The Constitution Prohibits Trump From Ever Being President Again

[Faun]

According to the Constitution,Trump could have had Pence arrested on 1/6/21.

For what?

 

[Faun]

Under these unprecedented circumstances, with or without Pence under arrest ,the president could have declared martial law and began confiscating Dominion voting machines immediately. ....among other things .

Regardless of .the Constitution .

LOLOLOL

You idiot... THAT was the Oath Keepers' plan for which members received sentences as much as 18 years for seditious conspiracy.

 

[the other mike]

Does that mean Dictator for a day would just have come early?

WW

It would have meant the 4 year attempted coup d'etat came to an end.

 

[the other mike]

I think Peter Stzrok and Lisa Paige are members here.

 

[Weatherman2020]

If that were true, then every single candidate running for prident would have to have their name appear on every ballot in every state. Yet many do not.

I and you can run for President, NAZI.

 

[Faun]

I and you can run for President, NAZI.

Sure we can. But not because it's a right. It's a privilege.

And because it's not a right, neither you nor I would get our names on any State's ballot.

 

[Esdraelon]

No one is denying that there isn't enough scared, hate driven, stupid people in this country to elect him. That means little. If he was elected we will be at that point in a dictatorship. with a dictator that is a traitor to this country and a total piece of shit. Elected by ugly hate driven Americans that sold out their country and are traitors to this country.

So, you're all about free elections and democracy until the country elects someone you hate, that about right?

 

[forkup]

So, you're all about free elections and democracy until the country elects someone you hate, that about right?

I think he's more concerned when the country selects someone who's willing to use all means at his disposal,legal and otherwise, to remain in power even after he loses an election.

You can have a free and fair election, and vote somebody out who you hate.

If that person you hate says "**** you". I don't like the that I lost, so the Vice President can decide who he prefers. Well then we have a problem.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Sure we can. But not because it's a right. It's a privilege.

And because it's not a right, neither you nor I would get our names on any State's ballot.

It takes a criminal court to remove a persons constitutional rights, NAZI

 

[WorldWatcher]

It takes a criminal court to remove a persons constitutional rights, NAZI

Not meeting one of the six Constitutional qualifications requirements and not being eligible for the ballot does not mean there is a Constitutional right to be on the ballot.

WW

 

[forkup]

It takes a criminal court to remove a persons constitutional rights, NAZI

Does it now? What trial does a 34 year get to be deemed ineligible to run for President. Since you content it's a Constitutional right?

 

[Faun]

It takes a criminal court to remove a persons constitutional rights, NAZI

Nope, never has.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Nope, never has.

We already know you’re a fascist who hates America.
Your terrified manner of Trump winning is both telling and hilarious.

 

[Concerned American]

Does it now? What trial does a 34 year get to be deemed ineligible to run for President. Since you content it's a Constitutional right?

Being under the required age is not a CRIME, moron. Engaging in insurrection IS A CRIME, which requires due process to determine guilt. There was no insurrection so there obviously was no one that engaged in insurrection. If due process had been afforded, that would have been determined. There has been no one charged or convicted of insurrection nor any declaration or official recognition that there was an insurrection. NEXT.

 

[forkup]

Being under the required age is not a CRIME, moron. Engaging in insurrection IS A CRIME, which requires due process to determine guilt. There was no insurrection so there obviously was no one that engaged in insurrection. If due process had been afforded, that would have been determined. There has been no one charged or convicted of insurrection nor any declaration or official recognition that there was an insurrection. NEXT.

Due process. Like a judge determining you engaged in an insurrection while lawyers for Trump could argue he didn't. That is due process.

 

[Concerned American]

Like a judge determining you engaged in an insurrection while lawyers for Trump could argue he didn't. That is due process.

No, like a jury of his peers determining guilt. BTW, when did that judge become the sole arbiter of whether or not an insurrection ever took place. Next.

 

[forkup]

No, like a jury of his peers determining guilt. BTW, when did that judge become the sole arbiter of whether or not an insurrection ever took place. Next.

Since he or she had to rule on it to determine the relevance of the 14th amendment. And they aren't the sole arbiter since it has to go through 2 levels of judicial review. As due process dictates.

 

[Concerned American]

Since he or she had to rule on it to determine the relevance of the 14th amendment. And they aren't the sole arbiter since it has to go through 2 levels of judicial review. As due process dictates.

Insurrection is a crime. Your assertion is moot. No one has been charged with the crime. The crime has not been officially recognized by the federal government. There was NO CRIME. There can be no penalty levied. This isn't rocket science. Don't live up to your handle.

18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection

www.law.cornell.edu

 

[Faun]

We already know you’re a fascist who hates America.
Your terrified manner of Trump winning is both telling and hilarious.

Nope, you're wrong about that too. But then again, that's your norm.

 

[Faun]

Being under the required age is not a CRIME, moron. Engaging in insurrection IS A CRIME, which requires due process to determine guilt. There was no insurrection so there obviously was no one that engaged in insurrection. If due process had been afforded, that would have been determined. There has been no one charged or convicted of insurrection nor any declaration or official recognition that there was an insurrection. NEXT.

Of course it was an insurrection. Bizarre how you can deny that. An insurrection is a violent uprising against the government, especially in opposition to the execution of law.

That's exactly what happened on Insurrection Day when Trump's violent thugs broke into the Capitol to stop the election certification.