- Dec 18, 2012
- Reaction score
Fed asset Ray Epps inciting crowd.
Do you have a police report for Ray Epps?The OP should be banned for spreading lies and conspiracy theories!
He's a fucking Oathkeeper. No FBI affiliation has ever been shown.The difference between Epps and the Trump supporters is that Epps actually was promoting an insurrection.
There have been claims that Epps was on a "Most Wanted List".Do you have a police report for Ray Epps?
I absolutely agree, if you can post proof that it is a lie. BUT?! Since Senator Massie asked AG Garland about it, and the Attorney General, didn't, even when given the chance to deny these allegations, say, "no. . they are lies and a conspiracy theory."
Then, you know what? You should probably shut your trap unless you have some proof that even AG Garland wasn't giving up.
Meet Ray Epps: The Fed-Protected Provocateur Who Appears To Have Led The Very First 1/6 Attack On The U.S. Capitol
Meet Ray Epps: The Fed-Protected Provocateur Who Appears To Have Led The Very First 1/6 Attack On The U.S. Capitol - RevolverIn order to protect the country from fictional right-wing "patriot" groups, did the FBI become an insurrectionist "patriot" movement?www.revolver.news
October 25, 2021
". . . After months of research, Revolver’s investigative reporting team can now reveal that Ray Epps appears to be among the primary orchestrators of the very first breach of the Capitol’s police barricades at 12:50pm on January 6. Epps appears to have led the “breach team” that committed the very first illegal acts on that fateful day. What’s more, Epps and his “breach team” did all their dirty work with 10 minutes still remaining in President Trump’s National Mall speech, and with the vast majority of Trump supporters still 30 minutes away from the Capitol.
Secondly, Revolver also determined, and will prove below, that the the FBI stealthily removed Ray Epps from its Capitol Violence Most Wanted List on July 1, just one day after Revolver exposed the inexplicable and puzzlesome FBI protection of known Epps associate and Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes. July 1 was also just one day after separate New York Times report amplified a glaring, falsifiable lie about Epps’s role in the events of January 6.
Lastly, Ray Epps appears to have worked alongside several individuals — many of them suspiciously unindicted — to carry out a breach of the police barricades that induced a subsequent flood of unsuspecting MAGA protesters to unwittingly trespass on Capitol restricted grounds and place themselves in legal jeopardy.. . . "
For your edification, we matched FBI Suspect Photo #16 to the timestamp 0:48 of the full barricade breach source video:
First, Epps instructed his commandos and the crowds at his attention to rush into the Capitol and let nothing stop them. Second, Epps assiduously protected cops and law enforcement so no local or federal officers would be harmed during the precision breaches.
On, July 1, Ray Epps, Suspect 16, was disappeared, as if he never existed.
". . .. After receiving instructions from Epps, MaroonPB replies, “Noted” — which, last we checked, means “stipulated”, “understood” or “agreed.” This is an explicit verbal agreement between two or more people — the opposite of the NYT’s claim that Epps “acted on his own.”
In case it wasn’t clear enough already, Epps also says “One more thing” — stipulating he gave the man a set of instructions before adding others. And those next instructions were, “When we go in, leave this here,” likely in reference to MaroonPB’s cannister of bear spray. . . . "
Amazingly, on June 30th, the NYT’s “Insurrection” obsessives, trying to decipher a secret “dog whistle” between President Trump, Stephen Bannon, Rudy Giuliani, and Roger Stone and the tens of thousands of MAGA protesters in DC that day, were now poking their own eyes out to avoid acknowledging actual coordination, caught on tape, between unindicted persons apparently orchestrating the opening act of the Capitol attack.
In any case, the NYT story must have created a real public relations headache for the FBI. How could the New York Times tell tens of millions of people that Epps was a key instigator in the “Makeup of the Mob” if the FBI had already known about Epps for 6+ months and even had his mugshot on the Most Wanted list? Perhaps the Times would have done the FBI a much bigger favor if they had simply not referred to Epps at all.
Could it be that the FBI decided they’d just purge Epps from the list, never tell anyone, and pretend they had never seen all the videotapes, the images, the message boards, the newspaper confession, and so on? As long as no one blew up Ray Epps’s name any further, the whole thing might blow over.. . . "
. . . I swear, the STATE believes the people are all as dumb as they were trained to be in high school. . .
Darren Beatty is Revolver....He's a one-man operation.Who is the site Revolver? It was created in 2020. Who owns them? Who created the site? What country are they from? Who are their writers?
All this info on them, is hidden. There is no ABOUT page. Why? Doesn't that bother you?
I smell a rat....and its name ain't Epps...
If the FBI didn't have anyone in the crowds, I would be shocked! It would have been a dereliction of duty.
Epps is a 10 plus year veteran in the Oath Keepers.....long history of it.... He could be an informant for the fbi or he could just be an oath keeper...?
He supposedly was not charged, because after months of hunting, there was no evidence, that he was ever inside the capitol....no video, no pictures, no nothing inside. They are only charging those who entered, unless they beat up cops outside.
If I were you guys, I'd be asking, who created Revolver and who runs the show there? And I'd be wondering, why they are keeping this info, secret? There is no transparancy. Why?
< Previous Thread