Statistics, God and Estimating

[Hollie]

Let me explain why I said that. When looking up at the night sky, are you able to count the stars? Estimates are there are billions of them. I can't promise there is more than one god among equals, but at least I can to understand hnow billions orf stars can all happen by one GOD. Now as you shop at supermarkets, you would laugh at anybody who told you t hat only one supermarket is possible. Parents with children do not imagine they have one parent, why can't there be like parents, more GODS. all equal as they are?

Not at all relevant.

 

[Robert W]

Not at all relevant.

Hollie, when you talk here, I don't talk that way to you.

 

[Hollie]

Hollie, when you talk here, I don't talk that way to you.

I don’t see how counting stars and shopping at supermarkets is relevant.

 

[Robert W]

I don’t see how counting stars and shopping at supermarkets is relevant.

Got it now. We are good.

I used the analogy thinking republicans will get it.

 

[alang1216]

A weak religion is one which relies on unsupported claims of miracles and supernaturalism.

Provide an example of either.

Take your pick, all religions are weak by your definition.

 

[Hollie]

Take your pick, all religions are weak by your definition.

They’re weak in terms of presenting evidence for their various gods.

 

[Hollie]

Got it now. We are good.

I used the analogy thinking republicans will get it.

I don’t think you got it, Such things as supermarkets corporeal experiences and those experiences can be shared. Spirit realms? Not so much.

 

[Hollie]

While some might argue that this post belongs in a religion forum, I wish to point out that it is purely scientific, based on modern biochemistry coupled with statistics. The correspondence between science and its Creator continues to unfold.
--------------------------------------------------------------

A great many people get wrapped up in definitions that are erroneous.
Mathematicians have been known to say, "Nothing is impossible unless its probability is zero."
While that sounds plausible, let's look at reality.
Distinguished mathematician, Emile Borel, defined "impossible" as one chance in 10 to the 50th or less.
Ten to the 50 is 1 followed by fifty zeroes.

Before reading any further, what volume do you estimate 10 to the 50 small marbles would occupy?
/
/
/
/
/
Ten to the 50 marbles 1 cm in diameter would fill 37,400 billion billion spheres the size of earth.

So who thinks it is possible to select one out of 37,400 billion billion spheres, and from that one enormous sphere full of 1 cm marbles, blindfolded, on your first and only try, get the unique marble?

Titin is the largest protein in the human body, at 38,138 amino acid residues in a precise sequence.

I did the calculation to evaluate the probability of titin's original synthesis from any natural mechanism you can imagine, being 1/20 amino acids selected one at a time taken to the 38,138th power times two other factors which produce a probability for titin's original synthesis of 1 in about 10 to the 72,000th power. Those two other factors are the exclusive selection of L amino acids and not R amino acids, which works out to 1/2 to the 38,138th. Similarly, amino acids can bond by peptide bonds, where the -OH radical links to an -H radical, or a non-peptide bond, where it does not. This constitutes another factor of 1/2 to the 38,138th power.

This is insanely beyond impossible and titin is only one of over 20,000 different proteins in the human body.

Let’s see your calculation for the correspondence between your various alleged “creator gods” and the cancer cell they created.

A true master stroke of godly design.

 

[Robert W]

I don’t think you got it, Such things as supermarkets corporeal experiences and those experiences can be shared. Spirit realms? Not so much.

I no clue it bothers you until you disagreed.

 

[Hollie]

I no clue it bothers you until you disagreed.

It doesn’t bother me. I’m just holding you to a consistent standard.

We live in a Darwinian world, not a platonic one.

 

[Robert W]

Let’s see your calculation for the correspondence between your various alleged “creator gods” and the cancer cell they created.

A true master stroke of godly design.

Do you have an alternative belief how the universe was created as well as all life we know of?

 

[Robert W]

It doesn’t bother me. I’m just holding you to a consistent standard.

We live in a Darwinian world, not a platonic one.

Darwin was never able to explain the creation of the universe nor all living life.

 

[Hollie]

Darwin was never able to explain the creation of the universe nor all living life.

He didn’t explain the creation of supermarkets either,

 

[Hollie]

Do you have an alternative belief how the universe was created as well as all life we know of?

I don’t need beliefs. A belief that supernatural gods created anything is fine as a fable, but then you’re obligated to believe in lots of differing/ competing fables.