The Environment Forum now decidedly one sided!!

You're an embarrassing liar.

And you have no education or experience in any related field.
post the evidence you got. We'll wait for you. You won't, cause you're a demofk and that's the last thing a demofk would ever do is bring in a receipt.
 
you claimed there was more of it causing at least a 1 degree warming. How do you know that if you don't have data? That's how I arrived there.
That's the theoretical GHG effect from simple physics. 1C per doubling of CO2.
 
That's the theoretical GHG effect from simple physics. 1C per doubling of CO2.
Of course, climate scientists have discovered that will lead to 1.5degC to 4.5degC warming.

Get caught up.
 
That's the theoretical GHG effect from simple physics. 1C per doubling of CO2.



Then there is the ACTUAL DATA

increase CO2 in atmosphere = no warming in atmosphere


THEORY REJECTED
 
That's the theoretical GHG effect from simple physics. 1C per doubling of CO2.
so you have no data to prove the theory? That's what science does if you recall.
 
Go lick a street lamp. Why would i ever do an exercise for a worthless troll like you? Please.
You never like to get called out for you lies. Almost never any receipt. And it's like that this time. Congratulations, you failed.
 
so you have no data to prove the theory? That's what science does if you recall.
You mean besides the fact that there is literally a greenhouse gas effect that slows heat transfer from the earth to outer space?

Is this fake too?

1736295007995.png


I purposely selected this graphic of it because it was well before AGW was a thing.


 
Then there is the ACTUAL DATA

increase CO2 in atmosphere = no warming in atmosphere


THEORY REJECTED
1C per doubling of CO2

"...Doubling concentration rises that level nearer to the tropopause which radiates at a lower temperature. The estimate given for the Earth’s warming in Houghton’s book is 1.2 degrees for each doubling..."

 
Last edited:
1C per doubling of CO2

"...Doubling concentration rises that level nearer to the tropopause which radiates at a lower temperature. The estimate given for the Earth’s warming in Houghton’s book is 1.2 degrees for each doubling..."




Actual DATA from INSTRUMENTS, not traditional CO2 FRAUD FUDGE




satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling



CO2 went up. Atmospheric temps did not = the ACTUAL DATA, the ONLY DATA....
 


Winds drive ocean currents in the upper 100 meters of the ocean’s surface. However, ocean currents also flow thousands of meters below the surface. These deep-ocean currents are driven by differences in the water’s density, which is controlled by temperature (thermo) and salinity (haline). This process is known as thermohaline circulation




WATER

WATER

WATER does not cause ICE


IQ over 5 required to notice...
Are you going to ignore the word "temperature?"
 
Actual DATA from INSTRUMENTS, not traditional CO2 FRAUD FUDGE




satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling



CO2 went up. Atmospheric temps did not = the ACTUAL DATA, the ONLY DATA....
CO2 is a relatively weak GHG but to argue it has no effect is dumb.
 
Actual DATA from INSTRUMENTS, not traditional CO2 FRAUD FUDGE




satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling



CO2 went up. Atmospheric temps did not = the ACTUAL DATA, the ONLY DATA....
"...Increasing carbon dioxide will cause a small additional surface warming. It is difficult to
calculate exactly how much, but our best estimate is that it is about 1 C for every doubling of
CO2 concentration, when all feedbacks are correctly accounted for..."
 
You mean besides the fact that there is literally a greenhouse gas effect that slows heat transfer from the earth to outer space?

Is this fake too?

View attachment 1062880

I purposely selected this graphic of it because it was well before AGW was a thing.


I grow tired of theoretical answers with no data whatsoever
 
"...Increasing carbon dioxide will cause a small additional surface warming. It is difficult to
calculate exactly how much, but our best estimate is that it is about 1 C for every doubling of
CO2 concentration, when all feedbacks are correctly accounted for..."
Why can’t you prove it?
 
Then prove it!
How does this not prove it? Do you see the total atmosphere? Do you see water vapor? Do you see CO2? Which of those two most resemble the total atmosphere?

1736309130394.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom