When Bush left office, ISIS was a total non player in the Middle East...it wasn't until Barack Obama withdrew American combat troops from Iraq despite his military experts warning him that it was premature...
You see, here's the first mistake you make. You mistake 'What they were calling themselves" with "What they were doing".
When Bush left office, you had a bunch of Sunni Militias and Al Qaeda in Iraq, and what was known as the Sunni Triangle was hardly a safe place to go.
The thing was, we didn't WANT to keep Combat Troops in Iraq, and the Iraqis didn't want us to stay. so I'm having a hard time seeing how this was Obama's fault, exactly...
that ISIS grew in power like they did! Barry's total misjudgment on what ISIS was...calling them the JV team...and failure to act as they took over huge swaths of the Middle East led to one of the biggest refugee crisis in modern day history. That isn't on Bush...that is totally on Obama!
Well,I would put that more on Maliki and Assad for allowing the political chaos that gave them an opportunity to grow, but those guys wouldn't have created chaos if Bush hadn't overthrown Saddam in the first place.
But until you and every other asshole Right Winger forms your own private army to go over there and fight the bad old muslims, I wouldn't take you too seriously about it.
I'm tired of working class kids going over there to die for the Jews and the Oil Companies.
I know that the Obama Administration wants you to believe that THEY caught Osama bin Laden without intelligence gotten from water boarding but the facts dispute that. The name of the courier which led to Osama bin Laden was disclosed by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Abu Farraj al Libbi after they had been water boarded. That name of that courier was the crucial piece of the "mosaic" that ultimately led to Pakistan and Osama bin Laden.
Well, no, that's not what the Senate Committee found.
Here's the thing. We caught Khalid in 2002. are you really saying he gave up some critical information during one of the 189 times he was waterboarded that it STILL took 9 years for someone to act on?
Now, your argument would make sense if we caught Bin Laden in 2003 or 2004 (you know, because we didn't pull everything out of Afghanistan so Bush could get revenge on Saddam)