The courts were never going to save America from Donald Trump

[Smokin' OP]

Seriously, go and get yourself sorted, you're a crank and probably a danger to others.

You're from England and still can't comprehend English?

Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office​

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

 

[Smokin' OP]

View attachment 913563
~S~

Trump: "In reality"?

LOL.

 

[sparky]

Trump: "In reality"?

LOL.

Deep state most wanted list smokin'....


~S~

 

[Smokin' OP]

Deep state most wanted list smokin'....


~S~

I'm sure they are.........Trump hired most of them.

 

[Captain Caveman]

You're from England and still can't comprehend English?

Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office​

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Do you sniff glue?

 

[Smokin' OP]

Do you sniff glue?

Even if I did.
"shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof".

It would cause LESS brain damage than...............

 

[Captain Caveman]

Even if I did.
"shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof".

It would cause LESS brain damage than...............

View attachment 914075

Thanks for confirming.

 

[The Duke]

Banker's? Why a new interpretation?

Yes, Bankers'. Globalist bankers. You're about as ignorant as the day is long.

The same bankers who had Hillary assassinate Khaddafi.

(and the AP ran cover for all that)

 

[The Duke]

‘The Supreme Court has ordered the most important of former President Donald Trump’s four criminal trials to be put on hold indefinitely. It’s an extraordinary victory for Trump and a devastating blow to special counsel Jack Smith. The Court’s decision also raises serious doubts about whether these justices will allow a trial to take place before the November election.

Many Court observers, including myself, were shocked by Wednesday’s order because it appeared to rest on the flimsiest of pretexts. The ostensible reason why the Court ordered Trump’s trial paused is so the justices could spend the next few months considering Trump’s argument that he is immune from prosecution for any “official acts” he engaged in while he was still president.

This is an exceptionally weak legal argument, with monstrous implications. Trump’s lawyers told one of the judges who ruled against this immunity claim that a former president could not be prosecuted, even if he ordered “SEAL Team 6 to assassinate a political rival,” unless the president was first successfully impeached and convicted (by lawmakers that, under Trump’s argument, the president could order killed if they attempted to impeach him).

There are, of course, historical examples of the Supreme Court behaving less deferentially toward presidents who thumb their nose at the law. The most well-known is United States v. Nixon (1974), the Court’s decision ordering President Richard Nixon to turn over tape recordings that implicated him in a crime, eventually leading to Nixon’s resignation.

The decision to halt Trump’s trial, however, fits within a different judicial tradition, which is no less robust and no less prominent in the Supreme Court’s history. The judiciary is a weak institution, staffed by political officials who are often reluctant to stand against popular authoritarian policies or movements. Indeed, the justices themselves often belong to those movements.’

The courts were never going to save America from Donald Trump

No one is coming to save US democracy, except for ourselves.

www.vox.com

Trump committed treasonous, historic crimes: attempting to overturn a presidential election, disenfranchise millions of Americans, and disrupt peaceful transfer of power – none of which constitute ‘official acts.’

 

[The Duke]

That would be Trump and his cult.
Including SCOTUS.

Trump and his cult don't know how courts work.

SCOTUS rigged the election, everyone knows it.
The 14th amendment is clear.

Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office​

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Trump and some congresspeople did exactly that.

USSC is disgraceful and 100% wrong.

As usual, you're FOS.

They are corrupt.
They ignored everything.

Wisconsin false electors admit their actions were used in ...​

View attachment 913517
WPR
https://www.wpr.org › politics › wisconsin-false-electors-...
Dec 6, 2023 — “Ten MAGA Republican fake electors today publicly admitted that they ... Former Wisconsin GOP Chair says false electors were 'tricked' · Former ...

6 Republicans who falsely certified that Trump won ...​

View attachment 913520
CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com › Politics
Dec 6, 2023 — A Nevada grand jury has indicted six Republicans who submitted certificates to Congress falsely declaring Donald Trump the winner of the ...

Over a dozen Capitol rioters say they were following Trump's ...​

View attachment 913519
ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos
https://abcnews.go.com › story
Feb 9, 2021 — As President Trump's second impeachment trial arrives, Senate Democrats are trying to tie a direct line between his rhetoric and the deadly ...

Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office​

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

That's all that is needed according to the 14th amendment.




Poor teabagger, your Trump Devotion Syndrome is desperate, but Trump loves you very much.

How you can see to type with your ass, so far up Trump ass impresses me.

You're apparently drunk on the MAGA Koolaid.

The DOJ operates independently of the political system. (Except when Trump is President).

The 3-year delay was harshly criticized by Democrats. It played right into Trump's hand.

No one knows why Garland waited so long before appointing a special prosecutor - but whatever the reason, Democrats were not happy with it.

 

[Zincwarrior]

He has until Monday to secure the Carroll verdict.

 

[Smokin' OP]

 

[Oddball]

The recent SCOTUS decision was pure bunk. Expect Congress to pass legislation clarifying this.

The whole notion of a Constitutional amendment not being self-enacting is pure BULLSHIT!

SCOTUS has considered every other part of the Constitution as 'self-enacting' and has been ruling on them since this country was founded.

There is no reason why A 14 S. 3 should be treated any differently.

SCOTUS has proven that they are partisan hacks. They have no credibility.

I just wonder what thug tactics were used against the Liberal Justices to force them to go along with this.