Procrustes Stretched
"intuition and imagination and intelligence"
Lack of substance? Try and challenge Dante in the Bull Ring -- you'd get your pathetic little butt handed to you on a roll with mustardParading your ignorance and idiocy around in public will only expose you further for the fool you are....actually not. Reading and comprehension deficit runs rampant online. you're excused for it.
The reasons many of the framers and ratifiers didn't think a bill of rights was needed was they thought they all agreed on what were self evident rights. Learn your history before posting
Actually not what? Perhaps you could be a little less vague and cryptic in your answers as you attempt to avoid the question.
the conclusion of your statement: I think you may be confusing the Constitution with the Declaration of Independence.
Dante's reply: actually not.
concise, to the point
Did you ever figure out which rights in the Constitution are "self evident" ? Or are you still stuck on the Declaration of Independence?
Saying many of the framers and ratifiers thought there was no need for a bill of rights, because they thought rights were self evident -- presupposes a Constitution without a Bill of Rights. So -- drum roll please ......................
\
......................
/..............
? = a cymbal .......... / There would be no rights enumerated IN the Constitution. Your exposed. Now run along little girlyman/boy
Your constant name calling does nothing to disguise your lack of substance.