Zhukov
VIP Member
Considered the greatest technological achievement in history, thirty-six years ago today, 20 July 1969, man first set foot on the moon.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's facinating but why? Is the expense really justified?onedomino said:
What happened to us? Where did the spirit of exploration go? Above is a photo of Gene Cernan, the last man on the moon, December 1972, thirty-two years ago. What happened to us? Was it merely Nixon's NASA budget cuts, or did something in the American character fade? By the time the Shuttle is launched next week, it will have been grounded for more than 2 years. The exploration of space is inherently dangerous; it will never be safe, no matter how long the Shuttle is grounded, no matter how many bureaucrats interfere. Get on with it!
Vietnam, Watergate, liberalism, Jimmy Carter. Yes, something of the American character faded. Elements of American society have started to make a comeback over the last two decades or so, but huge blocks of our country continue to resist anything that smacks of greatness.onedomino said:What happened to us? Where did the spirit of exploration go? Above is a photo of Gene Cernan, the last man on the moon, December 1972, thirty-two years ago. What happened to us? Was it merely Nixon's NASA budget cuts, or did something in the American character fade?
The expense is minimal.dilloduck said:Is the expense really justified?
Zhukov said:NASA gets some $16b per annum.
By way of comparison the Dept. of Ed. gets about $72b.
I'd be willing to bet that all the R&D NASA does, and has done, far exceeds any and every accomplishment the Dept. of Ed. has ever had.
Cmon---they keep most of the kids off the streets for awhile and give em a good place to sleep during the day.Zhukov said:I can't think of anything.
Wait, now that I think of it, they did manage to waste alot of money......
I'm Texas--don't forget the "big" contribution made by the state lottery !Zhukov said:No. That would be your property taxes and your city council.
Zhukov said:No. That would be your property taxes and your city council.
Zhukov said:Vietnam, Watergate, liberalism, Jimmy Carter. Yes, something of the American character faded. Elements of American society have started to make a comeback over the last two decades or so, but huge blocks of our country continue to resist anything that smacks of greatness.
The expense is minimal.
NASA gets some $16b per annum.
By way of comparison the Dept. of Ed. gets about $72b.
I'd be willing to bet that all the R&D NASA does, and has done, far exceeds any and every accomplishment the Dept. of Ed. has ever had.
no1tovote4 said:Not only that, the expense more than pays for itself in revenues. Many of the new products of the 80s and 90s came directly from the space program.
Stuff like:
Erasable Pens
Velcro
and also many Medical advances.
It more than pays itself back, it is a worthwhile investment.
dilloduck said:If we invested that much in basic science or even ocean exploration they could have come up with that stuff and learned something worthwhile at the same time.
Simple abstract research doesn't produce the same quality and quantity of results as applied science and technological problem solving.dilloduck said:If we invested that much in basic science or even ocean exploration they could have come up with that stuff and learned something worthwhile at the same time.
The pics and the fireworks are cool, don't get me wrong and I agree that throwing money at abstract research is a waste but if this money was used for more "earthly" goals ( medicine for example),the results would be realized in indirect AND direct achievements. Let private enterprise finance the exploration of space.Zhukov said:Simple abstract research doesn't produce the same quality and quantity of results as applied science and technological problem solving.
When you set for yourself far-flung goals, like sending men to Mars, you will run into all sorts of problems you never even considered. The solutions to these problems are novel and tend to have alternate applications apart of space exploration.
Funding basic non-applied research science.....well you just end up getting a slew of scientists who endlessly investigate minutae that interests no one but themselves and has no useful application. You can trust me on that.
I'm all for ocean exploration. That will also drive technology forward.
I just happen to think space is much more interesting, and there's alot more of it to investigate.
Baloney. The Theory of General Relativity emerged from basic research. Quantum Mechanics is a product of basic research. The discovery of DNA came from basic research. The sequencing the human genome was basic research. The Theory of Natural Selection came from basic research. The discovery of Plate Tectonics emerged from basic research. It's a good thing you are not handing out the NSF grants for basic research.Zhukov said:Funding basic non-applied research science.....well you just end up getting a slew of scientists who endlessly investigate minutae that interests no one but themselves and has no useful application. You can trust me on that.
Zhukov said:Considered the greatest technological achievement in history, thirty-six years ago today, 20 July 1969, man first set foot on the moon.