The Epstein Files

CrusaderFrank said:
You sound like the Trump defenders

I donā€™t have ā€œevidenceā€ Iā€™ve read enough of the filtered, redacted files to know that at any point over the past 20 years, the FBI should have raided Epstein properties like they were Melaniaā€™s panty drawer

Oh, the British just discovered that Epstein maintained a number of storage lockers, none of which, like Zorro Ranch, were ever searched!
Click to expand...

How did the British 'discover' that exactly?
 
CrusaderFrank said:
How is demanding accountability for Satanic pedophiles ā€œsleeping with the enemyā€œ????????

Have you thought that through?? I mean at all!!??
Click to expand...

You have no evidence that can be used in a court of law to convict the 'satanic pedophiles', you seem to want the DOJ to just make it up, how very American of you. :rolleyes:
 
OldFlame said:
You have no evidence that can be used in a court of law to convict the 'satanic pedophiles', you seem to want the DOJ to just make it up, how very American of you. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I don't have a magic wand either.

There is more than enough information in the highly filtered and redacted Files that have been released to open an investigation into: Leon Black, John and Tony Podesta, Jes Staley and to drag Jeff and Ghislaine back from Israel

I won't debate your fictional, silly, unrealistic standards
 
CrusaderFrank said:
I don't have a magic wand either.

There is more than enough information in the highly filtered and redacted Files that have been released to open an investigation into: Leon Black, John and Tony Podesta, Jes Staley and to drag Jeff and Ghislaine back from Israel

I won't debate your fictional, silly, unrealistic standards
Click to expand...

'More than enough information', link to it, and then point to what should be investigated further using that information. It's very easy to sit back and criticize using broad arguments that have no substance. :dunno:

Talk about unrealistic standards, that's all you have.
 
OldFlame said:
'More than enough information', link to it, and then point to what should be investigated further using that information. It's very easy to sit back and criticize using broad arguments that have no substance. :dunno:

Talk about unrealistic standards, that's all you have.
Click to expand...

Like I said, you're a silly, unserious person
 
CrusaderFrank said:
DYOR

I'm weary of having to educate people who can't or won't read
Click to expand...

They state they 'discovered' all of this, but just like you, don't give any information about the files that they claimed to discover it in. They 'unearthed' bank statements? From where? Why don't they show them? They reviewed emails, yet don't disclose the exact emails that they claim to have found the link to storage lockers in. One supposed document, again not linked, to show contents of one storage locker. 'Identified' an agency that was hired to move items, still not showing that documentation. I don't believe people just because they say so, the 'media' lies constantly, it's all they do. What is the reason that they can't site and provide the evidence that they supposedly found that led to this information they wrote an article about? Why are they the only ones who found any of this?

  • Financial Records: The Telegraph unearthed bank statements and credit card receipts showing Epstein was paying for at least six storage lockers across the US between 2003 and 2019.
  • DoJ Documents & Emails: The paper reviewed a massive release of documents from the Department of Justice, which included emails between Epstein, his lawyers, and the Riley Kiraly private detective agency.
  • Detailed Evidence of Content: The documents included an inventory of a Palm Beach lock-up, revealing it contained computers, hard drives, 29 address books, and photographs of victims.
  • Detective Agency Involvement: The Telegraph identified that the Riley Kiraly detective agency, run by former police officers, was hired to move items from Epsteinā€™s properties to these storage units, particularly before a 2005 police raid in Florida
 
CrusaderFrank said:
Like I said, you're a silly, unserious person
Click to expand...

Says the one that can't provide any evidence for the people he says should be locked up. I believe in the American Constitution and the concept of innocent until PROVEN guilty. Someone can be guilty as hell, but until you have enough evidence to prove that in a court of law and get a conviction, they are innocent. You seem to want to throw that entire concept in the trash, I'm not willing to do that, so if that makes me a 'silly and unserious' person in your opinion then it does. I don't really GAF what you think about me one way or the other, you're just another silly conspiracy theorist ready to throw out the tenets of innocent until proven guilty, just like the 'media' and the left were when they went after Trump. You are no different than they are.
 
dblack said:
MisterBeale

Of course they are!

How low will they go?

How low ya' got?
Click to expand...
no one and I mean no one is defending Epstein, and that is just a fking ignorant thing to say. Just makes you someone who has no control of your own mind.
CowboyTed said:
Still trying to hide the fact that Trump is all over the Epstein Files...
Click to expand...
What does that mean? I still don't think Clinton did anything, there is no evidence. Association with people doesn't make anyone a co-conspirator of that person. Far as I'll go, you're just an asshole. pure and simply.
CowboyTed said:
In your head it is Obama's fault that Trump wasn't arrested for trying to have sex with a 13 year old girl and beating her for biting him when he was forcing her to to give him a blowjob... Yep, that was Obama's fault...
Click to expand...
Go post that somewhere that it counts, cause it's been out for quite awhile and there's obviously nothing to it, but democrat's cum
 
YoursTruly said:
They don't understand anything that has more than 2 sides.
Click to expand...
I understand facts and to date, you have provided exactly zero facts. So anytime put up or stfu!

Let's hear from the accusers and who they point at!!!!!!! That's what I want to see. Why aren't you? You seem more inclined to the silence of the matter. TDS is a funny thing. Any day mthr f.
 
jc456 said:
I understand facts and to date, you have provided exactly zero facts. So anytime put up or stfu!

Let's hear from the accusers and who they point at!!!!!!! That's what I want to see. Why aren't you? You seem more inclined to the silence of the matter. TDS is a funny thing. Any day mthr f.
Click to expand...

Just because you don't believe the facts, doesn't mean they're not facts.
 
A political mess. NO one really cares about old rich guys.
Just looking to blame what has been going on forever, on people from what ever party they DONT support.
 
15th post
You must log in or register to reply here.

Mandatory Digital ID UK Prime Minister Starmer Loses Second Aide in Epstein Scandal, Calls to...

< Previous Thread

Trump signs executive order quadrupling beef imports from Argentina

Next Thread >

Similar threads

munkle
Epstein Files: Epstein Ordered Six 55-Gallon Drums of Sulfuric Acid on Same Day Investigation Was Re-Opened in 2018, Which is a Lot
Replies
9
Views
205
struth
S
Raynine
The Epstein Files, what a show!
2 3
Replies
50
Views
616
Ringo
Ringo
Pastelli
About pro-Islamists lying 'CJWerleman' lies re Epstein list
Replies
0
Views
68
Pastelli
Pastelli
excalibur
EPSTEIN FILES: Maine Gov Janet Mills Accused of Child Abuse Cover-up, Cocaine Trafficking in Newly Released SDNY Documents
2
Replies
25
Views
435
CowboyTed
CowboyTed
IM2
Michael Cohen might be in the Epstein Files. That's why he says he was coerced.
Replies
12
Views
206
struth
S

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom