ineffective prison system, voter rights, gay rights and the rights of women

And help twats like you crush anyone who doesn't agree with you.

Fascist.

You are not crushed, you will just have to accept a more liberal America

a more PROGRESSIVE STATIST america. you idiots left the classical liberal boat a long time ago.

No such thing as a classical liberal. Liberalism is a function of its time and the issues they face

Wrong. When one prefers government to enforce morality and thought, one cannot be liberal.

Government enforcing morality is not liberal?

Which world do you live in?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Marty lives in a world where only is point of view and his definitions and his "facts" count.

None of which impacts the fact that if HRC is elected, the court will go liberal.

 

[martybegan]

And help twats like you crush anyone who doesn't agree with you.

Fascist.

You are not crushed, you will just have to accept a more liberal America

a more PROGRESSIVE STATIST america. you idiots left the classical liberal boat a long time ago.

No such thing as a classical liberal. Liberalism is a function of its time and the issues they face

Wrong. When one prefers government to enforce morality and thought, one cannot be liberal.

Government enforcing morality is not liberal?

Which world do you live in?

No, it is not classically liberal. Classic Liberalism encourages freedom of expression and thought. Modern progressive Statism (under the cover of the word liberal) does not.

Classical liberalism is a political ideology and a branch of liberalism which advocates civil liberties and political freedom with representative democracy under the rule of law and emphasizes economic freedom.[1][2]

Classical liberalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[martybegan]

Marty lives in a world where only is point of view and his definitions and his "facts" count.

None of which impacts the fact that if HRC is elected, the court will go liberal.

it will go progressive Statist, not liberal.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Wikipedia is not a legitimate source for definitions, Marty.

 

[martybegan]

Wikipedia is not a legitimate source for definitions, Marty.

Why? because it refutes your views?

 

[rightwinger]

You are not crushed, you will just have to accept a more liberal America

a more PROGRESSIVE STATIST america. you idiots left the classical liberal boat a long time ago.

No such thing as a classical liberal. Liberalism is a function of its time and the issues they face

Wrong. When one prefers government to enforce morality and thought, one cannot be liberal.

Government enforcing morality is not liberal?

Which world do you live in?

No, it is not classically liberal. Classic Liberalism encourages freedom of expression and thought. Modern progressive Statism (under the cover of the word liberal) does not.

Classical liberalism is a political ideology and a branch of liberalism which advocates civil liberties and political freedom with representative democracy under the rule of law and emphasizes economic freedom.[1][2]

Classical liberalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No such thing as "Classical Liberalism"

The liberalism of our founders existed in the views and morals of the day.....nothing "classical" about it

They supported slavery, opposed the equal rights of women yet were still the greatest "liberals" of their day

 

[martybegan]

a more PROGRESSIVE STATIST america. you idiots left the classical liberal boat a long time ago.

No such thing as a classical liberal. Liberalism is a function of its time and the issues they face

Wrong. When one prefers government to enforce morality and thought, one cannot be liberal.

Government enforcing morality is not liberal?

Which world do you live in?

No, it is not classically liberal. Classic Liberalism encourages freedom of expression and thought. Modern progressive Statism (under the cover of the word liberal) does not.

Classical liberalism is a political ideology and a branch of liberalism which advocates civil liberties and political freedom with representative democracy under the rule of law and emphasizes economic freedom.[1][2]

Classical liberalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No such thing as "Classical Liberalism"

The liberalism of our founders existed in the views and morals of the day.....nothing "classical" about it

They supported slavery, opposed the equal rights of women yet were still the greatest "liberals" of their day

Some supported slavery, some didn't, but the ones that didn't realized that was a fight for another day, and the same could be said for women's suffrage. Hell, back then property requirements for the franchise were considered A-OK.

Their liberalism was based on the concepts of representative government, individual freedoms, and equality under the law. Things that are all under attack by modern progressive Statists.

Moving away from representative government by using Courts to enforce their will on others. Away from individual freedom by forcing people to do things they don't want to, regardless of the minimal impact said refusal actually has, and away from equality under the law by the constant balkanization of people via identity politics, and the mentality of "all animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others".

 

[rightwinger]

No such thing as a classical liberal. Liberalism is a function of its time and the issues they face

Wrong. When one prefers government to enforce morality and thought, one cannot be liberal.

Government enforcing morality is not liberal?

Which world do you live in?

No, it is not classically liberal. Classic Liberalism encourages freedom of expression and thought. Modern progressive Statism (under the cover of the word liberal) does not.

Classical liberalism is a political ideology and a branch of liberalism which advocates civil liberties and political freedom with representative democracy under the rule of law and emphasizes economic freedom.[1][2]

Classical liberalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No such thing as "Classical Liberalism"

The liberalism of our founders existed in the views and morals of the day.....nothing "classical" about it

They supported slavery, opposed the equal rights of women yet were still the greatest "liberals" of their day

Some supported slavery, some didn't, but the ones that didn't realized that was a fight for another day, and the same could be said for women's suffrage. Hell, back then property requirements for the franchise were considered A-OK.

Their liberalism was based on the concepts of representative government, individual freedoms, and equality under the law. Things that are all under attack by modern progressive Statists.

Moving away from representative government by using Courts to enforce their will on others. Away from individual freedom by forcing people to do things they don't want to, regardless of the minimal impact said refusal actually has, and away from equality under the law by the constant balkanization of people via identity politics, and the mentality of "all animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others".

Irrelevant to the coming liberal court which will apply 21st century liberal standards

 

[martybegan]

Wrong. When one prefers government to enforce morality and thought, one cannot be liberal.

Government enforcing morality is not liberal?

Which world do you live in?

No, it is not classically liberal. Classic Liberalism encourages freedom of expression and thought. Modern progressive Statism (under the cover of the word liberal) does not.

Classical liberalism is a political ideology and a branch of liberalism which advocates civil liberties and political freedom with representative democracy under the rule of law and emphasizes economic freedom.[1][2]

Classical liberalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No such thing as "Classical Liberalism"

The liberalism of our founders existed in the views and morals of the day.....nothing "classical" about it

They supported slavery, opposed the equal rights of women yet were still the greatest "liberals" of their day

Some supported slavery, some didn't, but the ones that didn't realized that was a fight for another day, and the same could be said for women's suffrage. Hell, back then property requirements for the franchise were considered A-OK.

Their liberalism was based on the concepts of representative government, individual freedoms, and equality under the law. Things that are all under attack by modern progressive Statists.

Moving away from representative government by using Courts to enforce their will on others. Away from individual freedom by forcing people to do things they don't want to, regardless of the minimal impact said refusal actually has, and away from equality under the law by the constant balkanization of people via identity politics, and the mentality of "all animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others".

Irrelevant to the coming liberal court which will apply 21st century liberal standards

21st Century liberalism isn't liberal. It is progressive statism.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Wikipedia is not a legitimate source for definitions, Marty.

Because it allows anyone to post what they think instead of what are traditional, accept facts, definitions, and terms.

 

[martybegan]

Wikipedia is not a legitimate source for definitions, Marty.

Because it allows anyone to post what they think instead of what are traditional, accept facts, definitions, and terms.

Actually it is quite well vetted, and except for articles that are part of an edit war, can be trusted.

What is wrong with the wikipedia definition of classical liberalism?

 

[jon_berzerk]

The first liberal court in two generations if HRC wins

another good reason to vote Trump

thanks for sharing dupe