The Equality Act, another lawyers' full employment Act and an attack on inalienable rights

[danielpalos]

There is no natural rate of unemployment under capitalism.

How did you reach that conclusion? I understand economics unlike most right-wingers.

No you do not.

Yes, I do and You have no valid arguments to disprove it. You must not understand economics and practice the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God) like the morally challenged Right-Wing.

No you do not.

I have proven on every thread that you are massively and intentionally ignorant. The burden is on you to prove that it exists and you cannot.

The cvlaim ids stupid and childish.

You simply appeal to ignorance as is typical of the Right-Wing by Habit.

Why do you believe there is no "natural rate of unemployment" under Capitalism?Yes and that is your engtire

No I never appeal and I correct your ignorance.

It is on you to prove that there is and you cannot.

Isn't right-wing fantasy wonderful.

Your entire belief system is right wing fantasy

How can I tell right-wingers are lying? They type on the Internet and resort to fallacy instead valid arguments.

 

[johnwk]

There is no natural rate of unemployment under capitalism.

"Capitalism" vs a free market, free enterprise system

When you use the word "capitalism", do you have a distinction in mind between "capitalism" and a free market, free enterprise system, which is what our founders intended to protect and advocated for.

I would like to point out the word “capitalism” was unknown to our founders. In fact it was used and popularized by Karl Marx to describe a free market system in an evil light. By contrast, our founder’s often describe our system in a manner promoting a free market, free trade, or free enterprise ___ “free” being the operative word. For example see Thomas Jefferson : First Annual Message to Congress
”Agriculture, manufactures, commerce, and navigation, the four pillars of our prosperity, are the most thriving when left most free to individual enterprise.”

I have never found our founders using the word “capitalism” in our founding documents to describe our system. In fact, the very reason for granting power to Congress to “regulate commerce” among the States was to protect and advance free trade among the States by forbidding one state taxing another state’s exports which passed through its borders. This is further illustrated in Article 1, Section 9 which declares: No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one States over those of another; nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one States, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another.

But our progressive/socialist domestic enemies do not like the word “free” being used to describe our economic system because it is hard to attack the word “free” which clearly implies the people are to be “free” to engage in commerce and freely trade with their mutual consent ___ an original inalienable right of mankind. “Capitalism” on the other hand gives great latitude to cast America’s system in an evil light, particularly as a system manipulated by evil “Crony Capitalists”.

For more on the distinction between our system, as intended by our Founders, and “Capitalism”, see: PART TWO: Free Enterprise is Better than Capitalism


JWK

 

[Soupnazi630]

There is no natural rate of unemployment under capitalism.

How did you reach that conclusion? I understand economics unlike most right-wingers.

No you do not.

Yes, I do and You have no valid arguments to disprove it. You must not understand economics and practice the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God) like the morally challenged Right-Wing.

No you do not.

I have proven on every thread that you are massively and intentionally ignorant. The burden is on you to prove that it exists and you cannot.

The cvlaim ids stupid and childish.

You simply appeal to ignorance as is typical of the Right-Wing by Habit.

Why do you believe there is no "natural rate of unemployment" under Capitalism?Yes and that is your engtire

No I never appeal and I correct your ignorance.

It is on you to prove that there is and you cannot.

Isn't right-wing fantasy wonderful.

Your entire belief system is right wing fantasy

How can I tell right-wingers are lying? They type on the Internet and resort to fallacy instead valid arguments.

Yes you lie all the time in every post proving you srre precisely the right winger you describe and you never post valid arguments.

 

[danielpalos]

There is no natural rate of unemployment under capitalism.

How did you reach that conclusion? I understand economics unlike most right-wingers.

No you do not.

Yes, I do and You have no valid arguments to disprove it. You must not understand economics and practice the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God) like the morally challenged Right-Wing.

No you do not.

I have proven on every thread that you are massively and intentionally ignorant. The burden is on you to prove that it exists and you cannot.

The cvlaim ids stupid and childish.

You simply appeal to ignorance as is typical of the Right-Wing by Habit.

Why do you believe there is no "natural rate of unemployment" under Capitalism?Yes and that is your engtire

No I never appeal and I correct your ignorance.

It is on you to prove that there is and you cannot.

Isn't right-wing fantasy wonderful.

Your entire belief system is right wing fantasy

How can I tell right-wingers are lying? They type on the Internet and resort to fallacy instead valid arguments.

Yes you lie all the time in every post proving you srre precisely the right winger you describe and you never post valid arguments.

Right-Wingers are literally, Incredible in most threads and must be so in abortion threads.

 

[Soupnazi630]

There is no natural rate of unemployment under capitalism.

How did you reach that conclusion? I understand economics unlike most right-wingers.

No you do not.

Yes, I do and You have no valid arguments to disprove it. You must not understand economics and practice the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God) like the morally challenged Right-Wing.

No you do not.

I have proven on every thread that you are massively and intentionally ignorant. The burden is on you to prove that it exists and you cannot.

The cvlaim ids stupid and childish.

You simply appeal to ignorance as is typical of the Right-Wing by Habit.

Why do you believe there is no "natural rate of unemployment" under Capitalism?Yes and that is your engtire

No I never appeal and I correct your ignorance.

It is on you to prove that there is and you cannot.

Isn't right-wing fantasy wonderful.

Your entire belief system is right wing fantasy

How can I tell right-wingers are lying? They type on the Internet and resort to fallacy instead valid arguments.

Yes you lie all the time in every post proving you srre precisely the right winger you describe and you never post valid arguments.

Right-Wingers are literally, Incredible in most threads and must be so in abortion threads.

This is not an abortion thread and in every thread you are the right winger who lies and appeals to ignorance.

 

[danielpalos]

There is no natural rate of unemployment under capitalism.

How did you reach that conclusion? I understand economics unlike most right-wingers.

No you do not.

Yes, I do and You have no valid arguments to disprove it. You must not understand economics and practice the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God) like the morally challenged Right-Wing.

No you do not.

I have proven on every thread that you are massively and intentionally ignorant. The burden is on you to prove that it exists and you cannot.

The cvlaim ids stupid and childish.

You simply appeal to ignorance as is typical of the Right-Wing by Habit.

Why do you believe there is no "natural rate of unemployment" under Capitalism?Yes and that is your engtire

No I never appeal and I correct your ignorance.

It is on you to prove that there is and you cannot.

Isn't right-wing fantasy wonderful.

Your entire belief system is right wing fantasy

How can I tell right-wingers are lying? They type on the Internet and resort to fallacy instead valid arguments.

Yes you lie all the time in every post proving you srre precisely the right winger you describe and you never post valid arguments.

Right-Wingers are literally, Incredible in most threads and must be so in abortion threads.

This is not an abortion thread and in every thread you are the right winger who lies and appeals to ignorance.

Says a true-witness bearing challenged right-winger who practices the abomination of hypocrisy but wants to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth" in any other thread.

 

[Soupnazi630]

There is no natural rate of unemployment under capitalism.

How did you reach that conclusion? I understand economics unlike most right-wingers.

No you do not.

Yes, I do and You have no valid arguments to disprove it. You must not understand economics and practice the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God) like the morally challenged Right-Wing.

No you do not.

I have proven on every thread that you are massively and intentionally ignorant. The burden is on you to prove that it exists and you cannot.

The cvlaim ids stupid and childish.

You simply appeal to ignorance as is typical of the Right-Wing by Habit.

Why do you believe there is no "natural rate of unemployment" under Capitalism?Yes and that is your engtire

No I never appeal and I correct your ignorance.

It is on you to prove that there is and you cannot.

Isn't right-wing fantasy wonderful.

Your entire belief system is right wing fantasy

How can I tell right-wingers are lying? They type on the Internet and resort to fallacy instead valid arguments.

Yes you lie all the time in every post proving you srre precisely the right winger you describe and you never post valid arguments.

Right-Wingers are literally, Incredible in most threads and must be so in abortion threads.

This is not an abortion thread and in every thread you are the right winger who lies and appeals to ignorance.

Says a true-witness bearing challenged right-winger who practices the abomination of hypocrisy but wants to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth" in any other thread.

I never displyed hypocrisy you did and i never want to be taken as the truth. I consistently prove you wrong two cfaced and dishonest which is not the same as wanting to be taken as the truth.

 

[hadit]

The only Equality Act we need is equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States.

Only the morally challenged Right-Wing has a problem with it.

Well, all 5 of them and the entire legal profession. You know, the people who actually know the law?

Isn't right-wing fantasy wonderful.

Do you deny that the entire legal profession agrees with me and disagrees with you about your imagined link between UC and at-will laws?

Yes. You (right-wingers) alleging something means Nothing. Get them on here to argue it with me. I already know right-wingers will have to make like Trumpian attorneys in open Court.

Can you cite any lawyer or judge's writing in which he agrees with you that at-will means you can collect UC? I want the legal professional's name and a link to his/her paper.

 

[danielpalos]

There is no natural rate of unemployment under capitalism.

How did you reach that conclusion? I understand economics unlike most right-wingers.

No you do not.

Yes, I do and You have no valid arguments to disprove it. You must not understand economics and practice the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God) like the morally challenged Right-Wing.

No you do not.

I have proven on every thread that you are massively and intentionally ignorant. The burden is on you to prove that it exists and you cannot.

The cvlaim ids stupid and childish.

You simply appeal to ignorance as is typical of the Right-Wing by Habit.

Why do you believe there is no "natural rate of unemployment" under Capitalism?Yes and that is your engtire

No I never appeal and I correct your ignorance.

It is on you to prove that there is and you cannot.

Isn't right-wing fantasy wonderful.

Your entire belief system is right wing fantasy

How can I tell right-wingers are lying? They type on the Internet and resort to fallacy instead valid arguments.

Yes you lie all the time in every post proving you srre precisely the right winger you describe and you never post valid arguments.

Right-Wingers are literally, Incredible in most threads and must be so in abortion threads.

This is not an abortion thread and in every thread you are the right winger who lies and appeals to ignorance.

Says a true-witness bearing challenged right-winger who practices the abomination of hypocrisy but wants to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth" in any other thread.

I never displyed hypocrisy you did and i never want to be taken as the truth. I consistently prove you wrong two cfaced and dishonest which is not the same as wanting to be taken as the truth.

In right-wing fantasy, you are Always Right.

 

[danielpalos]

The only Equality Act we need is equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States.

Only the morally challenged Right-Wing has a problem with it.

Well, all 5 of them and the entire legal profession. You know, the people who actually know the law?

Isn't right-wing fantasy wonderful.

Do you deny that the entire legal profession agrees with me and disagrees with you about your imagined link between UC and at-will laws?

Yes. You (right-wingers) alleging something means Nothing. Get them on here to argue it with me. I already know right-wingers will have to make like Trumpian attorneys in open Court.

Can you cite any lawyer or judge's writing in which he agrees with you that at-will means you can collect UC? I want the legal professional's name and a link to his/her paper.

This issue is before the Court now. All I have been getting from, the establishment, is nothing but continuance, diversion, and other forms of fallacies not any sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation and the administration of Justice.

And, you can't find anyone to gainsay my contention or you would have brought them on here by now.

 

[hadit]

The only Equality Act we need is equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States.

Only the morally challenged Right-Wing has a problem with it.

Well, all 5 of them and the entire legal profession. You know, the people who actually know the law?

Isn't right-wing fantasy wonderful.

Do you deny that the entire legal profession agrees with me and disagrees with you about your imagined link between UC and at-will laws?

Yes. You (right-wingers) alleging something means Nothing. Get them on here to argue it with me. I already know right-wingers will have to make like Trumpian attorneys in open Court.

Can you cite any lawyer or judge's writing in which he agrees with you that at-will means you can collect UC? I want the legal professional's name and a link to his/her paper.

This issue is before the Court now. All I have been getting from, the establishment, is nothing but continuance, diversion, and other forms of fallacies not any sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation and the administration of Justice.

And, you can't find anyone to gainsay my contention or you would have brought them on here by now.

I don't have to give you any names because no one has ever tried to make the case that the laws are linked in any way except you.

Now, which court is hearing the case? Link to it so we can see the arguments being presented. And while you're at it, give us the name of the lawyer who is presenting your case and a link to his/her opinion on this law.

 

[danielpalos]

The only Equality Act we need is equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States.

Only the morally challenged Right-Wing has a problem with it.

Well, all 5 of them and the entire legal profession. You know, the people who actually know the law?

Isn't right-wing fantasy wonderful.

Do you deny that the entire legal profession agrees with me and disagrees with you about your imagined link between UC and at-will laws?

Yes. You (right-wingers) alleging something means Nothing. Get them on here to argue it with me. I already know right-wingers will have to make like Trumpian attorneys in open Court.

Can you cite any lawyer or judge's writing in which he agrees with you that at-will means you can collect UC? I want the legal professional's name and a link to his/her paper.

This issue is before the Court now. All I have been getting from, the establishment, is nothing but continuance, diversion, and other forms of fallacies not any sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation and the administration of Justice.

And, you can't find anyone to gainsay my contention or you would have brought them on here by now.

I don't have to give you any names because no one has ever tried to make the case that the laws are linked in any way except you.

Now, which court is hearing the case? Link to it so we can see the arguments being presented. And while you're at it, give us the name of the lawyer who is presenting your case and a link to his/her opinion on this law.

So what. Your opinion is irrelevant since this issue is before those delegated the Judicial power of the State or the Union.

 

[hadit]

The only Equality Act we need is equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States.

Only the morally challenged Right-Wing has a problem with it.

Well, all 5 of them and the entire legal profession. You know, the people who actually know the law?

Isn't right-wing fantasy wonderful.

Do you deny that the entire legal profession agrees with me and disagrees with you about your imagined link between UC and at-will laws?

Yes. You (right-wingers) alleging something means Nothing. Get them on here to argue it with me. I already know right-wingers will have to make like Trumpian attorneys in open Court.

Can you cite any lawyer or judge's writing in which he agrees with you that at-will means you can collect UC? I want the legal professional's name and a link to his/her paper.

This issue is before the Court now. All I have been getting from, the establishment, is nothing but continuance, diversion, and other forms of fallacies not any sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation and the administration of Justice.

And, you can't find anyone to gainsay my contention or you would have brought them on here by now.

I don't have to give you any names because no one has ever tried to make the case that the laws are linked in any way except you.

Now, which court is hearing the case? Link to it so we can see the arguments being presented. And while you're at it, give us the name of the lawyer who is presenting your case and a link to his/her opinion on this law.

So what. Your opinion is irrelevant since this issue is before those delegated the Judicial power of the State or the Union.

So, after ranting on ad nauseum about people lying and being hypocrites, you are unwilling (or unable) to back up your contention that a lawyer has actually taken your case and is suing in court for you to be able to collect something you have no right to collect. I am not surprised.

 

[danielpalos]

The only Equality Act we need is equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States.

Only the morally challenged Right-Wing has a problem with it.

Well, all 5 of them and the entire legal profession. You know, the people who actually know the law?

Isn't right-wing fantasy wonderful.

Do you deny that the entire legal profession agrees with me and disagrees with you about your imagined link between UC and at-will laws?

Yes. You (right-wingers) alleging something means Nothing. Get them on here to argue it with me. I already know right-wingers will have to make like Trumpian attorneys in open Court.

Can you cite any lawyer or judge's writing in which he agrees with you that at-will means you can collect UC? I want the legal professional's name and a link to his/her paper.

This issue is before the Court now. All I have been getting from, the establishment, is nothing but continuance, diversion, and other forms of fallacies not any sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation and the administration of Justice.

And, you can't find anyone to gainsay my contention or you would have brought them on here by now.

I don't have to give you any names because no one has ever tried to make the case that the laws are linked in any way except you.

Now, which court is hearing the case? Link to it so we can see the arguments being presented. And while you're at it, give us the name of the lawyer who is presenting your case and a link to his/her opinion on this law.

So what. Your opinion is irrelevant since this issue is before those delegated the Judicial power of the State or the Union.

So, after ranting on ad nauseum about people lying and being hypocrites, you are unwilling (or unable) to back up your contention that a lawyer has actually taken your case and is suing in court for you to be able to collect something you have no right to collect. I am not surprised.

How is your special pleading relevant? You don't Have to have an attorney in pro per.

 

[hadit]

The only Equality Act we need is equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States.

Only the morally challenged Right-Wing has a problem with it.

Well, all 5 of them and the entire legal profession. You know, the people who actually know the law?

Isn't right-wing fantasy wonderful.

Do you deny that the entire legal profession agrees with me and disagrees with you about your imagined link between UC and at-will laws?

Yes. You (right-wingers) alleging something means Nothing. Get them on here to argue it with me. I already know right-wingers will have to make like Trumpian attorneys in open Court.

Can you cite any lawyer or judge's writing in which he agrees with you that at-will means you can collect UC? I want the legal professional's name and a link to his/her paper.

This issue is before the Court now. All I have been getting from, the establishment, is nothing but continuance, diversion, and other forms of fallacies not any sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation and the administration of Justice.

And, you can't find anyone to gainsay my contention or you would have brought them on here by now.

I don't have to give you any names because no one has ever tried to make the case that the laws are linked in any way except you.

Now, which court is hearing the case? Link to it so we can see the arguments being presented. And while you're at it, give us the name of the lawyer who is presenting your case and a link to his/her opinion on this law.

So what. Your opinion is irrelevant since this issue is before those delegated the Judicial power of the State or the Union.

So, after ranting on ad nauseum about people lying and being hypocrites, you are unwilling (or unable) to back up your contention that a lawyer has actually taken your case and is suing in court for you to be able to collect something you have no right to collect. I am not surprised.

How is your special pleading relevant? You don't Have to have an attorney in pro per.

So you're doing it all on your own. Like I said, you're the ONLY one who believes this. At least tell us which court you're in.

 

[danielpalos]

The only Equality Act we need is equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States.

Only the morally challenged Right-Wing has a problem with it.

Well, all 5 of them and the entire legal profession. You know, the people who actually know the law?

Isn't right-wing fantasy wonderful.

Do you deny that the entire legal profession agrees with me and disagrees with you about your imagined link between UC and at-will laws?

Yes. You (right-wingers) alleging something means Nothing. Get them on here to argue it with me. I already know right-wingers will have to make like Trumpian attorneys in open Court.

Can you cite any lawyer or judge's writing in which he agrees with you that at-will means you can collect UC? I want the legal professional's name and a link to his/her paper.

This issue is before the Court now. All I have been getting from, the establishment, is nothing but continuance, diversion, and other forms of fallacies not any sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation and the administration of Justice.

And, you can't find anyone to gainsay my contention or you would have brought them on here by now.

I don't have to give you any names because no one has ever tried to make the case that the laws are linked in any way except you.

Now, which court is hearing the case? Link to it so we can see the arguments being presented. And while you're at it, give us the name of the lawyer who is presenting your case and a link to his/her opinion on this law.

So what. Your opinion is irrelevant since this issue is before those delegated the Judicial power of the State or the Union.

So, after ranting on ad nauseum about people lying and being hypocrites, you are unwilling (or unable) to back up your contention that a lawyer has actually taken your case and is suing in court for you to be able to collect something you have no right to collect. I am not surprised.

How is your special pleading relevant? You don't Have to have an attorney in pro per.

So you're doing it all on your own. Like I said, you're the ONLY one who believes this. At least tell us which court you're in.

Sacramento Superior Court.

 

[johnwk]

Sacramento Superior Court.

Provide a link to the case.

 

[danielpalos]

Sacramento Superior Court.

Provide a link to the case.

Public Case Access System

services.saccourt.ca.gov

I sent a follow-up email this morning.

 

[johnwk]

Sacramento Superior Court.

Provide a link to the case.

Public Case Access System

services.saccourt.ca.gov

I sent a follow-up email this morning.

Provide a link to the case.

 

[danielpalos]

Sacramento Superior Court.

Provide a link to the case.

Public Case Access System

services.saccourt.ca.gov

I sent a follow-up email this morning.

Provide a link to the case.

I had to log into the public case access system and subscribe to the case.