JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,527
- 2,165
- Banned
- #221
The FBI is to be trusted. You I don't trust, because you believe in Trump more than the rule of law.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The FBI is to be trusted. You I don't trust, because you believe in Trump more than the rule of law.
Why would I not? Since the removal of Hoover and the reform of the FBI, I have considered it more trustworthy than the office of the Presidency.
More: https://www.thedailybeast.com/trey-g...as-appropriate
Trey Gowdy says the FBI acted appropriately.
The FBI is to be trusted. You I don't trust, because you believe in Trump more than the rule of law.
I agree with you, task, in general.
What I don't like is Trump acting out and saying the FBI was weaponized against him.
The FBI is supposed to be weaponized against all criminality.
I do believe the reports will be released before 15 September.
zerohedge's shrill and extremist partisanship, its willingness to lie for its side -- all is well known.
It is no different that way than Der Angst or Pravda each in its day.
Well what about the FBI protecting the Hillary Campaign? Her emails were hacked and she lost. Why didn't the fBI plant a spy in any of the democRATs campaigns? The FBI wanted Trump to win?
https://www.americanthinker.com/art...fbi_was_actually_trying_to_protect_trump.html
WaPo published an opinion piece entitled, “The FBI didn’t use an informant to go after Trump. They used one to protect him.”
Rangappa concludes that Trump, “Should be glad to know that the FBI appears to have been trying to thwart a hostile country’s efforts to infiltrate his campaign.”
What the former FBI agent doesn’t realize is that she inadvertently gave Trump the green light to do the same to his 2020 electoral opponent. Trump can use his FBI, CIA, and DOJ to “protect” his Democrat opponent by inserting a spy into their campaign.
Two wrongs don't make a right. Let's get rid of the corruption, first.
/——/ It would have come out already as a big CYA..Well what about the FBI protecting the Hillary Campaign? Her emails were hacked and she lost. Why didn't the fBI plant a spy in any of the democRATs campaigns? The FBI wanted Trump to win?
https://www.americanthinker.com/art...fbi_was_actually_trying_to_protect_trump.html
WaPo published an opinion piece entitled, “The FBI didn’t use an informant to go after Trump. They used one to protect him.”
Rangappa concludes that Trump, “Should be glad to know that the FBI appears to have been trying to thwart a hostile country’s efforts to infiltrate his campaign.”
What the former FBI agent doesn’t realize is that she inadvertently gave Trump the green light to do the same to his 2020 electoral opponent. Trump can use his FBI, CIA, and DOJ to “protect” his Democrat opponent by inserting a spy into their campaign.
Two wrongs don't make a right. Let's get rid of the corruption, first.
How do you know they didn’t?
You have no factual, objective evidence of your opinion./——/ It would have come out already as a big CYA..Well what about the FBI protecting the Hillary Campaign? Her emails were hacked and she lost. Why didn't the fBI plant a spy in any of the democRATs campaigns? The FBI wanted Trump to win?
https://www.americanthinker.com/art...fbi_was_actually_trying_to_protect_trump.html
WaPo published an opinion piece entitled, “The FBI didn’t use an informant to go after Trump. They used one to protect him.”
Rangappa concludes that Trump, “Should be glad to know that the FBI appears to have been trying to thwart a hostile country’s efforts to infiltrate his campaign.”
What the former FBI agent doesn’t realize is that she inadvertently gave Trump the green light to do the same to his 2020 electoral opponent. Trump can use his FBI, CIA, and DOJ to “protect” his Democrat opponent by inserting a spy into their campaign.
Two wrongs don't make a right. Let's get rid of the corruption, first.
How do you know they didn’t?