The Dam is Breaking on the Vaccines

[PeterPilot]

As of 2025, the NIH has not approved ivermectin for treating COVID-19.
Here's the most up-to-date confirmation:
• The American Medical Association reiterated that the NIH’s COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel continues to find insufficient evidence to recommend ivermectin for COVID-19.
• The FDA’s consumer update also remains firm: ivermectin is not authorized or approved for COVID-19 treatment.
What sparked confusion: Some social media posts misinterpreted NIH’s listing of ivermectin in clinical trial databases as a tacit endorsement. But inclusion in a trial registry does not equal approval—it simply means the drug is being studied.

Why do you place such faith in the claims of known liars calling themselves experts?

 

[BULLDOG]

Why do you place such faith in the claims of known liars calling themselves experts?

In a choice between credentialled experts and crazy people ranting about gay frogs, I'll go with credentialled experts every time. If I loved every right wing policy, I would still hate them for undermining every group and organization we have all known and trusted, and done it for nothing more than political purposes.

 

[gipper]

skye You can disagree all you want, but you've fallen for another conspiracy theory. If they actually approved it's use, they would have released a statement. Link to that.

 

[PeterPilot]

In a choice between credentialled experts and crazy people ranting about gay frogs, I'll go with credentialled experts every time. If I loved every right wing policy, I would still hate them for undermining every group and organization we have all known and trusted, and done it for nothing more than political purposes.

Even if the credentialled experts are being paid to write and say things that are false?

 

[BULLDOG]

Even if the credentialled experts are being paid to write and say things that are false?

Like rudy said, you have lots of theories, but no proof. Your silly accusations are just silly accusations, no matter how many times you make them.

 

[PeterPilot]

Like rudy said, you have lots of theories, but no proof. Your silly accusations are just silly accusations, no matter how many times you make them.

Marcia Angell MD, former editor of NEJM, says otherwise. The history of the Sackler Family and Oxy Contin says otherwise. Those and other facts suggest you've been living under a rock for quite a few years.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Time to start the executions!

OMG, that spoiled little Tucker ****** is back.. willing to fool any willing tool..

 

[gipper]

OMG, that spoiled little Tucker ****** is back.. willing to fool any willing tool..

Lol. Attacking the source but not the substance. You loser.

 

[Grumblenuts]

From JAMA:

During the COVID-19 pandemic, broad, one-size-fits-all mandates were aggressively pursued, requiring vaccines in populations with potentially net-negative benefit-risk profiles. This risk-taking approach may, in part, be responsible for widespread loss of trust in public health and medicine and growing hesitancy against all vaccination. Public trust takes decades to build, but can be forfeited in a single action. The FDA’s class SLC action on mRNA products represents one step toward rebuilding that trust.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Lol. Attacking the source but not the substance. You loser.

Substance? What Tucker says? Point made way back here, stupid:

Fox News won a court case by 'persuasively' arguing that no 'reasonable viewer' takes Tucker Carlson seriously

Actually, no one reasonable voluntarily watches his shit to begin with.

 

[skye]

 

[BULLDOG]

View attachment 1160914

As always, NO CONSPIRACY THEORY LEFT BEHIND right?

 

[skye]

 

[BULLDOG]

View attachment 1159908

We already knew you were a full of hate trump cult member. No need to remind us.

 

[skye]

 

[MisterBeale]

 

[skye]

 

[skye]

 

[MisterBeale]

 

[eagle1462010]

Canada tested this already