CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 153,064
- 78,279
- 2,645
I know!! We can beat back the glaciers with our hockey stick graphs!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
See, this is part of the problem. Half the people arguing about this issue don't even understand the basic underlying science of the carbon cycle. If we think back to our school biology, the CO2 in human breath is carbon NEUTRAL. It's produced from the oxidation of carbohydrate, which is ultimately derived from plants, which absorb atmospheric CO2 in the production of that carbohydrate. So no net change. Fossil CO2 is generated, in quantities that surpass natural uptake, from hydrocarbons that have been sequestered over geologic timescales. And nobody I know supports a return to the horse & buggy days (another straw man). What they do support is maximizing efficiency and transitioning away from fossil carbon fuels.Actually, we are breathing the CO2 out of our bodies. Should we stop breathing?...
See, this is part of the problem. Half the people arguing about this issue don't even understand the basic underlying science of the carbon cycle. If we think back to our school biology, the CO2 in human breath is carbon NEUTRAL. It's produced from the oxidation of carbohydrate, which is ultimately derived from plants, which absorb atmospheric CO2 in the production of that carbohydrate. So no net change. Fossil CO2 is generated, in quantities that surpass natural uptake, from hydrocarbons that have been sequestered over geologic timescales. And nobody I know supports a return to the horse & buggy days (another straw man). What they do support is maximizing efficiency and transitioning away from fossil carbon fuels.Actually, we are breathing the CO2 out of our bodies. Should we stop breathing?...
DAVID ROSE: The mini ice age starts here | Mail Online
Ive been waiting for a story like this for over 10 years as Ive been telling the hoplessly duped that "Man-made" golbal warming is a fraud...............
Arctic summer sea ice is expanding at mind bending rates...........and even some of the most ardent global warming k00ks are not even disputing this anymore.......
So.....yup............ahhhhhhhhhh ( draws drag on ciggy in classic Denis Leary fashion)
Its the dawn of a mini-ice age you fcukking dummies!!!!!!!![]()
Everyone knows that 2008 was the year global warming died, just google it!
2008: the year Man-Made Global Warming died « South Carolina Conservative
DAVID ROSE: The mini ice age starts here | Mail Online
Ive been waiting for a story like this for over 10 years as Ive been telling the hoplessly duped that "Man-made" golbal warming is a fraud...............
Arctic summer sea ice is expanding at mind bending rates...........and even some of the most ardent global warming k00ks are not even disputing this anymore.......
So.....yup............ahhhhhhhhhh ( draws drag on ciggy in classic Denis Leary fashion)
Its the dawn of a mini-ice age you fcukking dummies!!!!!!!![]()
Everyone knows that 2008 was the year global warming died, just google it!
2008: the year Man-Made Global Warming died « South Carolina Conservative
Idiocy from an idiot.
Everyone knows that 2008 was the year global warming died, just google it!
2008: the year Man-Made Global Warming died « South Carolina Conservative
Everyone knows that 2008 was the year global warming died, just google it!
2008: the year Man-Made Global Warming died « South Carolina Conservative
Who wrote this? Shawn Hannity? No data, no facts...only conjecture and opinion.
Old Rocks reminds me of the occasional WWII Japanese soldier they find in Guam who is convinced the war is still on
See, this is part of the problem. Half the people arguing about this issue don't even understand the basic underlying science of the carbon cycle. If we think back to our school biology, the CO2 in human breath is carbon NEUTRAL. It's produced from the oxidation of carbohydrate, which is ultimately derived from plants, which absorb atmospheric CO2 in the production of that carbohydrate. So no net change. Fossil CO2 is generated, in quantities that surpass natural uptake, from hydrocarbons that have been sequestered over geologic timescales. And nobody I know supports a return to the horse & buggy days (another straw man). What they do support is maximizing efficiency and transitioning away from fossil carbon fuels.Actually, we are breathing the CO2 out of our bodies. Should we stop breathing?...
Nice.
But a logical arguement supporting your denial would be neater. Just impossible, so all you have is mindless derision.
Poor Doooodeeeee.........