The fallout of the Charlie Kirk assassination; violence in politics identified as a pre-cursor to civil war.

Another lie.
Post # 227:

View attachment 1162729

See?
All you do is lie.

Lie to us some more.

Why did he put himself in that situation? If I did everything he did, I would feel like I murdered someone.

But I see your side of this. He should not have been attacked just because he was carrying around a gun. Same for that guy in the Texas BLM protest. But some nut in a car (that wasn't attacked) shot him for doing what Kyle was doing.

It's a double standard. And a way for you guys to let off your murderers. I'll bet you anything Governor Abbott let the murderer off with a pardon because it was a BLM protester who got shot. You won't admit it but I see what's going on.

I'm a rich white old man. You guys won't attack me. I will just make sure not to tell you guys anymore that I'm a liberal. Just like good Germans in 1939 did. Keep quiet and hope MAGA doesn't destroy America. Which seems to be where Trump is taking us.

Remember any violence on Biden's watch was his fault? How come Trump isn't being blamed for Charlie's death?

Did you hear Trump talk about his dear sweet good friend Charlie? He was sad, for a second. Then went right into talking about his renovations on the White House.

Seems you care more about Charlie than his dead old friend Donald does.
 
All you do is lie, you bigoted, ignorant *****.
Lie to us some more.

Who cares about Charlie? Certainly not Trump

Trump Asked About Charlie Kirk, But Answers About New Ballroom​




How are you holding up after your friend Charlie's death Mr President?

His answer "Very good. See the trucks? The new construction of the ballroom is starting".

Asked if he'd go to the funeral he said he feels obligated to go. Some friend.
 
Kyle murdered someone. They didn't try to kill him.

And let me use your own words against you. You said the insurrection wasn't violent because they didn't bring weapons. First of all, yes they did bring weapons. But let's say you were right. Well guess what? The people who Kyle murdered didn't have weapons. Only he had a weapon. Yet you call us violent?
Kyle murdered nobody. It was justifiable homicide by reason of self-defense.
 
You know she's going to lie to you, right?
Of course. But we can’t allow the leftists to make up their lies without calling them out. Their lies and demonization of conservatives just got a good man murdered.
 
IMG_1567.webp
 

Someone yesterday was talking about Charlie and said "if you want people to say nice things about you when you're dead, say nice thing when you are alive".

No one is happy at what happened to Charlie. But did he help foster this kind of mad society? They say all these right wing podcasters who are so ******* popular have a lot to do with the radicalization of freedom

The radicalization of freedom is a complex idea that inverts or perverts the concept of liberty. Instead of being an empowering social good, freedom is manipulated to justify extremist views and actions that harm or deny the freedom of others. This process transforms the individual's pursuit of liberty into an ideology that promotes exclusion, violence, or hatred.
  • Weaponization of liberty: Extremist narratives exploit the value of liberty to recruit followers and justify their cause. The goal is no longer to secure universal freedom but to use the language of freedom to advance a narrow, often violent, agenda.
  • Destruction of freedoms: As an ideology radicalizes, its adherents show contempt for the life, freedom, and human rights of those outside their group. The ultimate aim is not to expand liberty but to destroy the freedoms of others who are deemed enemies or threats.
  • Justification of violence: The radicalization of freedom provides a psychological justification for violence. The extremist group's narrative can lead to a dehumanization of the out-group, which then makes violence against them seem like a heroic act in a "cosmic battle".
  • Profiling and fear: As a concept, the "radicalization myth" can be used by authorities to justify ideological profiling. This can stigmatize entire communities and create a climate of fear where people forsake their fundamental freedoms of speech and religious exercise to avoid being branded as "extreme".
  • Manipulation of grievances: Groups on both the far-right and far-left can exploit legitimate feelings of grievance and injustice. By framing their cause as a righteous struggle for freedom, they can recruit marginalized individuals and steer them toward violent extremist acts.
 
The fallout of the Charlie Kirk assassination
And how the resistance movements against the elites should proceed instead with restraint, patience and polite internet discussions.

A probable purpertrator (Tyler Robinson) was found. Apprehended. Time will tell us about the details.
A death penalty does not seem in order if you ask me. This was a signal of war against the whole Republican Party.

But you got to wonder; grief sticks to the family and close friends of Kirk for the rest of their lives (or for nearly all of them), but the rest of the Republicans have surely started in-depth investigations as to who is behind this; and they will deliver heavier strikes back.

Moral of the story? An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.

Opinions sought.

Let's all remember who Charlie was

Conservative podcasts are frequently cited in studies for spreading false claims
  • The Ben Shapiro Show: Cited in a 2024 University of Michigan study for using emotionally charged titles and commentary that, despite being factually grounded, often intensifies partisan sentiments and distrust in institutions.
  • The Dan Bongino Show: A popular show that, along with others, was found to have contributed to spreading unsubstantiated and false claims related to the 2020 presidential election.
  • Turning Point USA with Charlie Kirk: The podcast and its host, Charlie Kirk, are often criticized for their aggressive commentary and for promoting divisive rhetoric on issues like LGBTQ+ rights.
Glenn Beck, Hannity, Rush, Bill O'Reilly
Trump claimed that “radical left” rhetoric of comparing “wonderful Americans like Charlie to Nazis and the world’s worst mass murderers and criminals” is “directly responsible for the terrorism that we’re seeing in our country today.”
The President declared that his “Administration will find each and every one of those who contributed to this atrocity and to other political violence, including the organizations that fund it and support it.”

It’s an apparently widely shared sentiment on the right, as popular right-wing figures on social media have echoed messages of resentment for the left after Kirk’s death, and some have called for a heavy-handed response, even likening the current moment to “war.”

“It’s a real treat to see all these Liberals condemn political violence now. You called us Hitler. You called us Nazis. You called us Racists. You have blood on your hands.”

Sorry, don't act like nazi's we won't liken you to them.

“The Democrat Party must be classified as a domestic terror organization and their members & leaders treated accordingly,” posted conservative political strategist Joey Mannarino. “Enough is enough.”

Far-right radio show host and conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, who was ordered in 2022 to pay more than $1 billion to the families of Sandy Hook over his claim that the 2012 school shooting that killed 26 people, including 20 children, was fake, said in a livestream on his InfoWars channel: “This is a war, this is a war, this is a war.”

You sure are acting like nazi's. Right now. Is it illegal to point it out? No wonder you are threatening the media. They better not speak up when they see shady shit. Drain the swamp my ass you stupid right wing Americans.

 
The fallout of the Charlie Kirk assassination
And how the resistance movements against the elites should proceed instead with restraint, patience and polite internet discussions.

A probable purpertrator (Tyler Robinson) was found. Apprehended. Time will tell us about the details.
A death penalty does not seem in order if you ask me. This was a signal of war against the whole Republican Party.

But you got to wonder; grief sticks to the family and close friends of Kirk for the rest of their lives (or for nearly all of them), but the rest of the Republicans have surely started in-depth investigations as to who is behind this; and they will deliver heavier strikes back.

Moral of the story? An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.

Opinions sought.
We had 3 famous Democratic political leaders assassinated in the 1960s, and a War where 50,000 19 year old draftees were killed...

Some how, we made it through it...and came out better, for a while...

An eye for an eye Scripture, was meant to be a RESTRICTION on punishment, from what I have read... Criminals were being OVER PUNISHED.

AN EYE FOR AN EYE...

WAS SAYING

No more punishment than what the criminal did...

NO MORE THAN an eye for an eye taken.
NO MORE THAN a tooth for a tooth taken.
NO MORE THAN a life for a life...(don't take the killer's wife's life too or father's life too)

If understood in that Biblical manner, his life can be taken for the life he took, if proven beyond a reasonable doubt and he is not determined to be crazy. (Layman's term)
 
Is that what he said? I heard he said this:

"I can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that — it does a lot of damage."

He also said this:

Charlie Kirk called for an 'amazing patriot' to bail out Paul Pelosi's attacker in 2022​


However, in the same episode, Kirk condemned the attack, saying it was "awful."

So he's not really the kind of person people on the left are going to mourn for. Ya mean?​

 
Back
Top Bottom