The Elephant in the Room: Mail In Ballot Signatures

Norman

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Messages
31,256
Reaction score
15,062
Points
1,590
The rate of rejection for Biden's mail in votes are unreasonable - especially in elections where ballots can be received and sent back by anyone in many states.

Let's take a leap backward in time to see how many ballots have been thrown out in past mail in elections, when convenient to democrat causes.

"Kanye West won’t be appearing on the presidential ballot for his home state after election officials in Illinois found that 1,900 of the 3,128 signatures West submitted are invalid.

That leaves the rapper short of the 2,500 needed to be included on the state’s Presidential ballot.

While no reason was given, issues could be fake names or undresses, voters who were not eligible in Illinois, illegible signatures or something else entirely, TMZ notes."


Before an entire election was thrown out because the high rejection rates.

"A New Jersey judge invalidated a city council election and ordered a new one after allegations of voter fraud, according to a ruling issued Wednesday.
The May 12 election for Paterson's Third Ward city council was "rife with mail in vote procedural violations," Judge Ernest Caposela said in his ruling, though he left the decision on whether there was voter fraud to the criminal courts.

In addition to allegations of fraud, more than 24% of ballots were rejected for failing to meet the standard for mail-in ballots. No other municipal election that day had a rejection rate higher than 13%, according to the ruling."


However, now that it's convenient for democrats, the rejection rate have lowered below all statistical realities. About hundred times below the usual - and that's in contrast to elections where fraud is not rampant.

"The non-partisan United States Election Project research site maintained by University of Florida professor Michael McDonald reports 1,009 rejected mail-in ballots, out of a total 2,615,045 mail-in ballots cast as of Nov. 5, or a rate of 0.038%. However, "The few rejected ballots reported here," the site cautions, "are for first time voters who did not provide required id with their mailed ballot or a missing signature."

The historical rate of mail-in ballot rejection generally hovers around 1%. For first-time mail-in voters, the rate can jump as high as 3%. "


They did not appear to do a proper verification.
 
Last edited:

Penelope

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
49,700
Reaction score
7,708
Points
1,860
The rate of rejection for Biden's mail in votes are unreasonable - especially in elections where ballots can be received and sent back by anyone in many states.

Let's take a leap backward in time to see how many ballots have been thrown out in past mail in elections, when convenient to democrat causes.

"Kanye West won’t be appearing on the presidential ballot for his home state after election officials in Illinois found that 1,900 of the 3,128 signatures West submitted are invalid.

That leaves the rapper short of the 2,500 needed to be included on the state’s Presidential ballot.

While no reason was given, issues could be fake names or undresses, voters who were not eligible in Illinois, illegible signatures or something else entirely, TMZ notes."


Before an entire election was thrown out because the high rejection rates.

"A New Jersey judge invalidated a city council election and ordered a new one after allegations of voter fraud, according to a ruling issued Wednesday.
The May 12 election for Paterson's Third Ward city council was "rife with mail in vote procedural violations," Judge Ernest Caposela said in his ruling, though he left the decision on whether there was voter fraud to the criminal courts.

In addition to allegations of fraud, more than 24% of ballots were rejected for failing to meet the standard for mail-in ballots. No other municipal election that day had a rejection rate higher than 13%, according to the ruling."


However, now that it's convenient for democrats, the rejection rate have lowered below all statistical realities. About hundred times below the usual - and that's in contrast to elections where fraud is not rampant.

"The non-partisan United States Election Project research site maintained by University of Florida professor Michael McDonald reports 1,009 rejected mail-in ballots, out of a total 2,615,045 mail-in ballots cast as of Nov. 5, or a rate of 0.038%. However, "The few rejected ballots reported here," the site cautions, "are for first time voters who did not provide required id with their mailed ballot or a missing signature."

The historical rate of mail-in ballot rejection generally hovers around 1%. For first-time mail-in voters, the rate can jump as high as 3%. "


Obviously, they did not do a proper verification.
Get use to it, it will be that way from now on.
 

C_Clayton_Jones

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
58,120
Reaction score
15,963
Points
2,180
Location
In a Republic, actually
The rate of rejection for Biden's mail in votes are unreasonable - especially in elections where ballots can be received and sent back by anyone in many states.

Let's take a leap backward in time to see how many ballots have been thrown out in past mail in elections, when convenient to democrat causes.

"Kanye West won’t be appearing on the presidential ballot for his home state after election officials in Illinois found that 1,900 of the 3,128 signatures West submitted are invalid.

That leaves the rapper short of the 2,500 needed to be included on the state’s Presidential ballot.

While no reason was given, issues could be fake names or undresses, voters who were not eligible in Illinois, illegible signatures or something else entirely, TMZ notes."


Before an entire election was thrown out because the high rejection rates.

"A New Jersey judge invalidated a city council election and ordered a new one after allegations of voter fraud, according to a ruling issued Wednesday.
The May 12 election for Paterson's Third Ward city council was "rife with mail in vote procedural violations," Judge Ernest Caposela said in his ruling, though he left the decision on whether there was voter fraud to the criminal courts.

In addition to allegations of fraud, more than 24% of ballots were rejected for failing to meet the standard for mail-in ballots. No other municipal election that day had a rejection rate higher than 13%, according to the ruling."


However, now that it's convenient for democrats, the rejection rate have lowered below all statistical realities. About hundred times below the usual - and that's in contrast to elections where fraud is not rampant.

"The non-partisan United States Election Project research site maintained by University of Florida professor Michael McDonald reports 1,009 rejected mail-in ballots, out of a total 2,615,045 mail-in ballots cast as of Nov. 5, or a rate of 0.038%. However, "The few rejected ballots reported here," the site cautions, "are for first time voters who did not provide required id with their mailed ballot or a missing signature."

The historical rate of mail-in ballot rejection generally hovers around 1%. For first-time mail-in voters, the rate can jump as high as 3%. "


Obviously, they did not do a proper verification.
Get use to it, it will be that way from now on.
Unfortunately that’s not going to happen.

For the foreseeable future, for years to come, conservatives will whine about the 2020 election being ‘unfair,’ and propagate the lies that the election was ‘rigged’ and subject to ‘massive fraud.’
 

Eric Arthur Blair

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2015
Messages
19,098
Reaction score
9,523
Points
950
That's what happens when elections are ‘rigged’ and subject to ‘massive fraud.’

You sound like some whiny punk clown who shoves a shiv in someone's back and then says
with disgust,
"Well, I guess they are going to put me through metal detectors everywhere I go now and
watch me like a hawk".

Yeah, that's exactly what's going to happen.
 
Last edited:

Penelope

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
49,700
Reaction score
7,708
Points
1,860
The rate of rejection for Biden's mail in votes are unreasonable - especially in elections where ballots can be received and sent back by anyone in many states.

Let's take a leap backward in time to see how many ballots have been thrown out in past mail in elections, when convenient to democrat causes.

"Kanye West won’t be appearing on the presidential ballot for his home state after election officials in Illinois found that 1,900 of the 3,128 signatures West submitted are invalid.

That leaves the rapper short of the 2,500 needed to be included on the state’s Presidential ballot.

While no reason was given, issues could be fake names or undresses, voters who were not eligible in Illinois, illegible signatures or something else entirely, TMZ notes."


Before an entire election was thrown out because the high rejection rates.

"A New Jersey judge invalidated a city council election and ordered a new one after allegations of voter fraud, according to a ruling issued Wednesday.
The May 12 election for Paterson's Third Ward city council was "rife with mail in vote procedural violations," Judge Ernest Caposela said in his ruling, though he left the decision on whether there was voter fraud to the criminal courts.

In addition to allegations of fraud, more than 24% of ballots were rejected for failing to meet the standard for mail-in ballots. No other municipal election that day had a rejection rate higher than 13%, according to the ruling."


However, now that it's convenient for democrats, the rejection rate have lowered below all statistical realities. About hundred times below the usual - and that's in contrast to elections where fraud is not rampant.

"The non-partisan United States Election Project research site maintained by University of Florida professor Michael McDonald reports 1,009 rejected mail-in ballots, out of a total 2,615,045 mail-in ballots cast as of Nov. 5, or a rate of 0.038%. However, "The few rejected ballots reported here," the site cautions, "are for first time voters who did not provide required id with their mailed ballot or a missing signature."

The historical rate of mail-in ballot rejection generally hovers around 1%. For first-time mail-in voters, the rate can jump as high as 3%. "


Obviously, they did not do a proper verification.
Get use to it, it will be that way from now on.
Unfortunately that’s not going to happen.

For the foreseeable future, for years to come, conservatives will whine about the 2020 election being ‘unfair,’ and propagate the lies that the election was ‘rigged’ and subject to ‘massive fraud.’
You are probably right, the state of MI voted on "no excuse" absentee ballots in 2018, more of the states are wising up. Least ways we should have a week for early voting.
 

DGS49

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2012
Messages
9,957
Reaction score
4,371
Points
400
Location
Pittsburgh
Actually, it is obvious to anyone with eyes and no preconceptions that the Democrats cheated bigly, especially in the so-called swing states. They did everything possible to prevent-in-advance discovery of their hundreds of thousands of strategically inserted votes, with elimination of signature verification being the most obvious gambit.

Why in the world, the rational person asks, would you LOOSEN the security precautions - compared with in-person voting and Absentee Ballots - when you introduce massive mail-in voting? What about witness signatures, photos of picture ID, signature verification? There is only one conceivable reason: to cheat.

It appears at this date that they have done it well enough to not only record the votes to win, but also to hide or destroy the evidence (e.g., the destroyed ballot envelopes) that would prove the case of cheating. Everybody knows that Barry Bonds cheated, but his records remain. And so it may remain for the Biden-Harris ticket. The truth will inevitably out, but it may not be on time, or in a forum that would produce the correct result in this election.

We are worse than the worst banana republic in Central America. Our highest elected position is being filled through a fraudulent election.
 

Penelope

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
49,700
Reaction score
7,708
Points
1,860
That's what happens when elections are ‘rigged’ and subject to ‘massive fraud.’
No according the head guy at Homeland security who got fired when he said the election was the most secure which he had seen.
 

Crepitus

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2018
Messages
42,294
Reaction score
9,484
Points
2,040
The rate of rejection for Biden's mail in votes are unreasonable - especially in elections where ballots can be received and sent back by anyone in many states.

Let's take a leap backward in time to see how many ballots have been thrown out in past mail in elections, when convenient to democrat causes.

"Kanye West won’t be appearing on the presidential ballot for his home state after election officials in Illinois found that 1,900 of the 3,128 signatures West submitted are invalid.

That leaves the rapper short of the 2,500 needed to be included on the state’s Presidential ballot.

While no reason was given, issues could be fake names or undresses, voters who were not eligible in Illinois, illegible signatures or something else entirely, TMZ notes."


Before an entire election was thrown out because the high rejection rates.

"A New Jersey judge invalidated a city council election and ordered a new one after allegations of voter fraud, according to a ruling issued Wednesday.
The May 12 election for Paterson's Third Ward city council was "rife with mail in vote procedural violations," Judge Ernest Caposela said in his ruling, though he left the decision on whether there was voter fraud to the criminal courts.

In addition to allegations of fraud, more than 24% of ballots were rejected for failing to meet the standard for mail-in ballots. No other municipal election that day had a rejection rate higher than 13%, according to the ruling."


However, now that it's convenient for democrats, the rejection rate have lowered below all statistical realities. About hundred times below the usual - and that's in contrast to elections where fraud is not rampant.

"The non-partisan United States Election Project research site maintained by University of Florida professor Michael McDonald reports 1,009 rejected mail-in ballots, out of a total 2,615,045 mail-in ballots cast as of Nov. 5, or a rate of 0.038%. However, "The few rejected ballots reported here," the site cautions, "are for first time voters who did not provide required id with their mailed ballot or a missing signature."

The historical rate of mail-in ballot rejection generally hovers around 1%. For first-time mail-in voters, the rate can jump as high as 3%. "


They did not appear to do a proper verification.
There is no elephant in this room.

Maybe you should check your refrigerator?
 

busybee01

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
18,910
Reaction score
3,380
Points
290
The rate of rejection for Biden's mail in votes are unreasonable - especially in elections where ballots can be received and sent back by anyone in many states.

Let's take a leap backward in time to see how many ballots have been thrown out in past mail in elections, when convenient to democrat causes.

"Kanye West won’t be appearing on the presidential ballot for his home state after election officials in Illinois found that 1,900 of the 3,128 signatures West submitted are invalid.

That leaves the rapper short of the 2,500 needed to be included on the state’s Presidential ballot.

While no reason was given, issues could be fake names or undresses, voters who were not eligible in Illinois, illegible signatures or something else entirely, TMZ notes."


Before an entire election was thrown out because the high rejection rates.

"A New Jersey judge invalidated a city council election and ordered a new one after allegations of voter fraud, according to a ruling issued Wednesday.
The May 12 election for Paterson's Third Ward city council was "rife with mail in vote procedural violations," Judge Ernest Caposela said in his ruling, though he left the decision on whether there was voter fraud to the criminal courts.

In addition to allegations of fraud, more than 24% of ballots were rejected for failing to meet the standard for mail-in ballots. No other municipal election that day had a rejection rate higher than 13%, according to the ruling."


However, now that it's convenient for democrats, the rejection rate have lowered below all statistical realities. About hundred times below the usual - and that's in contrast to elections where fraud is not rampant.

"The non-partisan United States Election Project research site maintained by University of Florida professor Michael McDonald reports 1,009 rejected mail-in ballots, out of a total 2,615,045 mail-in ballots cast as of Nov. 5, or a rate of 0.038%. However, "The few rejected ballots reported here," the site cautions, "are for first time voters who did not provide required id with their mailed ballot or a missing signature."

The historical rate of mail-in ballot rejection generally hovers around 1%. For first-time mail-in voters, the rate can jump as high as 3%. "


They did not appear to do a proper verification.
There is absolutely no evidence of that.
 

rightwinger

Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
217,124
Reaction score
43,367
Points
2,190
For the foreseeable future, for years to come, conservatives will whine about the 2020 election being ‘unfair,’ and propagate the lies that the election was ‘rigged’ and subject to ‘massive fraud.’
Yet they will gladly accept the Senate and House seats they won on those same ballots
 

Winco

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2019
Messages
2,402
Reaction score
1,120
Points
210
Was there any cheating in 2016?
Trump told you that was rigged too
But he actually won
So he kept the same strategy for 2020.

Shut the fuck up you whinny bitches.
trump lost
 
OP
Norman

Norman

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Messages
31,256
Reaction score
15,062
Points
1,590
Actually, it is obvious to anyone with eyes and no preconceptions that the Democrats cheated bigly, especially in the so-called swing states. They did everything possible to prevent-in-advance discovery of their hundreds of thousands of strategically inserted votes, with elimination of signature verification being the most obvious gambit.

Why in the world, the rational person asks, would you LOOSEN the security precautions - compared with in-person voting and Absentee Ballots - when you introduce massive mail-in voting? What about witness signatures, photos of picture ID, signature verification? There is only one conceivable reason: to cheat.

It appears at this date that they have done it well enough to not only record the votes to win, but also to hide or destroy the evidence (e.g., the destroyed ballot envelopes) that would prove the case of cheating. Everybody knows that Barry Bonds cheated, but his records remain. And so it may remain for the Biden-Harris ticket. The truth will inevitably out, but it may not be on time, or in a forum that would produce the correct result in this election.

We are worse than the worst banana republic in Central America. Our highest elected position is being filled through a fraudulent election.
This is correct, but verification would clear most of it up.

Destroying the records is a serious crime. That requires a much bigger organized fraud than they had in my opinion. In any case, destroyed records would be fool proof certain way to call the election a result of fraud.
 

Penelope

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
49,700
Reaction score
7,708
Points
1,860
For the foreseeable future, for years to come, conservatives will whine about the 2020 election being ‘unfair,’ and propagate the lies that the election was ‘rigged’ and subject to ‘massive fraud.’
Yet they will gladly accept the Senate and House seats they won on those same ballots
Hey , those were republican votes!!
 

rightwinger

Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
217,124
Reaction score
43,367
Points
2,190
For the foreseeable future, for years to come, conservatives will whine about the 2020 election being ‘unfair,’ and propagate the lies that the election was ‘rigged’ and subject to ‘massive fraud.’
Yet they will gladly accept the Senate and House seats they won on those same ballots
Hey , those were republican votes!!
Show me a Republican Senator or Congressman who is willing to forfeit his 2020 victory because the election was a fraud and I will take Republican fraud claims seriously.
 

wamose

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2019
Messages
6,821
Reaction score
5,966
Points
2,015
Location
Pennsylvania
The decision the Pa. House came to today that the election was overwhelmed with fraud and can't be considered legal should also be the final verdict in Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, Arizona and Nevada since the exact same things happened there. Democrats cheated and that can not stand. Forget about rushing through a bogus certification. Let's get this right
 

busybee01

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
18,910
Reaction score
3,380
Points
290
Actually, it is obvious to anyone with eyes and no preconceptions that the Democrats cheated bigly, especially in the so-called swing states. They did everything possible to prevent-in-advance discovery of their hundreds of thousands of strategically inserted votes, with elimination of signature verification being the most obvious gambit.

Why in the world, the rational person asks, would you LOOSEN the security precautions - compared with in-person voting and Absentee Ballots - when you introduce massive mail-in voting? What about witness signatures, photos of picture ID, signature verification? There is only one conceivable reason: to cheat.

It appears at this date that they have done it well enough to not only record the votes to win, but also to hide or destroy the evidence (e.g., the destroyed ballot envelopes) that would prove the case of cheating. Everybody knows that Barry Bonds cheated, but his records remain. And so it may remain for the Biden-Harris ticket. The truth will inevitably out, but it may not be on time, or in a forum that would produce the correct result in this election.

We are worse than the worst banana republic in Central America. Our highest elected position is being filled through a fraudulent election.
Anyone who has a brain can see that there waxs no cheating. Republicans are trying to cheat. The fact is that judges have seen no evidence of fraud and even Trump's lawyers are not claiming fraud. The truth is already out and you can't accept it because you have been brainwashed by the cult of Trump. People who are doing their best in a difficult situation are being slandered by garbage like you.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top