The democrats policies that create crime

[Paradoxical#1]

The problem you mention is correct. That did happen. Nonetheless, it was not a problem that was created by the Democrats or supported by them. It is a problem that occurred because humans are fallible. The problem was (and continues) to be addressed.

Nothing in life is perfect (humans by nature are fallible) and all kinds of mistakes and injustices have occurred since time began (and will continue to occur until time ends).

We all know humans are fallible and not punishing them increases crime. Some people are "fallible" and commit murder, rape, muggings. When you essentially allow them to steal up to $1,000.00 knowing it is just a felony and won't be reported you increase thefts and that leads to more serious crimes.

 

[Luckyone]

We all know humans are fallible and not punishing them increases crime. Some people are "fallible" and commit murder, rape, muggings. When you essentially allow them to steal up to $1,000.00 knowing it is just a felony and won't be reported you increase thefts and that leads to more serious crimes.

We have laws and we have a Constitution that addresses all of that. In addition, we are a Republic where each State picks its leaders and follows its own decisions without any ONE person (or president) decides what is to happen in that state without the state asking the president to help.

Whether those decisions made in that state are right or wrong, it is the state that has to pay (or benefit) from its decisions and not the president doing so.

That is called a Dictatorship and not a Democratic Republic

 

[Hafar1014]

You're delusional.

Gingrich had NOTHING to do with the surplus or balancing shit.


WOW.

On May 15, 1997, after months of intense negotiations, President Clinton reached a bipartisan budget agreement with Speaker Newt Gingrich (R), Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R), and Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle (D). House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt (D) did not sign on.

I was Senator Lott’s budget staffer at the time. In addition to aiding him in those negotiations, I assembled the 1997 agreement document. While it was widely circulated then, that was 14 years ago, and I haven’t seen the 24-page document or that agreement discussed anywhere recently.

Here it is: Bipartisan Budget Agreement (May 15, 1997).

Of particular relevance to the current negotiation is the table on page 4, titled “SUMMARY OF DEFICIT REDUCTION IN BUDGET RESOLUTION MARK.” From this table you can see that President Clinton (and Senator Daschle) agreed with Leader Lott and Speaker Gingrich to a deal that cut spending, reduced the deficit enough to balance the budget, and cut taxes.

That’s right. The 1997 Clinton-Gingrich-Lott bipartisan budget agreement cu

Only congress can balance the budget and the GOP was in control

 

[Hafar1014]

We have laws and we have a Constitution that addresses all of that. In addition, we are a Republic where each State picks its leaders and follows its own decisions without any ONE person (or president) decides what is to happen in that state without the state asking the president to help.

Whether those decisions made in that state are right or wrong, it is the state that has to pay (or benefit) from its decisions and not the president doing so.

That is called a Dictatorship and not a Democratic Republic

The Federal government doesnt need permission to enforce federal law in any state. There is also the supremacy clause.
Chicago just had 37 shootings and 7 deaths this weekend and not a single arrest. Thee mayor and governor claim they will fight any attempt by the Federal government to reduce crime.

This is called nuts

 

[Nostra]

You're delusional.

Gingrich had NOTHING to do with the surplus or balancing shit.


WOW.

Wokester lies.

Clinton vetoed that budget, and only signed when forced to by an impending override in the Senate. Then the worm tried to take credit for it.


And you are so stupid you fell for it.

 

[Hafar1014]

Wokester lies.

Clinton vetoed that budget, and only signed when forced to by an impending override in the Senate. Then the worm tried to take credit for it.


And you are so stupid you fell for it.

Clinton had no power he was busy sexually abusing his staff

 

[Paradoxical#1]

We have laws and we have a Constitution that addresses all of that. In addition, we are a Republic where each State picks its leaders and follows its own decisions without any ONE person (or president) decides what is to happen in that state without the state asking the president to help.

Whether those decisions made in that state are right or wrong, it is the state that has to pay (or benefit) from its decisions and not the president doing so.

That is called a Dictatorship and not a Democratic Republic

When a state allows crime to run rampant like Illinois, Oregon and California do, and that creates an emergency, then the federal government can take steps to stem the murders and crimes. This does not violate the constitution. Otherwise, we could not remain a Republic.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

On May 15, 1997, after months of intense negotiations, President Clinton reached a bipartisan budget agreement with Speaker Newt Gingrich (R), Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R), and Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle (D). House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt (D) did not sign on.

I was Senator Lott’s budget staffer at the time. In addition to aiding him in those negotiations, I assembled the 1997 agreement document. While it was widely circulated then, that was 14 years ago, and I haven’t seen the 24-page document or that agreement discussed anywhere recently.

Here it is: Bipartisan Budget Agreement (May 15, 1997).

Oops, This Page Could Not Be Found!​

Of particular relevance to the current negotiation is the table on page 4, titled “SUMMARY OF DEFICIT REDUCTION IN BUDGET RESOLUTION MARK.” From this table you can see that President Clinton (and Senator Daschle) agreed with Leader Lott and Speaker Gingrich to a deal that cut spending, reduced the deficit enough to balance the budget, and cut taxes.

That’s right. The 1997 Clinton-Gingrich-Lott bipartisan budget agreement cu

Only congress can balance the budget and the GOP was in control

So, the GOP balanced the budget?
LOL.
WTF did they do with it?

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Wokester lies.

Clinton vetoed that budget, and only signed when forced to by an impending override in the Senate. Then the worm tried to take credit for it.


And you are so stupid you fell for it.

You fell for it Q-NUT.
And still are.

 

[Hafar1014]

You fell for it Q-NUT.
And still are.

Trump will balance the budget and pay off the deficit with tariffs

 

[Luckyone]

When a state allows crime to run rampant like Illinois, Oregon and California do, and that creates an emergency, then the federal government can take steps to stem the murders and crimes. This does not violate the constitution. Otherwise, we could not remain a Republic.

BS statement. In addition, crime running rampant in those cities is an outright lie that is proven untrue by data, statistics, and facts.

You are a true Trump cult member. Admit it.

 

[Luckyone]

The Federal government doesnt need permission to enforce federal law in any state. There is also the supremacy clause.
Chicago just had 37 shootings and 7 deaths this weekend and not a single arrest. Thee mayor and governor claim they will fight any attempt by the Federal government to reduce crime.

This is called nuts

two things I will say to address your post

1) "not a single arrest". Are you saying that arrests should be made without clear cause to arrest the person responsible, or at least person(s) that are clear suspects?

2) have you even considered that the additional violence might be caused by the unhappiness and hate that Trump is causing in Chicago by acting like a Dictator?

Have you seen what kind of response by the public occurs when a person (not the proper authorities in the city) does something the public hate and are against?

Here are two perfect and recent examples of what I am saying:

and he is a pic of you and of all Trump supporters

 

[Paradoxical#1]

BS statement. In addition, crime running rampant in those cities is an outright lie that is proven untrue by data, statistics, and facts.

You are a true Trump cult member. Admit it.

How many shootings and killings in Chicago the other day?

 

[Luckyone]

How many shootings and killings in Chicago the other day?

see post #72 as my addressing your post

 

[Hafar1014]

two things I will say to address your post

1) "not a single arrest". Are you saying that arrests should be made without clear cause to arrest the person responsible, or at least person(s) that are clear suspects?

2) have you even considered that the additional violence might be caused by the unhappiness and hate that Trump is causing in Chicago by acting like a Dictator?

Have you seen what kind of response by the public occurs when a person (not the proper authorities in the city) does something the public hate and are against?

Here are two perfect and recent examples of what I am saying:

View attachment 1157155

View attachment 1157158

and he is a pic of you and of all Trump supporters

View attachment 1157162

58 shot over weekend in Chicago as governor rejects Trump's threat to send in National Guard

At least eight people have been killed and 58 others injured in shootings across Chicago over Labor Day weekend, according to police.

abcnews.go.com

Its now up to 54 shootings great work Chicago democrats
At least 54 people have been shot, seven fatally, across Chicago over Labor Day weekend, including a drive-by attack that left seven victims wounded, according to police.

The violent holiday weekend came as President Donald Trump renewed threats to send federal agents and National Guard troops to Chicago over the objections of Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson.

Trump on Saturday sent a warning to Pritzker in a post on his social media platform, referencing recent crime in Chicago and saying Pritzker "better straighten it out, FAST, or we're coming!"

Pritzker, a Democrat, responded in a news conference a week ago to an earlier Trump threat to "straighten out Chicago, just like we did D.C.," by saying that the president's plan was "unprecedented and unwarranted. It is illegal, it is unconstitutional, it is un-American."

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker speaks during a news conference at River Point Park, Aug. 25, 2025, in Chicago.
Nam Y. Huh/AP
Johnson responded last week by saying in part that he had "grave concerns about the impact of any unlawful deployment of National Guard troops to the city of Chicago," and calling Trump's approach "uncoordinated, uncalled for, and unsound." Johnson also said that deploying the National Guard in Chicago could "inflame tensions between residents and law enforcement."

 

[Luckyone]

58 shot over weekend in Chicago as governor rejects Trump's threat to send in National Guard

At least eight people have been killed and 58 others injured in shootings across Chicago over Labor Day weekend, according to police.

abcnews.go.com

Its now up to 54 shootings great work Chicago democrats
At least 54 people have been shot, seven fatally, across Chicago over Labor Day weekend, including a drive-by attack that left seven victims wounded, according to police.

The violent holiday weekend came as President Donald Trump renewed threats to send federal agents and National Guard troops to Chicago over the objections of Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson.

Trump on Saturday sent a warning to Pritzker in a post on his social media platform, referencing recent crime in Chicago and saying Pritzker "better straighten it out, FAST, or we're coming!"

Pritzker, a Democrat, responded in a news conference a week ago to an earlier Trump threat to "straighten out Chicago, just like we did D.C.," by saying that the president's plan was "unprecedented and unwarranted. It is illegal, it is unconstitutional, it is un-American."

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker speaks during a news conference at River Point Park, Aug. 25, 2025, in Chicago.
Nam Y. Huh/AP
Johnson responded last week by saying in part that he had "grave concerns about the impact of any unlawful deployment of National Guard troops to the city of Chicago," and calling Trump's approach "uncoordinated, uncalled for, and unsound." Johnson also said that deploying the National Guard in Chicago could "inflame tensions between residents and law enforcement."

You did NOT address the points I made, simply repeated yours.

I am not biting you lure anymore. Go looking somewhere else where you can actually find sheep that follow your lead blindly. Your herd.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

see post #72 as my addressing your post

I just read it. You are aware that Venezuela has a drug runner as their president, right? You are saying that if he puts troops in Chicago, the murderers will get angry and riot?

 

[Hafar1014]

You did NOT address the points I made, simply repeated yours.

I am not biting you lure anymore. Go looking somewhere else where you can actually find sheep that follow your lead blindly. Your herd.

Nice dodge of the issue. Who cares what your points are they are just lame excuses as people die under the watch of democrats who dont give a damn. Thats the point the only point

 

[Woodznutz]

Family values

And an unemployed, drugged up boyfriend in the house doesn't make a 'family'.

 

[Hafar1014]

And an unemployed, drugged up boyfriend in the house doesn't make a 'family'.

Democrats cities destroyed the family thats why there is so munch violence