The Evolution Fraud

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Evolution is a fairy tale....we didn’t evolve from apes, dolphins, Bigfoot, or aliens. There were no cavemen pulling the women by the hair. These same nut jobs push the paleo diet another fraud that never existed.

Please post religious horseshit in the religion section. Thanks.

 

[rightwinger]

Evolution is a fairy tale....we didn’t evolve from apes, dolphins, Bigfoot, or aliens. There were no cavemen pulling the women by the hair. These same nut jobs push the paleo diet another fraud that never existed.

Very true

The only reasonable explanation is that all creatures were created by magic

Poof......there is a snail
Poof, poof, poof......how about some fishes
Poof, Poof, Poof.......Dinosaurs, reptiles and birds
POOF.......Human beings

 

[anynameyouwish]

Evolution is a fairy tale....we didn’t evolve from apes, dolphins, Bigfoot, or aliens. There were no cavemen pulling the women by the hair. These same nut jobs push the paleo diet another fraud that never existed.

Very true

The only reasonable explanation is that all creatures were created by magic

Poof......there is a snail
Poof, poof, poof......how about some fishes
Poof, Poof, Poof.......Dinosaurs, reptiles and birds
POOF.......Human beings

and to make sure human beings are miserable....
poof....mosquitos....
poof.....black flies......
poof.....greenheads......
poof.....politics!

 

[DGS49]

The fact of "divine" creation has been obvious for ten thousand years. But it's not scientific; it is simply an observation. There is no other plausible explanation for the variety of life on this planet. Obviously, the timeline of the Bible is unscientific nonsense, but the description of the creation of different species is consistent with what we can observe, and even the fossil record.

Darwin's theory is nice, and it explains how species EVOLVE in order to survive, but it has NO explanation for the creation of new species, and there is no tenable SCIENTIFIC theory extant that adequately explains how one species evolved into another. In short, it cannot happen.

There is a 5-minute video at Prager U (PreviewPreview5:52Evolution: Bacteria to Beethoven) that explains two insurmountable problems with Darwin's theory, but of course going from there to Genesis is also preposterous.

What is important to take away from this whole discussion of Evolution is that the Left not only does not believe in God; it abhors anything that might lead one to believe in "god." Which is why, as with Climate Change, the people with the LEAST scientific knowledge argue most emphatically for "Evolution."

 

[rightwinger]

The fact of "divine" creation has been obvious for ten thousand years. But it's not scientific; it is simply an observation. There is no other plausible explanation for the variety of life on this planet. Obviously, the timeline of the Bible is unscientific nonsense, but the description of the creation of different species is consistent with what we can observe, and even the fossil record.

Darwin's theory is nice, and it explains how species EVOLVE in order to survive, but it has NO explanation for the creation of new species, and there is no tenable SCIENTIFIC theory extant that adequately explains how one species evolved into another. In short, it cannot happen.

There is a 5-minute video at Prager U (PreviewPreview5:52Evolution: Bacteria to Beethoven) that explains two insurmountable problems with Darwin's theory, but of course going from there to Genesis is also preposterous.

What is important to take away from this whole discussion of Evolution is that the Left not only does not believe in God; it abhors anything that might lead one to believe in "god." Which is why, as with Climate Change, the people with the LEAST scientific knowledge argue most emphatically for "Evolution."

You are welcome to your faith

Just don’t pass it off as science

 

[ChemEngineer]

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit, is it.......... I bet you graduated from the 2nd grade........, after 10 attempts.........

Your strong suits are misplaced arrogance, condescension, and pettiness. They are a few of the métiers of Leftists.

A>B>C>D is not science, it is unintelligent

 

[Ringel05]

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit, is it.......... I bet you graduated from the 2nd grade........, after 10 attempts.........

Your strong suits are misplaced arrogance, condescension, and pettiness. They are a few of the métiers of Leftists.

A>B>C>D is not science, it is unintelligent

Wow, did my point rocket over your head........... Look up, see the pretty contrails........
Oh and leftist, expected comeback but still funnier than all get out!!

 

[ChemEngineer]

You are welcome to your faith

Just don’t pass it off as science

Nobody has more faith than Darwin's Priests waving his Magic Wand of Selection.
And you call THAT "science"?

 

[ChemEngineer]

Wow, did my point rocket over your head........... Look up, see the pretty contrails........
Oh and leftist, expected comeback but still funnier than all get out!!

You giggle to yourself while saying nothing. I have no time to waste on giggly boys.
Join your friends on my Ignore List.
ciao

 

[Ringel05]

Wow, did my point rocket over your head........... Look up, see the pretty contrails........
Oh and leftist, expected comeback but still funnier than all get out!!

You giggle to yourself while saying nothing. I have no time to waste on giggly boys.
Join your friends on my Ignore List.
ciao

COOL!!!!! Pathetic twit.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Darwin's theory is nice, and it explains how species EVOLVE in order to survive, but it has NO explanation for the creation of new species,

Ridiculously false. That is literally the central concept explained by evolution. You would fail a 10th grade science test. Religious nonsense goes in the religion section.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Nobody has more faith than Darwin's Priests waving his Magic Wand of Selection.
And you call THAT "science"?

No, I call that the insane ramblings of a delusional religious person (That's you).

 

[rightwinger]

You are welcome to your faith

Just don’t pass it off as science

Nobody has more faith than Darwin's Priests waving his Magic Wand of Selection.
And you call THAT "science"?

They support their views with scientific evidence of Biology, Geology, Fossil Records and DNA

What supports your view?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You are welcome to your faith

Just don’t pass it off as science

Nobody has more faith than Darwin's Priests waving his Magic Wand of Selection.
And you call THAT "science"?

They support their views with scientific evidence of Biology, Geology, Fossil Records and DNA

What supports your view?

1 times 10 to the 150th.....or something.

 

[ChemEngineer]

They support their views with scientific evidence of Biology, Geology, Fossil Records and DNA

What supports your view?

1 times 10 to the 150th.....or something.

What does 1 times 10 to the 150th work out to be, Toddsterpatriot? Feel free to use a calculator, slide rule, or cheat.

Rightwinger, no Darwinists do NOT support their views with scientific evidence. They provide snippets and dibbles and dabs that have been shown to be utterly inadequate. But you regurgitate it dutifully without thinking. It's done everywhere, most particularly by the obedient, fascist Left. The impeachment clown show is a perfect example. Repeat what your handlers and CNN say and don't listen to anybody else.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Rightwinger, no Darwinists do NOT support their views with scientific evidence.

You sound like an idiot.

 

[rightwinger]

You are welcome to your faith

Just don’t pass it off as science

Nobody has more faith than Darwin's Priests waving his Magic Wand of Selection.
And you call THAT "science"?

They support their views with scientific evidence of Biology, Geology, Fossil Records and DNA

What supports your view?

1 times 10 to the 150th.....or something.

Evolution occurred .....there is no denying it

 

[rightwinger]

They support their views with scientific evidence of Biology, Geology, Fossil Records and DNA

What supports your view?

1 times 10 to the 150th.....or something.

What does 1 times 10 to the 150th work out to be, Toddsterpatriot? Feel free to use a calculator, slide rule, or cheat.

Rightwinger, no Darwinists do NOT support their views with scientific evidence. They provide snippets and dibbles and dabs that have been shown to be utterly inadequate. But you regurgitate it dutifully without thinking. It's done everywhere, most particularly by the obedient, fascist Left. The impeachment clown show is a perfect example. Repeat what your handlers and CNN say and don't listen to anybody else.

Reams of scientific evidence supporting evolution

Biological comparisons, fossil analysis, geological strata showing increasing biological complexity, DNA mapping

Ummmm....you lose

 

[harmonica]

The Insuperable Statistics of Life - Scientific Proof of Nature's God


Intelligent design has been viciously attacked, not so much for its claim that design can be detected, and not so much for the mathematical methods it uses, but because it trumps the belief system of those who consider themselves to be our ruling intellectual elite. It trumps Scientism. – Counting to God, A Personal Journey Through Science to Belief, by Douglas Ell, p 50

Dembski suggests a lower bound, a “universal probability limit,” of 1 in 10 to the 150. He gets that by taking the number of protons, neutrons and electrons in the visible universe (10 to the 80), multiplying it by the number of seconds since the creation of the universe (about 4 times 10 to the 17), and multiplying by 10 to the 43 units of “Planck time” in each second. (Planck time is theoretically the smallest time measurement that will ever be possible.) – p 52

----------------------

Now consider the universal probability limit of 1 in 10 the 150th power in comparison to any naturalistic synthesis of a modest human protein of just 300 amino acid residues in length.

1/20 x 1/20 x 1/20... 300 times is 1 chance in 20 to the 300th power, which is equal to 1 chance in 10 to the 390th power.

Titin is a protein in the muscles of everyone reading this. Titin is 34,350 amino acid residues in length. Please do the math. There are at least 5,000 different proteins in your body. Do the math. 1 chance in 10 to the 150th is statistically equivalent to 0.

Attempting to prove God exists utilizing man's science is as foolish and fruitless as attempting to prove God doesn't exist utilizing man's science.

if you can't prove your claim that means it's bullshit
no one has to disprove there is a god

The Insuperable Statistics of Life - Scientific Proof of Nature's God


Intelligent design has been viciously attacked, not so much for its claim that design can be detected, and not so much for the mathematical methods it uses, but because it trumps the belief system of those who consider themselves to be our ruling intellectual elite. It trumps Scientism. – Counting to God, A Personal Journey Through Science to Belief, by Douglas Ell, p 50

Dembski suggests a lower bound, a “universal probability limit,” of 1 in 10 to the 150. He gets that by taking the number of protons, neutrons and electrons in the visible universe (10 to the 80), multiplying it by the number of seconds since the creation of the universe (about 4 times 10 to the 17), and multiplying by 10 to the 43 units of “Planck time” in each second. (Planck time is theoretically the smallest time measurement that will ever be possible.) – p 52

----------------------

Now consider the universal probability limit of 1 in 10 the 150th power in comparison to any naturalistic synthesis of a modest human protein of just 300 amino acid residues in length.

1/20 x 1/20 x 1/20... 300 times is 1 chance in 20 to the 300th power, which is equal to 1 chance in 10 to the 390th power.

Titin is a protein in the muscles of everyone reading this. Titin is 34,350 amino acid residues in length. Please do the math. There are at least 5,000 different proteins in your body. Do the math. 1 chance in 10 to the 150th is statistically equivalent to 0.

Attempting to prove God exists utilizing man's science is as foolish and fruitless as attempting to prove God doesn't exist utilizing man's science.

if you can't prove your claim that means it's bullshit
no one has to disprove there is a god

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit, is it.......... I bet you graduated from the 2nd grade........, after 10 attempts.........

the typical dumbass response when you can't refute it

 

[harmonica]

if you can't prove your claim that means it's bullshit
no one has to disprove there is a god

You wouldn't know proof if it bit you in the gluteus.

First, "Nothing is known for certain except in pure mathematics." - Carl Sagan
Second, I made no mention of God. You did, attempting to derail the thread, as Leftists do incessantly.
Third, if you knew ANYTHING about bioichemistry, you would address what I had to say, instead of regurgitating your inane Talking Points you picked up from haters like Richard Dawkins.

still--that's no proof of creation--plain and simple
hahhahahahahhahahahhaha