Mac1958
Diamond Member
Or, a no-lose, depending on your "side"...Holy crap, hadn't though of that. It that's the case, I wouldn't exactly be shocked.Probably for the best. Replace them (and their brass) with officers the people there want.
We're probably moving towards having white officers for this area, black officers for this area, Asian officers for that area, Muslim officers for that area. That will, of course, exacerbate our Balkanization as like people then move to those areas.
Those who are consumed with dividing people by skin color are getting precisely what they want.
.
NOPE. The police have tried that tactic of sending mostly black cops to black areas...white ones to white areas...etc etc. We tried it in Atlanta.
Guess what happened? The black cops, NAACP, etc, claimed racism because.....drum roll......the PD only sends black cops to the "Most dangerous areas" while sending white ones to the easier safer zones.
Well, the race pimps gotta stay relevant and put food on the table, I guess...
.
Yep. That's how it went down. I know for a fact Atlanta did it, and LA and St Louis have experimented with it. I'm sure many others have too.
And the result is accusations that white cops always get the easy "cake assignments" while the black cops all get sent to the most dangerous zones where they end up having to go to court more often on their days off because they make so many more arrests.
Notice how many of the lines of cops at some of these protests have had black cops "front and center" of the line, as if their skin color will calm the crowd? How long until a lawyer starts suing and saying you discriminated by putting the minority cops up front closest to the threat.
As I said...a no-win.

.